Factor analysis of the Revised Spontaneity Assessment Inventory (SAI-R)

  • David A. Kipper
  • Christopher R. Beasley
Hauptbeiträge

Abstract

The present study describes a factor analysis of the Revised Spontaneity Assessment Inventory (SAI-R), an original scale design to measure spontaneity. The analysis revealed three factors underlying the inventory. The first, titled vigor/ pleasure, suggests that spontaneity is a pleasurable and dynamic experience. The second factor, titled freedom, indicates that spontaneity is characterized by a sense of free expression and actions unhindered by conventions. The third factor, titled involvement/focus, indicates that spontaneity is focused experience a characteristics that separates it from impulsivity. These factors seemed consistent with the theoretical understanding of spontaneity.

Keywords

Spontaneity Factor analysis Measurement Psychodrama 

Faktorenanalyse des Revidierten Spontaneität Assessment Inventars

Zusammenfassung Faktorenanalyse des Revidierten Spontaneität Assessment Inventars (SAI-R)

Diese Studie beschreibt die Faktorenanalyse des Revidierten Spontaneität Assessment Inventars (SAI-R), eine Originalskala, die entwickelt wurde, um Spontaneität zu messen. Die Analyse zeigte drei Faktoren, die dem Inventar zu Grunde liegen. Der erste mit dem Titel Vitalität/Behagen, legt nahe, dass die Spontaneität eine angenehme und dynamische Erfahrung ist. Der zweite Faktor, betitelt mit Freiheit, besagt, dass Spontaneität im Sinne des freien Ausdrucks und Handlung sich von Konventionen nicht behindern lässt. Der dritte Faktor, mit dem Titel Beteiligtsein/Fokus, zeigt an, dass Spontaneität eine Eigenschaft des Erlebens ist, die anders als Impulsivität zu verstehen ist. Diese Faktoren sind konsistent mit dem theoretischen Verständnis der Spontaneität.

Schlüsselwörter

Spontaneität Faktorenanalyse Test Psychodrama 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baim, C., Burmeister, J., & Marciel, M. (Eds.). (2007). Psychodrama: Advances in theory and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Blatner, A. (2000). Foundations of psychodrama (4th ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 10, 1–9.Google Scholar
  4. Davelaar, P. M., Araujo, F. S., & Kipper, D. A. (2008). The Revised Spontaneity Assessment Inventory (SAI-R): Relationship to goal orientation, motivation, perceived self-efficacy, and self-esteem. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 35, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fiumara, G. C. (2009). Spontaneity: A psychoanalytic Inquiry. New York: Routlege.Google Scholar
  6. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kellar, H., Treadwell, T. W., Kumar, V. A., & Leach, E. S. (2002). The Personal Attitude Scale-II: A revised measure of spontaneity. Journal of Action Methods Psychodrama, Skill Training and Role Playing, 55, 35–46.Google Scholar
  9. Kipper, D. A., & Shemer, H. (2006). The Revised Spontaneity Assessment Inventory (SAI-R): Spontaneity, well-being, and stress. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama & Sociometry, 59, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kipper, D. A., Davelaar, P. S., & Herst, S. (2009). The relationship between spontaneity and inhibition. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 36, 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kipper, D. A., Green, D. J., & Prorak, A. (2010). The relationship among spontaneity, impulsivity, and creativity. Journal of Creativity and Mental Health, 5, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moreno, J. L. (1953). Who shall survive? Beacon: Beacon House.Google Scholar
  13. Moreno, J. L. (1964). Psychodrama Vol. 1. Beacon: Beacon House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Kipper
    • 1
  • Christopher R. Beasley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington CollegeChestertownUSA

Personalised recommendations