Advertisement

Naturbewusstsein psychologisch: Was ist Naturbewusstsein, wie misst man es und wie wirkt es auf Umweltschutzverhalten?

  • Adrian Brügger
  • Siegmar Otto
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

In der Naturbewusstseinsstudie 2011 „werden unter Naturbewusstsein subjektive Auffassungen von Natur und Einstellungen zur Natur gefasst“ (Kleinhückelkotten/Neitzke 2012: 6). Diese von der Person ausgehende individuelle Perspektive entspricht dem Einstellungskonzept der Psychologie. Doch was sind Einstellungen genau? Wie kann man sie messen? Und warum sind sie interessant für den Natur- und Umweltschutz?

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Abrahamse, W.; Steg, L.; Vlek, C.; Rothengatter, T. (2005): A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991): The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 179–211.Google Scholar
  3. Armitage, C. J.; Conner, M. (2001): Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. In: British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1991): Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 248–287.Google Scholar
  5. Beckers, S. (2005): Measuring people’s connection with nature. Unpublished Master Thesis, Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit, Eindhoven, Nederland.Google Scholar
  6. Bem, D. J. (1967): Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. In: Psychological Review, 74(3), 183–200.Google Scholar
  7. Bolderdijk, J. W.; Knockaert, J.; Steg, E. M.; Verhoef, E. T. (2011): Effects of pay-as-you-drive vehicle insurance on young drivers’ speed choice: Results of a Dutch field experiment. In: Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(3), 1181–1186.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, T. G.; Fox, C. M. (2007): Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Brügger, A.; Kaiser, F. G.; Roczen, N. (2011): One for all? Connectedness to Nature, Inclusion of Nature, Environmental Identity, and Implicit Association with Nature. In: European Psychologist, 16(4), 324–333.Google Scholar
  10. Bundesamt für Energie (2012): Sozialpsychologische Akzeptanz von Windkraftprojekten an potentiellen Standorten: Eine quasiexperimentelle Untersuchung. Bern: Eidgenössisches Departement für Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie und Kommunikation UVEK Bundesamt für Energie.Google Scholar
  11. Byrka, K.; Hartig, T.; Kaiser, F. G. (2010): Environmental attitude as a mediator of the relationship between psychological restoration in nature and self-reported ecological behavior. In: Psychological Reports, 107(3), 847–859.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, D. T. (1963): Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. In: Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 6, pp. 94–172). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Clayton, S. (2003): Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In: Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. DeFleur, M. L.; Westie, F. R. (1958): Verbal attitudes and overt acts: An experiment on the salience of attitudes. In: American Sociological Review, 23(6), 667–673.Google Scholar
  15. Duerden, M. D.; Witt, P. A. (2010): The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 379–392.Google Scholar
  16. Dunlap, R. E.; Van Liere, K. D.; Mertig, A. G.; Jones, R. E. (2000): Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. In: Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.Google Scholar
  17. Eagly, A. H.; Chaiken, S. (1993): The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  18. Gelman, A.; King, G. (1993): Why are American presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable? In: British Journal of Political Science, 23(04), 409–451.Google Scholar
  19. Greve, W. (2001): Traps and gaps in action explanation: Theoretical problems of a psychology of human action. In: Psychological Review, 108(2), 435.Google Scholar
  20. Griskevicius, V.; Tybur, J. M.; Van den Bergh, B. (2010): Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.Google Scholar
  21. Hartig, T.; Evans, G. W.; Jamner, L. D.; Davis, D. S.; Gärling, T. (2003): Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. In: Journal of environmental psychology, 23(2), 109–123.Google Scholar
  22. Hartig, T.; Kaiser, F. G.; Bowler, P. A. (2001): Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. In: Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 590–607.Google Scholar
  23. Hartig, T.; Kaiser, F. G.; Strumse, E. (2007): Psychological restoration in nature as a source of motivation for ecological behaviour. In: Environmental Conservation, 34, 291–299.Google Scholar
  24. Hinds, J.; Sparks, P. (2008): Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 109–120.Google Scholar
  25. Homburg, A.; Matthies, E. (1998): Umweltpsychologie: Umweltkrise, Gesellschaft und Individuum. Weinheim und München: Juventa Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Joule, R.-V.; Girandola, F.; Bernard, F. (2007): How can people be induced to willingly change their behavior? The path from persuasive communication to binding communication. In: Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 493–505.Google Scholar
  27. Kaiser, F. G.; Brügger, A.; Hartig, T.; Bogner, F. X.; Gutscher, H. (2013): Appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection: Stable attitudes, but which comes first? Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  28. Kaiser, F. G.; Byrka, K.; Hartig, T. (2010): Reviving Campbell’s Paradigm for attitude research. In: Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(4), 351 –367.Google Scholar
  29. Kaiser, F. G.; Frick, J.; Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2001): Zur Angemessenheit selbstberichteten Verhaltens: Eine Validitätsuntersuchung der Skala Allgemeinen Ökologischen Verhaltens. Diagnostica, 47, 88–95.Google Scholar
  30. Kaiser, F. G.; Gutscher, H. (2003). The proposition of a general version of the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting ecological behavior. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(3), 586–603.Google Scholar
  31. Kaiser, F. G.; Hartig, T.; Brügger, A.; Duvier, C. (2013): Environmental protection and nature as distinct attitudinal objects: An application of the Campbell Paradigm. In: Environment and Behavior, 45(3), 369–398.Google Scholar
  32. Kaiser, F. G.; Hübner, G.; Bogner, F. X. (2005): Contrasting the theory of Planned Behavior with the Value-Belief-Norm Model in explaining conservation behavior. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2150–2170.Google Scholar
  33. Kaiser, F. G.; Roczen, N.; Bogner, F. X. (2008): Competence formation in environmental education: Advancing ecology-specific rather than general abilities. Umweltpsychologie.Google Scholar
  34. Kaiser, F. G.; Schultz, P. W. (2009): The attitude–behavior relationship: A test of three models of the moderating role of behavioral difficulty. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 186–207.Google Scholar
  35. Kaiser, F. G.; Wilson, M. (2004): Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. In: Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531–1544.Google Scholar
  36. Kals, E.; Schumacher, D.; Montada, L. (1999): Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. In: Environment and Behavior, 31, 178–202.Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan, R.; Kaplan, S. (1989): The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kleinhückelkotten, S.; Neitzke, H.-P. (2012): Naturbewusstseinsstudie 2011 – Abschlussbericht. Hannover: Bundesamt für Naturschutz.Google Scholar
  39. Liefländer, A. K.; Fröhlich, G.; Bogner, F. X.; Schultz, P. W. (2013): Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. In: Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 370–384.Google Scholar
  40. Mayer, F. S.; Frantz, C. M. (2004): The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.Google Scholar
  41. Mayer, F. S.; Frantz, C. M.; Bruehlman-Senecal, E.; Dolliver, K. (2009): Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. In: Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643.Google Scholar
  42. Nisbet, E. K.; Zelenski, J. M.; Murphy, S. A. (2009): The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behaviour. In: Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715 –740.Google Scholar
  43. OECD (2013): PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from dx.doi.org/ 10.787/9789264190511-en
  44. Otto, S.; Kaiser, F. G.; Arnold, O. (2014): Climate change’s critical challenges for psychology: Preventing rebound and promoting individual irrationality. In: European Psychologist, 19, 96-106.Google Scholar
  45. Petty, R. E.; Cacioppo, J. T. (1981): Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.Google Scholar
  46. Rosenberg, M. J.; Hovland, C. I. (1960): Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In: Attitude organization and change (pp. 1–14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ryan, R. M.; Weinstein, N.; Bernstein, J.; Brown, K. W.; Mistretta, L.; Gagné, M. (2010): Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 159–168.Google Scholar
  48. Schell, C.; Mues, A.; Küchler-Krischun, J.; Kleinhückelkotten, S.; Neitzke, H.-P.; Borgstedt, S.; Christ, T. (2012): Naturbewusstsein 2011 – Bevölkerungsumfrage zu Natur und biologischer Vielfalt. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit und Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Retrieved from http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/themen/gesellschaft/Naturbewusstsein_2011/Naturbewusstsein-2011_barrierefrei.pdf
  49. Schultz, P. W. (2001): The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339.Google Scholar
  50. Schultz, P. W. (2002): Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck; P. W. Schultz (Eds.), The psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–78). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  51. Schultz, P. W.; Shriver, C.; Tabanico, J. J.; Khazian, A. M. (2004): Implicit connections with nature. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31–42.Google Scholar
  52. Schultz, P. W.; Tabanico, J. J. (2007): Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1219–1247.Google Scholar
  53. Stets, J. E.; Biga, C. F. (2003): Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology. In: Sociological Theory, 21, 398–423.Google Scholar
  54. Strobl, C. (2012): Das Rasch-Modell. Eine verständliche Einführung für Studium und Praxis (2., erweiterte.). München: Rainer Hampp Verlag.Google Scholar
  55. Thøgersen, J.; Møller, B. (2008): Breaking car use habits: The effectiveness of a free one-month travelcard. In: Transportation, 35(3), 329–345.Google Scholar
  56. Tobias, R.; Brügger, A.; Mosler, H.-J. (2009): Developing strategies for waste reduction by means of tailored interventions in Santiago de Cuba. In: Environment and Behavior, 41(6), 836–865.Google Scholar
  57. Van den Berg, A. E.; Koole, S. L.; van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003): Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 135–146.Google Scholar
  58. Weinstein, N.; Przybylski, A. K.; Ryan, R. M. (2009): Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1315–1329.Google Scholar
  59. Wells, N. M.; Lekies, K. S. (2006): Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. In: Children Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  60. White, M. P.; Alcock, I.; Wheeler, B. W.; Depledge, M. H. (2013): Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. In: Psychological Science.Google Scholar
  61. Wicker, A. W. (1969): Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. In: Journal of social issues, 25(4), 41–78.Google Scholar
  62. Williams, K.; Harvey, D. (2001): Transcendent experience in forest environments. In: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 249–260.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BernSchweiz
  2. 2.MagdeburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations