Advertisement

Concepts, Formats, and Methods of Participation: Theory and Practice

  • Jörg Radtke
  • Lars Holstenkamp
  • Jake Barnes
  • Ortwin Renn
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

New energies form new energy landscapes (Apostol, Palmer, Pasqualetti, Smardon, & Sullivan, 2016; Gailing & Leibenath, 2013). Energy carriers converge within space and open up leeway and scope for design. Different spaces are affected: offshore and onshore, plains and mountains, waters, volcanic areas, coastal regions, deserts, etc. Different energy sources and types of technology are used and integrated through grids. Grids are increasingly governed as smart energy systems equipped with smart meters and apps etc., linked with smart mobility.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agamben, G. (Ed.). (2012). Demokratie ? Eine Debatte. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  2. Alcántara, S., Kuhn, R., Renn, O., Bach, N., Böhm, B., Dienel, H.-L., … Walk, H. (2014). DELIKAT – Fachdialoge Deliberative Demokratie: Analyse Partizipativer Verfahren für den Transformationsprozess. Google Scholar
  3. Apostol, D., Palmer, J. F., Pasqualetti, M. J., Smardon, R., & Sullivan, R. (2016). The Renewable Energy Landscape: Preserving Scenic Values in Our Sustainable Future. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216 – 224.Google Scholar
  5. Barry, A. (2013). Material Politics: Disputes along the Pipeline. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Bauer, C. (2015). Die Energiewende in der Politik- und Partizipationsverflechtungsfalle: Das Beispiel des Stromnetzausbaus. Verwaltungsarchiv, 106(1), 112 – 154.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, D. (2013). Environmental citizenship: global, local and individual. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics (pp. 347 – 358). London: Routledge Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Benz, A., & Dose, N. (2010). Governance – Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen: eine Einführung (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  9. Bertelsmann-Stiftung, & Staatsministerium Baden-Württemberg (Eds.). (2014). Partizipation im Wandel: unsere Demokratie zwischen Wählen, Mitmachen und Entscheiden. Gütersloh: Verl. Bertelsmann-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  10. Blair, H. (2000). Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries. World Development, 28(1), 21 – 39.Google Scholar
  11. Blühdorn, I. (2013). Simulative Demokratie: neue Politik nach der postdemokratischen Wende. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  12. Borras, S., & Edler, J. (2015). The Governance of Socio-Technical Systems: Explaining Change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.Google Scholar
  13. Bosch, S., & Peyke, G. (2011). Gegenwind für die Erneuerbaren: Räumliche Neuorientierung der Wind-, Solar- und Bioenergie vor dem Hintergrund einer verringerten Akzeptanz sowie zunehmender Flächennutzungskonflikte im ländlichen Raum. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 69(2), 105 – 118.Google Scholar
  14. Bovens, M. A. P. (Ed.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brühne, T. (2015). Die Rückkehr zur Fläche: Postmoderne Energielandschaften als Zeichen sozialer Aushandlungsprozesse im Raum. In J. Lempp, G. van der Beek, & T. Korn (Eds.), Aktuelle Herausforderungen in der Wirtschaftsförderung (pp. 111 – 117). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.Google Scholar
  16. Bryant, R. L. (2015a). The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Bude, H., & Staab, P. (Eds.). (2016). Kapitalismus und Ungleichheit: Die neuen Verwerfungen. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  18. Bulkeley, H. (2010). Cities and the Governing of Climate Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 229 – 253.Google Scholar
  19. Chilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (Eds.). (2016). Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Christensen, H. S. (2011). Political participation beyond the vote: how the institutional context shapes patterns of political participation in the 18 western European democracies. Åbo: Åbo Akad. Förl.Google Scholar
  21. Cloke, K., & Goldsmith, J. (2002). The end of management and the rise of organizational democracy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1 – 23.Google Scholar
  23. Creighton, J. L. (2005). The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions through Citizen Involvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Cambridge et al.: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. D’Alisa, G., De Maria, F., & Kallis, G. (Eds.). (2015). Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76 – 98.Google Scholar
  27. Denecke, M., Ganzert, A., Otto, I., & Stock, R. (Eds.). (2016). ReClaiming Participation: Technology – Mediation – Collectivity. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  28. Deth, J. W. van (2014). A conceptual map of political participation. Acta politica; international journal of political science, 49(3), 349 – 367.Google Scholar
  29. Deth, J. W. van, & Maloney, W. A. (Eds.). (2012). New Participatory Dimensions in Civil Society: Professionalization and Individualized Collective Action. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Deth, J. W. van. (2009). Politische Partizipation. In V. Kaina & A. Römmele (Eds.), Politische Soziologie (pp. 141 – 161). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  31. Devine-Wright, P. (2007). Energy Citizenship: Psychological Aspects of Evolution in Sustainable Energy Technologies. In J. Murphy (Ed.), Governing technology for sustainability (pp. 63 – 88). London & Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  32. Devine-Wright, P. (2014). Towards a comprehensive understanding of energy and communities: Advances, experiments, gaps and challenges. Presentation, 1st Symposium on Community Energy Systems, 10 March 2014. Lille.Google Scholar
  33. Dolata, U., & Schrape, J.-F. (2014). Kollektives Handeln im Internet: Eine akteurtheoretische Fundierung. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 24(1), 5 – 30.Google Scholar
  34. Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy: politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  35. Erhard, J., Lauwers, S., & Schmerz, S. (2013). Do unconventional forms of citizen participation add value to the quality of democracy in Germany ? A case study of the Bürgerdialog Energietechnologien für die Zukunft. In A. Römmele & H. Banthien (Eds.), Empowering Citizens: Studies in Collaborative Democracy (pp. 17 – 105). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  36. Feindt, P. H., & Saretzki, T. (2010). Umwelt- und Technikkonflikte. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  37. Fox, S. (2013). Is it Time to Update the Definition of Political Participation ? Political Participation in Britain: The Decline and Revival of Civic Culture. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(1), 1 – 11.Google Scholar
  38. Fudge, S., Peters, M., & Woodman, B. (2016). Local authorities as niche actors: the case of energy governance in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 1 – 17.Google Scholar
  39. Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 66 – 75.Google Scholar
  40. Gabriel, O. W. (2013). Politische Partizipation. In J. W. van Deth & M. Tausendpfund (Eds.), Politik im Kontext: Ist alle Politik lokale Politik ? (pp. 381 – 411). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.Google Scholar
  41. Gailing, L., & Leibenath, M. (Eds.). (2013). Neue Energielandschaften – Neue Perspektiven der Landschaftsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  42. Gailing, L., & Röhring, A. (2016). Is it all about collaborative governance ? Alternative ways of understanding the success of energy regions. Utilities Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.009
  43. Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257 – 1274.Google Scholar
  44. Geis, A. (2002). Neue Konflikte durch kooperative Politikformen. In J. Bogumil (Ed.), Kommunale Entscheidungsprozesse im Wandel (pp. 267 – 284). Wiesbaden: VS, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  45. Glaab, M. (Ed.). (2016). Politik mit Bürgern – Politik für Bürger: Praxis und Perspektiven einer neuen Beteiligungskultur. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  46. Goldsmith, S. (2010). The power of social innovation: How civic entrepreneurs ignite community networks for good. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Grote, J. R. (2012). Participatory governance reloaded: the horizontalist expectation. In B. Egner, M. Haus, & G. Terizakis (Eds.), Regieren (pp. 75 – 97). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  48. Grote, J. R., & Gbikpi, B. (Eds.). (2002). Participatory governance: political and societal implications. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  49. Grunwald, A. (2004). Participation as a means of enhancing the legitimacy of decisions on technology ? A sceptical analysis. Poiesis & Praxis, 3(1-2), 106 – 122.Google Scholar
  50. Gustafsson, S., Ivner, J., & Palm, J. (2015). Management and stakeholder participation in local strategic energy planning – Examples from Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 205 – 212.Google Scholar
  51. Heinelt, H. (Ed.). (2002). Participatory governance in multi-level context: concepts and experience. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  52. Heinrichs, H., Kuhn, K., & Newig, J. (2011). Nachhaltige Gesellschaft: welche Rolle für Partizipation und Kooperation ? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  53. Heinze, R. G. (2009). Rückkehr des Staates ? Politische Handlungsmöglichkeiten in unsicheren Zeiten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  54. Hepp, A., & Pfadenhauer, M. (2014). Mediatisierte Partizipation ? In F. Krotz, C. Despotovíc, & M.-M. Kruse (Eds.), Die Mediatisierung sozialer Welten: Synergien empirischer Forschung (pp. 253 – 262). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  55. Hjorth, D., & Bjerke, B. (2006). Public entrepreneurship: moving from social/consumer to public/citizen. In C. Steyaert, & D. Hjorth (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as social change (pp. 97 – 120). Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  56. Industrial Democracy in Europe (Ed.). (1993). Industrial democracy in Europe revisited. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Jansen, S. A. (2012). Bürger. Macht. Staat ?: Einleitung. In S. A. Jansen, E. Schröter, & N. Stehr (Eds.), Bürger. Macht. Staat ?: Neue Formen gesellschaftlicher Teilhabe, Teilnahme und Arbeitsteilung (pp. 7 – 14). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  58. Kaase, M. (2011). Participation. In B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International encyclopedia of political science. Vol. 6. Non-Pol (pp. 1777 – 1788). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  59. Kamlage, H., Nanz, P., & Fleischer, B. (2014). Dialogorientierte Bürgerbeteiligung im Netzausbau. Jahrbuch Nachhaltige Ökonomie, 4, 195 – 216.Google Scholar
  60. Kaufman, M., & Dilla Alfonso, H. (Eds.). (1997). Community power and grassroots democracy: the transformation of social life. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  61. Keil, S. I. (2013). Soziale Partizipation. In J. W. van Deth & M. Tausendpfund (Eds.), Politik im Kontext: Ist alle Politik lokale Politik ? (pp. 157 – 189). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  62. Kersting, N. (2008). Politische Beteiligung: Einführung in dialogorientierte Instrumente politischer und gesellschaftlicher Partizipation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  63. Kersting, N. (Ed.). (2012). Electronic Democracy. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  64. Klagge, B., & Arbach, C. (2013). Governance-Prozesse für erneuerbare Energien. Hannover: ARL, Akad. für Raumforschung und Landesplanung.Google Scholar
  65. Kohler-Koch, B., Quittkat, C., Buth, V., & Altides, C. (2013). De-mystification of participatory democracy: EU governance and civil society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Sage Publications, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  67. Leitner, H. (2004). The Politics of Scale and Networks of Spatial Connectivity: Transnational Interurban Networks and the Rescaling of Political Governance in Europe. In E. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and Geographic Inquiry (pp. 236 – 255). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  68. Lindgren, K.-O., & Persson, T. (2011). Participatory governance in the EU: enhancing or endangering democracy and efficiency ? Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  69. Lindner, R., Aichholzer, G., & Hennen, L. (Eds.). (2016). Electronic democracy in Europe: Prospects and Challenges of E-Publics, E-participation and E-Voting. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (Eds.). (2012). Social media and democracy: innovations in participatory politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Månsson, A. (2015). A resource curse for renewables ? Conflict and cooperation in the renewable energy sector. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, 1 – 9.Google Scholar
  72. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955 – 967.Google Scholar
  73. Marg, S., Geiges, L., Butzlaff, F., & Walter, F. (2013). Die neue Macht der Bürger: Was motiviert die Protestbewegungen ? (BP-Gesellschaftsstudie). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  74. Marres, N. (2012). Material participation: technology, the environment and everyday publics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  75. Martins, J. T., & Molnar, A. (2016). Handbook of research on innovations in information retrieval, analysis, and management. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  76. Mason, P. (2015). PostCapitalism. A Guide to Our Future. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  77. Meadowcroft, J. (2002). Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61(2-4), 169 – 179.Google Scholar
  78. Mey, F., Diesendorf, M., & McGill, I. (2016, in press). Role of Local Government in Facilitating Renewable Energy in Australia. Energy Research & Social Science. Google Scholar
  79. Michelsen, D., & Walter, F. (2013). Unpolitische Demokratie: Zur Krise der Repräsentation. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  80. Midgley, J. (1986). Community participation, social development, and the state. London & New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  81. Monstadt, P. D. J., & Scheiner, D.-U. S. (2016). Die Bundesländer in der nationalen Energie-und Klimapolitik: Räumliche Verteilungswirkungen und föderale Politikgestaltung der Energiewende. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 74(3), 179 – 197.Google Scholar
  82. Moor, J. de (2016). Lifestyle politics and the concept of political participation. Acta Politica. http://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2015.27
  83. Moss, T., & Newig, J. (2010). Multilevel Water Governance and Problems of Scale: Setting the Stage for a Broader Debate. Environmental Management, 46(1), 1 – 6.Google Scholar
  84. Nanz, P., & Fritsche, M. (2012). Handbuch Bürgerbeteiligung: Verfahren und Akteure, Chancen und Grenzen. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.Google Scholar
  85. Nanz, P., & Leggewie, C. (2016). Die Konsultative: Mehr Demokratie durch Bürgerbeteiligung? Berlin: Wagenbach.Google Scholar
  86. Newig, J. (2011). Partizipation und neue Formen der Governance. In M. Groß (Ed.), Handbuch Umweltsoziologie (pp. 485 – 502). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  87. Newman, J. (2005). Participative governance and the remaking of the public. In J. Newman (Eds.), Remaking governance: peoples, politics and the public sphere. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  88. Ohlhorst, D., & Schön, S. (2010): Windenergienutzung in Deutschland im dynamischen Wandel von Konfliktkonstellationen und Konflikttypen. In P. H. Feindt & T. Saretzki (Eds.), Umwelt- und Technikkonflikte (pp. 198 – 218). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  89. Ornetzeder, M., & Rohracher, H. (2013). Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing: Comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations. Global Environmental Change, 23, 856 – 867.Google Scholar
  90. Pande, R. (2008). Understanding political corruption in low income countries. In Handbook of development economics (pp. 3155 – 3184). Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  91. Papadopoulos, Y., & Benz, A. (Eds.). (2006). Governance and democracy: comparing national, European and international experiences. Abingdon, Oxfordshire & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Pestre, D. (2008). Challenges for the Democratic Management of Technoscience: Governance, Participation and the Political Today. Science as Culture, 17(2), 101 – 119.Google Scholar
  93. Poguntke, T. (Ed.). (2015). Citizenship and democracy in an era of crisis: essays in honour of Jan W. van Deth. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  94. Pörksen, U. (1995). Plastic Words: The Tyranny of a Modular Language. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Poser, H. (2012). Wissenschaftstheorie: eine philosophische Einführung (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  96. Rau, I., Schweizer-Ries, P., & Hildebrand, J. (2012). Participation: The Silver Bullet for the Acceptance of Renewable Energies ? In S. Kabisch (Ed.), Vulnerability, risks, and complexity: impacts of global change on human habitats (pp. 177 – 192). Cambridge, MA et al.: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  97. Renn, O. (2004). The Challenge of Integrating Deliberation and Expertise: Participation and Discourse in Risk Management. In T. McDaniels and M. J. Small (Eds.), Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field (pp. 289 – 366). Cambridge, Mass.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  99. Renn, O., Köck, W., Schweizer, P.-J., Bovet, J., Benighaus, C., Scheel, O., & Schröter, K. (2014). Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung bei Planungsvorhaben der Energiewende. Policy-Brief Helmholtz Allianz ENERGY TRANS.Google Scholar
  100. Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P. (Eds.). (1995). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  101. Roberts, N. C. (Ed.). (2015). The age of direct citizen participation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  102. Römmele, A. (Ed.). (2013). Empowering Citizens: studies in Collaborative Democracy. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  103. Roth, R. (2011). Bürgermacht: eine Streitschrift für mehr Partizipation. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.Google Scholar
  104. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(2), 251 – 290.Google Scholar
  105. Schaper, D. M. (2012). Making Ecopreneurs: Developing Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Farnham et al.: Gower.Google Scholar
  106. Schiller, C. (2016). The politics of welfare state transformation in Germany: still a semisovereign state. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Schimank, U. (2007). Elementare Mechanismen. In A. Benz, S. Lütz, U. Schimank, & G. Simonis (Eds.), Handbuch Governance: theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder (pp. 29 – 45). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  108. Schot, J., Kanger, L., & Verbong, G. (2016). The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems. Nature Energy, 1, 16054.Google Scholar
  109. Schröter, R., Scheel, O., Renn, O., & Schweizer, P.-J. (2016, in press). Testing the value of public participation in Germany: Theory, operationalization and a case study on the evaluation of participation. Energy Research & Social Science. Google Scholar
  110. Schweizer, P., & Renn, O. (2013): Partizipation in Technikkontroversen: Panakeia für die Energiewende ? Technikfolgenabschätzung. Theorie und Praxis, 22(2), 42 – 47.Google Scholar
  111. Schweizer, P.-J., Renn, O., Köck, W., Bovet, J., Benighaus, C., Scheel, O., & Schröter, R. (2014). Public participation for infrastructure planning in the context of the German “Energiewende”. Utilities Policy.Google Scholar
  112. Schweizer-Ries, P. (2011). Socio-Environmental Research on Energy Sustainable Communities: Participation Experiences of Two Decades. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation (pp. 187 – 202). London et al.: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  113. Scoones, I., Leach, M., & Newell, P. (Eds.). (2015). The Politics of Green Transformations. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  114. Selle, K., Rösener, B., & Rössig, M. (Eds.). (1996). Planung und Kommunikation: Gestaltung von Planungsprozessen in Quartier, Stadt und Landschaft; Grundlagen, Methoden, Praxiserfahrungen. Wiesbaden: Bauverl.Google Scholar
  115. Seyfang, G. (2005). Shopping for sustainability: can sustainable consumption promote ecological citizenship? Environmental Politics, 14(2), 290 – 306.Google Scholar
  116. Shove, E., & Spurling, N. (Eds.). (2012). Sustainable Practices: Social theory and climate change. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  117. Sirianni, C. (2009). Investing in democracy: engaging citizens in collaborative governance. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  118. Smith, A. (2012). Civil Society in Sustainable Energy Transitions. In G. Verbong, & D. Loorbach (Eds.), Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity? (pp. 180 – 202). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  119. Stein, T. (2015). Neue politische Engagementformen: Bürgerinnen und Bürger als civil entrepreneurs für die Transformation. In M. Tauschek & M. Grewe (Eds.), Knappheit, Mangel, Überfluss: kulturwissenschaftliche Positionen zum Umgang mit begrenzten Ressourcen (pp. 103 – 123). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verl.Google Scholar
  120. Straßburger, G., & Rieger, J. (2014). Partizipation kompakt: für Studium, Lehre und Praxis sozialer Berufe. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar
  121. Streeck, W. (2013). Gekaufte Zeit: die vertagte Krise des demokratischen Kapitalismus; Frankfurter Adorno-Vorlesungen 2012. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  122. Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999). The consensus building handbook: a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  123. US-National Research Council of the National Academies (2008). Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  124. Voigt, R. (Ed.). (2016). Staatsdenken: zum Stand der Staatstheorie heute. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  125. Voß, J.-P. (2016). Governance-Innovationen: Epistemische und politische Reflexivitäten in der Herstellung von “Bürgerpanelen” als neue Form von Demokratie. In W. Rammert, A. Windeler, H. Knoblauch, & M. Hutter (Eds.), Innovationsgesellschaft heute: Perspektiven, Felder und Fälle. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  126. Voßkuhle, A., Bumke, C., & Meinel, F. (Eds.). (2013). Verabschiedung und Wiederentdeckung des Staates im Spannungsfeld der Disziplinen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  127. Walk, H. (2008). Partizipative Governance: Beteiligungsformen und Beteiligungsrechte im Mehrebenensystem der Klimapolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  128. Walker, G. (2011). The role for “community” in carbon governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review Climate Change, 2, 777 – 782.Google Scholar
  129. Walker, G., & Devine-Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy: What should it mean ? Energy Policy, 36(2), 497 – 500.Google Scholar
  130. Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Barnett, J., Burningham, K., Cass, N., Devine-Wright, H., … Theobald, K. (2011). Symmetries, expectations, dynamics and contexts: a framework for understanding public engagement with renewable energy projects. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation (pp. 1 – 14). London et al.: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  131. Watson, J., & Devine-Wright, P. (2011). Centralisation, decentralisation and the scales in between. In M. Pollitt, & T. Jamasb (Eds.), The Future of Electricity Demand: Customers, Citizens and Loads (pp. 542 – 577). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  132. Wells, C. (2015). The civic organization and the digital citizen: communicating engagement in a networked age. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  133. Wilkinson, A., Gollan, P. J., Marchington, M., & Lewin, D. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organizations. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  134. Zukin, C. (2006). A new engagement ? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. New York et al.: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Radtke
    • 1
  • Lars Holstenkamp
    • 2
  • Jake Barnes
    • 3
  • Ortwin Renn
    • 4
  1. 1.Universität BremenBremenDeutschland
  2. 2.Professur für Finanzierung und FinanzwirtschaftLeuphana Universität LüneburgLüneburgDeutschland
  3. 3.BrightonUK
  4. 4.PotsdamDeutschland

Personalised recommendations