Abstract
In this article I present an argument for the necessary co-articulation of meaning within our felt enkinaesthetic engagement with our world. The argument will be developed through a series of stages, the first of which will be an elaboration of the notion of articulation of and through the body. This will be followed by an examination of enkinaesthetic experiential entanglement and the role it plays in rendering our world meaningful and our actions values-realising. At this stage I will begin to extend Husserl’s notion of intentional transgression to the enkinaesthetic sphere of lived experience, and in support of this claim I will examine the theoretical and practical work of osteopathic manual listening [Gens & Roche 2014] and the ‘felt sense’ in focusing [Gendlin] which makes possible a shift from a somatic articulation to a semantic, and potentially conceptual, one. Throughout, my position will be compatible with Merleau-Ponty’s claim that “Whenever I try to understand myself, the whole fabric of the perceptible world comes too, and with it comes the others who are caught in it.” [Merleau-Ponty 1964a, p.15].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Benedict, R. 1(989) The chrysanthemum and the sword: patterns of Japanese culture, Foreword by Ezra F. Vogel, Houghton Mifflin.
Buber, M. (1970) I and thou, translated with prologue and notes by Walter Kaufmann, Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. K. (eds.) (1996) Theories of theories of mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chemero, A. (2006) “Information and direct perception: A new approach”, in P. Farias & J. Queiroz (Eds.), Advanced issues in cognitive science and semiotics, pp. 59–72 Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
Davies, M. & Stone T. (eds.) (1995) Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Dickens, C. (1865) Our Mutual Friend, London: Chapman and Hall.
DSM –5 (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM –5, American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, Va., London.
Gallagher, S. & Meltzoff, A. (1996) “The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies”, Philosophical Psychology, 9, pp. 211–33.
Gallagher, S. & Marcel, A. J. (1999) “The Self in Contextualized Action”, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6 (4), pp. 4–30.
Gallagher, S. (2008) “Direct perception in the intersubjective context”,Consciousness and Cognition, 17 (2), pp. 535–543.
Gendlin, E. T. (1966). “The discovery of felt meaning”, in J.B. McDonald & R.R. Leeper (Eds.), Language and meaning, Papers from the ASCD Conference, The Curriculum Research Institute (Nov. 21–24, 1964 & March 20–23, 1965), pp. 45–62. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. From http://www.focusing.org/gendlin/docs/gol_2039.html
Gendlin, E. T. (1992) “The primacy of the body, not the primacy of perception”, Man and World’, 25 (3–4), pp. 341–53.
Gendlin, E. T. (1997). A process model. New York: The Focusing Institute. (Also available at http://www.focusing.org/process.html).
Gendlin, E. T. (2015) “A New Way of Thinking–About Anything–and How to Write From It”, Synthesis Philosophica, forthcoming.
Gens, J-C. & Roche, E. (2014) “The emergence of feeling in osteopathic manual listening”, conference presentation, Consciousness and Experiential Psychology Section Conference, Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge, 4–6 September 2014.
Husserl, E. (1989) Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Second Book (Ideas II), trans. R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hutcheson, F. (2005) A system of moral philosophy, in two volumes (1755), Intro. Daniel Carey, London; New York: Continuum.
Ingold, T. (2000) The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill, Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Latour, B. (1999) “On Recalling ANT”, The Sociological Review, 47, (S1), 15–25.
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leibniz, F. W. (1991) G. W. Leibniz’s Monadology, An Edition for Students, trans. Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press.
Macmurray, J. (1961) Persons in Relation, London: Faber & Faber.
Malloch, S. & Trevarthen, C. (Eds.) (2009) Communicative Musicality, Exploring the Basis of Human Companionship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of perception, New York: The Humanities Press. Trans. Colin Smith, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964a) Signs, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964b) The Primacy of Perception, And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics, trans. James M. Edie, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968) The Visible and The Invisible, ed. Claude Lefort, trans. Alphonso Lingis, Northwestern University, Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, Evanston, Illinois.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1970) Themes from the Lectures at the Collège de France, 1952–1960, trans. by John O’Neill, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois.
Pollatos, O., Gramann, K., & Schandry, R. (2007)“Neural systems connecting interoceptive awareness and feelings”, Human Brain Mapping January, 28 (1), pp. 9–18.
Reddy. V. (2008) How Infants Know Minds, Harvard University Press.
Shakespeare, W. (1969) King Lear, Penguin Books Ltd., Harmondsworth, Middlesex, London, pp. 248–94.
Smith, A. (1976) The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), edited by D.D. Raphael & A.L. Macfie, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sperry, R. W. (1939) “Action current study in movement coordination” Journal of General Psychology 20, pp. 295–313.
Steinbeck, J. (1952) “The Chrysanthemums”, in 50 Great Short Stories, edited by Milton Crane, Bantam Classics, Bantam Dell, New York, pp. 337–48.
Stuart, S. A. J. (2010) “Enkinaesthesia, Biosemiotics and the Ethiosphere”, in Signifying Bodies: Biosemiosis, Interaction and Health, The Faculty of Philosophy, University of Braga, Portugal, pp. 305–30.
Stuart, S. A. J. (2012) “Enkinaesthesia: the essential sensuous background for co-agency”, In: Radman, Z. (ed.) The Background: Knowing Without Thinking, Palgrave Macmillan, Chp. 8, pp. 167–86.
Stuart, S. A. J. (2013) “The Union of Two Nervous Systems: Neurophenomenology, Enkinaesthesia, and the Alexander Technique”, Journal of Constructivist Foundations, 8, (3), pp. 314–23.
Stuart, S. A. J. & Thibault, P. J. (2015) “Enkinaesthetic Polyphony as the Underpinning for First- order Languaging”, Emotion in Language: Theory – Research – Application, edited volume, John Benjamins Publishing (forthcoming).
Sutherland, W. G. at http://www.cranialacademy.com/cranial.html
Trevarthen, C. (2009)“Embodied Human Intersubjectivity: Imaginative Agency, To Share Meaning”, Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, IV (1), pp. 6–56.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Willett, C. (2014) Interspecies Ethics, Columbia University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958) Philosophical Investgations, Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford.
Young, I. M. (1980) “Throwing like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment Motility and Spatiality”, Human Studies, 3(2) pp. 137–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stuart, S. (2016). The Articulation of Enkinaesthetic Entanglement. In: Jung, M., Bauks, M., Ackermann, A. (eds) Dem Körper eingeschrieben. Studien zur Interdisziplinären Anthropologie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10474-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10474-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10473-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10474-0
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)