Skip to main content

Cross-Case Comparison: Testing the Research Hypotheses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Cooperation and Climate Governance

Abstract

As elaborated in chapter 4.2 the comparative perspective provided by multiple case studies allows for the identification of patterns in the independent variables of the phenomenon analysed. This is a crucial prerequisite for the analytical generalisation of the findings in qualitative research designs (Yin, 2009). In this comparative case study analysis four independent variables have been drawn from the literature to derive explanations for success and failure in transnational urban partnership projects on low carbon development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Beermann .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beermann, J. (2017). Cross-Case Comparison: Testing the Research Hypotheses. In: Urban Cooperation and Climate Governance . Energiepolitik und Klimaschutz. Energy Policy and Climate Protection. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17146-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics