Managers’ Awareness of Their Decision Making: Discussing Cognitive Biases

  • Marie-Therese ClaesEmail author
  • Thibault Jacquemin
Part of the Forschung und Praxis an der FHWien der WKW book series (FPGHW)


Managers are currently confronted with highly complex situations where time constraints and the availability of information make it essential that they have an effective decision-making process. Studies show that in many cases we do not use a rational process to make decisions but instead rely on instinct, emotion, or quickly processed information. The objective of this chapter is to enhance managers’ decision making by understanding the impact their cognitive biases may have on decision making, more specifically on managing people.


  1. Arzlan, D. (2003). Postmodernism, Keynesian uncertainty and rational expectations: A methodological approach. Paper Presented at the Eastern Economic Association Conference in New York City on February 22.Google Scholar
  2. Becklen, R., & Cervone, D. (1983). Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events. Memory & Cognition, 11(6), 601–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, H. H., & Ricciardi, V. (2014). Investor Behavior: The Psychology of Financial Planning and Investing. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  4. Beshears, J., Frederick, S., & Gino, F. (2015). Test yourself. Are you being tricked by intuition? Retrieved from:
  5. Beyth, B., & Fischhoff, B. (1975). I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 1–16.Google Scholar
  6. Brehm, J. (1956). ‘Post-decision Changes in Desirability of Alternatives’. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389.Google Scholar
  7. Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton: Princeton Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chabris, C. & Simons, D. (2010). The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  9. Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences. Address of the President of Section F of the British Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  10. Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and Economic order. London: Routledge Press and Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hogg, M., & Vaughan, G. (2008). Social psychology. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  12. Hume, D. (1748). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
  13. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  14. Keenan, L., & Somerville, J. (2009). Decision-making and the rational economic actor: An interdisciplinary approach. Dublin: Trinity College.Google Scholar
  15. Malmendier, U. & Tate, G. (2009). Superstar CEOs. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 24, 1593–1638.Google Scholar
  16. Morewedge, C. K., & Kahneman, D. (2010). Associative processes in Intuitive Judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 435–440.Google Scholar
  17. Morgenstern, O., & Von Neumann, J. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pareto, V. (1916). Trattato di Sociologia Generale (vol. 4). New York: Harcourt. (The Mind and Society, vol. IV, G. Barbèra, Brace and Company, 1935).Google Scholar
  19. Ross, H. (2014). Everyday Bias: Identifying and Navigating Unconscious Judgments in Our Daily Lives. Lanham Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Simon, H. (1955). A Behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, A. (1776). Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
  22. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–726.Google Scholar
  23. Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Tomer, J. F. (2007). “What is behavioral economics?” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 463–479.Google Scholar
  25. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging Frequency and Probability”. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.Google Scholar
  26. Walras, L. (1874). Éléments d’économie politique pure, ou théorie de la richesse sociale. Lausanne. (Elements of Pure Economics, or the theory of social wealth, transl. W. Jaffé. 1954.)Google Scholar
  27. Wansink, B., & Sobal, J. (2007). Mindless eating: The 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environment and Behavior, 39(1), 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Andersen, T. J. (2004). Integrating decentralized strategy making and strategic planning processes in dynamic environments. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1271–1299.Google Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.Google Scholar
  3. Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2007). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2(3), 412–414. Published online 2006 Jun 27.
  4. Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  5. Deutscher, G. (2010). Through the Language Glass: Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages. Picador.Google Scholar
  6. Elster, J. (1983). Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Elster, J. (1989). Solomonic Judgments: Studies in the limitation of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Elster, J. (2000). Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Elster, J. (2009). Reason and Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Franz, R. (2012). Hayek and Behavioral Economics. San Diego: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.Google Scholar
  12. Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). ‘The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences’. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 295–314.Google Scholar
  13. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326–338.Google Scholar
  15. Jamali, D., Khoury, G., & Sahyoun, H. (2006). From bureaucratic organizations to learning organizations: An evolutionary roadmap. The Learning Organization, 13(4), 337–352.Google Scholar
  16. Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What Is the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis? American Anthropological Association. Google Scholar
  17. Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., Brown, A. C. & Elbedour, S. (2000). Cultural influences on confidence: Country and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 152–159.Google Scholar
  18. Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Paulos, J. A. (2003). A Mathematician Plays the Market. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Roberson, D., & Davidoff, J. (2000). The categorical perception of colors and facial expressions: The effect of verbal interference. Memory and Cognition, 28, 977–986.Google Scholar
  21. Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and company.Google Scholar
  22. Schwartz, H. (2002). Herbert Simon and Behavioral Economics, Journal of Socio-Economics, 31, 181–189.Google Scholar
  23. Shiv, B., Loewenstein, G., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). Investment behavior and the negative side of emotion. Psychological Sciences, 16, 435–439.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. Edinburgh: A. Millar, in the Strand; and A. Kincaid and J. Bell.Google Scholar
  25. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  26. Thaler, R. H. (1993). Advances in Behavioral Finance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Thaler, R. H. (1994). Quasi Rational Economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Thaler, R. H. (2005). Advances in Behavioral Finance, Volume II (Roundtable Series in Behavioral Economics). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 39–63.Google Scholar
  30. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.Google Scholar
  31. Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. Annalen der Naturphilosophie, 14. (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, translated by C.K. Ogden [1922]).Google Scholar
  32. Zajonc, R. B. (1969). Exposure and effect: A field experiment. Psychonomic Science, 17, 216–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Louvain School of ManagementLouvain-la-NeuveBelgien

Personalised recommendations