Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Personalauswahl pp 181–196Cite as

Arbeitsprobe und Situational-Judgment-Test

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Im folgenden Beitrag werden zwei simulationsorientierte Verfahren der Personalauswahl eingehend diskutiert – die Arbeitsprobe und der Situational-Judgment-Test (SJT). Es gilt, einen umfassenden Überblick über die genannten Instrumente zu generieren sowie deren Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede darzulegen. Ausgehend von der Begriffsbestimmung und -abgrenzung werden die Ziele, Typen und der genaue Ablauf beider Verfahren erläutert sowie deren Vor- und Nachteile gegenübergestellt. Empirisch-gestützte Aussagen zu den Gütekriterien (Validität, Reliabilität), subgruppenspezifischen Leistungsunterschieden („adverse impact“) sowie zur Verfälschbarkeit der Arbeitsprobe und des SJT ergänzen die Inhalte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Asher, J. J., & Sciarrino, J. A. (1974). Realistic work sample tests: A review. Personnel Psychology, 27, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Behrmann, M. (2007). Situational-Judgment-Tests. In H. Schuler & K. Sonntag (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (S. 484–489). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bledow, R., & Frese, M. (2005). Situational-Judgment-Test on personal initiative. Gießen: Justus-Liebig-Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Callinan, M., & Robertson, I. T. (2000). Work sample testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2005). Situational-judgment-test. In A. Evers, N. Anderson, & O. Smit-Voskuijl (Hrsg.), Handbook of personnel selection (S. 219–246). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christian, M. S., Edwards, B. D., & Bradley, J. C. (2010). Situational-Judgment-Tests: Constructs assessed and a meta-analysis of their criterion-related validities. Personnel Psychology, 63, 83–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clevenger, J., Pereira, G. M., Wiechmann, D., Schmitt, N., & Schmidt Harvey, V. (2001). Incremental validity of Situational-Judgment-Tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 410–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Downs, S., Farr, R. M., & Colbeck, L. (1978). Self-appraisal: A convergence of selection and guidance. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 51, 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Görlich, Y. (2007). Arbeitsproben. In H. Schuler & K. Sonntag (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (S. 468–474). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guion, R. M., & Highhouse, S. (2006). Essentials of personnel assessment and selection. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hedge, J. W., & Teachout, M. S. (1992). An interview approach to work sample criterion measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 453–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson, D. N., Harris, W. G., Ashton, M. C., McCarthy, J. M., & Tremblay, P. F. (2000). How useful are work samples in validation studies? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(1), 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanning, U. P., & Schuler, H. (2014). Simulationsorientierte Verfahren der Personalauswahl. In H. Schuler & U. P. Kanning (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (S. 215–256). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krause, D. E. (2011). Trends in der internationalen Personalauswahl. Praxis der Personalpsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krumm, S., Hüffmeier, J., Lievens, F., Lipnevich, A. A., Bendels, H., & Hertel, G. (2015). How „situational“ is judgment in Situational Judgment Tests? Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lievens, F., Peeters, H., & Schollaert, E. (2008). Situational Judgment Tests: A review of recent research. Personnel Review, 37(4), 426–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2001). Situational Judgment Tests: A review of practice and constructs assessed. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1/2), 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McDaniel, M. A., Morgeson, F. P., Finnegan, E. B., Campion, M. A., & Braverman, E. P. (2001). Use of Situational Judgment Test to predict job performance: A clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 730–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 640–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen, N. T., Biderman, M. D., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Effects of response instructions on faking a Situational Judgment Test. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(4), 250–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oswald, F. L., Schmitt, N., Kim, B. H., Gillespie, M. A., & Ramsay, L. (2004). Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patterson, F., Lievens, F., Kerrin, M., Zibarras, L., & Carette, B. (2012). Designing selection systems for medicine: The importance of balancing predictive and political validity in high-stakes selection contexts. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(4), 486–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ployhart, R. E., Schneider, B., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Staffing organizations: Contemporary practice and research. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robertson, I. T., & Kandola, R. S. (1982). Work sample tests: Validity, adverse impact and applicant reaction. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & McFarland, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature. Personnel Psychology, 58, 1009–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., McFarland, L., & Buster, M. (2008). Work sample tests in personnel selection: A meta-analysis of black-white differences in overall and exercise scores. Personnel Psychology, 61, 637–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schuler, H. (2014). Psychologische Personalauswahl. Eignungsdiagnostik für Personalentscheidungen und Berufsberatung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weekly, J. A., & Jones, C. (1999). Further studies of situational tests. Personnel Psychology, 52, 679–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Weekly, J. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2005). Situational judgment: Antecedents and relationships with performance. Human Performance, 18(1), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(5), 372–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Whetzel, D. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2009). Situational-Judgment-Tests: An overview of current research. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Österreich

    Arleta Franczukowska

Authors
  1. Arleta Franczukowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arleta Franczukowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin, Germany

    Diana Eva Krause

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franczukowska, A. (2017). Arbeitsprobe und Situational-Judgment-Test. In: Krause, D. (eds) Personalauswahl. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14567-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14567-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14566-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14567-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation