Skip to main content

Concepts, Formats, and Methods of Participation: Theory and Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation

Zusammenfassung

New energies form new energy landscapes (Apostol, Palmer, Pasqualetti, Smardon, & Sullivan, 2016; Gailing & Leibenath, 2013). Energy carriers converge within space and open up leeway and scope for design. Different spaces are affected: offshore and onshore, plains and mountains, waters, volcanic areas, coastal regions, deserts, etc. Different energy sources and types of technology are used and integrated through grids. Grids are increasingly governed as smart energy systems equipped with smart meters and apps etc., linked with smart mobility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agamben, G. (Ed.). (2012). Demokratie ? Eine Debatte. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, S., Kuhn, R., Renn, O., Bach, N., Böhm, B., Dienel, H.-L., … Walk, H. (2014). DELIKAT – Fachdialoge Deliberative Demokratie: Analyse Partizipativer Verfahren für den Transformationsprozess.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostol, D., Palmer, J. F., Pasqualetti, M. J., Smardon, R., & Sullivan, R. (2016). The Renewable Energy Landscape: Preserving Scenic Values in Our Sustainable Future. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216 – 224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. (2013). Material Politics: Disputes along the Pipeline. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, C. (2015). Die Energiewende in der Politik- und Partizipationsverflechtungsfalle: Das Beispiel des Stromnetzausbaus. Verwaltungsarchiv, 106(1), 112 – 154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2013). Environmental citizenship: global, local and individual. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics (pp. 347 – 358). London: Routledge Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., & Dose, N. (2010). Governance – Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen: eine Einführung (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann-Stiftung, & Staatsministerium Baden-Württemberg (Eds.). (2014). Partizipation im Wandel: unsere Demokratie zwischen Wählen, Mitmachen und Entscheiden. Gütersloh: Verl. Bertelsmann-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, H. (2000). Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries. World Development, 28(1), 21 – 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn, I. (2013). Simulative Demokratie: neue Politik nach der postdemokratischen Wende. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras, S., & Edler, J. (2015). The Governance of Socio-Technical Systems: Explaining Change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, S., & Peyke, G. (2011). Gegenwind für die Erneuerbaren: Räumliche Neuorientierung der Wind-, Solar- und Bioenergie vor dem Hintergrund einer verringerten Akzeptanz sowie zunehmender Flächennutzungskonflikte im ländlichen Raum. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 69(2), 105 – 118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. A. P. (Ed.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brühne, T. (2015). Die Rückkehr zur Fläche: Postmoderne Energielandschaften als Zeichen sozialer Aushandlungsprozesse im Raum. In J. Lempp, G. van der Beek, & T. Korn (Eds.), Aktuelle Herausforderungen in der Wirtschaftsförderung (pp. 111 – 117). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, R. L. (2015a). The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bude, H., & Staab, P. (Eds.). (2016). Kapitalismus und Ungleichheit: Die neuen Verwerfungen. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H. (2010). Cities and the Governing of Climate Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 229 – 253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (Eds.). (2016). Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. S. (2011). Political participation beyond the vote: how the institutional context shapes patterns of political participation in the 18 western European democracies. Åbo: Åbo Akad. Förl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, K., & Goldsmith, J. (2002). The end of management and the rise of organizational democracy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1 – 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, J. L. (2005). The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions through Citizen Involvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Cambridge et al.: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alisa, G., De Maria, F., & Kallis, G. (Eds.). (2015). Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76 – 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denecke, M., Ganzert, A., Otto, I., & Stock, R. (Eds.). (2016). ReClaiming Participation: Technology – Mediation – Collectivity. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deth, J. W. van (2014). A conceptual map of political participation. Acta politica; international journal of political science, 49(3), 349 – 367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deth, J. W. van, & Maloney, W. A. (Eds.). (2012). New Participatory Dimensions in Civil Society: Professionalization and Individualized Collective Action. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deth, J. W. van. (2009). Politische Partizipation. In V. Kaina & A. Römmele (Eds.), Politische Soziologie (pp. 141 – 161). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P. (2007). Energy Citizenship: Psychological Aspects of Evolution in Sustainable Energy Technologies. In J. Murphy (Ed.), Governing technology for sustainability (pp. 63 – 88). London & Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P. (2014). Towards a comprehensive understanding of energy and communities: Advances, experiments, gaps and challenges. Presentation, 1st Symposium on Community Energy Systems, 10 March 2014. Lille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, U., & Schrape, J.-F. (2014). Kollektives Handeln im Internet: Eine akteurtheoretische Fundierung. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 24(1), 5 – 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy: politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhard, J., Lauwers, S., & Schmerz, S. (2013). Do unconventional forms of citizen participation add value to the quality of democracy in Germany ? A case study of the Bürgerdialog Energietechnologien für die Zukunft. In A. Römmele & H. Banthien (Eds.), Empowering Citizens: Studies in Collaborative Democracy (pp. 17 – 105). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feindt, P. H., & Saretzki, T. (2010). Umwelt- und Technikkonflikte. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. (2013). Is it Time to Update the Definition of Political Participation ? Political Participation in Britain: The Decline and Revival of Civic Culture. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(1), 1 – 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, S., Peters, M., & Woodman, B. (2016). Local authorities as niche actors: the case of energy governance in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 1 – 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 66 – 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, O. W. (2013). Politische Partizipation. In J. W. van Deth & M. Tausendpfund (Eds.), Politik im Kontext: Ist alle Politik lokale Politik ? (pp. 381 – 411). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gailing, L., & Leibenath, M. (Eds.). (2013). Neue Energielandschaften – Neue Perspektiven der Landschaftsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gailing, L., & Röhring, A. (2016). Is it all about collaborative governance ? Alternative ways of understanding the success of energy regions. Utilities Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.009

  • Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257 – 1274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, A. (2002). Neue Konflikte durch kooperative Politikformen. In J. Bogumil (Ed.), Kommunale Entscheidungsprozesse im Wandel (pp. 267 – 284). Wiesbaden: VS, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaab, M. (Ed.). (2016). Politik mit Bürgern – Politik für Bürger: Praxis und Perspektiven einer neuen Beteiligungskultur. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, S. (2010). The power of social innovation: How civic entrepreneurs ignite community networks for good. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, J. R. (2012). Participatory governance reloaded: the horizontalist expectation. In B. Egner, M. Haus, & G. Terizakis (Eds.), Regieren (pp. 75 – 97). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, J. R., & Gbikpi, B. (Eds.). (2002). Participatory governance: political and societal implications. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A. (2004). Participation as a means of enhancing the legitimacy of decisions on technology ? A sceptical analysis. Poiesis & Praxis, 3(1-2), 106 – 122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, S., Ivner, J., & Palm, J. (2015). Management and stakeholder participation in local strategic energy planning – Examples from Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 205 – 212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt, H. (Ed.). (2002). Participatory governance in multi-level context: concepts and experience. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs, H., Kuhn, K., & Newig, J. (2011). Nachhaltige Gesellschaft: welche Rolle für Partizipation und Kooperation ? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, R. G. (2009). Rückkehr des Staates ? Politische Handlungsmöglichkeiten in unsicheren Zeiten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, A., & Pfadenhauer, M. (2014). Mediatisierte Partizipation ? In F. Krotz, C. Despotovíc, & M.-M. Kruse (Eds.), Die Mediatisierung sozialer Welten: Synergien empirischer Forschung (pp. 253 – 262). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, D., & Bjerke, B. (2006). Public entrepreneurship: moving from social/consumer to public/citizen. In C. Steyaert, & D. Hjorth (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as social change (pp. 97 – 120). Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industrial Democracy in Europe (Ed.). (1993). Industrial democracy in Europe revisited. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, S. A. (2012). Bürger. Macht. Staat ?: Einleitung. In S. A. Jansen, E. Schröter, & N. Stehr (Eds.), Bürger. Macht. Staat ?: Neue Formen gesellschaftlicher Teilhabe, Teilnahme und Arbeitsteilung (pp. 7 – 14). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaase, M. (2011). Participation. In B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International encyclopedia of political science. Vol. 6. Non-Pol (pp. 1777 – 1788). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamlage, H., Nanz, P., & Fleischer, B. (2014). Dialogorientierte Bürgerbeteiligung im Netzausbau. Jahrbuch Nachhaltige Ökonomie, 4, 195 – 216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, M., & Dilla Alfonso, H. (Eds.). (1997). Community power and grassroots democracy: the transformation of social life. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, S. I. (2013). Soziale Partizipation. In J. W. van Deth & M. Tausendpfund (Eds.), Politik im Kontext: Ist alle Politik lokale Politik ? (pp. 157 – 189). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, N. (2008). Politische Beteiligung: Einführung in dialogorientierte Instrumente politischer und gesellschaftlicher Partizipation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, N. (Ed.). (2012). Electronic Democracy. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klagge, B., & Arbach, C. (2013). Governance-Prozesse für erneuerbare Energien. Hannover: ARL, Akad. für Raumforschung und Landesplanung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B., Quittkat, C., Buth, V., & Altides, C. (2013). De-mystification of participatory democracy: EU governance and civil society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Sage Publications, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, H. (2004). The Politics of Scale and Networks of Spatial Connectivity: Transnational Interurban Networks and the Rescaling of Political Governance in Europe. In E. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and Geographic Inquiry (pp. 236 – 255). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, K.-O., & Persson, T. (2011). Participatory governance in the EU: enhancing or endangering democracy and efficiency ? Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, R., Aichholzer, G., & Hennen, L. (Eds.). (2016). Electronic democracy in Europe: Prospects and Challenges of E-Publics, E-participation and E-Voting. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (Eds.). (2012). Social media and democracy: innovations in participatory politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Månsson, A. (2015). A resource curse for renewables ? Conflict and cooperation in the renewable energy sector. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, 1 – 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955 – 967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marg, S., Geiges, L., Butzlaff, F., & Walter, F. (2013). Die neue Macht der Bürger: Was motiviert die Protestbewegungen ? (BP-Gesellschaftsstudie). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marres, N. (2012). Material participation: technology, the environment and everyday publics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, J. T., & Molnar, A. (2016). Handbook of research on innovations in information retrieval, analysis, and management. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, P. (2015). PostCapitalism. A Guide to Our Future. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (2002). Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61(2-4), 169 – 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mey, F., Diesendorf, M., & McGill, I. (2016, in press). Role of Local Government in Facilitating Renewable Energy in Australia. Energy Research & Social Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen, D., & Walter, F. (2013). Unpolitische Demokratie: Zur Krise der Repräsentation. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, J. (1986). Community participation, social development, and the state. London & New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monstadt, P. D. J., & Scheiner, D.-U. S. (2016). Die Bundesländer in der nationalen Energie-und Klimapolitik: Räumliche Verteilungswirkungen und föderale Politikgestaltung der Energiewende. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 74(3), 179 – 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor, J. de (2016). Lifestyle politics and the concept of political participation. Acta Politica. http://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2015.27

  • Moss, T., & Newig, J. (2010). Multilevel Water Governance and Problems of Scale: Setting the Stage for a Broader Debate. Environmental Management, 46(1), 1 – 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanz, P., & Fritsche, M. (2012). Handbuch Bürgerbeteiligung: Verfahren und Akteure, Chancen und Grenzen. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanz, P., & Leggewie, C. (2016). Die Konsultative: Mehr Demokratie durch Bürgerbeteiligung? Berlin: Wagenbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newig, J. (2011). Partizipation und neue Formen der Governance. In M. Groß (Ed.), Handbuch Umweltsoziologie (pp. 485 – 502). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2005). Participative governance and the remaking of the public. In J. Newman (Eds.), Remaking governance: peoples, politics and the public sphere. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlhorst, D., & Schön, S. (2010): Windenergienutzung in Deutschland im dynamischen Wandel von Konfliktkonstellationen und Konflikttypen. In P. H. Feindt & T. Saretzki (Eds.), Umwelt- und Technikkonflikte (pp. 198 – 218). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornetzeder, M., & Rohracher, H. (2013). Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing: Comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations. Global Environmental Change, 23, 856 – 867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande, R. (2008). Understanding political corruption in low income countries. In Handbook of development economics (pp. 3155 – 3184). Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Y., & Benz, A. (Eds.). (2006). Governance and democracy: comparing national, European and international experiences. Abingdon, Oxfordshire & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestre, D. (2008). Challenges for the Democratic Management of Technoscience: Governance, Participation and the Political Today. Science as Culture, 17(2), 101 – 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poguntke, T. (Ed.). (2015). Citizenship and democracy in an era of crisis: essays in honour of Jan W. van Deth. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pörksen, U. (1995). Plastic Words: The Tyranny of a Modular Language. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poser, H. (2012). Wissenschaftstheorie: eine philosophische Einführung (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, I., Schweizer-Ries, P., & Hildebrand, J. (2012). Participation: The Silver Bullet for the Acceptance of Renewable Energies ? In S. Kabisch (Ed.), Vulnerability, risks, and complexity: impacts of global change on human habitats (pp. 177 – 192). Cambridge, MA et al.: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (2004). The Challenge of Integrating Deliberation and Expertise: Participation and Discourse in Risk Management. In T. McDaniels and M. J. Small (Eds.), Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field (pp. 289 – 366). Cambridge, Mass.. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., Köck, W., Schweizer, P.-J., Bovet, J., Benighaus, C., Scheel, O., & Schröter, K. (2014). Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung bei Planungsvorhaben der Energiewende. Policy-Brief Helmholtz Allianz ENERGY TRANS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P. (Eds.). (1995). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N. C. (Ed.). (2015). The age of direct citizen participation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Römmele, A. (Ed.). (2013). Empowering Citizens: studies in Collaborative Democracy. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, R. (2011). Bürgermacht: eine Streitschrift für mehr Partizipation. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(2), 251 – 290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaper, D. M. (2012). Making Ecopreneurs: Developing Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Farnham et al.: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, C. (2016). The politics of welfare state transformation in Germany: still a semisovereign state. Abingdon, Oxon & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimank, U. (2007). Elementare Mechanismen. In A. Benz, S. Lütz, U. Schimank, & G. Simonis (Eds.), Handbuch Governance: theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder (pp. 29 – 45). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot, J., Kanger, L., & Verbong, G. (2016). The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems. Nature Energy, 1, 16054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, R., Scheel, O., Renn, O., & Schweizer, P.-J. (2016, in press). Testing the value of public participation in Germany: Theory, operationalization and a case study on the evaluation of participation. Energy Research & Social Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, P., & Renn, O. (2013): Partizipation in Technikkontroversen: Panakeia für die Energiewende ? Technikfolgenabschätzung. Theorie und Praxis, 22(2), 42 – 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, P.-J., Renn, O., Köck, W., Bovet, J., Benighaus, C., Scheel, O., & Schröter, R. (2014). Public participation for infrastructure planning in the context of the German “Energiewende”. Utilities Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer-Ries, P. (2011). Socio-Environmental Research on Energy Sustainable Communities: Participation Experiences of Two Decades. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation (pp. 187 – 202). London et al.: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I., Leach, M., & Newell, P. (Eds.). (2015). The Politics of Green Transformations. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selle, K., Rösener, B., & Rössig, M. (Eds.). (1996). Planung und Kommunikation: Gestaltung von Planungsprozessen in Quartier, Stadt und Landschaft; Grundlagen, Methoden, Praxiserfahrungen. Wiesbaden: Bauverl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G. (2005). Shopping for sustainability: can sustainable consumption promote ecological citizenship? Environmental Politics, 14(2), 290 – 306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., & Spurling, N. (Eds.). (2012). Sustainable Practices: Social theory and climate change. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirianni, C. (2009). Investing in democracy: engaging citizens in collaborative governance. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2012). Civil Society in Sustainable Energy Transitions. In G. Verbong, & D. Loorbach (Eds.), Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity? (pp. 180 – 202). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, T. (2015). Neue politische Engagementformen: Bürgerinnen und Bürger als civil entrepreneurs für die Transformation. In M. Tauschek & M. Grewe (Eds.), Knappheit, Mangel, Überfluss: kulturwissenschaftliche Positionen zum Umgang mit begrenzten Ressourcen (pp. 103 – 123). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straßburger, G., & Rieger, J. (2014). Partizipation kompakt: für Studium, Lehre und Praxis sozialer Berufe. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (2013). Gekaufte Zeit: die vertagte Krise des demokratischen Kapitalismus; Frankfurter Adorno-Vorlesungen 2012. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999). The consensus building handbook: a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • US-National Research Council of the National Academies (2008). Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, R. (Ed.). (2016). Staatsdenken: zum Stand der Staatstheorie heute. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voß, J.-P. (2016). Governance-Innovationen: Epistemische und politische Reflexivitäten in der Herstellung von “Bürgerpanelen” als neue Form von Demokratie. In W. Rammert, A. Windeler, H. Knoblauch, & M. Hutter (Eds.), Innovationsgesellschaft heute: Perspektiven, Felder und Fälle. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voßkuhle, A., Bumke, C., & Meinel, F. (Eds.). (2013). Verabschiedung und Wiederentdeckung des Staates im Spannungsfeld der Disziplinen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walk, H. (2008). Partizipative Governance: Beteiligungsformen und Beteiligungsrechte im Mehrebenensystem der Klimapolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. (2011). The role for “community” in carbon governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review Climate Change, 2, 777 – 782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., & Devine-Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy: What should it mean ? Energy Policy, 36(2), 497 – 500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Barnett, J., Burningham, K., Cass, N., Devine-Wright, H., … Theobald, K. (2011). Symmetries, expectations, dynamics and contexts: a framework for understanding public engagement with renewable energy projects. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation (pp. 1 – 14). London et al.: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., & Devine-Wright, P. (2011). Centralisation, decentralisation and the scales in between. In M. Pollitt, & T. Jamasb (Eds.), The Future of Electricity Demand: Customers, Citizens and Loads (pp. 542 – 577). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C. (2015). The civic organization and the digital citizen: communicating engagement in a networked age. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A., Gollan, P. J., Marchington, M., & Lewin, D. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organizations. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, C. (2006). A new engagement ? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. New York et al.: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Radtke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Radtke, J., Holstenkamp, L., Barnes, J., Renn, O. (2018). Concepts, Formats, and Methods of Participation: Theory and Practice. In: Holstenkamp, L., Radtke, J. (eds) Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09416-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09416-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-09415-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-09416-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics