Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Energiewende

Pfadbruch oder Manifestierung des Ausgangspfades?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Innovationsgesellschaft heute

Zusammenfassung

Geprägt von einer Semantik des Neuen, haben wir es bei der Energiewende mit einem lebhaft gesellschaftlich reflektierten Umbruch zu tun. Dabei kamen bewegte Innovationsbiographien bei der Etablierung erneuerbarer Energien wie der Windenergie zustande. Gesellschaftlich veränderte Werthaltungen nach einschneidenden Krisen (Chernobyl, Fukushima und andere) erlaubten eine umwelt- und innovationspolitisch motivierte Pfadkreation für die Energiewende. Die so geschaffenen Rahmenbedingungen wie vor allem garantierte Stromeinspeisetarife erwiesen sich als wirkungsvoll. Zuletzt zeigte sich die ebenso innovative wie komplexe Transformation des Energiesystems als zunehmend schwerer steuerbar, zumal aufgrund vielfältiger Querbezüge (Stromerzeugung, -transport und -speicherung). Auch in der gesellschaftlichen Reflektion überlagern teils widerständige Akzeptanzmuster das Geschehen. Der Beitrag mündet in die Fragestellung, ob jüngeres politisches Eingreifen in die Innovationsbiographien von Wind- und Solarenergie eine Manifestierung der Ausgangskonstellation erlauben – oder ob gleichzeitig wiedererstarkte Konstellationen des fossilen Energiesystems, sich ebenso auf technologische Innovationen wie unkonventionelle Öl- und Gasförderung oder unterirdische Kohlenstoffeinlagerung berufend, zu einem „re-lock-in“ führen können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aas, O., Devine-Wright, P., Taneland, T., & Batel, S. (2014). Public believes about highvoltage powerlines in Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom: A comparative survey. Energy Research & Social Science 2, 30-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alphen, K. van, Voorst tot Voorst, Q. van, Hekkert, M. P., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies. Energy Policy 35, 4368-4380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alphen, K. van, Ruijven, J. van, Kasa, S., Hekkert, M., & Turkenburg, W. (2009). The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system. Energy Policy 37, 43-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. (2015). Windenergie im Wald – eine Konstellationsanalyse am Fallbeispiel des Windparks Ellern im Soonwald/ Hunsrück. Bachelorarbeit am Fachgebiet Umweltprüfung und Umweltplanung, TU Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, P., Dolan, L., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). Global patterns of renewable energy innovation, 1990-2009. Energy for Sustainable Development 17, 288-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechberger, M., Mez, L., & Sohre, A. (2008). Windenergie im Ländervergleich: Steuerungsimpulse, Akteure und technische Entwicklungen in Deutschland, Dänemark, Spanien und Großbritannien. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell, D. (2013). The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy. Energy Policy 58, 189-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer, M. (2012). Regional protests against new power lines: How citizen action groups make sense of mass media. UVP-report 26 (5), 217-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E., Köppel, J., Ohlhorst, D., & Schön, S. (2008). Die Innovationsbiographie der Windenergie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Absichten und Wirkungen von Steuerungsimpulsen. Berlin: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E., Ohlhorst, D., Wenzel, B., & Köppel J. (2011). Renewable energies. In E. Bruns, J. Köppel, D. Ohlhorst & S. Schön (Hrsg.), Germany´s Electricity Market. A Biography of the Innovation Process. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciupuliga, A. R., & Cuppen, E. (2013). The role of dialogue in fostering acceptance of transmission lines: the case of a France-Spain interconnection project. Energy Policy 60, 224-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsatea, T. D. (2014). Technological capabilities for innovation activities across Europe: Evidence from wind, solar and bioenergy technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 37, 469-479. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, M., Rattle, I., & Alstine, J. V. (2014). Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy 73, 427-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darmani, A., Arvidsson, N., Hidalgo, A., & Albors, J. (2014). What drives the development of renewable energy technologies? Toward a typology for the systemic drivers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 38, 834-847.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75 (2), 332-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. (2012). The politics of ”Fracking”: Regulating Natural Gas Drilling Practices in Colorado and Texas. Review of Policy Research 29 (2), 177-191. doi: 10.1111/j.15411338.2011.00547.x.

  • Davis, C., & Fisk, J. M. (2014). Energy Abundance or Environmental Worries? Analyzing Public Support for Fracking in the United States. Review of Policy Research 31 (1), 1–16. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Think global, act local? The relvance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Global Environmental Change 23, 61-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dütschke, E. (2011). What drives local public acceptance – comparing two cases from Germany. Energy Procedia 4, 6234-6240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, J., Kempton, W., Lilley, M. B., & Samoteskul, K. (2012). Public acceptance of offshore wind power across regions and through time. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 55, 1369-1386. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.682782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsa (2013). Verbraucherinteressen in der Energiewende. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung. Berlin, zuletzt geprüft am 14.08.2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxon, T., & Pearson, P. (2008). Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: Some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 148-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxon, T. J., Grossa, R., Chase, A., Howes, J., Arnall, A., & Anderson, D. (2005). UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures. Energy Policy 33, 2123–2137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxon, T. J. (2013). Technological Lock-In. Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource and Environmental Economic, 123-127. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375067-9.00067-X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, G. (2014). The Governance of Innovations in the Energy Sector: Between Adaptation and Exploration. Science & Technology Studies 27 (1), 34-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies 47, 760-774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartman, V., Wichmann, K., Bulling, L. E., Huesca-Pérez, M. E., & Köppel, J. (2014). Wind of change or wind of challenges: Implementation factors regarding wind energy development, an international perspective. AIMS Energy 2 (4), 485-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geißler, G., Köppel, J. & Gunther, P. (2013). Wind energy and environmental assessments – A hard look at two forerunners’ approaches: Germany and the United States. Renewable Energy (51), 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, T. M., & Vogt, C. (2014). Residents’ perceptions of wind turbines: An analysis of two townships in Michigan. Energy Policy 65, 251-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, A., & Bryngelsson, M. (2009). Expert opinions on carbon dioxide capture and storage – A framing of uncertainties and possibilities. Energy Policy 37, 2273-2282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecking, Claus (2014). Weltweiter Energieboom: Comeback der Kohle. Im Westen gilt Kohle als Relikt der industriellen Frühzeit, doch der Rohstoff wird zum wichtigsten Energieträger der Welt. Kein Brennstoff ist so billig wie der Klimakiller Nummer eins. In: Spiegel Online Wissenschaft, 29.01.2014. Online unter http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/natur/kohle-wird-wichtigster-energietraeger-der-welt-noch-vor-oel-a-946168.html, Zugegriffen: 26.08.2014.

  • Hellström, M., Ruuska, I., Wikström, K., & Jafs, D. (2013). Project governance and path creation in early stages of Finnish nuclear power projects. International Journal of Project Management 31, 712-723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holohan, R., & Arnold, G. (2013). An institutional theory of hydraulic fracturing policy. Ecological Economics 94, 127-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, van der, D. (2007). NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the policies of voiced opinions in renwable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 35, 2705-2714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijts, N. M. A., Midden, C. J. H., & Meijnders, A. L. (2007). Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage. Energy Policy 35, 2780-2789.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. Von Stechow, T. Zwickel & J. C. Minx (Hrsg.)]. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, S., & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34, 256-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolivet, E., & Heiskanen, E. (2010). Blowing against the wind – An explanatory application of actot network theory to the analysis of local controversies and participation processes in wind energy. Energy Policy 38, 6746-6754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnøe, P., & Garud, R. (2012). Path Creation: Co-creation of Heterogeneous Resources in the Emergence of the Danish Wind Turbine Cluster. European Planning Studies 20 (5), 733-752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S., Odparlik, L. F., & Köppel, J. (2014). Wo steht die Partizipation beim Netzausbau? Eine Analyse der Beteiligungsverfahren zu ausgewählten Projekten aus dem Badarfsplan des Energieleitungsausbaus. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 46 (4), 116-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köppel, J., Dahmen, M., Helfrich, J., Schuster, E., & Bulling, L. (2014). Cautious but Committed: Moving Toward Adaptive Planning and Operation Strategies for Renewable Energy’s Wildlife Implications. Environmental Management, doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0333-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke, J., Geißler, G., & Köppel, J. (2012). Der neue Offshore-Netzplan zur Regelung der Anbindung von Offshore Windparks. Analyse und Diskussion der Prüfung seiner Umweltauswirkungen. UVP-report 26 (3+4), 183-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcraft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences 42 (4), 323-340. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges, R., & Beyer, G. (2013). Energiewende und Übertragungsnetzausbau: Sind Erdkabel ein Instrument zur Steigerung der gesellschaftlichen Akzeptanz des Leitungsbaus? Eine empirische Untersuchung auf Basis der Kontingenten Bewertungsmethode. Z. Energiewirtsch. 37 (4), S. 277-295. doi: 10.1007/s12398-013-0118-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, U., & Schubert, C. (2007). Integrating path dependency and path creation in a general understanding of path constitution. The role of agency and institutions in the stabilisation of technological innovations. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 2007 (3), 23-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. M. (2013). Managing the Energiewende – A Constallation Analysis of the Pumped Hydro Energy Power Plant Blautal. Master Thesis. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin. Fachgebiet für Umweltprüfung und Umweltplanung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. M., & Köppel, J. (2014). Managing the Energiewende – A Constellation Analysis of the Pumped Hydro Energy Power Plant Blautal. ISSRM (20st International Symposium on Society and Resource Management), Konferenzbeitrag, 13.06.2014, Hannover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadai, A. (2007). „Planning”, „siting”, and the local acceptance of wind power: Some lessons from the French case. Energy Policy 35, 2715-2726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesta, L., Vona, F., & Nicolli, F. (2014). Environmental policies, competition and innovation in renewable energy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 67, 396-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordensvärd J., & Urban, F. (2015). The stuttering energy transition in Germany: Wind energy policy and feed-in tariff lock-in. Energy Policy 82, 156-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltra, C., Sala, R., Solà, R., Di Masso, M., & Rowe, G. (2010). Lay perceptions of carbon capture and storage technology. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 698-706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portman, M. E., Duff, J. A., Köppel, J., Reisert, J., & Higgins, M. E. (2009). Offshore wind energy development in the exclusive economic zone: Legal and policy supports and impediments in Germany and the US, Energy Policy, 37 (9), 3596-3607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, B. G., & Borick, C. (2013). Conventional Politics for Unconventional Drilling? Lessons from Pennsylvania’s Early Move into Fracking Policy Development. Review of Policy Research 30 (3), 321–340. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rio, P. del, & Unruh, G. (2007). Overcoming the lock-out of renewable energy technologies in Spain: The cases of wind and solar electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11, 1498-1513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder Colorado: Westview Press (Theoretical lenses on public policy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley, S., Waterman, H., Godfroij, P., Reiner, D., Anderson, J., Draxlbauer, K., & Flach, T. (2007). Stakeholder perceptions of CO2 capture and storage in Europe: Results from a survey. Energy Policy 35, 5091-5108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, S., Kruse, S., Meister, M., Nölting, B., & Ohlhorst, D. (2007). Handbuch Konstellationsanalyse. Ein interdisziplinäres Brückenkonzept für die Nachhaltigkeits-, Technikund Innovationsforschung. München: oekom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, E., Bulling, L., & Köppel, J. (2015). Consolidating the State of Knowledge: A Synoptical Review of Wind Energy’s Wildlife Effects. Environmental Management, 56 (2), 300-331. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0501-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmie, J. (2012). Path Dependence and New Technological Path Creation in the Danish Wind Power Industry. European Planning Studies 20 (5), 753-752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K., & Ratan, P. L. (2012). Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, 5268-5279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, B. (2012). Prospects for pumped-hydro storage in Germany. Energy Policy 45; 420–429. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach, A. (2013). Barriers and solutions for expansion of electricity grids—the German experience. Energy Policy 63, 224–229. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J. C., & Jiusto, S. (2010). Assessing innovation in emerging energy technologies: Socio-technical dynamics of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in the USA. Energy Policy 38 (4); 2020–2031. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sühlsen, K., & Hisschemöller, M. (2014). Lobbying the ‘Energiewende’. Assessing the effectiveness of strategies to promote the renewable energy business in Germany. Energy Policy 69. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strunz, S. (2014). The German energy transition as a regime shift. Ecological Economics 100, 150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, J., & Slattery, M. (2010). Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energy Policy 38, 2508-2519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: opening the black box. Academy of Management Review 34, 689-709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trümper, S. C., Gerhard, S., Saatmann, S., & Weinmann, O. (2014). Qualitative Analysis of Strategies for the Integration of Renewable Energies in the Electricity Grid. Energy Procedia 46, 161-170. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, G. C., & Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. (2006). Globalizing carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 34, 1185-1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergne, J., & Durand, R. (2010). The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies 47, 736-759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voort, van der, N., & Vanclay, F. (2014). Social impacts of earthquakes caused by gas extraction in the Province of Groningen, The Netherlands. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 50, 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakiyama, T., Zusman, E., & Monogan III, J. E. (2014). Can alow-carbon-energy transition be sustained in post-Fukushima Japan? Assessing the varying impacts of exogenous shocks. Energy Policy 73, 654-666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Chen, Xi, Awadhesh, N. J., & Rogers, H. (2014). Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30, 1-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, D. (2014). Windkraft im Wald - Befragung zu Einstellungen, Wahrnehmungen und Akzeptanz. Bachelorarbeit am Fachgebiet Umweltprüfung und Umweltplanung, TU Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyer, J. (2008). Techniksoziologie: Genese, Gestaltung und Steuerung soziotechnischer Systeme. Grundlagentexte Soziologie. Weinheim, München: Beltz Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35 (5), 2683-2691. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Robert K. (2014). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonk, M., Simmons, R. T., & Steed C. (2013). Green vs. green. The political legal and administrative pitfalls facing green energy production. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, R., Kloke, S., & Gaedtke, M. (2012). Der Streit um die Uckermarkleitung – Eine Diskursanalyse. Studie im Rahmen des UfU-Schwerpunktes „Erneuerbare Energien im Konflikt“. Ufu-Paper. Hg. v. Unabhängiges Institut für Umweltfragen. Online: http://opus.kobv.de/zlb/volltexte/2013/20508/pdf/Streit_um_die_Uckermarkleitung.pdf, Zugegriffen: 13.09.2014.

Internetquellen

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Johann Köppel

Authors
  1. Johann Köppel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johann Köppel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Werner Rammert

  2. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Arnold Windeler

  3. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Hubert Knoblauch

  4. für Sozialforschung gGmbH, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Michael Hutter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Köppel, J. (2016). Energiewende. In: Rammert, W., Windeler, A., Knoblauch, H., Hutter, M. (eds) Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10874-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10874-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10873-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10874-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation