Advertisement

Personalistic Linkages and Persuasion in Turkish Party Politics

  • Kerem YıldırımEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Establishing linkages between political elites and voters is fundamental for every political system. In democracies, elite groups are expected to be responsive towards different interest groups and the general public. By representing these groups, elites and decision makers are able to respond to the demands of voters.

Keywords

Local Election Vote Choice Election Period Democratic Accountability Swing Voter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, Catherine. 2002. Personal States: Making Connections Between People and Bureaucracy in Turkey. Oxford University.Google Scholar
  2. Arıkan-Akdağ, Gül. 2013 Incumbent Mobilization of Swing Voters: Voter-Party Linkages and Consolidation of Ethnic Votes in Istanbul. PhD Thesis, Sabancı University.Google Scholar
  3. Auyero, Javier. 2001. Poor people’s politics: Peronist survival networks and the legacy of Evita. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ayata, Ayşe. 1992. CHP: Örgüt ve İdeoloji [CHP: Organization and Ideology]. Gündoğan Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Bartels, Larry M. 2010. The study of electoral behavior. The Oxford handbook of American elections and political behavior, ed.by. Leighley, J. E., Oxford University Press. 239-261.Google Scholar
  6. Çarkoğlu, Ali & Adaman, Fikret. 2001 “Engagement in Corruptive Activities at Local and Central Governments in Turkey: Perceptions of Urban Settlers” Euro-Mediterranean Forum of Economic Institutes, Conference Proceeding.Google Scholar
  7. Çarkoğlu, Ali & Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. 2009. The Rising Tide of Conservatism in Turkey. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenstadt, S. N., & Roniger, Luis. 1984. Patrons, clients and friends: Interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Erdoğan, Necmi. 1998. Making do with the State Power: Laughter, Grotesque and Metis in Turkish Popular Culture, PhD Dissertation. Lancaster University, Department of Sociology, England.Google Scholar
  10. Gallego, Jorge & Wantchekon, Leonard. 2012. Experiments on clientelism and vote-buying. Research in Experimental Economics, 15: 177-212.Google Scholar
  11. Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel, Kiewiet, Chad, Melendez, Carlos, Osorio, Javier and Nickerson, David W. (2012).Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence from Nicaragua, American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 202–217.Google Scholar
  12. Graham, Richard. 1997. “Clientelismo na cultura politica brasileira: Tomá lá dá cá” (Sáo Paulo: Braudel Center Papers No. 15), quoted in Roniger, L. (2004).Google Scholar
  13. Heper, Metin & Keyman, Fuat. 1998. “Double‐faced state: political patronage and the consolida-tion of democracy in Turkey” Middle Eastern Studies, 34(4): 259-277.Google Scholar
  14. Hicken, Allen. 2011. Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289-310.Google Scholar
  15. Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. 2010. ‘Islam, Secularism, and Democracy: Insights from Turkish Politics’ (paper presented at the 67th Annual Midwest Conference, Chicago).Google Scholar
  16. Kemahlıoğlu, Özge. 2012. Agents or Bosses? Patronage and Intra-Party Politics in Argentina and Turkey. ECPR PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Kitschelt, Herbert. 2011. “Clientelistic Linkage Strategies. A Descriptive Exploration”. Presented at Workshop on Democratic Accountability Strategies. Duke University.Google Scholar
  18. Krishna, Anirudh. 2007. “Politics in the middle: Mediating relationships between the citizens and the state in rural North India” in Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. by Kitchelt, H and Wilkinson, S. I. Cambridge University press, pp.141-158.Google Scholar
  19. Kudat, Ayşe. 1977. “Patron-Client Relations: The State of the Art and Research in Eastern Turkey”, in in Political Participation in Turkey, ed. By Akarli, E.D. and Ben-Dor, G. Boğaziçi University Publications, pp.33-60.Google Scholar
  20. Landé, Carl 1983. “Political Clientelism in Political Studies: Retrospect and Prospects”. International Political Science Review 3, p.441.Google Scholar
  21. Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. The Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Özbudun, Sibel. 2005. „The Reproduction of Clientelism in Regressing Rural Turkey or “Why I Became an ‘Erect Ear’?”, Dialectical Anthropology, no. 29: 241-272.Google Scholar
  23. Piattoni Simona. 2001. “Clientelism in historical and comparative perspective”, in Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective, ed. by. Piattoni, S. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, pp.1-30.Google Scholar
  24. Sayarı, Sabri. 1977. “Some Notes on Beginnings of Mass Political Participation” in Political Participation in Turkey, ed. By Akarli, E.D. and Ben-Dor, G. Boğaziçi University Publications, pp.121-133.Google Scholar
  25. Stokes, Susan. C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, & Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, voters, and clientelism. S. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sunar, İlkay. 1990. “Populism and Patronage: The Demokrat Party and Its Legacy in Turkey,” Il Politico, 25(4): 745-757.Google Scholar
  27. Szwarcberg, Mariela. 2012. Revisiting clientelism: A network analysis of problem-solving networks in Argentina. Social Networks, 34(2), 230-240.Google Scholar
  28. Toprak, Binnaz. 2005. Islam and democracy in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 6(2): 167-186.Google Scholar
  29. Unbehaun, Horst. 2006. Türkiye Kırsalında Kliyentalizm ve Siyasal Katılım: Datça Örneği, 1923-1992 [Clientelism and Political Participation in Rural Turkey: the Case of Datça, 1923-1992]. Ütopya Press.Google Scholar
  30. van de Walle, Nicolas. 2007. “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss? The evolution of political clientelism in Africa” in Patrons, Clients and Politics, ed. by. Kitschelt, H & Wilkinson, S. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, pp.50-67.Google Scholar
  31. White, Jenny. 2012.”Islamist Social Networks and Social Welfare Services in Turkey.” In Islamist Politics in the Middle East: Movements and Change, by Samer S. Shehata, 59-67. Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Yeşilada, Birol A. 2002. The Virtue Party. Turkish Studies, 3(1): 62-81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations