Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Tobias FlessenkemperEmail author
Part of the Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft book series (VGPO)


Constitutional politics in Bosnia and Herzegovina are dominated by ethno-politics and the results of the 1992–1995 war. The constitution contained in the Dayton peace agreement of 1995 established a stable but inefficient consociational arrangement based on an ethno-territorial division of the country with particular rights for the three constituent peoples: Bosniaks, Croats and Serbs. In 2009, the European Court of Human Rights found that the constitution discriminates citizens who do not claim to belong to any of these constituent peoples. Furthermore, the European Union established constitutional reform as a precondition for Bosnia and Herzegovina’s further EU integration. However, the political representatives of the constituent peoples have resisted any calls for change so far.


Bosnia and Herzegovina Conditionality Constitutional politics Dayton agreement European integration European Union 


  1. Anderson, George, and Sujit Choudhry. 2015. Constitutional transitions and territorial cleavages. Stockholm: IDEA.Google Scholar
  2. Andjelic, Neven. 2003. Bosnia-Herzegovina. The end of a legacy. London: Cass.Google Scholar
  3. Arsenijević, Damir (ed.). 2015. Unbribable Bosnia and Herzegovina. The fight for the commons. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  4. Bahtić-Kunrath, Birgit. 2011. Of Veto players and entity-voting: Institutional gridlock in the Bosnian reform process. Nationalities Papers 39(6): 899–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calic, Marie-Janine. 1996. Krieg und Frieden in Bosnien und Herzegowina, 2nd ed. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Calic, Marie-Janine. 2011. The beginning of the end. The 1970s as a historical turning point in Yugoslavia. In The crisis of socialist modernity. The Soviet Union and Yugoslavia in the 1970s, ed. Marie-Janine Calic, Dieter Neutatz, and Julia Obertreis, 66–86. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  7. Flessenkemper, Tobias, and Tobias Bütow. 2011. Building and removing visa walls. On European integration of the Western Balkans. Security and Peace 29(3): 162–168.Google Scholar
  8. Flessenkemper, Tobias. 2012. Bosnien und Herzegowina und die Europäische Union. 20 schwierige Jahre. Südosteuropa Mitteilungen 52(2): 46–65.Google Scholar
  9. Gavrić, Saša, and Damir Banović. 2010. Constitutional Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Procedures, challenges, recommendations. Südosteuropa Mitteilungen 50(1): 60–75.Google Scholar
  10. Glaurdić, Josip. 2011. The hour of Europe: Western powers and the breakup of Yugoslavia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hays, Don, and Jason Crosby. 2006. From Dayton to Brussels.Constitutional preparations for Bosnia’s EU accession. United States Institute for Peace: Washington.Google Scholar
  12. Hoare, Marko-Attila. 2007. History of Bosnia and Herzegowina. From the middle ages to the present day. London: Saqi Books.Google Scholar
  13. Holbrooke, Richard. 1998. To end a war. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  14. International Crisis Group. 2014. Bosnia’s Future. Europe Report No. 232 (10 July 2014). Brussels: International Crisis Group. (accessed September 14, 2015).
  15. Katz, Vera. 2010. Parliamentarism in Bosnia and herzegovina in conditions of political pluralism (1990–1995). (accessed September 14, 2015).
  16. Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Marko, Joseph. 2006. Constitutional reform in Bosnia and herzegovina 2005–2006. European Yearbook of Minority Issues 5: 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mujkić, Asim. 2007. Mi, građani etnopolisa. Sarajevo: Šahinpašić.Google Scholar
  19. Ó Tuathail, Gearóid, John O’Loughlin, and Dino Djipa. 2006. Bosnia-herzegovina ten years after Dayton: Constitutional change and public opinion. Eurasian Geography and Economics 47(1): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Offe, Claus. 1991. Capitalism by democratic design? Democratic theory facing the triple transition in East Central Europe. Social Research 58: 865–892.Google Scholar
  21. Perry, Valerie. 2015. Not-so-great expectations. The EU and the constitutional politics of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In The EU and member state building. European foreign policy in the Western Balkans, ed. Soeren Keil, and Zeynep Arkan, 163–187. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Steiner, Christian, and Nedim Ademović. 2010. Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung: Commentary. Sarajevo.Google Scholar
  23. Toal, Gerard, and Carl T. Dahlman. 2011. Bosnia Remade. Ethnic cleansing and its reversal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tolksdorf, Dominik. 2012. Die EU und Bosnien-Herzegowina. Außenpolitik auf der Suche nach Kohärenz. Nomos: Baden-Baden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Bosnia and Herzegovina. 1995. Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina of December 14, 1995. (accessed August 11, 2015).
  2. Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2009. Amendment I to the constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (accessed August 11, 2015).
  3. Constitutional Court. 2000. Decision No. U 5/2000. Sarajevo, September 29. (accessed September 14, 2015).
  4. Council of the European Union. 2011. Conclusions on Bosnia and Herzegovina, Foreign Affairs Council, 3076th meeting, Brussels, 21 March 2011.Google Scholar
  5. Council of the European Union. 2015. Conclusions on Bosnia and Herzegovina, Foreign Affairs Council, 3379th meeting, Brussels, 16 March 2015.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission. 2014. Bosnia and Herzegovina progress report. SWD(2014)305final. Brussels, October 8. (accessed September 14, 2015).
  7. European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). 2005. Opinion on the constitutional situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Powers of the high representative, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 62nd plenary session (Venice, 11–12 March 2005). CDL-AD(2005)004-e. Venice, March 11 (accessed September 14, 2015).
  8. European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber. 2009. Case of Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (Applications nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06). Judgment. Strasbourg, December 22.{“itemid”:[“001-96491“]} (accessed September 14, 2015).
  9. GFAP. 1995. General framework agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Paris, December 14. (accessed September 14, 2015).
  10. Hahn, Johannes. 2014. European neighbourhood policy and enlargement negotiation. Opening Speech at the European Policy Centre. Brussels, December 3. (accessed September 14, 2015).
  11. Peace Implementation Council. 2008. Communiqué of the steering board of the peace implementation council. n.p., June 25. (accessed September 14, 2015).
  12. Peace Implementation Council. 2009. Communique of the steering board of the peace implementation Council. n.p., March 26. (accessed September 14, 2015).
  13. Peace Implementation Council. 2012. The peace implementation council and its steering board. n.p., February 16. (accessed September 14, 2015).

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European InstituteCIFENiceFrance

Personalised recommendations