Unterstützung im alternden Europa – Ein Blick in den Stand der Forschung zum Zusammenspiel von Familie und Staat

Chapter
Part of the Dortmunder Beiträge zur Sozialforschung book series (SOZF)

Zusammenfassung

Die Alterung ‚westlicher‘ Gesellschaften und damit die absolut und relativ steigende Zahl Älterer und Hochbetagter, so viel scheint klar, führt zu einer steigenden Belastung Jüngerer; und zwar nicht allein im Hinblick auf die vieldiskutierten umlagefinanzierten Rentensysteme sondern auch im Hinblick auf steigenden Pflegebedarf. Dem stehen allerdings wohl auch mehr finanzielle und gesundheitliche Ressourcen Älterer aufgrund einer – zumindest heute noch oft – relativ großzügigen Rente und einer steigenden Zahl gesunder oder zumindest behinderungsfreier Lebensjahre entgegen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Attias-Donfut, C., & Wolff, F.-C. (2000). Complementarity between private and public transfers. In S. Arber & C. Attias-Donfut (Eds.). The myth of generational conflict: The family and state in ageing societies (pp. 47–68). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Daatland, S. O. (1990). What are families for? On family solidarity and preference for help. Ageing & Society, 10, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daatland, S. O., & Herlofson, K. (2003). Families and welfare states: Substitution or complementarity. In A. Lowenstein & J. Ogg (Eds.). OASIS: Old age and autonomy—the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. The final report (pp. 281-305). Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa.Google Scholar
  4. Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., Schaan, B., Stuck, S., & Zuber, S. on behalf of the SHARE Central Coordination Team. (2013). Data resource profile: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology, DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt088.Google Scholar
  5. Bengtson, V. L., & Roberts, R. E. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 856–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandt, M. 2013. Intergenerational help and public support in Europe. A case of specialization? European Societies, 15, 26–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandt, M. & Deindl, C. (2013). Intergenerational transfers to adult children in Europe: Do social policies matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt, M., Haberkern, K., & Szydlik, M. (2009). Intergenerational help and care in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25, 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crimmins, E.M., & Beltrán-Sánchez, H. (2010). Mortality and morbidity trends: is there compression of morbidity? Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 66B(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deindl, C., & Brandt, M. (2015a, i. E.). Support networks of childless older people: informal and formal support in Europe. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  11. Deindl, C. & Brandt, M. (2015b, i. E.). Social exclusion and support between generations in Europe. In A. Börsch-Supan, T. Kneip, H. Litwin, M. Myck & G. Weber (Eds.). Ageing in Europe. Supporting policies for an inclusive society. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Deindl, C., & Brandt, M. (2011). Financial support and practical help between older parents and their middle-aged children in Europe. Ageing & Society, 31, 642–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deindl, C., & Isengard, B. (2011). Familiale Unterstützung und soziale Ungleichheit in Europa. In P. A. Berger, K. Hank & A. Tölke (Eds.). Reproduktion von Ungleichheit durch Arbeit und Familie (pp. 23–47). Wiesbaden: VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haberkern, K., & Szydlik, M. (2010). State care provision, societal opinion and children’s care of older parents in 11 European countries, Ageing & Society, 30, 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Igel, C., & Szydlik, M. (2011). Grandchild care and welfare state arrangements in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 21, 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansson, L., Sundström, G., & Hassing, L. B. (2003). State provision down, offspring’s up: The reverse substitution of old-age care in Sweden. Ageing and Society, 23, 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kasearu, K. & Kutsar, D. (2013). Intergenerational solidarity in families: interplay between the family and the state . In I. Albert & D. Ferring (Eds.). Intergenerational Relations: European Perspectives in Family and Society (pp. 25-38).The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ko, P.-C., & Hank, K. (2014). Grandparents caring for grandchildren in China and Korea: findings from CHARLS and KLOSA. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 646–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Künemund, H., & Rein, M. (1999). There is more to receiving than needing: Theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing and Society, 19, 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lingsom, S. (1997). The substitution issue. Care policies and their consequences for family care. Oslo: Norwegian Social Research.Google Scholar
  21. Litwak, E., Silverstein, M., Bengtson, V. L., & Wilson Hirst, Y. (2003). Theories about families, organizations and social supports. In V. L. Bengtson & A. Lowenstein (Eds.). Global aging and challenges to families (pp. 27–53). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  22. Lowenstein, A. & Ogg, J. (Eds.) (2003). OASIS: Old age and autonomy—the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. The final report. Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa.Google Scholar
  23. Isengard, B. & Szydlik, M. (2012). Living apart (or) together? Coresidence of elderly parents and their adult children in Europe. Research on Aging, 34, 449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C., & von Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2005). Welfare states do not crowd out the family: Evidence for mixed responsibility from comparative analyses. Ageing and Society, 25, 863–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pickard, L. (2012). Substitution between formal and informal care: a ‘natural experiment’ in social policy in Britain between 1985 and 2000. Ageing and Society, 32, 1147–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmid, T., Brandt, M., & Haberkern, K. (2012).Gendered support to older parents: Do welfare states matter? European Journal of Ageing, 9, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Szydlik, M. (2000). Lebenslange Solidarität? Generationenbeziehungen zwischen erwachsenen Kindern und Eltern. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  28. Wagner, M. & Brandt, M. (2015, i. E.). Loneliness among informal caregivers aged 50+ in Europe. In A. Börsch-Supan, T. Kneip, H. Litwin, M. Myck & G. Weber (Eds.). Ageing in Europe. Supporting policies for an inclusive society. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für SoziologieTU DortmundDortmundDeutschland

Personalised recommendations