Skip to main content

The Imaginary of Resilience: Trauma, Struggle, Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

As a culture we are saturated today by discourses around the need to develop the self. In fact discourses around selfhood can be seen to be driving wider social and political discourses around development on a more or less global scale. The discourse on ‘the resilient self’ is a case in point.

An earlier version of this article was published in: Bohland, J., Davoudi, S. and Lawrence, J. L. (eds.), “The Resilience Machine” (2018), pp. 29–42, New York: Routledge.​

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Consider also, in the current security climate, here in 2016, also the hysteria surrounding the threats posed by images created by Islamic State (ISIS) and disseminated on social media. A wide range of western security analysts have demanded more attention and greater responses to the functions of these images in the war against terror (see especially Harmanşah 2015; Giroux 2014).

  2. 2.

    Much of the energy of critical theory in the discipline of International Relations has been devoted to shoring up this central premise of Hobbesian thinking concerning relations between imagination, fear, security and state power. For a now classic account, see Campbell (1992).

  3. 3.

    “Resilience thereby comes to be a fundamental mechanism for policing the political imagination, nothing less than the attempted colonisation of the political imagination by the state” Neocleous (2013).

  4. 4.

    For the analysis of resilience, see especially Evans and Reid (2013); Chandler (2013).

  5. 5.

    For a full account of the film, see the excellent Julian Rice (2012).

References

  • Butler, J. & Athanasiou, A. (2013). Dispossession: The performative in the political. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1992). Writing security. Minneapolis: University of Minneosta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2013). Resilience: The governance of complexity. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cyrulnik, B. (2009). Resilience: How your inner strength can set you free from the past. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The time-image. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delsarte, F. (2011). Delsarte system of expression. Milton Keynes: Lightning Source.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B. & Reid, J. (2013). Resilient life: The art of living dangerously. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. (2007). Making up the mind: How the brain creates our mental world. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2014). ISIS and the spectacle of terrorism: Resisting mainstream workstations of fear.https://philosophersforchange.org/2014/10/07/isis-and-the-spectacle-of-terrorism-resisting-mainstream-workstations-of-fear/.

  • Harmanşah, Ö. (2015). ISIS, heritage, and the spectacles of destruction in the global media, Near Eastern Archaeology 78 (3), 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1993). Leviathan. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., Leveson, N. (eds.). (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, A. (2013). Emotion and imagination. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United State. (2004). The 9/11 commission report: The full final report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. (2013). Resisting Resilience. Radical Philosophy 178 (March/April), 1–7 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279570324_Resisting_resilience (accessed on 19 March 2014).

  • Neocleous, M. (2016). The universal adversary. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. (2012). The Jarmusch way: Spirituality and imagination in Dead Man, Ghost Dog and Limits of Control. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaby, J. (2015). Critical neuroscience meets medical humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities 41, 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff, K. & Gabrys, J. (2011). Climate change and the imagination. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews 2, 516–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. Z. (1988). In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Reid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reid, J. (2019). The Imaginary of Resilience: Trauma, Struggle, Life. In: Rampp, B., Endreß, M., Naumann, M. (eds) Resilience in Social, Cultural and Political Spheres. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15329-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15329-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-15328-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-15329-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics