Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft ((VGPO))

  • 788 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I examine the role of constitutional politics in Moldova. I argue that executive-legislative relations, questions concerning rule of law, and disputes over the identity of the polity are the dominant features of constitutional politics in the post-soviet Moldovan context. I find that most amendments of the constitution, both successful and unsuccessful, were driven by dysfunctions of the political system, and intense power struggles among the elite. Thus, the constitutional amendments present a picture torn between tendencies that harm democracy (i.e. the reduction of the autonomy of judges in 2002) and something resembling democratization. At the same time, I argue that the influence of external actors, e.g. the Council of Europe, the Venice Commission and Russia, is ambiguous and limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pridnestrovian Moldovan Republic (Pridnestrowskaja Moldawskaja Respublika, in the following Transnistria).

  2. 2.

    See, for example, Steinsdorff and Fruhstorfer (2012).

  3. 3.

    According to participants in the constitutional commission, President Snegur would have preferred a constitution modeled after the French constitution as of 1962 (Matsuzato 2006, 330) in terms of presidential power.

  4. 4.

    These three types differ in the majority necessary for their implementation, the number of voting rounds in parliament, and the areas in which they regulate (see Law on legislative acts 2001).

  5. 5.

    Several authors also discuss the question of democratization before federalization (for example Protsyk 2005).

  6. 6.

    The data on this specific constitutional amendment vary, as it was according to reports not registered. Quinlan (2002, 99) reports 90 deputies out of 104 voted in favor during the first round and 84 in favor and 4 against after the presidential veto, some indication might be that only 95 members were present and 5 voted against it.

  7. 7.

    I counted in addition 4 unsuccessful constitutional amendment attempts in relation to the proposal put forward by President Lucinschi (or his supporters) between May and October 2000.

  8. 8.

    Comment of a non-communist member of parliament: “None of us had carefully read the law concerning the procedure of election of the president” (cited according to Quinlan 2002, 100).

  9. 9.

    Distribution according to d’Hondt (Adept 2001).

  10. 10.

    Consisting of the Liberal Democratic Party (Partidul Liberal Democrat din Moldova—PLDM), the Liberal Party (Partidul Liberal—PL), the PDM and Our Moldova Alliance (Partidul Alianţă Moldova Noastră—AMN).

  11. 11.

    Although the communist party still had a relative majority, the four smaller opposition parties established the Alliance for European Integration and formed a government.

  12. 12.

    Art. 70 was also part of the 1470-XV 2002 amendment law (immunity and remuneration of parliamentary deputies outside parliament), which was already an issue in 1998 with a failed constitutional amendment (Azizov, and Buscaneanu, pers. comm.). However, I was not able to discover the reason for this failure. In 2002, Art. 70, Sec. 1 was amended to allow deputies scientific and didactic occupations outside of parliament.

  13. 13.

    Similar provisions were also discussed in Bulgaria (Hein 2013, 360) and Romania (see the country chapter in this volume).

  14. 14.

    These drafts failed on March 23, 1998, July 14, 2000 and November 18, 2005 (N. Azizov, and S. Buscaneanu, pers. comm.).

  15. 15.

    These drafts failed on March 23, 1997.

  16. 16.

    This process was completed with the addition to the law on citizenship in July 2003, which allowed different forms of acquiring citizenship. These modifications triggered a Romanian response in restricting their citizenship laws, especially the process of restitution.

  17. 17.

    According to Büscher, no legislative initiative of Gagauzia had been passed as a bill yet (Büscher 2010, 598). However, two other amendments, which were also tabled in 2003, failed. They would have changed Art. 72 (categories of laws) and 102 (decisions by the government). This draft was also considered, but subsequently excluded from the parliamentary agenda.

  18. 18.

    Voronin was born in Corjova, a town located in today’s Transnistria.

  19. 19.

    Although joint endeavor should not be overemphasized as Transnistria was forced by the treat of a visa ban through the EU and the US (European Commission 2005, 10).

  20. 20.

    Demonstrations against this revaluation of the Russian language were primarily led by the Christian-Democratic People's Party (Partidul Popular Creștin Democrat—PPCD), under the logo of Romanian people-Romanian language.

References

  • Adept. 2001. Early parliamentary elections of February 25, 2001. Last modified August 14. http://www.e-democracy.md/en/elections/parliamentary/2001/ (accessed April 28, 2015).

  • Adept. 2010. Results of the republican constitutional referendum of September 5, 2010. Last modified December 21, 2010. http://www.e-democracy.md/en/elections/referendum/2010/results/ (accessed March 11, 2014).

  • Azizov, Nighina, and Sergiu, Buscaneanu. 2014. E-Mail message to author, December 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banting, Keith G., and Richard Simeon. 1985. Introduction. In The Politics of Constitutional Change in Industrial Nations: Redesigning the State, ed. Keith G. Banting, and Richard Simeon, 1–29. London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Broich, Markus J. W. 2008. Der Wandel der Beziehungen zwischen der Europäischen Union und der Republik Moldau im Kontext der EU-Erweiterungspolitik. Ph.D. diss., Universität Duisburg-Essen. http://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=18292 (accessed August 4, 2014).

  • BBC News Online. 2009. Moldovan parties form government. August 8. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8191443.stm (accessed March 12, 2014).

  • Büscher, Klemens. 2004. Das politische system Moldovas. In Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas, 2nd ed, ed. Wolfgang Ismayr, 515–552. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Büscher, Klemens. 2010. Das politische system Moldovas. In Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas, ed. Wolfgang Ismayr, 583–626. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cabacenco, Pavel. 2010. Moldova, On the threshold of change. Election Guide, September 1. http://www.electionguide.org/digest/post/1748/ (accessed July 3, 2015).

  • Cantir, Cristian. 2011. The parliamentary election in the Republic of Moldova, November 2010. Electoral Studies 30(4): 880–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coalson, Robert. 2012. Profile: Who is Moldova’s new president-elect? RFE/RL News, March 16. http://www.rferl.org/content/who_is_moldovas_new_president/24518350.html (accessed July 3, 2015).

  • Constitutional Court of Moldova. 2006. Nr. 1, asupra proiectului de lege pentru excluderea propoziţiei “Caracterul licit al dobîndirii se prezumă” din alineatul (3) articolul 46 din Constituţia Republicii Moldova. Chișinău, April 25. http://lex.justice.md/index.php?action=view&view=doc&lang=1&id=315710 (accessed April 16, 2015).

  • Council of Europe. 2004. Opinion on the proposal to amend the constitution of the republic of Moldova (introduction of the individual complaint to the Constitutional Court) Opinion 315/2004: European Commission For Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). CDL-AD(2004)043. Strasbourg, December 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 2013. Report by Nils Muižnieks, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe. CommDH(2013)19. Strasbourg, September 30. https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=2102463&Site=COE&BackColorInternet=B9BDEE&BackColorIntranet=FFCD4F&BackColorLogged=FFC679 (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • Council of Europe: Parliamentary assembly. 2006. Functioning of Democratic Institutions in Moldova. Doc. 10931. Strasbourg, May 12. http://www.refworld.org/docid/44c4d7e74.html (accessed April 10, 2015).

  • Crowther, William E., and Helen Fedor. 1995. Moldova. In Belarus and Moldova: Country Studies, ed. Helen Fedor, 93–180. Washington D.C.: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mello, Luiz. 2001. Fiscal federalism and government size in transition economies: The case of Moldova. Journal of International Development 13(2): 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edinger, Michael. 1996. Die Verfassung der Republik Moldova. Der Donauraum 36(3–4): 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2005. Country strategy paper 2004–2006 Moldova. Last modified August 05, 2014. eeas.europa.eu/moldova/csp/csp04_06_nip05_06_en.pdf (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • Freedom House. 2002. Moldova: Freedom in the world 2002. Last modified April 10, 2015. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2002/moldova#.VSeK2PCbH88 (accessed April 10, 2015).

  • Freedom House. 2003. Moldova: Nations in transit 2003. Last modified August 05, 2014. http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2003/moldova#.U-CY-aMd0X8 (accessed August 5, 2014).

  • Freedom House. 2006. Moldova: Freedom in the world 2006. Last modified August 07, 2014. http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2006/moldova#.U-OE-KMd0X8

  • Freedom House. 2015. Moldova. Freedom in the world 2015. Last modified July 21, 2015 (accessed July 21, 2015) https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2015/moldova#.Va5Ps7WbH88.

  • Fruhstorfer, Anna. 2015. Presidents and constitutions. How formal rules constrain and empower. Ph.D. diss., Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasca, Viorelia. 2012. Report on Moldova. European union democracy observatory on citizenship. Florence: European University Institute. http://eudo-citizenship.eu/docs/CountryReports/Moldova.pdf (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • Grzymala-Busse, Anna M. 2002. Redeeming the communist past: The regeneration of communist parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Henry E. 2013. The informal politics of formal constitutions. In Constitutions in authoritarian regimes, ed. Tom Ginsburg, and Alberto Simpser, 218–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, Michael. 2013. Verfassungskonflikte zwischen Politik und Recht in Südosteuropa: Bulgarien und Rumänien nach 1989 im Vergleich. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Stephen, and Cass Sunstein. 1995. The politics of constitutional revision in Eastern Europe. In Responding to imperfection: The theory and practice of constitutional amendment, ed. Sanford Levinson, 275–306. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, Tilman. 2014. Illicit enrichment and confiscation—Assessment of the revised Moldovan criminal code. ECCU-EaP-2/2014. Strasbourg, September 08. http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/corruption/Projects/EaP-CoE%20Facility/Technical%20Paper/TP%20CrimCode%20Moldova%2014%2009%2005%20final.pdf (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • Horowitz, Donald L. 1993. Democracy in divided societies. Journal of Democracy 4(4): 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, Ian. 2004. Countries of the former soviet union at the turn of the twenty-first century: The baltic and european states in transition. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, Charles. 2000. Post-postcommunism: Transition, comparison, and the end of ‘Eastern Europe’. World Politics 53(1): 143–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Hanna. 2011. Making Constitutions in deeply divided societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • March, Luke. 2005. The Moldovan communists: From Leninism to democracy? EuroJournal.org 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, Luke. 2006. Power and opposition in the Former Soviet Union: The communist parties of Moldova and Russia. Party Politics 12(3): 341–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuzato, Kimitaka. 2006. Differing dynamics of semipresidentialism across Euro/Eurasian Borders: Ukraine, Lithuania, Poland, Moldova, and Armenia. Demokratizatsiya 14(3): 317–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, Dieter, and Mirjana Kasapović. 1996. Wahlsysteme und Systemwechsel in Osteuropa. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Philip, and David M. Olson. 1996. Parliaments in adolescence. In The new parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe, ed. David M. Olson, and Philip Norton, 231–244. London, Portland, Ore: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, Bertil. 2007. The rebuilding of Greater Russia: Putin’s foreign policy towards the CIS countries. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, Nicu. 2010. EU foreign policy and post-soviet conflicts: Stealth intervention. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protsyk, Oleh. 2005. Federalism and democracy in Moldova. Post-Soviet Affairs 21(1): 72–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protsyk, Oleh. 2006. Intra-executive competition between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of institutional conflict and cooperation under semi-presidentialism. Political Studies 54(2): 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1994. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, Paul D. 2002. Moldova under Lucinschi. Demokratizatsiya 10(1): 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • RFE/RL. 1999. Newsline. August 4. http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1141962.html (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • RFE/RL. 2009. Voronin To Resign As Acting Moldovan President. RFE/RL News, July 9. http://www.rferl.org/content/Acting_Moldovan_President_Voronin_Reportedly_Resigns/1812942.html (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • Ria Novosti. 2013. Verfassungsgericht: Amtssprache in Moldawien ist Rumänisch. December 5. http://de.ria.ru/post_soviet_space/20131205/267422465.html (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • Roper, Steven D. 2002a. Are All Semipresidential Regimes the Same? A Comparison of Premier-Presidential Regimes. Comparative Politics 3(3): 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, Steven D. 2002b. Regionalism in Moldova. The case of transnistria and Gagauzia. In Ethnicity and territory in the former Soviet Union: Regions in conflict, ed. James Hughes and Gwendolyn Sasse, 101–122. London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, Steven D. 2005. The politicization of education: Identity formation in Moldova and Transnistria. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 38(4): 501–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, Steven D. 2008. From semi-presidentialism to parliamentarism: Regime change and presidential power in Moldova. Europe-Asia Studies 60(1): 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, Steven D. 2010. Moldova. In Central and Southeast European politics since 1989, ed. Sabrina P. Ramet, 473–491. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • von Steinsdorff, Silvia, and Anna Fruhstorfer. 2012. Post-Soviet de facto states in search of internal and external legitimacy. Introduction. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45(1–2): 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troebst, Stefan. 2001. Die Autonomieregelung für Gagausien in der Republik Moldau—ein Vorbild zur Regelung ethnopolitischer Konflikte? Berliner Osteuropa Info 17: 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursu, Valentina, and Coalson, Robert. 2011. Moldova’s Gagauz Region Struggles To Find Common Language With Chisinau. RFE/RL Feature, August 3. http://www.rferl.org/content/moldovas_gagauz_autonomous_region_struggles_to_find_a_common_language_with_chisinau/24285661.html (accessed July 3, 2015).

  • Zabarah, Dareg A. 2012. Opportunity structures and group building processes: An institutional analysis of the secession processes in Pridnestrovie and Gagauzia between 1989 and 1991. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45(1–2): 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Sources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Fruhstorfer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Constitutional Politics in Moldova 1994–2014

Appendix: Constitutional Politics in Moldova 1994–2014

Dates of Amendment and Implementation

Articles

Constitutional subfields

Short analysis of the reform process

07/19/1996

Art. 116

• Judiciary

• Regular amendment

• Main actors: unclear (final vote: not detectable)

• Initiated by President Snegur

07/05/2000

Art.74, 78, 80, 82–83 (deleted), 85, 89–91, 98, 100–102, 106A (new), 106B (new), 124, 131, 135–136, 141

• Legislation

• President

• Legislature

• Executive

• Judiciary

• Revision of the constitution

• Regular amendment with broad majority (final vote: 92 out of 101)

• Main actors: all parliamentary parties in conflict with the president (reaction to a referendum)

• Initiated by deputies

07/12/2001

Art. 24–25, 30, 54–55

• Fundamental rights and freedoms

• Regular amendment (final vote: not detectable)

• Initiated by deputies

11/21/2002

Art. 17–19

• Fundamental rights, freedoms and duties/citizenship

• Regular amendment (final vote: not detectable)

• initiated by deputies

11/21/2002

Art. 70

• Legislature

• Regular amendment (final vote: not detectable)

• Initiated by deputies

11/21/2002

Art. 115–116, 122–123

• Judiciary

• Regular amendment (final vote: not detectable)

• Initiated by deputies

07/25/2003

Art. 73, 110

• Legislation

• Administrative-territorial organization

• Regular amendment (voting results: not detectable)

• Initiated by deputies

06/29/2006

Art. 24

• Fundamental rights and freedoms

• Regular amendment (final vote: 82 out of 101)

• Initiated by deputies and government

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fruhstorfer, A. (2016). Moldova. In: Fruhstorfer, A., Hein, M. (eds) Constitutional Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13762-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics