Skip to main content

On Belonging and Being Professional: In Pursuit of an Ethics of Sharing in Project Teams

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ReThinking Management

Part of the book series: Management – Culture – Interpretation ((MCI))

  • 301 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter seeks to advance an ethics of sharing through the lens of a project team of a global management-consulting firm. Today’s project teams are heavily burdened by dominant project management approaches that are overly reliant on pre-defined knowledge, standardisation of practice, and the pursuit of a unitary identity in teams. In re-thinking current practice, this chapter introduces a performative view of project teams that constructs social selves and identities in different situated and on-going narratives of project work. Unlike the mainly ‘value-free’ view of today’s project management, project teams imagine the own social space creatively whilst in action, thus constructing different narratives about preferred ways of doing and being in projects. In particular, ‘being professional’ is entangled with on-going identifications and personal senses of belonging in the team. Methodologically, the adoption of a two-way narrative analysis including a focus on poetic tropes contained in narratives reveals what is considered legitimate or not in every-day team practice.

Findings show the emergence of three types of ethical imagination in terms of emphatic, normative as well as more explicit ethical dimensions defining the team’s life-world. They can support an alternative view of professional identities and of their sustainability in project work. Starting from a dynamic view of project management practice, they tentatively address questions and issues that are often neglected in project management such as the role of wisdom, beyond merely standardised knowledge and expertise, and the creation of alternative forms of responsibility and citizenship in groups. More often than not, these need to be fostered in fragile and hybrid spaces of collective action whilst the possibility (or indeed desirability) of solidarity in the realm of project work may be questioned and challenged. Yet the reward of engaging in a more nuanced manner with an ethics of sharing ‘on the ground’ will allow for opening up spaces of belonging and the expansion of moral imaginations in projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agamben, G. (1993): The coming community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann-Medick, D. (2015): Cultural turns: New orientations in the study of culture. Translated by Adam Blauhut. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1965): Rabelais and his world. Trans. Helene Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, V. (1999): Performativity and belonging: An introduction. In: Theory, Culture, & Society, 16(2), 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1990): The third space: Interview with Homi Bhabha. In: Rutherford, J. (Ed.) Identity: Community, culture, difference. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 207-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993): Bodies that matter. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. and Shapiro, M. (1999): Introduction: From ethical theory to the ethical relation. In: Campbell, D. and Shapiro, M. (Eds.): Moral spaces: Rethinking ethics and world politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, vii-xx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, C. (1987): The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, C. (1994): Radical imagination and the social instituting imaginary. In: Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (Eds.): Rethinking imagination: Culture and creativity. London: Routledge, 136-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, C. (1991): Philosophy, politics, autonomy: Essays in political philosophy. Translated by D. Ames. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R. and Rhodes, C. (2006) (Eds.): Management ethics – contemporary contexts. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croucher, S. (2004): Globalization and belonging: The politics of identity in a changing world. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, M. (1984): The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1990): Force of law: The ‘mystical foundation of authority’. In: Cardozo Law Review, 11, 919-1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. (2004): Subject to ourselves: Social theory, psychoanalysis and postmodernity, 2nd edition. Boulder: Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001): Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again (reprinted 2003). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, S. (1996): Music and identity. In: Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (Eds.): Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage, 108-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. (2000): Storytelling in organisations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel Y. (2003): Glass palaces and glass cages: Organizations in times of flexible work, fragmented consumption and fragile selves. In: Ephemera, 3(3), 166-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, L. (1996): The space of culture, the power of space. In: I. Chambers and L. Curti (Eds.): That Post-Colonial Question. London: Routledge, 169-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall. S. (1990): Cultural identity and diaspora. In: J. Rutherford (Ed.): Identity. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 222-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1996): Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In: Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (Eds.): Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage, 1-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. and Langenhove, L. (1999): Positioning theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, G. (1999): Educating for the imagination. UltiBASE articles, December edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D.E. (2004): Project teams: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-Bureaucratic organization. In: Organization, 11(1), 81-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D.E. and Cicmil, S. (2006): Making projects critical. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2007): Editorial introduction to special issue ‘Levinas, business, ethics’. In: Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3): 196-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosellek, R. (1979) (Ed.): Historische Semantik und Begriffsgeschichte. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpers, W. (2015): Phenomenology of the embodied organization: The construction of Meleau-Ponty for a carnal organisation studies and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000): The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge, 219-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langellier, K. (2001): You’re marked: Breast cancer, tattoo and the narrative performance of identity. In: Brockmeier, J. and Carbaugh, D. (Eds.): Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 145-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1985): Ethics and infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo (translated by R. Cohen). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991): The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell [original 1974].

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffesoli, M. (1996): The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. and Avritzer, L. (2000): Complexity, cultural pluralism and democracy: Collective action and the public space. In: Trends and Developments, 39(4), 507-527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.L. (1991): The inoperative community (translated by P. Conner, L. Garbus, M. Holland and S. Sawhney, edited by P. Conner). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.L. (1993): The experience of freedom (translated by B. McDonald). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.L. (2000): Being singular plural (translated by R. Richardson and A. O’Byrne). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J. and Goodman, H. (2009): Systems psychodynamics and communicative space. In: Action Research, 7(3), 291-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocker, M.O. (2006): The contested object: Projects as emergent space. In: Hodgson, D.E. and Cicmil, S. (Eds.): Making projects critical. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan, 132-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. (2003): Introduction: Ethics, politics and organizing. In: Organization, 10(2), 187-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinkel, A. (2005): Imagination as category of history: An essay concerning Koselleck’s concept of Erfahrungsraum and Erwartungshorizont. In: History and Theory, 44, 42-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (2005): ‘Inside the moment of managing’: Wittgenstein and the everyday dynamics of our expressive-responsive activities. In: Organization Studies, 26(1), 113-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoezler, M. and Yuval-Davis, N. (2002): Standpoint theory, situated knowledge and the situated imagination. In: Feminist Theory, 3(3), 315-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (1988): In search of the imagination. In: Egan, K. and Nadaner, D. (Eds.): Imagination and education. New York: Teachers College Press, 3-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002): On organisational becoming: Rethinking Organisational Change. In: Organization Science, 13(5), 567-582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, P. G. and Reason, P. (2009): Initiating action research: Challenges and paradoxes of opening communicative space. In: Action Research, 7(3), 243-262.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Nocker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nocker, M. (2017). On Belonging and Being Professional: In Pursuit of an Ethics of Sharing in Project Teams. In: Küpers, W., Sonnenburg, S., Zierold, M. (eds) ReThinking Management. Management – Culture – Interpretation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16983-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16983-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16982-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16983-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics