Skip to main content

Structure Genesis as a Factor of Success of Interorganisational Innovation Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
German-Turkish Perspectives on IT and Innovation Management

Part of the book series: FOM-Edition ((INTSE))

  • 714 Accesses

Abstract

Small and medium‐sized companies (SMEs) fall – measured on the investment for innovations – behind large‐scale companies: “Small and medium‐sized companies with up to 249 employees held in year 2011 a share of 10.2% of the entire research and development expenses and a share of 17.8% of research and development workforce. Larger companies with 250 to 499 employees represent a share of 4.8% of the research and development expenses and 7.0% of the research and development workforce. Measured on the share of these group companies to the net value‐added and to total employment (54.8% respectively 59.4%) the research and development stake is small in comparison to large‐scale companies with at least 500 employees.” (IfM Bonn).

However, this declaration deforms the picture. SMEs spend relatively less for R&D, but they are not necessarily less innovative since they concentrate on other forms of innovation. A popular model is the interorganisational cooperation in innovation networks. The following explanations aim to examine the goal, the development and structure genesis of innovation networks. With the help of the case study of the “Fördergesellschaft Erneuerbare Energien e. V.” (Promotional Organisation for Renewable Energies), which is an in Germany active innovation network under significant participation of SMEs, an exemplary model will be described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aderhold, J., Meyer, M., & Ziegenhorn, F. (2001). Wie funktionieren Netzwerke? In T. Teich (ed.), Hierarchielose Regionale Produktionsnetzwerke (vol. 2001, pp. 131–160). Chemnitz: GUC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. A. (1979). Network analysis: orienting notion, rigorous technique or substantive field of study. In P. W. Holland & S. Leinhardt (eds.), Perspectives on social network research (pp. 403–423). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1992). Centrality and power in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and organizations. Structure, form, and action (vol. 1992, pp. 191–215). Boston: Havard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coxon, A. P. M., & Davies, P. M. (1986). Images of social stratification: occupational structures and class. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch-Türkische Industrie- und Handelskammer. www.eclareon.com/sites/default/files/factsheet_bioenergie_2016.pdf. Accessed 2. Mar. 2016.

  • EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH. http://www.energieagentur.nrw/international/laenderinformationen/tuerkei. Accessed 2. Mar. 2016.

  • Fördergesellschaft Erneuerbare Energien e.V. http://www.fee-ev.de/verein/satzung.html, http://www.fee-ev.de, http://www.fee-ev.de/arbeitsgruppen.html, http://www.fee-ev.de/arbeitsgruppen/biogene-gase-brennstoffzellen.html. Accessed 2. Mar. 2016.

  • Gläser et al. (2004). Einleitung: Heterogene Kooperation. In Strübing et al. (ed.), Kooperation im Niemandsland. Neue Perspektiven auf Zusammenarbeit in Wissenschaft und Technik (vol. 2004, pp. 7–24). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, K. (2013). Heterogene Akteure als Innovationspartner: Zur Strukturierung von Handeln in industriellen Innovationsprojekten. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (1989). Herrschen und Sehnen. Kulturdynamik des Westens. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (2011). Allgemeine Umweltsoziologie (2nd edn.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IfM Institut für Mittelstandsforschung Bonn. http://www.ifm-bonn.org/statistiken/mittelstand-im-einzelnen/#accordion=0&tab=4. Accessed 02. Mar. 2016.

  • Koschatzky, K., Kulicke, M., & Zenker, A. (2013). Innovation networks. Concepts and challenges in the European perspective (technology, innovation and policy (ISI). vol. 12. Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranzusch, P., & Holz, M. (2013). Internationalisierungsgrad von KMU. Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung. In Institut für Mittelstandsforschung Bonn (ed.), IfM-Materialien Nr. 222. Bonn: Institut für Mittelstandsforschung Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C.J. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In: Mitchell, C.J. (1969): Social networks in Urban situations: analysis of personal relationships in central african towns (pp. 1–32). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, A. (2004). Zur Strukturgenese von und Kommunikation in Innovationsnetzwerken, S. 90 ff. http://sundoc.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/diss-online/04/04H201/prom.pdf. Accessed 2. Mar. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappi, F. U. (ed.). (1987). Methoden der Netzwerkanalyse. vol. 1. München: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seemann, M. (2012). Innovationsnetzwerke in jungen Branchen: Formation, Morphologie und unternehmensstrategische Implikationen am Beispiel der deutschen Photovoltaikbranche. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türkisch-Deutsches Biogas-Projekt. http://www.biyogaz.web.tr/de. Accessed 2. Mar. 2016.

  • Weyer, J. (1997). Weder Ordnung noch Chaos. Die Theorie sozialer Netzwerke zwischen Institutionalismus und Selbstorganisationstheorie. In J. Weyer et al. (ed.), Technik, die Gesellschaft schafft. Soziale Netzwerke als Ort der Technikgenese (pp. 53–99). Berlin: edition sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZEW (2015). Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft. Indikatorenbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2014, Mannheim. http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/mip/14/mip_2014.pdf. Accessed 2. Mar. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Axel Müller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Müller, A., Pick Vidal, S. (2018). Structure Genesis as a Factor of Success of Interorganisational Innovation Networks. In: Bakırcı, F., Heupel, T., Kocagöz, O., Özen, Ü. (eds) German-Turkish Perspectives on IT and Innovation Management. FOM-Edition(). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16962-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics