Skip to main content
Book cover

Schulinspektion als Steuerungsimpuls? pp 285–324Cite as

Wirkungen und Nebenwirkungen europäischer Inspektionssysteme

Part of the Educational Governance book series (EDUGOV,volume 25)

Zusammenfassung

In vielen europäischen Bildungssystemen werden Schulinspektionen als eine wichtige Methode zur Aufrechterhaltung und Verbesserung von Schulqualität angesehen. Allerdings war bisher wenig über die Wege und Mechanismen bekannt, auf denen Schulinspektionen zu Wirkungen auf die Schulentwicklung führen können. In diesem Kapitel wird ein Wirkungsmodell von Schulinspektion, das aus einer Analyse von Inspektionskonzepten von sechs europäischen Ländern (Niederlande, England, Irland, Schweden, Tschechische Republik, Österreich/Steiermark) gewonnen wurde, mit den Daten einer Schulleiterbefragung in den sechs teilnehmenden Ländern untersucht. Um dem Unterschied zwischen den Inspektionsmodellen verschiedener Länder gerecht zu werden, werden vier zentrale Charakteristika von Inspektionsmodellen vergleichend in Hinblick auf ihre Auswirkungen auf Schulentwicklung und auf unerwünschte Reaktionen im Gefolge von Schulinspektionen analysiert.

Dieser Text fasst einige wesentliche Ergebnisse des von der Europäischen Union im Rahmen des Lifelong Learning-Programms (511490-2010-LLP-NL-KA1- KA1SCR) geförderten Projekts „Impact of school inspection on teaching and learning (ISI-TL)“ zusammen. Er nutzt dabei Argumente und Daten, die in zwei englischsprachigen Artikeln veröff entlicht wurden, u.zw. in Ehren et al. (2015) sowie in Gustafsson et al. (2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-10872-4_9
  • Chapter length: 40 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-658-10872-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Altrichter, H. (2012). Veränderungen von Schulaufsicht und Schulinspektion in Österreich. Working Paper AT4. Project “Impact of School Inspection on Teaching and Learning”. Linz: JKU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altrichter, H., Bacher, J., Beham, M., Nagy, G., & Wetzelhütter, D. (2011). The Effects of a Free School Choice Policy on Parents’ School Choice Behaviour. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(4), 230-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altrichter, H., Ehren, M.C.M., McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2014). Wie will Schulinspektion wirken? Analyse von Annahmen über Wirkungsmechanismen von Schulinspektion in sechs europäischen Ländern. In M. Pfeifer (Hrsg.), Schulqualität und Schulentwicklung (S. 184-207). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altrichter, H., & Kemethofer, D. (2015). Does Accountability Pressure through School Inspections Promote School Improvement? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 32-56. DOI:10.1080/09243453.2014.927369

    Google Scholar 

  • Altrichter, H., Kemethofer, D., & Schmidinger, E. (2013). Neue Schulinspektion und Qualitätsmanagement im Schulsystem. Erziehung und Unterricht, 163(9-10), 961–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. (2004). The Virtue of Accountability: System Redesign, Inspection, and Incentives in the Era of Informed Professionalism. Journal of Education, 85(1), 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. (2005). All Choices Created Equal? How Good Parents Select “Failing” Schools. National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Columbia University, NY. http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/OP106.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, H. de, Enders, J., & Schimank U. (2007). On the way towards New Public Management? The Governance of University Systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In: D. Jansen (Hrsg.), New Forms of Governance in Research Organisations (S. 137-152). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böttger-Beer, M., & Koch, E. (2008). Externe Schulevaluation in Sachsen–ein Dialog zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. In W. Böttcher, W. Bos, H. Döbert, & H. G. Holtappels (Hrsg..), Bildungsmonitoring und Bildungscontrolling in nationaler und internationaler Perspektive (S. 253–264). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2008). Regularity Capitalism. How it works, ideas for making it work better. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Quality assessment and institutional change: Experiences from 14 countries. Higher Education, 40(3), 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brimblecombe, N., Shaw, M., & Ormston, M. (1996). Teachers’ intention to change practice as a result of OFSTED school inspections. Educational Management & Administration, 24(4), 339-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruggen, van, J.C. (2010). Inspectorates of Education in Europe; some comparative remarks about their tasks and work. http://www.sici-inspectorates.org. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. (2001). Changing classrooms through inspection. School leadership and management, 21(1), 59-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. (2011). OFSTED Keywords D1; for SIEG meeting 29-29 March, 2011, Umeå. http://www.education.ox.ac.uk/governing-by-inspection/working-papers. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015l

  • Clarke, J., & Ozga, J. (2011). Working paper 4: Inspection as Governing. http://www.education.ox.ac.uk/governing-by-inspection/working-papers/. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015

  • Coe, R. (2002). Evidence on the role and impact of performance feedback in schools. In: A.J. Visscher & R. Coe (Hrsg.), School improvement through performance feedback (S. 27-39). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J.B., & Jacob, B.A. (2007). Is Gaining Access to Selective Elementary Schools Gaining Ground? Evidence From Randomized Lotteries. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 13443. http://www.nber.org/papers/w13443.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015

  • Cullen, J.B., & Reback, R. (2006). Tinkering toward accolades: school gaming under a performance accountability system. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 12286. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12286.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015

  • Cullen, J.B., Jacob, B.A., & Levitt, S. (2006). The Effect of School Choice on Participants: Evidence from Randomized Lotteries. Econometrica, Econometric Society, 74(5), 1191–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wolf, I.F., & Janssens, F.J.G. (2007). Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: an overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 379–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 147-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1991). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. In: W.W. Powell & P.J. DiMaggio (Hrsg.). The New institutionalism in organizational analysis (S. 63-82). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dronkers, J., & Veenstra, R. (2001). Schoolprestatie-indicatoren in het voortgezet onderwijs: start, reacties en vervolg. In: A.B. Dijkstra, S. Karsten, R. Veenstra & A.J. Visscher (Hrsg.), Het oog der natie: scholen op rapport; standaarden voor de publicatie van schoolprestaties (S. 21-36). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutch Educational Council (2001). De markt meester? Een verkenning naar marktwerking in het onderwijs. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehren, M.C.M., Gustafsson, J.-E., Altrichter, H., Skedsmo, G., & Kemethofer, D. (2015). Comparing effects and side effects of different school inspection systems across Europe. Comparative Education (51)3, 375-400. DOI:10.1080/03050068.2015.1045769

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehren, M.C.M., Altrichter, H., McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2013). Impact of school inspections on teaching and learning – describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 25(1), 3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehren, M.C.M., & Visscher, A.J. (2008).The Relationship between School Inspections, School Characteristics and School Improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R.F., & Fuhrman, S.H. (2001). Research Finds the False Assumption of Accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(4), 9-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice (2004). Evaluation of Schools providing Compulsory Education in Europe. http://www.indire.it/lucabas/lkmw_file/eurydice///Evaluation_schools_EN.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015

  • Gärtner, H. (2011). Die Wirkung von Schulinspektion auf Schulentwicklung. Eine quasi-experimentelle Feldstudie. In C. Quesel, C. V. Husfeldt, N. Landwehr, & P. Steiner (Hrsg.) Wirkungen und Wirksamkeit der externen Schulevaluation (S. 145-161). Bern: h.e.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner, H., & Pant, H.A. (2011). Validity of processes and results of school inspection. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(2-3), 85-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner, H., Wurster, S., & Pant, H.A. (2013): The effect of school inspections on school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2013.811089

    Google Scholar 

  • Geijsel, P., Sleegers, P.J.C., Stoel, R.D., & Kruger, M.L. (2009). The Effect of Teacher Psychological and School Organizational and Leadership Factors on Teachers’ Professional Learning in Dutch Schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greger, D. (2011). School inspection of Czech schools: A critical reflection on intended effects and causal mechanisms. Unpublished working paper, LLP-project ‘Impact of school inspections on teaching and learning’. Prague: Charles University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grek, S., Lawn, M., Ozga, J., & Segerholm, C. (2013) ‘Governing by inspection? European inspectorates and the creation of a European education policy space’, Comparative Education, DOI: 10.1080/03050068.2013.787697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J.-E., & Myrberg, E. (2011). School inspections of Swedish schools: A critical reflection on intended effects, causal mechanisms and methods. Unpublished working paper, LLP-project ‘Impact of school inspections on teaching and learning’. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J.-E., Ehren, M. C. M., Conyngham, G., McNamara, G., Altrichter, H., & O’Hara, J. (2015). School Inspections and School Improvement: Testing Assumptions on Causal Mechanisms. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., & Tymms, P. (2014) Ofsted’s role in promoting school improvement: the mechanisms of the school inspection system in England. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 315–330, DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2014.911726

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsten, S., & Visscher, A. (2001). Ervaringen met het openbaar maken van schoolprestaties in Engeland en Frankrijk. In: A.B. Dijkstra, S. Karsten, R. Veenstra & A.J. Visscher (Hrsg.), Het oog der natie: scholen op rapport; standaarden voor de publicatie van schoolprestaties (S. 36-54). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klerks, M. (2013). The effect of school inspections: a systematic review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. http://schoolinspections.eu/impact/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2013/12/ORD-paper-2012-Review-Effect-School-Inspections-MKLERKS.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015

  • Kluger, A.N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koretz, D.M. (2003). Using Multiple Measures to Address Perverse Incentives and Score Inflation. Educational Measurement, 22(2), 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuper, H. (2005). Evaluation im Bildungssystem. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, H.F. (2007). Holding Schools Accountable Revisited. 2007 Spencer Foundation Lecture in Education Policy and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, H., & Walsh, R. (2002). Implementing Value-Added Measures of School Effectiveness: Getting the Incentives Right. Economics of Education Review, 21(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuw, F.L. (2003). Reconstructing program theories: methods available and problems to be solved. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, J., Hult, A., Segerholm, C., & Rönnberg, L. (2012). Mediating School Inspection – Key dimensions and keywords in agency text production 2003–2010. Education Inquiry, 3(4), 569-590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luginbuhl, R., Webbink, D., & De Wolf, I. (2007). Do School Inspections Improve Primary School Performance? CPB-paper, nr. 83. http://www.cpb.nl/en/publication/do-school-inspections-improve-primary-school-performance. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015

  • Malen, B. (1999). On Rewards, Punishments, and Possibilities: Teacher Compensation as an Instrument for Education Reform. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,12(4), 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P., & Sammons, P. (2004). Improvement through Inspection. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1992). The Structure of Educational Organizations. In J.W. Meyer & W.R. Scott (Hrsg.), Organizational Environments. Ritual and Rationality (S. 71-97). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. (2006). The New Institutionalism in Education. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th edition). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Ehren, M. C. M. (2014). Review and Synthesis of Evidence on the (Mechanisms of) Impact of School Inspections. http://schoolinspections.eu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2014/02/Review-and-synthesis-of-evidence-on-the-mechanisms-ofimpact-of-school-inspections.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015.

  • Nichols, S.L., Glass, G.V., & Berliner, D.C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: does accountability pressure increase student learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1), http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/72. Zugegriffen: 20.8.2015

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008). Measuring Improvements. Best practices to assess value added of schools. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouston, J., Fidler, B., & Earley, P. (1997). What do schools do after OFSTED school inspections-or before? School Leadership & Management, 17(1), 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W. (2007). The new institutionalism. In S.R. Clegg & J.R, Bailey (Hrsg.), The International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. http://www.stanford.edu/group/song/papers/NewInstitutionalism.pdf; 20.8.2015

  • Rosenthal, L. (2004). Do school inspections improve school quality? Ofsted inspections and school examination results in the UK. Economics of Education Review, 23(2), 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (Hrsg.) (2012). School Leadership Effects Revisited. Review and Meta-Analysis of Empirical Studies. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheipl, J., & Seel, H. (1985). Die Entwicklung des österreichischen Schulwesens von 1750 bis 1938. Graz: Leykam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimank, U. (2002). Handeln und Strukturen. Einführung in die akteurtheoretische Soziologie. Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerholm, C. (2011). Values in Evaluation: the what and how values in Swedish school inspection. Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference, Anaheim, 2-5 November 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2000). Research and Inspection: HMI and OFSTED, 1981-1996 – A Commentary. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3/4), 333-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standaert, R. (2001). Inspectorates of education in Europe: a critical analysis. Leuven: Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visscher, A.J., & Coe, R. (2002). School improvement through performance feedback. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visscher, A.J., & Coe, R. (2003). School Performance Feedback Systems: Conceptualisation, Analysis, and Reflection. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 321–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitby, K. (2010). School Inspection: recent experiences in high performing education systems; literature review. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Musterinstitut, Universität Linz, Altenbergerstr 69, A-404, Linz, Österreich

    Prof. Dr. Herbert Altrichter

  2. Bundesinstitut für Bildungsforschung, Innovation und Entwicklung des österreichischen Bildungswesens, Alpenstraße 121, A-5020, Salzburg, Österreich

    Mag. David Kemethofer

  3. Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, London, England, UK

    Dr. Melanie Ehren

  4. Universität Göteborg, Department of Education and Special Education;, Box 100,, S-405 30, Gothenburg, Schweden

    Prof. Dr. Jan-Eric Gustafsson

  5. Institut für Bildungsmanagement und Bildungsökonomie der Pädagogischen Hochschule Zug, Zugerbergstrasse 3 3, CH-6301, Zug, Schweiz

    Assoc.Prof. Dr. Guri Skedsmo & Prof. Dr. Stephan G. Huber

  6. Dublin City University Business School, Glasnevin, IRL-Dublin 9, Dublin 9, Irland

    Gerry Conyngham

  7. School of Education Studies, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, IRL-Dublin 9, Dublin 9, Irland

    Prof. Dr. Gerry McNamara & Prof. Dr. Joe O’Hara

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Herbert Altrichter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mag. David Kemethofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dr. Melanie Ehren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Prof. Dr. Jan-Eric Gustafsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Assoc.Prof. Dr. Guri Skedsmo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Prof. Dr. Stephan G. Huber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gerry Conyngham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Prof. Dr. Gerry McNamara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Prof. Dr. Joe O’Hara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbert Altrichter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and Permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

    About this chapter

    Cite this chapter

    Altrichter, H. et al. (2016). Wirkungen und Nebenwirkungen europäischer Inspektionssysteme. In: Schulinspektion als Steuerungsimpuls?. Educational Governance, vol 25. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10872-4_9

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10872-4_9

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

    • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10871-7

    • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10872-4

    • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)