Skip to main content

Research Ethics in the Doctoral Project “Boundary Management in Social Media Communication”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The authors doctoral project focus on the private and personal social media communication of employees and how it is affecting economic interests of their employers. The research on private and personal content is limited by ethical concerns, such as accessing private social media profiles for the observation of communication behavior or introducing instruments to control or manipulate private affairs of employees to achieve economic benefits. This paper explains the ethical doubts and presents possibilities to respect moral standards in conducting research on social media communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boyd, D. (2010). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z. Papacharissi (eds.), Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959): The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, D. (2014): Crossing Public-Private and Personal-Professional Boundaries: How Changes in Technology May Affect CEOs’ Communication. In: Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 2014, Vol. 77(1), pp. 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, J. & Gray, D. (2007): Making a Drama Out of a Crisis a Dramaturgical Perspective on th new technology Controversy. In: Journal of Risk Research 2007, Vol. 10(8), pp. 1065-1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2013). A networked self: Identity performance and sociability on social network sites. In F. L. F. Lee, L. Leung, J. L. Qiu & D. S. C. Chu (eds.), Frontiers in new media research, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 207-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleil, T. & Zerfaß, A. (2007). Internet und Social Software in der Unternehmenskommunikation. In M. Piwinger & A. Zerfaß (Ed.), Handbuch Unternehmenskommunikation (pp. 511-533). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J.-H. (2013): Social Media. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, M. (2011): Self-Protection of Online Privacy: A Behavioral Approach. In: S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (eds.), Privacy online: perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 111-125). Heidelberg, New York: Springer. Bullinger, Hans J.: (2012). Forschen für die Stadt von morgen. In: weiter.vorn Das Fraunhofer-Magazin, (4).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana Riedel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Riedel, J. (2018). Research Ethics in the Doctoral Project “Boundary Management in Social Media Communication”. In: Dobrick, F., Fischer, J., Hagen, L. (eds) Research Ethics in the Digital Age. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12908-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12909-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics