Advertisement

Missing the Big Picture on State-Owned Enterprises: Quality of Aggregate Holdings Reporting of Public Administrations and Reform Implications

  • Ulf PapenfußEmail author
  • Lars Steinhauer
  • Benjamin Friedländer
Chapter
Part of the NPO-Management book series (NPOM)

Abstract

In the context of current debates on sustainable public service provision, austerity, debts, and cutback management, the governance and management of and in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) is imbued with special relevance. An aggregate holdings report (AHR) is an important tool for public administrations to provide accountability for SOEs and the necessary overview of the institutional structures of the core administration and SOEs. This study analyses the quality of AHR in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland on the basis of a quality model with 175 criteria. Findings show that public administrations in many cases do not meet the identical requirements from theory and practice. Laws on AHR are necessary to ensure the realization of policy goals. First, the study provides a conceptual contribution for assessing AHR and for future research on the issues of the model categories. Second, empirical insight into quality patterns of AHR is provided. The model enables one to answer questions which are often raised in the reform debates, such as, “which AHR can I use as a reference to further develop my own AHR?” The study offers valuable new insights which can enhance sustainable management and control of SOEs.

Keywords

Aggregate Holdings Report Public Corporate Governance Quality State-Owned Enterprises 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bertelsmann Foundation (2008), Municipal Finance and Debt Report – A Federal Country Comparison.Google Scholar
  2. Bertelsmann Foundation (2013), Municipal Finance Report – Income, Spending and Indebtedness in Federal Country Comparison.Google Scholar
  3. Bovaird, Tony and Elke Löffler (2003), Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies, in: International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 313-328.Google Scholar
  4. Bovens, Marc (2010), Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism, in: West European Politics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 946-967.Google Scholar
  5. Bruton, Garry D., Mike W. Peng, David Ahlstrom, Ciprian Stan and Kehan Xu (2015), State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations, in: Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 92–114.Google Scholar
  6. Bryson, John M (2004), What to do When Stakeholders Matter. Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques, in: Public Management Review, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21-53.Google Scholar
  7. Crosby, Philip (1992), Quality is Free. New York.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, James H., David Schoorman and Lex Donaldson (1997), Toward a Stewardship theory of management, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 20-47.Google Scholar
  9. Demsetz, Harold (1967), Toward a theory of property rights, in: The American Economic Review, pp. 57, no. 2, pp. 347-359.Google Scholar
  10. Donaldson, Thomas and Lee E Preston (1995), The Stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65-91.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission (2009), Commission recommendation 2009/385/EC complementing recommendations 2004/913/EC and 2005/162/EC as regards the regime for the remuneration of directors of listed companies.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission (2011), The EU corporate governance framework COM 164 final. Green Paper.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission (2012), Directive proposal COM/2012/614 on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measure.Google Scholar
  14. European Parliament and the Council (2006a), Directive 2006/54/EC on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation.Google Scholar
  15. European Parliament and the Council (2006b), Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts.Google Scholar
  16. European Parliament and the Council (2014a), Directive 2014/95/EU amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. Official Journal of the European Union L 330/1.Google Scholar
  17. European Parliament and the Council (2014b), Regulation 537/2014/ on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L 158/77.Google Scholar
  18. German Federation (2009), Public Corporate Governance Code of the Federation, English version, www.bundesfinanzministerium.de (accessed: 24.02.2016).
  19. Grossi, Guiseppe, Ulf Papenfuß and Marie-Soleil Tremblay (2015), Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned enterprises: Relevance for science and society and interdisciplinary research perspectives, in: International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 274-285.Google Scholar
  20. Hodges, Ron, Mike Wright and Kevin Keasy (1996), Corporate governance in the public services: Concepts and issues, in: Public Money and Management, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 34-40.Google Scholar
  21. International Organisation for Standardization (ISO) (2015), ISO 9000:2015, Quality Management Systems, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9000:ed-4:v1:en (accessed: 16.02.2015).
  22. Jung, Chan S. (2014), Why are goals important in the public sector? Exploring the benefits of goal clarity for reducing turnover intention, in: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 209-234.Google Scholar
  23. Juran, Joseph (1988), Juran’s Quality Control Handbook. 4th ed., New York.Google Scholar
  24. Klein Peter G., Joseph T. Mahoney, Anita M. McGahan and Christos N. Pitelis (2012), Who is in Charge? A Property Rights Perspective on Stakeholder Governance, in: Strategic Organization, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 304-315.Google Scholar
  25. Kwon, Myungjung, Frances S. Berry and Hee S. Jang (2013), A Theoretical Framework on the Determinants of Strategic Cities: Empirical Results From Florida City Governments, in: The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 438-459.Google Scholar
  26. Millward, Robert (2011), Public enterprise in the modern western world: An historical analysis, in: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 375-398.Google Scholar
  27. OECD (2015), OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises. Paris.Google Scholar
  28. Osborne, Steven P. (2014), A Sustainable Business Model for Public Service Organizations?, in: Public Management Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 165-172.Google Scholar
  29. Papenfuß, Ulf (2014), How (should) public authorities report on stateowned enterprises for financial sustainability and cutback management - A new quality model, in: Public Money & Management, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 115-122.Google Scholar
  30. Schedler, Kuno and Isabella Proeller (2010), Outcome-Oriented Public Management: A Responsibility-Based Approach to the New Public Management. Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
  31. Tricker, Robert Ian (2012), Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies and Practices. Oxford.Google Scholar
  32. Van Slyke, David M. (2007), Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship, in: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 157-187.Google Scholar
  33. Verhoest, Koen, Sandra van Thiel, Geert Bouckaert and Per Laegreid (2012), Lessons and Recommendations for the Practice of Agencification, in: Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries, ed. By Koen Verhoest, Sandra van Thiel, Geert Bouckaert and Per Lægreid, Houndmills, pp. 413-439.Google Scholar
  34. Whincop, Michael J (2005), Corporate Governance in Government Corporations. Aldershot.Google Scholar
  35. Wong, Simon (2004), Improving corporate governance in SOEs: An integrated approach, in: Corporate Governance International, vol. 7, no.2, pp. 5-15.Google Scholar
  36. World Bank (2014), Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises: A Toolkit. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulf Papenfuß
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lars Steinhauer
    • 2
  • Benjamin Friedländer
    • 2
  1. 1.Chair of Public ManagementUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.LinzAustria

Personalised recommendations