Private Schooling and School Choice as Global Phenomena: An Introduction

  • Thomas KoinzerEmail author
  • Rita Nikolai
  • Florian Waldow


More than 25 years ago, Chubb and Moe (Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 1990) revitalised Friedman’s (Capitalism and freedom, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982 [1962]) earlier contention that a market-driven approach to education, in which parents have primary control over schools, will produce better schools than a state-driven one. More power to the consumers (pupils and parents) and less influence by state authorities would improve academic achievement and make schools more efficient and just. School organisation and school control should therefore no longer be the business of the state, but of the civil society and private respectively market protagonists—more (private) suppliers and more choice would make schools ‘great again’.


  1. Berends, M., Cannata, M., & Goldring, E. B. (Eds.). (2011). School choice and school improvement. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chakrabarti, R., & Peterson, P. E. (Eds.). (2009). School choice international: Exploring public-private partnerships. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  4. Dronkers, J., & Avram, S. (2015). What can international comparisons teach us about school choice and non-governmental schools in Europe? Comparative Education, 51(1), 118–132.Google Scholar
  5. Feinberg, W., & Lubiensky, C. (Eds.). (2008). School choice policies and outcomes. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Forsey, M., Davies, S., & Walford, G. (Eds.). (2008). The globalisation of school choice?. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, M. (1982 [1962]). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (First Published 1962).Google Scholar
  8. Gewirtz, S., Ball, S., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. GoG, Government of Ghana. (2015). Education sector performance report. Accra: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  10. Graham, P. A. (2005). Schooling America. How the public schools meet the nation’s changing needs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Henig, J. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice. Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton: The Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Koinzer, T. (2011). Auf der Suche nach der demokratischen Schule. Amerikafahrer, Kulturtransfer und Schulreform in der Bildungsreformära der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
  13. Musset, P. (2012). School choice and equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review. OECD education working papers, No 66, doi: 10.1787/19939019.
  14. NYT, The New York Times Online (2016, November 23). Why Betsy DeVos won’t be able to privatize U.S. education. Accessed 9 Mar 2017.
  15. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1994). School: A matter of choice. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  16. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016). Education online database. Accessed 9 Mar 2017.
  17. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system. How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Schuppert, G. F. (2004). The ensuring state. In A. Giddens (Ed.), The progressive manifesto: New ideas for the centre-left. (pp. 71–85). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  19. Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system. A history of American urban education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The privatization of education. A political economy of global education reform. Amsterdam: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. West, A., & Nikolai, R. (2017). The expansion of ‘private’ schools in England (academies/free schools), Sweden (friskolor) and Germany (Freie Schulen): A comparative perspective on policy development and the role of ideas in institutional change. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice (Published Online 17.01.2017), doi: 10.1080/13876988.2016.1262549.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, Department of Education StudiesHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Heisenberg-Fellow of the German Research Foundation, Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, Department of Education StudiesHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations