Advertisement

Recalibrating Turkish Foreign Policy After the Arab Uprisings: From Pro-activism to Uncertainty by Easing Off Ideational and Liberal Goals

  • Birce Altıok KarşıyakaEmail author
  • Sinan Karşıyaka
Chapter
  • 350 Downloads

Abstract

The western-oriented foreign policy tradition changed in the last decade under the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP – Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi), and the previously fragmented relations between Turkey and the Middle East (ME) has entered into a new phase Turkey has increased the level of interactions with the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries in terms of political, economic, and cultural affairs

Keywords

European Union Foreign Policy North Atlantic Treaty Organization Foreign Policy Objective Clear Side 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akgün, Mensur, Gündoğar, Sabiha S., Levack, Jonathan. and Gökçe Perçinoğlu. The Perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2010: Key Findings. Istanbul: TESEV Publications, 2010.Google Scholar
  2. Altıok, Birce. 2011. The EU-AKP-New Business Class Triangle: A liberal perspective on Democratization and Human Rights Improvements During the 2000s. Unpublished master dissertation, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Aras, Bülent and Sevgi Akarçeşme. 2012. »Turkey Faces the Arab Spring: A Turkish View.« International Journal. 67,1: 39–51.Google Scholar
  4. Banchoff, Thomas. 2001. »Realism, liberalism and German foreign policy.« in The real and the ideal: Essays on international relations in honor of Richard H. Ullman, edited by Anthony Lake, and David A. Ochmanek, 269–282. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield PublishersGoogle Scholar
  5. Barkey, Henri J. 2012. »The evolution of Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East.« TESEV Foreign Policy Programme. Istanbul: Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation. Available online at http://www.tesev.org.tr/Upload/Publication/e9461835-7524-4d67-85cd-9f72a425f684/Henri%20Barkey_final.pdf.
  6. Carr, Edward Hallett. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An introduction to the study of international relations. London: Macmillan, 1961 (1946).Google Scholar
  7. Cook, Steven. 2011. Arab spring, Turkish fall. Foreign Policy, May 5. Available online at http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/05/05/arab_spring_turkish_fall.
  8. Dalay, Galip and Dov Friedman. 2013. »The AK Party and the evolution of Turkish political Islam’s foreign policy.« Insight Turkey, 15,2: 123–139.Google Scholar
  9. Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Stratejik derinlik: Türkiye’nin uluslararası konumu. Istanbul: Kure Yayınları, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. Davutoğlu, Ahmet. 2008. »Turkey’s foreign policy vision: An assessment of 2007.« Insight Turkey. 10,1: 77–96.Google Scholar
  11. Davutoğlu, Ahmet. 2010. Turkey’s Zero-Problems foreign policy. Foreign Policy, May 20. Available online at http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/05/20/turkeys-zero-problems-foreign-policy/.
  12. Dede, Alper Y. 2013. »The end of Egyptian spring and its challenges for Turkish foreign policy.« Ortodogu Analiz. 5,57: 54–62.Google Scholar
  13. Demirtaş-Bagdonas, Özlem. 2014. »Reading Turkey’s foreign policy on Syria: The AKP’s construction of a great power identity and the politics of grandeur.« Turkish Studies, 15,1: 139–155.Google Scholar
  14. Ennis, Crystal A. and Bessma Momani. 2013. »Shaping the Middle East in the midst of the Arab uprisings: Turkish and Saudi foreign policy strategies.« Third World Quarterly, 34,6: 1127–1144.Google Scholar
  15. Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink 1998. »International norm dynamics and political change.« International Organization, 52,4: 887–917.Google Scholar
  16. Grigoriadis, Ioannis N. 2010. The Davutoğlu doctrine and Turkish foreign policy. ELIAMEP Working Paper, 8. Athens: ELIAMEP.Google Scholar
  17. Günay, Defne and Kaan Renda. 2014. »Usages of Europe in Turkish foreign policy towards the Middle East.« Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 16,1: 47–67.Google Scholar
  18. Karşıyaka, Sinan. 2011. Turkish foreign policy: Activism for hegemony or survival? A new mindset and strategic use of trade and visa policies in Turkish foreign policy. Unpublished master dissertation. New York University, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. Kornilov, Aleksandr and Alim V. Oglu Suleymanov. 2010. »Ankara’s Eurasian diplomacy.« International Affairs, 56,3: 112–119.Google Scholar
  21. Kirişci, Kemal. 2007. »The transformation of Turkish foreign policy: The rise of the trading state.« New Perspectives on Turkey, 49: 29–57.Google Scholar
  22. Kut, Şule. 2001. »The Contours of Turkish Foreign Policy in the 1990s.« in Turkey in world politics: An emerging multiregional power, edited by Barry Rubin and Kemal Kirişci, 5–12. Colorado: Lynee Reinner Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Legro, Jeffrey and Andrew Moravcsik. 1999. »Is anybody still a realist?« International Security, 24,2: 5–55.Google Scholar
  24. Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy Of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2001.Google Scholar
  25. Mercan, Murat. 2009. »Turkish foreign policy and Iran.« Turkish Policy Quarterly, 8,4: 13–19.Google Scholar
  26. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. »Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics.« International Organization, 51,4: 513–53.Google Scholar
  27. Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Brief edition revised by Kenneth W. Thompson. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993 (1948).Google Scholar
  28. Murinson, Alexander. 2006. »The strategic depth doctrine of Turkish foreign policy.« Middle Eastern Studies, 42,6: 945–964.Google Scholar
  29. Oğuzlu, Tarık. 2012. The Arab Spring and the Rise of the 2.0 Version of Turkey’s Zero Problems with Neighbours Policy, Ankara: Center for Strategic Research.Google Scholar
  30. Önis, Ziya and Şuhnaz Yılmaz. 2009. »Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: Activism in Turkey during the AKP era.« Turkish Studies, 10,1: 7–24.Google Scholar
  31. Öniş, Ziya. 2011. »Multiple faces of the “new” Turkish foreign policy: Underlying dynamics and a critique.« Insight Turkey, 13,1: 47–65.Google Scholar
  32. Öniş, Ziya. 2014. »Turkey and the Arab revolutions: Boundaries of middle power influence in a turbulent Middle East.« Mediterranean Politics, 19,2: 203–219.Google Scholar
  33. Oran, Baskın. Turkish foreign policy 1919-2006: Facts and analyses with documents. Utah: The University of Utah Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  34. Sümer, Fahrettin. 2013. »Turkey’s changing foreign policy and the Arab spring.« The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 18,1.Google Scholar
  35. Tocci, Nathalie. 2011. »Foreword.« in Turkey and the Arab Spring: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy from a Transatlantic Perspective, by Nathalie Tocci, Ömer Taşpınar, Henri J. Barkey, Eduard Soler i Lecha, and Hassan Nafaa, 3–5. Washington, DC: German Marshall Fund.Google Scholar
  36. Toktas, Sule and Ümit Kurt. 2010. »The Turkish military’s autonomy, JDP rule and the EU reform process in the 2000s: An assessment of the Turkish version of democratic control of armed forces (DECAF).« Turkish Studies, 11,3: 387–403.Google Scholar
  37. Turan, İlter. 2011. Turkish Foreign Policy: Interplay between the Domestic and External. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, September 21. Available online at http://carnegieendowment.org/2011/09/21/turkish-foreign-policy-interplay-between-domestic-and-external.
  38. Wendt, Alexander. Social theory of international politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations