Manifestations of the Posthuman in the Postsecular Imagination

  • Elaine Graham
Part of the Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society book series (TEWG)


This paper sketches out the beginnings of a conversation between two contemporary concepts in critical theory: the posthuman (or post/human) and the postsecular. They have shared origins in the critique of the assumptions that shaped Western modernity, particularly the elevation of the human subject as autonomous and self-determining, distinguished from animals, nature, and machines but also uniquely rational and unconstrained by the bounds of superstition, tradition, and religion.


Social Capital Human Nature Christian Theology Religious Revival Western Modernity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Badmington, N. (Ed.) (2000). Posthumanism. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Badmington, N. (2004). Post, oblique, human. Theology & Sexuality, 10 (2), 56–64.Google Scholar
  4. Beckford, J. A. (2012). Public religions and the postsecular: Critical reflections. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51 (1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, P. (1999). The desecularization of the world: A global overview. In P. Berger (Ed.), The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics (pp. 1–18). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  6. Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Borgmann, A. (2003). Power failure: Christianity in the culture of technology. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos.Google Scholar
  8. Bostrom, N. (2003). The transhumanist FAQ: A general introduction, version 3.0. Available at
  9. Bracke, S. (2008). Conjugating the modern/religious, conceptualizing female religious agency: Contours of a “post-secular” conjuncture. Theory, Culture and Society, 6 (2), 51–67.Google Scholar
  10. Braidotti, R. (2008). In spite of the times: The postsecular turn in feminism. Theory, Culture and Society, 25 (6), 1–24.Google Scholar
  11. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Braun, B. (2004). Querying posthumanisms. Geoforum, 35 (3), 269–273.Google Scholar
  13. Bukatman, S. (1993). Terminal identity: The virtual subject in post-modern science fiction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, J. (2008). Sexual politics, torture, and secular time. British Journal of Sociology, 59 (1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  15. Calhoun, C. (2010). Rethinking secularism. Hedgehog Review, 12 (3), 34–48.Google Scholar
  16. Calhoun, C. (2012). Time, world, and secularism. In P.S. Gorki, D.K. Kim, J. Torpey, & J. Van Antwerpen (Eds.), The Post-secular in question: Religion in contemporary society (pp. 335–364). New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Casanova, J. (1994). Religions in the modern world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, D. (1995). Technology: Liberation or enslavement? In R. Fellows (Ed.), Philosophy and technology (pp. 7–18). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Davie, G. (2002). Europe: The exceptional case. Parameters of faith in the modern world. London, England: Darton, Longman and Todd.Google Scholar
  20. Dawkins, R. (2008). The God delusion. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  21. Dennett, D. (2007). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. London, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Dillon, M. (2010). Can post-secular society tolerate religious differences? Sociology of Religion, 71 (2), 139–156.Google Scholar
  23. Dinham, A. (2012). Faith and social capital after the debt crisis. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eagleton, T. (2014). Culture and the death of God. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Eisenstadt, S. (2000). The reconstruction of religious arenas in the framework of “multiple modernities.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29 (3), 591–611.Google Scholar
  26. Ellul, J. (1965). The technological society. (J. Wilkinson, Trans.) (R. Merton, Intro.). London, England: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  27. Gane, N. (2006). When we have never been human, what is to be done? An interview with Donna Haraway. Theory, Culture and Society, 23 (7–8), 135–158.Google Scholar
  28. Garner, S. (2011). The hopeful cyborg. in R. Cole-Turner (Ed.), Transhumanism and transcendence, pp. 87–100. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Graham, E. (2002). Representations of the post/human: Monsters, aliens and others in popular culture. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Graham, E.( 2003). Frankensteins and cyborgs: Visions of the global future in an age of technology. Studies in Christian Ethics, 16 (1), 29–43.Google Scholar
  31. Graham, E. (2013). Between a rock and a hard place: Public theology in a post-secular age. London, England: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  32. Habermas, J. (2008). Religion in the public sphere: Cognitive presuppositions for the “public use of reason” by religious and secular citizens. In J. Habermas, (Ed.), Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essay (pp. 114–147). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Habermas, J. (2010). An awareness of what is missing. In J. Habermas et al., An awareness of what is missing: Faith and reason in a post-secular age (pp. 15–23). Cambridge, England: Polity.Google Scholar
  34. Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–182). London, England: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  35. Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.). Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Harris, S. (2005). The end of faith: Religion, terror, and the future of reason. London, England: Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hefner, P. (2003). Technology and human becoming. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.Google Scholar
  39. Heidegger, M. (1993 [1954]). The question of technology. In D.F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings (pp. 307–342). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. London, England: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  41. Hitchens, C. (2007). God is not great: How religion poisons everything. New York, NY: Warner Twelve.Google Scholar
  42. Humanity+ (2002). Transhumanist FAQ 3.0. Available at:
  43. Jantzen, G. M. (1998). Becoming divine: Towards a feminist philosophy of religion. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kelsey, D. (1998). Human being. In P. Hodgson & R. H. King (Eds.), Christian theology: An introduction to its traditions and tasks (pp. 167–193). London, England: SPCK.Google Scholar
  45. Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines. London, England: Orion.Google Scholar
  46. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. (C. Porter, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Mazlish, B. (1993). The fourth discontinuity: The co-evolution of humans and machines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. McKenny, G. (2011). Transcendence, technological enhancement, and Christian theology. In Ronald Cole-Turner (Ed.), Transhumanism and transcendence: Christian hope in an age of technological enhancement (pp. 177–192). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Noble, D. (1999). The religion of technology: The divinity of man and the spirit of invention (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  50. Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2012). The global religious landscape: A report on the size and distribution of the world’s major religious groups as of 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  51. Sandal, N. A. (2012). The clash of public theologies? Rethinking the concept of religion in global politics. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 37 (1), 66–83.Google Scholar
  52. Sandercock, L. (2006). Spirituality and the urban professions: The paradox at the heart of planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 7 (1), 65–97.Google Scholar
  53. Simon, B. (2003). Toward a critique of posthuman futures. Cultural Critique, 53, 1, 1–9.Google Scholar
  54. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Belknapp Press of the Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Thweatt-Bates, J. (2012). Cyborg selves: A theological anthropology of the posthuman. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  56. Ward, G. (2000). Cities of God. London, England: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  58. Žižek, S. (2003). The puppet and the dwarf: The perverse core of Christianity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ChesterUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations