Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Die Innenwelt der Ökonomie pp 339–360Cite as

Politikwissenschaftliche Methoden im Widerstreit

Holistische vs. parsimonische Analysen der globalen Finanzkrise

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 3132 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Knapp zehn Jahre nachdem sich die globale Finanzkrise zu entwickeln begann, besteht weiterhin kein einheitlicher Analyserahmen, der die Ursachen, den Verlauf und die Auswirkungen der Finanzkrise erklären könnte. Mehr noch: inzwischen ist deutlich geworden, dass viele der bestehenden Herangehensweisen und Wissensformen unzureichend zur Erklärung der Finanzkrise sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bakker, I. (1994). The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, I. (2002). Who Built the Pyramids? Engendering the New International Economic and Financial Architecture. femina politica 11 (1), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard, W., Broz, J. L., & Clark, W. R. (2002). The Political Economy of Monetary Institutions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Hennessy, P. (2009). Letter to Her Majesty the Queen. http://www.ft.com/cms/3e3b6ca8-7a08-11de-b86f-00144feabdc0.pdf. Zugegriffen: 30. März 2013.

  • Bieling, H.-J. (2011). Internationale Politische Ökonomie. Eine Einführung. 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N. (2007). Approaches to Social Enquiry. 2. Auflage. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (2009). Torn Between Two Lovers? Caught in the Middle of British and American IPE. New Political Economy 14 (3), 329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boy, N., Burgess, J. P., & Leander, A. (2011). The Global Governance of Security and Finance: Introduction to the Special Issue. Security Dialogue 42 (2), 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broz, J. L. (2005). Congressional Politics of International Financial Rescues. American Journal of Political Science 49 (4), 479–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, D., Martin, R., Montgomerie, J., & Williams, K. (2012). An Important Failure: Knowledge Limits and the Financial Crisis. Economy and Society 41 (3), 299–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. G. (1994). The Infrastructure of the Infrastructure? Towards Embedded Financial Orthodoxy in the International Political Economy. In R. P. Palan & B. K. Gills (Hrsg.), Transcending the State-Global Divide: A Neostructuralist Agenda in International Relations (S. 223–249). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. J. (2007). The Transatlantic Divide: Why Are American and British IPE so Different? Review of International Political Economy 14 (2), 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. J. (2008a). International Political Economy. An Intellectual History. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. J. (2008b). The Transatlantic Divide: A Rejoinder. Review of International Political Economy 15 (1), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. J. (2009a). A Grave Case of Myopia. International Interactions 35(4), 436–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. J. (2009b). The Way Forward. New Political Economy 14 (3), 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. J. (2014). Advanced Introduction to International Political Economy. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium 10 (2), 126–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. W. (1987). Power, Production, and World Order. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. W., & Sinclair, T. (Hrsg.) (1996). Approaches to world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. (1998). Dental Hygiene and Nuclear War: How International Relations Look from Economics. International Organization 52(4), 993–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (1989). Bananas, Beaches and Bases. Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times (2008). Good Question, Ma’am. Financial Times v. 14 November 2008. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5b306600-b26d-11dd-bbc9-0000779fd18c.html#axzz2MaMx6Ftt. Zugegriffen: 30. Januar 2014.

  • Fisher, I. (1933). The Debt Deflation Theory of Great Depressions. Econometrica 1 (4), 337–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J., & Martin, L. L. (2002). International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions. In I. Katznelson & H. V. Milner (Hrsg.), Political Science. The State of the Discipline (S. 118–146). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. A., Lake, D. A., & Schultz, K. A. (2009). World Politics: Interests, Interactions, and Institutions. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, J. A., & Lake, D. A. (Hrsg.) (2000). International Political Economy. Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain, R. D. (1997). The International Organization of Credit. States and Global Finance in the World-economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1975). U. S. Power and the Multinational Corporation. The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy. Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2003). Der neue Imperialismus. Hamburg: VSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (Hrsg.) (2010). New Directions in Political Science. Responding to the Challenges of an Interdependent World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, E., & Pagliari, S. (2011). The End of an Era in International Financial Regulation? A Postcrisis Research Agenda. International Organization 65 (1), 169–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, E. (1994). States and the Reemergence of Global Finance: From Bretton Woods to the 1990s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, E. (2009). Division and Dialogue in Anglo-American IPE: A Reluctant Canadian View. New Political Economy 14 (3), 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, E. (2011). Understanding the 2007–2008 Global Financial Crisis: Lessons for Scholars of International Political Economy. Annual Review of Political Science 14, 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgott, R., & Watson, M. (2008). All at Sea in a Barbed Wire Canoe: Professor Cohen’s Transatlantic Voyage in IPE. Review of International Political Economy 15 (1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1994). Some Remarks on “Economic Imperialism” and International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1978). The Origin of Geometry. In J. Derrida (Hrsg.), Edmund Husserl‘s „Origin of Geometry“: An Introduction (S. 157–180). New York: Nicolas Hays.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (Hrsg.) (1996). The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1976). International Relations and Domestic Structures: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. International Organization 30 (1), 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1978). Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (2009). Mid-Atlantic: Sitting on the Knife’s Sharp Edge. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1), 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. (1998). International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4), 645–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, P. (2007). Elections, Special Interests, and Financial Crisis. International Organization 61 (3), 607–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions. Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4), 379–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (2009). The Old IPE and the New. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. (1971). Transnational Relations and World Politics. International Organization 25 (3), 329–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston, Ma: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, O. (2009). Die Subprime-Krise und die Frage nach der Finanzmarktstabilität. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 16 (1), 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. (Hrsg.) (1983). International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. (1976). State Power and the Structure of International Trade. World Politics 28 (3), 317–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. (1996). The Accomplishments of International Political Economy. In S. Smith, K. Booth & M. Zalewski (Hrsg.), International Theory: Positivism & Beyond (S.108–127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2009). Making Banking Boring. New York Times v. 9 April. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=0. Zugegriffen: 29. July 2014.

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. A. (2006). International Political Economy: A Maturing Interdiscipline. In B. R. Weingast & D. Wittman (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy (S.757–777). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. A. (2009a). TRIPs Across the Atlantic: Theory and Epistemology in IPE. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. A. (2009b). Open Economy Politics: A Critical Review. Review of International Organization 4 (3), 219–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P. (2002). World Financial Orders. An Historical International Political Economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P. (2008). The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P. (2009). Power-knowledge Estranged. From Susan Strange to Poststructuralism in British IPE. In M. Blyth (Hrsg.), Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy. IPE as a Global Conversation (S. 126–139). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, A. (2009). Why we Need Multiple Stories about the Global Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy 16 (2), 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblang, D., & Satyanath, S. (2006). Institutions, Expectations, and Currency Crises. International Organization 60 (1), 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblang, D., & Pandya, S. (2009). The Financial Crisis of 2007: Our Waterloo or Take a Chance on IPE? International Interactions 35 (4), 430–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maliniak, D., & Tierney, M. J. (2009). The American School of IPE. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1), 6–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, K. R. (2009). Of Intellectual Monocultures and the Study of IPE. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1), 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. V. (1997). Interests, Institutions and Information. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. V. (2002). Reflections on the Field of International Political Economy. In M. Brecher & F. P. Harvey (Hrsg.), Conflict, Security, Foreign Policy, and International Political Economy (S. 207–223). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, L., & Singer, D. A. (2009). The Global Financial Crisis: Lessons and Opportunities for International Political Economy. International Interactions 35 (4): 420–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesvetailova, A. (2007). Fragile Finance Debt, Speculation and Crisis in the Age of Global Credit. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palan, R. (2003). The Offshore World: Sovereign Markets, Virtual Places, and Nomad Millionaires. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palan, R. (2009). The Proof of the Pudding is in the Eating: IPE in Light of the Crisis of 2007/8. New Political Economy 14 (3), 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palan, R. (2013). New Trends in Global Political Economy. In R. Palan (Hrsg.), Global Political Economy. Contemporary Theories (S. 1–14). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepinsky, T. B. (2008). Capital Mobility and Coalitional Politics: Authoritarian Regimes and Economic Adjustment in Southeast Asia. World Politics 60 (3), 438–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, V. S. (1992). Gendered States. (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, V. S. (2003). A Critical Rewriting of Global Political Economy. Integrating Reproductive, Productive and Virtual Economies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1957). The Poverty of Historicism. London: Butler & Tanner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogowski, R. (1989). Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosas, G. (2006). Bagehot or Bailout? An Analysis of Government Responses to Banking Crises. American Journal of Political Science 50 (1), 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (Hrsg.) (1983). The Antinomies of Interdependence: National Welfare and the International Division of Labor. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1998). Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryner, M. (2012). Financial Crisis, Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy in the Production of Knowledge about the EU. Millennium 40 (3), 647–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirm, S. A. (Hrsg.) (2006). Globalisierung. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H. (2009). Subprime Nation: American Power, Global Capital, and the Housing Bubble. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2010). Beyond Paradigms. Analytical Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). The Institutional Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization 60 (4), 781–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, A. C. (1994). Domestic Choices, International Markets. Dismantling National Barriers and Liberalizing Securities Markets. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, A. C. (2013). International Political Economy in Context: Individual Choices, Global Effects. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (Hrsg.) (1984). Path to International Political Economy. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1970). International Economics and International Relations: A Case of Mutual Neglect. International Affairs 46 (2), 304–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1986). Casino Capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1988). States and Markets. London, New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1991). An Eclectic Approach. In C. Murphy & R. Tooze (Hrsg.), The New International Political Economy (S. 33–50). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1994). Wake up, Krasner! The World has Changed. Review of International Political Economy 1 (2), 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (2009). Beware What You Wish for: Lessons for International Political Economy from the Transformation of Economics. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1), 106–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. (2007). The Political Economy of International Capital Mobility. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. (2009). Reflections on the American School: An IPE of our Making. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. M. (2003). Empire of Capital. London, New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wullweber, J., Graf, A., & Behrens, M. (Hrsg.) (2013). Theorien der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wullweber, J. (2014). The Question is Which is to Be Master – That‘s All! Amerikanische Internationale Politische Ökonomie vs. britische Internationale Politische Ökonomie? Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 21 (2), 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wullweber, J. (2016). A Grave Case of Myopia? Die globale Finanzmarktkrise und die Internationale Politische Ökonomie. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 26 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2009). First As Tragedy, Then As Farce. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kassel, Deutschland

    Joscha Wullweber

Authors
  1. Joscha Wullweber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joscha Wullweber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen , Gießen, Germany

    Jens Maeße

  2. Institut für Soziologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , München, Germany

    Hanno Pahl

  3. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany

    Jan Sparsam

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wullweber, J. (2017). Politikwissenschaftliche Methoden im Widerstreit. In: Maeße, J., Pahl, H., Sparsam, J. (eds) Die Innenwelt der Ökonomie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10428-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10428-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10427-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10428-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation