Abstract
Within the last decade, epigenetics has developed as a branch of molecular genetics and is currently experiencing a true hype. One of the most fascinating but also scaring findings of epigenetics is the confirmation of the old presumption that the environment can have lasting effects on gene expression – maybe even into the next generation(s). Thus, epigenetics has not only hugely expanded the horizon concerning the understanding of regulation mechanisms that influence the appearance of organisms, epigenetic knowledge pools also have a huge potential for innovations – especially in the health care sector (e.g. fighting cancer, Alzheimer’s and diabetes). But epigenetic research also provides advice for “better living” in respect to diet, everyday behavior, social relations and many more. This volume illuminates ethical, legal and social aspects of epigenetics from multidisciplinary perspectives that have been given little consideration to date. Here we will introduce its contributions and put them into context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
EC (European Commission). (2013). Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Science in Society, European Commission (EUR25766). http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/options-for-strengthening_en.pdf
Fleischer, T., & Quendt, C. (2007). Unsichtbar und unendlich – Bürgerperspektiven auf Nano-partikel - Ergebnisse zweier Fokusgruppen-Veranstaltungen in Karlsruhe. Karlsruhe: Wissenschaftliche Berichte (FZKA 7337).
Grossniklaus, U., Kelly, B., Ferguson-Smith, A. C., Pembrey, M., & Lindquist, S. (2013). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: How important is it? Nature Review Genetics, 14(3), 228–235.
Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(4), 399–408.
Hennen, L., Petermann, Th., & Scherz, C. (Eds.) (2004). Partizipative Verfahren der Technikfolgen-Abschätzung und parlamentarische Politikberatung. Neue Formen der Kommunikation zwischen Wissenschaft, Politik und Öffentlichkeit. Berlin: Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (TAB), TAB-Arbeitsbericht Nr. 96.
Kaati, G., Bygren, L. O., & Edvinsson, S. (2002). Cardiovascular and diabetes mortality determined by nutrition during parents’ and grandparents’ slow growth period. European Journal of Human Genetics, 10, 682–688.
König, H., Frank, D., Heil, R., & Coenen, C. (2013). Synthetic genomics and synthetic biology applications between hopes and concerns. Current Genomics, 14(1), 11–24.
Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A Framework for Responsible Innovation. In R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (Eds.): Responsible innovation (p. 27–50). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Rice, W. R., Friberg, U., & Gavrilets, S. (2012). Homosexuality as a consequence of epigenetically canalized sexual development. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87(4), 343–368.
Rip, A., & Voß, J.-P. (2013). Umbrella terms as a conduit in the governance of emerging science and technology. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies, 9, 39–59.
Rothstein, M. A., Cai, Y., & Marchant, G. E. (2009). The ghost in our genes: Legal and ethical implications of epigenetics. Health Matrix, 19(1), 1–62.
Rothstein, M. (2013). Legal and ethical implications of epigenetics. In R. L. Jirtle & F. L. Tyson (Eds.), Environmental epigenomics in health and disease (p. 297–308). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Smith, L. C., Suzuki, J., Goff, A. K., Filion, F., Therrien, J., Murphy, B. D., et al. (2012). Developmental and epigenetic anomalies in cloned cattle. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 47, 107–114.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary ob-jects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
van Montfoort, A. P., Hanssen, L. L., de Sutter, P., Viville, S., Geraedts, J. P., & de Boer, P. (2012). Assisted reproduction treatment and epigenetic inheritance. Human Reproduction Update, 18(2), 171–197.
von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation. In Owen, R., Heintz, M., & Bessant, J. (Eds.): Responsible innovation. Chichester (p. 51–74). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Weinhold, B. (2006). Epigenetics: The science of change. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(3), A160–A167.
Youngson, N. A., & Whitelaw, E. (2008). Transgenerational epigenetic effects. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 9(1), 233–257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heil, R., Seitz, S.B., Robienski, J., König, H. (2017). Introduction. In: Heil, R., Seitz, S., König, H., Robienski, J. (eds) Epigenetics. Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14460-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14460-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14459-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14460-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)