Skip to main content

Defining the playing field

A framework for analysing fairness in access to resources, media and the law

  • Aufsätze
  • Chapter
Democratization and Competitive Authoritarianism in Africa

Abstract

The playing field is a concept often used to describe level of fairness in electoral competition. With Levitsky and Way’s definition of the playing field as a case in point, this paper takes a critical look at existing work on the playing field, arguing that current conceptualizations suffer from lacking conceptual logic, operationalization and measurement. A new and disaggregated framework that can serve as the basis for future research on the playing field is then proposed. This framework is applied to an illustrative case study on the development of the playing field in Zambia under MMD rule, thereby demonstrating that it is able to capture both the changing nature of the playing field and the differing mechanisms at play to a larger degree than the framework put forth by Levitsky and Way. The 2011 elections in Zambia also clearly highlight the importance of conceptually and empirically separating the slope of the playing field from its impact on both the opposition and electoral outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Sources consulted

Publications reviewed

  • Baldwin, Kate. 2013. Why Vote with the Chief? Political Connections and Public Goods Provision in Zambia. American Journal of Political Science 57 (4): 794–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanda, Fackson. 1997. Elections and the press in Zambia: the case of the 1996 polls . Lusaka: Zambia Independent Media Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banda, Fackson. 2006. Zambia Research findings and conclusions. African Media Development Initiative . London: BBC World Service Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, Dave. 2001. Human rights, democracy and the donors: the first MMD government in Zambia. Review of African Political Economy 28 (87): 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, David M. C. 2000. Civil Society and Democracy: A Zambian Case Study. Journal of Southern African Studies 26 (3): 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylies, Carolyn and Morris Szeftel. 1997. The 1996 Zambian elections: still awaiting democratic consolidation. Review of African Political Economy 24 (71): 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, Michael. 1999. Political Participation in a New Democracy: Institutional Considerations from Zambia. Comparative Political Studies 32 (5): 549–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, Michael and Nicolas van de Walle. 1997. Democratic experiments in Africa: regime transitions in comparative perspective . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, Peter. 1995. Building on the Past? Party Politics in Zambia's Third Republic. Party Politics 1 (3): 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, Peter. 1997. Whither Zambia? The Zambian presidential and parliamentary elections of November 1996. Electoral Studies 16 (3): 407–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, Peter. 2000. The significance of the December 1998 local elections in Zambia and their aftermath. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 38, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, Peter. 2001. Does Economic Reform Promote Democratisation? Evidence from Zambia's Third Republic. New Political Economy 6, 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, Peter. 2001. The Party System and Party Politics in Zambia: Continuities Past, Present and Future. African Affairs 100 (399), 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, Peter. 2003. The tripartite elections in Zambia, December 2001. Electoral Studies 22, 388–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. C. 2002. A Comparative Analysis of Political Parties in Kenya, Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Democratization 9 (3): 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, Nick and Marja Hinfelaar. 2010. Parties, Platforms, and Political Mobilization: The Zambian Presidential Election of 2008. African Affairs 109 (434): 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirwa, Chris H. 1997. Press freedom in Zambia: a brief review of the state of the press during the MMD's first 5 years in office . Lusaka: Zambia Independent Media Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloppen, Siri. 2003. The accountability function of the courts in Tanzania and Zambia. Democratization 10 (4): 112–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Jeremy. 2006. Zambia's 2006 elections: The ethnicization of politics . Uppsala: NAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Steve and Richard Aidoo. Charting the Roots of Anti-Chinese Populism in Africa: A Comparison of Zambia and Ghana. Journal of Asian and Africa Studies 49: 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihonvbere, Julius O. 1995. From Movement to Government: The Movement for Multi-Party Democracy and the Crisis of Democratic Consolidation in Zambia. Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines 29 (1): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihonvbere, Julius O. 1996. Economic crisis, civil society, and democratisation: the case of Zambia . Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiyama, John, Anna Batta and Angela Sortor. 2013. Political parties, independents and the electoral market in sub-Saharan Africa. Party Politics 19 (5): 695–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabemba, Claude, ed. 2004. Elections and democracy in Zambia . Johannesburg: EISA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasara, Kimuli. 2007. Tax Me If You Can: Ethnic Geography, Democracy, and the Taxation of Agriculture in Africa. American Political Science Review 101 (1): 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasoma, Francis Peter. 2002. Community radio: its management and organisation in Zambia . Lusaka: Zambia Independent Media Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiwuva, David E. 2013. Democracy and the politics of power alternation in Africa. Contemporary Politics 19 (3): 262–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larmer, Miles and Alastair Fraser. 2007. Of cabbages and King Cobra: Populist politics and Zambia's 2006 election. African Affairs 106 (425): 611–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebas, Adrienne. 2012. From protest to parties: party-building and democratization in Africa . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, Stefan. 2011. Inclusive Elite Bargains and the Dilemma of Unproductive Peace: a Zambian case study. Third World Quarterly 32 (10): 1843–1869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, Tom, Denis Kadima and David Pottie. 