Advertisement

Governance-Formen und die Entstehung der dänischen Energievereinbarung von 2012: „ … we are doing things the Danish way“

  • Franziska Ehnert
Chapter
Part of the Innovation und Gesellschaft book series (INNOVAT)

Zusammenfassung

Wandlungsprozesse in Richtung einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung sind für die Gesellschaft eine politische Herausforderung, denn sie stellen bestehende Machtverhältnisse infrage, rütteln an bestehenden Strukturen und Institutionen und bringen auf diese Weise Gewinner sowie Verlierer einer solchen Transformation hervor. Diese Herausforderungen lassen sich mit Blick auf die Prozessdimension des Politischen als die ‚Politics-Frage‘ bezeichnen: „The politics of sustainability transitions requires a redefinition of societal interests and this implies political engagement to build reform coalitions, create new centres of power, buy off powerful lobbies, isolate die-hards, compensate losers, and so on. These struggles involve not only established political actors (such as political parties and major economic groups) but also emergent forces associated with new technologies, experimental practices and social movements“ (Meadowcroft 2011: 73; vgl. Meadowcroft 2009: 335).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Andersen, M. S. (1997): Denmark: The Shadow of the Green Majority. In: European Environmental Policy : The Pioneers, Hrsg. Andersen, M. S., Liefferink, D., 251–86. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benz, A. (2004): Governance – Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept? In: Governance – Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen, Hrsg. Benz, A., 11–28. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  3. Bouckaert, G. (2010): The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations: Shifting Patterns of Public Management. Public Sector Organizations. Basingstoke [England]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Connelly, J. (2012): Politics and the Environment: From Theory to Practice. Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Danish Government (2011b.): Et Danmark, Der Står Sammen: Regeringsgrundlag. http://www.stm.dk/publikationer/Et_Danmark_der_staar_sammen_11/Regeringsgrundlag_okt_2011.pdf. Zugegriffen: 10. Oktober 2012.
  6. Danish Government (2011c): Our Future Energy. http://www.ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/policy/danishclimate-energy-policy/our_future_energy.pdf. Zugegriffen: 10. Oktober 2012.
  7. Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A. (2004): Multi-Level Governance and Environmental Policy. In: Multi-level Governance, Hrsg. Bache, I., Flinders, M., 147–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Frantzeskaki, N., de Haan, H. (2009): Transitions: Two Steps from Theory to Policy. Futures 41 (9): 593–606.Google Scholar
  9. Geels, F. W., Schot, J. (2010): The Dynamics of Transitions: A Socio-Technical Perspective. In: Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long-Term Transformative Change, 11–104. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Glaab, M. (2014): Regierungsführung zwischen Formalität und Informalität. Deutschland und Großbritannien im Vergleich. In: Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 8 (S1): 211–35.Google Scholar
  11. Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J. (2010): Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Jensen, L. (2011): Steering From the Centre in Denmark. In Steering From the Center: Strengthening Political Control in Western Democracies, hrsg. C. Dahlström, B. G. Peters, und J. Pierre, 212–40. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  13. Klimakommissionen (2010): Green Energy: The Road to a Danish Energy System without Fossil Fuels: Summary of the Work, Results and Recommendations of the Danish Commission on Climate Change Policy. http://www.ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/policy/danish-climate-energypolicy/danish-commission-climate-change-policy/green-energy/green%20energy%20GB%20screen%201page%20v2.pdf. Zugegriffen: 10. Oktober 2012.
  14. Knudsen, T. (2000): How Informal Can You Be?: The Case of Denmark. In: Administering the Summit: Administration of the Core Executive in Developed Countries, Hrsg. Peters, B. G., Rhodes, R. A. W., Wright, V., 153–75. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  15. Koppenjan, J., Frantzeskaki, N., Loorbach, D., Charles, M., Ryan, N. (2012): Governing Systems Transitions: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations. In: International Journal of Sustainable Development 1:1–18.Google Scholar
  16. Kruse, J. (2014): Qualitative Interviewforschung: Ein Integrativer Ansatz. Weinheim: Juventa Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Loorbach, D. (2010): Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework. In: Governance 23 (1): 161–83.Google Scholar
  18. Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B. (2012): Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects. In: Research Policy 41 (6): 955–67.Google Scholar
  19. Mayntz, R. (2004a): Governance im modernen Staat. In: Governance – Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen, Hrsg. Benz, A., 65–76. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  20. Mayntz, R. (2004b): Governance Theory Als Fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? MPIfG Working Paper 4 (1).Google Scholar
  21. Meadowcroft, J. (2009): What about the Politics? Sustainable Development, Transition Management, and Long Term Energy Transitions. In: Policy Sciences 42 (4): 323–40.Google Scholar
  22. Meadowcroft, J. (2011): Engaging with the Politics of Sustainability Transitions. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 70–75.Google Scholar
  23. Nannestad, P. (2008): Gesetzgebung im politischen System Dänemarks. In: Gesetzgebung in Westeuropa. EU-Staaten und Europäische Union, hrsg. W. Ismayr, 133–58. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  24. Pedersen, K., Knudsen, T. (2005): Denmark: Presidentialization in a Consensual Democracy. In: The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Hrsg. Poguntke, T., Webb, P., 159–75. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Peters, B. G. (2013): Toward Policy Coordination: Alternatives to Hierarchy. In: Policy & Politics 41 (4): 569–84.Google Scholar
  26. Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. (2004): Multilevel Governance and Democracy: A Faustian Bargain? In: Multi-Level Governance, Hrsg. Bache, I., Flinders, M., 75–89. New York: Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Peters, B. G. (2006): Concepts and Theories of Horizontal Policy Management. In: Handbook of Public Policy, 115–38. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenau, J. N. (2004): Strong Demand, Huge Supply: Governance in an Emerging Epoch. In: Multilevel Governance, Hrsg. Bache, I., Flinders, M., 31–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., van Asselt, M. (2001): More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy. In: Foresight 3 (1): 15–31.Google Scholar
  30. Rotmans, J., Loorbach, D. (2010): Towards a Better Understanding of Transitions and Their Governance: A Systemic and Reflexive Approach. In: Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long-Term Transformative Change, 105–222. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Scharpf, F. W. (1997): Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wurzel, R. (2004): Germany: From Environmental Leadership to Partial Mismatch. In: Environmental Policy in Europe: The Europeanization of National Environmental Policy, Hrsg. Jordan, A., Liefferink, D., 99–117. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Wurzel, R. (2008): Germany. In: Innovation in Environmental Policy?: Integrating the Environment for Sustainability, Hrsg. Jordan, A., Lenschow, A., 180–201.Google Scholar
  34. Wurzel, R. (2010): Environmental, Climate and Energy Policies: Path-Dependent Incrementalism or Quantum Leap? In: German Politics 19 (3-4): 460–78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DresdenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations