Integration durch Diversifikation

Die Mediatisierung sozialer Bewegungen vom „Kampf von Seattle“ bis Occupy
  • Michael S. Daubs
Part of the Medien • Kultur • Kommunikation book series (MKK)


Dieser Beitrag ist eine theoretische Provokation – ein Versuch, die Mediatisierung (Hjarvard 2008, Krotz 2009) sozialer Bewegungen zu kontextualisieren, wobei problematische Ausdrücke wie „Twitter-Revolutionen“ vermieden werden.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adbusters (2011): #OCCUPYWALLSTREET. Zugegriffen: 13. Oktober 2011.
  2. Afshari, Reza (2009): A Historic Moment in Iran. Human Rights Quarterly 314(4), 839-855.Google Scholar
  3. Altheide, David/Snow, Robert (1979): Media Logic. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Barlow, John Perry (1996): A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. Zugegriffen: 21. August.2012.
  5. Barney, Darin (2008): Politics and Emerging Media: The Revenge of Publicity. Global Media Journal – Canadian Edition 11(1): 89-106.Google Scholar
  6. Benkler, Yochai (2006): The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale: University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, W. Lance (2003): New Media Power: The Internet and Global Activism. In: N. Couldry, J. Curran (Hrsg.), Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World (S. 17-38). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  8. Berg, Matthias (2014): Mediatisierung, Mobilisierung und Individualisierung als Theorieansätze kommunikativer Mobilität. In: J. Wimmer, M. Hartmann (Hrsg.), Medienkommunikation in Bewegung (S. 47-65). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  9. Bruns, Axel (2008): The Future Is User-Led: The Path towards Widespread Produsage. The Fibreculture Journal 11.Google Scholar
  10. Cammaerts, Bart/Mattoni, Alice/McCurdy, Patrick (2013): Introduction. In: B. Cammaerts, A, Mattoni, P. McCurdy (Hrsg.), Mediation and Protest Movements (S. 1-20). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Castells, Manuel (2012): Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Malden, Massachusetts: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Costanza-Chock, Sasha (2012): Mic check! Media Cultures and the Occupy Movement. Social Movement Studies 113-4(3-4), 375-385.Google Scholar
  13. Couldry, Nick (2008): Mediatization or Mediation? Alternative Understandings of the Emergent Space of Digital Storytelling. New Media & Society 103(3), 373-391.Google Scholar
  14. Dahlberg, Lincoln (2001): The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere. Information, Communication & Society 44(4), 615-633.Google Scholar
  15. Dahlberg, Lincoln (2007): Rethinking the Fragmentation of the Cyberpublic: from Consensus to Contestation. New Media & Society 95(5), 827-847.Google Scholar
  16. Dahlgren, Peter (2001): The public sphere and the net: Structure, space, and communication. In: W.L. Bennett, R.M. Entman (Hrsg.), Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy (S. 33-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dean, Jodi (2008): Communicative Capitalism: Circulation and the Foreclosure of Politics. In: M. Boller (Hrsg.), Digital Media and Democracy: Tactics in Hard Times (101-121). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dean, Jodi. (2011) Claiming Division, Naming a Wrong. Theory & Event 14.Google Scholar
  19. Debord, Guy (1994): The Society of the Spectacle. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  20. Donovan, Joan (2012): How Occupy Birthed a Rhizome. Google Scholar
  21. Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew (2001): The Internet and the Seattle WTO Protests. Peace Review 133(3), 331-337.Google Scholar
  22. Enzensberger, Hans Magnus (2000): Das digitale Evangelium. Zugegriffen: 25 Juni 2012.
  23. Fenton, Natalie/Downey, John (2003): Counter Public Spheres and Global Modernity. The Public 101(1), 15-32.Google Scholar
  24. Fischer, Noah (2013): Where Is Occupy Now? Answer: Turkey. Zugegriffen: 12. Mai 2014.
  25. Gerbaudo, Paolo (2012): Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gerhards, Jürgen/Neidhardt, Friedhelm (1991): Strukturen und Funktionen moderner Öffentlichkeit: Fragestellungen und Ansätze. In: Müller-Doohm, S. and Neumann-Braun, K. (Hrsg.), Öffentlichkeit, Kultur, Massenkommunikation: Beiträge zur Medien- und Kommunikationssoziologie (S. 31-89). Oldenburg: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  27. Gilder, George F. (1994): Life After Television. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Grossman, Lev. (2009): Iran Protests: Twitter, the Medium of the Movement. TIME. Zugegriffen: 18. Februar 2011.Google Scholar
  29. Hepp, Andreas (2009a): Differentiation: Mediatization and Cultural Change. In: K. Lundby (Hrsg.), Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences (S. 139-158). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  30. Hepp, Andreas (2009b): Researching ‘Mediatised Worlds’: Non-Mediacentric Media and Communication Research as a Challenge. In: N. Carpentier, IT. Trivundža, Pruulmann-P. Vengerfeldt et al. (Hrsg.), Media and Communication Studies: Interventions and Intersections (S. 37-48). Tartu, Estonia: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hepp, Andreas (2013): Medienkultur: Die Kultur mediatisierter Welten. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Hepp, Andreas/Krotz, Friedrich (2012): Mediatisierte Welten: Forschungsfelder und Beschreibungsansätze – Zur Einleitung. In: A. Hepp, F. Krotz (Hrsg.), Mediatisierte Welten: Forschungsfelder und Beschreibungsansätze (S. 7-26). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Hirsch, Tad/Henry, John (2005): TXTmob: Text Messaging for Protest Swarms. CHI ’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, 1455-1458.Google Scholar
  34. Hjarvard, Stig (2008): The Mediatization of Society. A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change. Nordicom Review 292(2), 105-134.Google Scholar
  35. Howard, Philip N/Hussain, Muzammil M (2011): The Role of Digital Media. Journal of Democracy 223(3), 35-48.Google Scholar
  36. Iyengar, Shanto (1994): Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jenkins, Henry (2006): Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Jha, Sonora (2007): Exploring Internet Influence on the Coverage of Social Protest: Content Analysis Comparing Protest Coverage in 1967 and 1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 841(1), 40-57.Google Scholar
  39. Kahn, Richard/Kellner, Douglas (2004): New Media and Internet Activism: From the ‘Battle of Seattle’ to Blogging. New Media & Society 61(1), 87-95.Google Scholar
  40. Knodel, Mallory (2011): Art of the 99 %. Zugegriffen: 4. Mai 2014.
  41. Krotz, Friedrich (2007): The Meta-Process of Mediatization as a Conceptual Frame. Global Media and Communication 33(3): 256-260.Google Scholar
  42. Krotz, Friedrich (2009): Mediatization: A Concept With Which to Grasp Media and Societal Change. In: K. Lundby (Hrsg.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences (S. 21-40). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  43. Kunert, Jessica/Schmidt, Jan-Hinrik (2009): Hub, Fine-Tuner oder Business as Usual? Social Network Sites und die Bundestaggwahl 2009. In: Schweitzer, E.J. and Albrecht, S. (Hrsg.), Das Internet im Wahlkampf: Analysen zur Bundestagswahl 2009 (S. 226-243). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  44. Levi, Margaret/Murphy, Gillian H. (2006): Coalitions of Contention: The Case of the WTO Protests in Seattle. Political Studies 544(4), 651-670.Google Scholar
  45. Lundby, Knut (2009): Media Logic: Looking for Social Interaction. In: K. Lundby (Hrsg.), Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences (S. 101-119). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  46. McLeod, Douglas M./Detenber, Benjamin H. (1999): Framing Effects of Television News Coverage of Social Protest. Journal of Communication 493(3), 3-23.Google Scholar
  47. Morley, David (2007): Media, Modernity and Technology. The Geography of the New. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Noveck, Jocelyn (2011): Wall Street Protesters Want World to Know They’re Just Like Us. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2014.
  49. Pickard, Victor W. (2006): Assessing the Radical Democracy of Indymedia: Discursive, Technical, and Institutional Constructions. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 231(1), 19-38.Google Scholar
  50. Platon, Sara/Deuze, Mark (2003): Indymedia Journalism: A Radical Way of Making, Selecting and Sharing News? Journalism 43(3), 336-355.Google Scholar
  51. Rushkoff, Douglas (2011): Think Occupy Wall St. is a phase? You don’t get it. Zugegriffen: 7. Mai 2014.
  52. Schmidt, Jan-Hinrik (2011): Zum Strukturwandel von Kommunikation im Web 2.0. Zugegriffen: 30. September 2011.
  53. Shifman, Limor (2013): Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Shirky, Clay (2008): Here Comes Everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  55. Turner, Fred (2006): From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wark, McKenzie (2011): This Shit is Fucked Up and Bullshit. Theory & Event 144(4).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Media StudiesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNeuseeland

Personalised recommendations