2002. Compendium of elections in Southern Africa, Johannesburg: EISA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Nicole M. and Jacob Ricker-Gilbert. 2013. Disrupting Demand for Commercial Seed: Input Subsidies in Malawi and Zambia. World Development 45: 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momba, Jotham. 2005. Political Parties and the Quest for Democratic Consolidation in Zambia . Johannesburg: EISA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, Dumisani. 2010. Musical chairs and reluctant liberalization: broadcasting policy reform trends in Zimbabwe and Zambia. In: Media Policy in a Changing Southern Africa: Critical Reflections on Media Reforms in the Global Age, eds. Dumisani Moyo and Wallace Chuma. Pretoria: UNISA Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, Gerardo L. and Jay Verkuilen. 2002. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, Gayatri and Muzammil M. Hussain. 2010. Mass Media in Zambia Demand-Side Measures of Access, Use and Reach . AudienceScapes Development Research Series. Washington: Intermedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwalongo, S. 2001. The role of the media in ensuring accountability in the Zambian 2001 elections . Lusaka: Zambia Institute of Mass Communications (Zamcom).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasong’o, Shadrack Wandala. 2007. Political Transition without Transformation. The Dialectic of Liberalization without Democratization in Kenya and Zambia. African Studies Review 50 (1): 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opalo, Kennedy Ochieng. 2012. African Elections: Two Divergent Trends. Journal of Democracy 23 (3): 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panter-Brick, Keith. 1994. Prospects for Democracy in Zambia. Government and Opposition 29 (2): 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phiri, Isaac. 1999. Media in “Democratic” Zambia: Problems and Prospects. Africa Today 46 (2): 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher, M. Anne. 2012. Party politics and economic reform in Africa's democracies . New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Daniel N. 2004. The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Revie w 98 (4): 529–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Daniel N. and David J. Simon. 2002. Economic Conditions and Incumbent Support in Africa's New Democracies: Evidence from Zambia. Comparative Political Studies 35 (3): 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakner, Lise. 2003. Political and economic liberalisation in Zambia 1991-2001. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakner, Lise. 2011. Institutionalizing the pro-democracy movements: the case of Zambia's Movement for Multiparty Democracy. Democratization 18 (5): 1106–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakner, Lise. 2012. Foreign Aid and Democratic Consolidation in Zambia . Wider Working Paper 2012/16. Helsinki: UNU Wider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakner, Lise and Lars Svåsand. 2004. From Dominant to Competitive Party System: The Zambian Experience 1991-2001. Party Politics 10, 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakner, Lise and Lars Svåsand. 2005. Stuck in transition: electoral processes in Zambia 1991-2001. Democratization 12 (1): 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakner, Lise and Lars Svåsand. 2010. In search of the impact of international support for political parties in new democracies: Malawi and Zambia compared. Democratization 17 (6): 1250–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, Vicky and Lars Svåsand. 2002. Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Africa. Democratization 9 (3): 30–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, Danielle. 2012. Opposition Parties and the Urban Poor in African Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 45 (11): 1351–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarritt, James R. 2006. The strategic choice of multiethnic parties in Zambia's dominant and personalist party system. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 44 (2): 234–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, David. 2002. Can Democracy Consolidate in Africa amidst Poverty? Economic Influences upon Political Participation in Zambia. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 40 (1): 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simutanyi, Neo. 2013. Zambia: Democracy and Political Participation: A review by AfriMAP and the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa . Open Society Foundation Discussion Paper. Johannesburg: Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Scott D. 2012. Influence without Organizations: State-Business Relations and Their Impact on Business Environments in Contemporary Africa. Business and Politics 14 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tordoff, William, and Young, Ralph. 2005. Electoral Politics in Africa: The Experience of Zambia and Zimbabwe. Government and Opposition 40 (3): 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Donge, Jan Kees. 2008. The EU Observer Mission to the Zambian Elections 2001: The Politics of Election Monitoring as the Construction of Narratives. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 46 (3): 296–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Donge, Jan Kees. 2009. The plundering of Zambian resources by Frederick Chiluba and his friends: A case study of the interaction between national politics and the international drive towards good governance. African Affairs 108 (430): 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Donge, Jan Kees. 2010. The 2008 presidential by-election in Zambia. Electoral Studies 29 (3): 521–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Soest, Christian. 2013. Persistent systemic corruption: why democratisation and economic liberalisation have failed to undo an old evil. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 7 (1): 57–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Soest, Christian, Karsten Bechle and Nina Korte. 2011. How Neopatrimonialism Affects Tax Administration: a comparative study of three world regions. Third World Quarterly 32 (7): 1307–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • VonDoepp, Peter. 2005. The Problem of Judicial Control in Africa's Neopatrimonial Democracies: Malawi and Zambia. Political Science Quarterly 120 (2): 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VonDoepp, Peter. 2006. Politics and Judicial Assertiveness in Emerging Democracies: High Court Behavior in Malawi and Zambia. Political Research Quarterly 59 (3): 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, Wendy. 2013. Participation-in what? Radio, convergence and the corporate logic of audience input through new media in Zambia. Telematics and Informatics 30 (3): 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Reports and other publications

  • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (BDHRL). 1999-2012. Human Rights Reports Zambia . Washington: U.S. Department of State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter Centre. 2002. Observing the 2001 Zambian Elections . Atlanta: The Carter Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Observer Group (COG). 2006. Zambia Presidential, Parliamentary and Local Government Elections 28 September 2006 . London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Observer Group (COG). 2011. Zambia General Elections 20 September 2011 . London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • EISA. 2010. EISA Election Observer Mission Report: Zambia Presidential By-Election 30 October 2008 . Johannesburg: EISA.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUEOM. 2006. European Election Observation Mission Zambia 2006: Final Report . Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUEOM. 2011. European Election Observation Mission Zambia 2011: Final Report . Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House (FH). 1999-2012. Freedom in the world: Country Report Zambia . Washington: Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Albaugh, Ericka A. 2011. An autocrat's toolkit: Adaptation and manipulation in ‘democratic’ Cameroon. Democratization 18 (2): 388–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriantsoa, Pascal, Nancy Andriasendrarivony, Steven Haggblade, Bart Minten, Mamy Rakotojaona, Frederick Rakotovoavy, and Harivelle Sarindra Razafinimanana. 2005. Media proliferation and democratic transition in Africa: The case of Madagascar. World Development 33 (11): 1939–1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneson, Richard. 2008. Equality of opportunity. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 ed.), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=equalopportunity. Accessed 08 March 2014.

  • Arriola, Leonardo R. 2013. Capital and opposition in Africa: Coalition building in multiethnic societies. World Politics 65 (2): 233–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, Stefano. 1999. Collusion, competition and democracy: Part I. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11 (4): 435–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, Stefano. 2000. Collusion, competition and democracy: Part II. Journal of Theoretical Politics 12 (1): 33–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjornlund, Eric. 2004. Beyond free and fair: Monitoring elections and building democracy . Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, Gary, Andrew Green, and Toby Moore. 2013. Measuring the quality of election administration. Democratization 20 (2): 358–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaards, Matthijs. 2013. Reexamining African elections. Journal of Democracy 24 (4): 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, Shari, and Denise Baer, eds. 2005. Money in politics: A study of party financing practices in 22 countries . Washington, DC: National Democratic Instistitute for International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnell, Peter, and André Gerrits. 2010. Promoting party politics in emerging democracies. Democratization 17 (6): 1065–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Anthony. 2010. Introduction: Money and politics. In Paying for politics: Party funding and political change in South Africa and the global South, ed. Anthony Butler, Johannesburg: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, Thomas. 2002. The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jager, Nicola, and Cara H. Meintjes. 2013. Winners, losers and the playing field in Southern Africa's ‘Democratic Darlings’: Botswana and South Africa compared. Politikon 40 (2): 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elklit, Jørgen, and Andrew Reynolds. 2005. A framework for the systematic study of election quality. Democratization 12 (3): 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elklit, Jørgen, and Palle Svensson. 1997. What makes elections free and fair? Journal of Democracy 8 (3): 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EUEOM. 2011. European election observation mission Zambia 2011: Final Report . Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, Jennifer, and Ellen Lust-Okar. 2009. Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, Tom., and Tamir Moustafa, eds. 2008. Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gloppen, Siri, Bruce M. Wilson, Roberto Gargarella, Elin Skaar, and Morten Kinander, eds. 2010. Courts and power in Latin America and Africa . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social science concepts: A user's guide . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin-Gill, Guy S. 1998. Codes of conduct for elections: A study prepared for the inter-parliamentary union . Geneva: Inter-parliamentary Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Richard, and Christine Jackson. 1995. A guide for elections observers . Darthmouth: Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadenius, Axel, and Jan Teorell. 2007. Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 18 (1): 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helle, Svein-Erik. 2011. Living in a material world: Political funding in electoral authoritarian regimes in Sub-Saharan Africa. Thesis published for degree of Master in Comparative Politics, University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helle, Svein-Erik, and Lise Rakner. 2012. The interplay between poverty and electoral authoritarianism: Poverty and political mobilization in Zambia and Uganda. CMI Working Paper 2012/3. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Steve, and Richard Aidoo. Charting the roots of anti-chinese populism in Africa: A comparison of Zambia and Ghana. Journal of Asian and Africa Studies 49: 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, Göran, and Charles Okigbo. 2002. The media and the two waves of democracy. In Media and democracy in Africa, eds. Folu Folarin Ogundimu, Göran Hydén, and Michael Leslie, Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucian Way. 2002. Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucian Way. 2010a. Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War . New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucian Way. 2010b. Why democracy needs a level playing field. Journal of Democracy 21 (1): 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, Staffan. 2009. The power of elections in Africa revisited. In Democratization by elections: A new mode of transition, ed. Staffan Lindberg. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Pintor, Rafael. 2000. Electoral Management Bodies as Institutions of Governance. UNDP Discussion Papers on Governance. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Gabrielle, and Gordon Crawford. 2011. Democratization in Africa 1990-2010: An assessment. Democratization 18 (2): 275–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merloe, Patrick. 1997. Democratic elections: Human rights, public confidence and fair competition . Washington, DC: NDI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenbesser, Lee. 2013. Elections in hybrid regimes: Conceptual stretching revived. Political Studies 62 (1): 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Yonatan L. 2012. The Era of electoral authoritarianism. World Politics 64 (1): 161–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, Dumisani. 2010. Musical chairs and reluctant liberalization: Broadcasting policy reform trends in Zimbabwe and Zambia. In Media policy in a changing Southern Africa: Critical reflections on media reforms in the global age, eds. Dumisani Moyo, and Wallace Chuma, Pretoria: UNISA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffar, Shaheen. 2002. Patterns of electoral governance in Africa's emerging democracies. International Political Science Review 23 (1): 85–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffar, Shaheen, and Andreas Schedler. 2002. The comparative study of electoral governance-introduction. International Political Science Review 23 (1): 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martinez i Coma. 2013. Assesing the quality of elections. Journal of Democracy 24 (4): 124–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opalo, Kennedy Ochieng. 2012. African elections: Two divergent trends. Journal of Democracy 23 (3): 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher, M. Anne. 2012. Party politics and economic reform in Africa's democracies . New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prempeh, H. Kwasi. 2008. Presidents untamed. Journal of Democracy 19 (2): 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakner, Lise, and Nicolas van de Walle. 2009. Opposition weakness in Africa. Journal of Democracy 20 (3): 108-121.k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, Vicky, and Lars Svåsand. 2002. Political parties and democratic consolidation in Africa. Democratization 9 (3): 30–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, John E. 1998. Equality of opportunity . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffu, Yaw. 2003. The funding of political parties and election campaigns in Africa. In Funding of political parties and election campaigns, eds. Reginald Austin, and Maja Tjernström, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assitance IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 2002. The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas, ed. 2006. Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition . Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 2012. Judgment and measurement in political science. Perspectives on Politics 10 (1): 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 2013. The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van de Walle, Nicolas. 2003. Presidentialism and clientelism in Africa's emerging party systems. The Journal of Modern African Studies 41 (2): 297–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • VonDoepp, Peter and Daniel J. Young. 2013. Assaults on the fourth estate: Explaining media harassment in Africa. The Journal of Politics 75 (1): 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Herman. 2011. Introduction: Taking it to the streets. In Popular media, democracy and development in Africa, ed. Herman Wasserman, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, Wendy. 2013. Participation-in what? Radio, convergence and the corporate logic of audience input through new media in Zambia. Telematics and Informatics 30 (3): 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Matthijs Bogaards Sebastian Elischer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helle, SE. (2016). Defining the playing field. In: Bogaards, M., Elischer, S. (eds) Democratization and Competitive Authoritarianism in Africa. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft – Sonderhefte. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09216-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics