Lifelogging pp 207-212 | Cite as


Embodying Data and Obliviating the lived body!?


The article considers the new culture of self-tracking in the frame of Foucault-inspired gouvernmentality studies. Following this, an empirical extension to these diagnoses is suggested to illustrate that numerical practices have the potential to affect the duality between the lived body and the corporeal body.


Corporeal Body Numerical Practice mHealth Technology Body Oblivion Blood Sugar Measurement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albrechtslund, A. (2013). Self-surveillance: How Quantification Practices and Monitoring Technologies Produce Subjectivity. In Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S), San Diego, CA, USA, 9-12 October 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In M. H. Luther; H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the Self (pp. 16-50). Amherst: University Press of Massachussetts.Google Scholar
  3. Foucault, M. (1989). Die Sorge um sich. Sexualität und Wahrheit, Vol. 3. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  4. Foucault, M. (2006). Sicherheit, Territorium, Bevölkerung. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität I. Vorlesung am Collège de France. 1977-1978. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  5. Fox, N. J. (1997). Is there life after Focault? Texts, frames and differends. In A. Petersen, & R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault: Health and Medicine (pp. 31-51). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Gelhard, A., & Alkemeyer, Th. (2013). Techniken der Subjektivierung. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605-622. doi: 10.1080/00071310020015280.
  8. Harrasser, K. (2013). Körper 2.0. Über die technische Erweiterbarkeit des Menschen. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  9. Langemeyer, I. (2007). Wo Handlungsfähigkeit ist, ist nicht immer schon Unterwerfung. Fünf Probleme des Gouvernementalitätsansatzes. In R. Anhorm, F. Bettinger, & J. Stehr (Eds.), Foucaults Machtanalytik und Soziale Arbeit. Eine kritische Einführung und Bestandsaufnahme (pp. 227-243). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  10. Lupton, D. (2013a). Understanding the human machine. IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY MAGAZINE, Winter 2013, 25-30. doi: 10.1109/MTS.2013.2286431.
  11. Lupton, D. (2013b). Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 393-403. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2013.794931.
  12. Lupton, D. (2014). Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics, In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design (pp. 77-86). New York.Google Scholar
  13. Mead, G. H. (1973). Geist Identität und Gesellschaft. Aus der Sicht des Sozialbehaviorismus. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Mol, A. (2000). What diagnostiv devices do: The case of blood sugar measurement. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 21, 9-22.Google Scholar
  15. Mol, A., & Law, J. (2004). Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: the Example of Hypoglycaemia. Body & Society, 10(2-3), 43-62. doi: 10.1177/1357034X04042932.
  16. Niewöhner, J., Kehl, Ch., & Beck, S. (2008). Wie geht Kultur unter die Haut – und wie kann man dies beobachten, In J. Niewöhner, Ch. Kehl, & S. Beck (Eds.), Wie geht Kultur unter die Haut? Emergente Praxen an der Schnittstelle von Medizin, Lebens- und Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 9-31). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  17. Pantzar, M., & Shove, E. (2005). Metering Everyday Life. In 17th Annual SASE Meeting: Budapest. Google Scholar
  18. Papadopoulos, D. (2010). “In the ruins of representation: Identity, individuality, subjectification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(1), 139-165.Google Scholar
  19. Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles. Societies, 4(1), 68-84. doi: 10.3390/soc4010068.
  20. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Selke, S. (2014). Lifelogging. Wie die digitale Selbstvermessung unsere Gesellschaft verändert. Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar
  22. Villa, P.-I. (2012). Die Vermessung des Selbst. Einsicht in die Logik zeitgenössischer Körperarbeit. Aviso, 3/2012, 14-19.Google Scholar
  23. Whitson, J. R. (2013). Gaming the Quantified Self. Surveillance & Society, 11(1/2), 163-176.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HamburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations