Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interne informelle Wissenschaftskommunikation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation

Zusammenfassung

In der kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Forschung zu Wissenschaftskommunikation wird informelle Kommunikation bisher kaum thematisiert. Wichtig ist sie jedoch in den kommunikativen Prozessen der Wissensproduktion. Informelle Wissenschaftskommunikation ist traditionell eher interpersonal, wird aber durch die Entwicklung neuer Medientechnologien zunehmend mediatisiert. In diesem Beitrag werden nach einer Definition bzw. Abgrenzung des Bereichs der informellen Wissenschaftskommunikation die beiden dominanten Forschungstraditionen zu Struktur (Informationswissenschaften) und Prozessen (Wissenschaftsethnologie) dargestellt, gefolgt von der neueren Entwicklung der Integration dieser beiden Traditionen. Den Abschluss bildet die Darstellung des Forschungsstands zu mediatisierter informeller Wissenschaftskommunikation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Empfohlene Literatur

  • Garvey, W. D. (1979). Communication: the essence of science – Facilitating information exchange among librariens, scientists, engineers and students. Pergamon Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In: Borgman, C. L. (Hrsg.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (S. 59-69). Newbury Park, CA. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A. (2010). Social media and the production of knowledge. A return to little science? Social Epistemology 24(3), 219-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C. (2014). Mediatisierte wissenschaftsinterne Kommunikation: Stand der Forschung und theoretische Rahmung. kommunikation@gesellschaft 15, 20 S. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-378465

Literatur

  • Abelson, P. H. (1980). Scientific communication. Science 209(4452), 60-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Aufi, A., & Fulton, C. (2014). Use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication in humanities and social sciences disciplines. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 147, 436-445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, A., Fritz, G. & Gloning, T. (2012). Digitale Wissenschaftskommunikation 2010-2011: Eine Online-Befragung. Gießen: Gießener Elektronische Bibliothek. http://geb.unigiessen.de/geb/volltexte/2012/8539/pdf/BaderDigitale_Wissenschaftskommunikation.pdf. Zugriff: 30. März 2013.

  • Barjak, F. (2006) The role of the internet in informal scholarly communication. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(10), 1350–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992). Homo academicus. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. & Wendt K. (1991). Electronic mail and scientific communication. A study of SOAR extended research group. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 12, 406–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimenler, O., Reeves, K. A., & Skvoretz, J. (2015). An evaluation of collaborative research in a college of engineering. Journal of Infometrics 9, 577-590. doi: 10.106/j.joi.2015.05.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1995). Places of inquiry: Research and advanced education in modern universities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, S., & Meadows, J. (2000). The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists. Journal of Information Science. doi: 10.1177/0165551004233258

  • Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (2003). Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures. Keynote address to the conference scholarly tribes and tribulations: How tradition and technology are driving disciplinary change. ARL Washington DC. http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/cronin.pdf. Zugegriffen: 30. März 2013.

  • Fleck, L. (1980). Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frandsen, T. F. (2009). The effect of open access on un-plublished documents: A case study of economics working papers. Journal of Infometrics. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2008.12.002

  • Fry, J. (2004a). Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach. Information Processing and Management 42, 299-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J. (2004b). The cultural shaping of ICTs within academic fields: corpus-based linguistic as a case study. Literacy and Linguistic Computing 19, 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J., & Talja, S. (2007) The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. Journal of Information Science 33(2), 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, W. D. (1979). Communication: the essence of science – Facilitating information exchange among librariens, scientists, engineers and students. Pergamon Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, W. D., & Griffith B. C. (1967). Scientific communication as a social system. Science 157(3792), 1011-1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1972). Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology. Information Storage and Retrieval 8, 123-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsparg, P. (1994). First steps towards electronic research communication. Computers in Physics 8, 390–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloning, T & Fritz, G. (Hg.) (2011). Digitale Wissenschaftskommunikation – Formate und ihre Nutzung. Gießener Elektronische Bibliothek. http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2011/8227/ Zugegriffen: 18. Dezember 2011.

  • Gloning, T. (2011). Interne Wissenschaftskommunikation im Zeichen der Digitalisierung. Formate, Nutzungsweisen, Dynamik. In: Gloning, T. & Fritz, G. (Hg.).: Digitale Wissenschaftskommunikation – Formate und ihre Nutzung. Gießener Elektronische Bibliothek. http://geb.unigiessen.de/geb/volltexte/2011/8227/ Zugegriffen: 18. Dezember 2011.

  • Goodwin, S., Jeng, W., & He, D. (2014). Changing communication on ResearchGate through interface updates. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. doi: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101129

  • Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 2340-2350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, F. (2011). Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media. The Electronic Library 29(6), 762-776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (1991). Post-Gutenberg galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production of knowledge. Public Access Computer Systems Review 2, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, B. (1993). Wissenschaft im Kontext: neuere Entwicklungstendenzen der Wissenschaftssoziologie. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 45(3), 528-552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaden, B. (2009). Library 2.0 und Wissenschaftskommunikation. Berlin: Simon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, C. (1968). Power, influence and social circles: a new methodology for studying opinion makers. American Sociological Review 33, 685-698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. (2004). The internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing. In: Blaise C. (Hg.): Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (S. 591–631). Medford, NJ: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. & Callahan, E. (2001). Electronic journals, the internet, and scholarly communication. In: Blaise C. (Hg.), Annual Review of Communication Science and Technology (S. 122-177). Medford, NJ: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. & Mc Kim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci 51(14), 1306–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1984). Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis. Zur Anthropologie der Naturwissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (2002). Wissenskulturen. Ein Vergleich naturwissenschaftlicher Wissensformen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K., & Mulkay, M. (Hrsg.) (1983). Science observed / perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, D., & Moskaliuk, J. (2009). Onlinestudie: Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten im Web 2.0. e-learning and education Journal (eleed) 5. http://eleed.campussource.de/archive/5/1842. Zugegriffen: 30.3.2013.

  • Kuhn, T. (1967). Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, W. B., & Bush, L. (1983). Informal scientific communication in the agricultural sciencees. Information Processing & Management 19(4), 193-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In: Borgman, C. L. (Hrsg.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (S. 59-69). Newbury Park, CA. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A. (2010). Social media and the production of knowledge. A return to little science? Social Epistemology 24(3), 219-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A., & Carley, K. (1990). Changing patterns of communication among scientists in an era of “telescience”. Technology in Society 12, 457-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C. (2014a). Mediatisierte wissenschaftsinterne Kommunikation: Stand der Forschung und theoretische Rahmung. kommunikation@gesellschaft 15, 20 S. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-378465

  • Lüthje, C. (2014b): Medienwandel und Wissenschaft: Feldspezifische Mediatisierung. In: Löw, Martina (Hrsg.): Vielfalt und Zusammenhalt. Verhandlungen des 36. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Bochum und Dortmund 2012. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C. (2015). Medienwandel – soziokultureller Wandel – Wissenschaftswandel: Transformationsfaktoren der internen Wissenschaftskommunikation. In: Schäfer, M. S., Kristiansen, S., & Bonfadelli, H. (Hrsg.), Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel (S. 44-67). Köln: Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C., & Neverla, I. (2012). Wissen, Diskurse, Erzählungen im Kontext von Medialisierung. Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zur sozialen Konstruktion von Klimawandel. In: Schäfer, M. S., & Neverla, I. (Hrsg.), Das Medien-Klima. Fragen und Befunde der kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Klimaforschung (S. 143-169). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matzat, U. (2004). Academic communication and Internet Discussion Groups: transfer of information or creation of social contacts? Social Networks 26(3), 221–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science 159, 59-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, N. C. (1968). The distribution of social and cultural properties in informal communication networks among biological scientists. American Sociological Review 33(5), 786-797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2007). Die akademische Elite. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Information Services & Use 31, 61-83. doi: 10.3233/ISU-2011-0623

  • Nielsen, K. H. (2012). Scientific communication and the nature of science. Science & Education. doi: 10.1007/s1191-012-9475-3

  • Noam, E. M. (1995). Electronics and the dim future of the university. Science and Public Policy 270, 247-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, C. F., & Stratton, K. (2015). Improving scientific communication and publication output in a multidisciplinary laboratory: Changing culture through staff development workshops. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference 978-1-4799-3374-7/15/$31.00

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Procter, R., Williams, R., & James, S. (2010). If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and uses web 2.0. Research Information Network RIN. http://rinarchive.jisc-collections.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/. Zugegriffen: 11. Januar 2012.

  • Schäfer, Mike S. (2014): The Media in the Labs, and the Labs in the Media. What we Know about the Mediatization of Science. in Lundby, Knut (Ed.): Mediatization of Communication. Vol. 21 of the „Handbooks of Communication Science“. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 571-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sondergaard, T. F., Andersen, J., & Hjorland, B. (2003). Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information – revising and updating the UNISIST model. Journal of Documentation 59(3), 278-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. & Kousha, K. (2014a). Acedemia.edu: Social network or academic network? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. doi: 10.1002/asi.23038

  • Thelwall, M. & Kousha, K. (2014b). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communication, and measuring scholarship? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.23236

  • Tuire, P. & Erno, L. (2001). Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relations within an educational research community. A Finnish case. Higher Education 42, 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, K. (2012). Informelle Wissenschaftskommunikation und Social Media. Berlin: Frank und Timme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S. (Hrsg.) (2008). The new invisible college. Science for development. Washington: Brookings Inst. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P., & Bayma, T. (1996). Computer Networks and Scientific Work. Social Studies of Science 26(3), 661–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (2), 152-168. doi: 10.1002/asi.20256

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rostock, Deutschland

    Corinna Lüthje

Authors
  1. Corinna Lüthje
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinna Lüthje .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Zürich IPMZ, Zürich, Switzerland

    Heinz Bonfadelli

  2. FWB, Deutsche Universität für Weiterbildung, Berlin, Germany

    Birte Fähnrich

  3. Institut für Medienforschung, Universität Rostock, Rostock, Germany

    Corinna Lüthje

  4. IFG Umwelt, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany

    Jutta Milde

  5. Zeppelin Universität, Friedrichshafen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Markus Rhomberg

  6. Universität Zürich Inst. für Publizistikwiss., Zürich, Switzerland

    Mike S. Schäfer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lüthje, C. (2017). Interne informelle Wissenschaftskommunikation. In: Bonfadelli, H., Fähnrich, B., Lüthje, C., Milde, J., Rhomberg, M., Schäfer, M. (eds) Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12898-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12898-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12897-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12898-2

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation