Skip to main content

How Politicians in Austria Obtain Information and Its Consequences for Corporate Communications Activities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conference Proceedings Trends in Business Communication 2016
  • 1071 Accesses

Abstract

The public affairs activities of companies often have to do with gut instincts. The communication experts think they know how to communicate most effectively but until now there is little reliable data available about the politicianĀ“s point of view. Do Austrian politicians still read printed newspapers or do they focus on social media? Which communications channels do the politicians trust? We asked the members of the Austrian parliament to examine their information sources and media use habits. Out of this we draw conclusions for successful PR work. In this context we show that print media is still the most effective media type to indirectly reach politicians in Austria. Print media are by far the most important information sources for AustrianĀ“s politicians and they are assessed as the most trustworthy. It was also surprising to see the high acceptance of corporate communications activities in the political sector and that corporate communications experts are still far away from overloading politicians with content. Quite the opposite, politicians seem to demand more information coming directly out of enterprises. And it is inexplicable that there are still members of parliament who do not receive any information from Austrian companies. It is time for them to edit their distribution lists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

List of References

  • Abels, H. (2004). EinfĆ¼hrung in die Soziologie. Band 1: Der Blick auf die Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Brants, K., & Voltmer, K. (2011). Introduction: Mediatization and Decentralization of Political Communication. In K. Brants, & K. Voltmer (Eds.), Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy (pp. 1-18). London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2012). Social Media as Beat. Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice, 6(3), 403-419.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Burkart, R. (2002). Kommunikationswissenschaft. Vienna, Austria: Bƶhlau.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Esser, F., & StrƶmbƤck, J. (Eds.). (2014). Mediatization of Politics. Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kƶppl, P., & Wippersberg, J. (2014). The state of public affairs in Austria. Journal of Public Affairs, 14(1), 31-43.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Livingstone, S. (2009). On the Mediation of Everything: ICA Presidential Address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 1-18.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Magin, M. (2015). Shades of Mediatization: Components of Media Logic in German and Austrian Elite Newspapers (1949-2009). The International Journal of Press/Politics 2015, 20(4), 415-437.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). ā€œMediatizationā€ of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247-262.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Meyen, M., Thieroff, M., & Strenger, S. (2014). Mass Media Logic and the Mediatization of Politics. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 271-288.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Michalowitz, I., & Talos, E. (2007). Ɩsterreichs Interessenpolitik auf neuen Pfaden ā€“ zwischen Austrokorporatismus und Lobbying? Ɩsterreichische Zeitschrift fĆ¼r Politikwissenschaft (ƖZP), 36(4), 369-388.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Oepav ā€“ Ɩsterreichische Public Affairs Vereinigung. (2016). Glossary. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://www.oepav.at/en/glossar/

  • OGM. (2014). Vertrauen in die Spitzen der Sozialpartner im Juli 2014. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://www.ogm.at/2014/?p=2913

  • OGM. (2015). Vertrauensindex politische Berichterstattung nach Mediengattungen. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://www.ogm.at/2015/07/apaogm-vertrauensindex-politische-berichterstattung-nachmediengattungen/

  • Prva ā€“ Public Relations Verband Austria. (2016). Fields of activity. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://prva.at/profession/fields-of-activity

  • Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87-101.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Segaard, S. B. (2015). Perceptions of Social Media. A Joint Area for Voters and Politicians? Nordicom Review, 36(1), 65-78.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Steiner, J. (2015). The Austrian Way. 70 Years of Social Partnership in Austria. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://www.austrianinformation.org/winter-2015-16/the-austrian-way

  • Steinmaurer, T. (2012). Medien und Medienpolitik in Ɩsterreich ā€“ ein Ɯberblick. In Forum Politische Bildung (Ed.), Medien und Politik. Informationen zur politischen Bildung (Vol. 35, pp. 5-16). Innsbruck, Austria: Forum Politische Bildung.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • StrƶmbƤck, J. (2008). Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228-246.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Thesen, G. (2014). Political Agenda Setting as Mediatized Politics? Media-Politics Interactions from a Party and Issue Competition Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 181-201.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Thiele, M. (2009). The Austrian Media System: Strong Media Conglomerates and an Ailing Public Service Broadcaster. In A. Czepek, M. Hellwig, & E. Nowak (Eds.), Press Freedom and Pluralism in Europe. Concepts and Conditions (pp. 251-259). Bristol, United Kingdom: Intellect Books.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Transparency International - Austrian Chapter. (2014). Lobbying in Austria. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from https://www.ti-austria.at/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Lobbying-in-Austria.pdf

  • Trappel, J. (n.d.). Media Landscapes. Austria. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://ejc.net/media_landscapes/austria

  • Verein Media Server. (2015). Wie die Ɩsterreicher die Medien nutzen. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://www.vereinmediaserver.at/files/downloads/2015-11-17%20Media%20Server%20-%20Wie%20Ɩsterreicher%20die%20Medien%20nutzen.pdf

  • Vonbun, R., & Schƶnbach, K. (2014). Wer ist politisch aktiv im Social Web? Eine Studie zur politischen Online-Kommunikation in Ɩsterreich. Publizistik, 59, 199-212.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Weber, M. (2002). Schriften 1894-1922. AusgewƤhlt von Dirk Kaesler. Stuttgart, Germany: Krƶner.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Wippersberg, J. (2012). Studie Berufsfeld Public Affairs. 1. Befragungswelle. Herbst 2012. Vienna, Austria.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Schneckenleitner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schneckenleitner, P. (2017). How Politicians in Austria Obtain Information and Its Consequences for Corporate Communications Activities. In: Becker, T., Schneckenleitner, P., Reitberger, W., Brunner-Sperdin, A. (eds) Conference Proceedings Trends in Business Communication 2016. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17254-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics