Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

IQM-Reifegradmodell für die Bewertung und Verbesserung des Information Lifecycle Management Prozesses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Daten- und Informationsqualität

  • 9531 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Heutige Organisationen produzieren und speichern mehr Informationen als je zuvor. Der resultierende Informationsüberfluss, zusammen mit einem Mangel an Qualitätssicherung für das Information Lifecycle Management, führt zu einem unsicheren Status der Informationsqualität in vielen Organisationen. Weiterhin hat sich herausgestellt, dass das Bewerten, Verbessern und Steuern der Informationsqualität ein offenkundig schwieriges Unterfangen ist. Dieses Kapitel stellt ein Modell zur Bewertung und Verbesserung der Information Quality Management Capability Maturity (IQM-Reifegrad) vor. Es wird ein Satz von Kriterien vorgestellt, der aus Literaturrecherche und Fallstudien abgeleitet wurde. Die Reifegradindikatoren werden validiert und in einem mehrstufigen Reifegradmodell durch eine Delphi-Studie gruppiert. Das abgeleitete IQM-Reifegradmodell hilft Organisationen ihre bestehenden Praktiken im IQM zu bewerten und potentielle Lücken und Verbesserungsstrategien zu ermitteln.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Agarwal, R. & Venkatesh, V.: Assessing a firm’s web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. In: Information Systems Research, 2. Jg., 2002, Heft 13, S. 168–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, J.: Information Theory and Evolution. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballou, D. P. & Pazer, H. L.: Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems. In: Management Science, 3. Jg., 1985, Heft 31, S. 150–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardecki, M. J.: Participants’ Response to the Delphi Method: An Attitudinal Perspective. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3. Jg., 1984, Heft 25, S. 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baškarada, S., Koronios, A. & Gao, J.: Towards a Capability Maturity Model for Information Quality Management: A TDQM Approach. In: 11th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-06), 2006, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, November 10– 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benarie, M.: Delphi and Delphi Like Approaches with Special Regards to Environmental Standard Setting. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2. Jg., 1988, Heft 33, S. 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, I., Gómez, Ó. & Piattini, M.: Getting Better Information Quality by Assessing and Improving Information Quality Management. In: The Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-04), 2004, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, November 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y. Y., Jeong, G. H. & Kim, S. H.: A Delphi Technology Forecasting Approach Using a Semi-Markov Concept. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Jg., 1991, Heft 40, S. 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • CMMI: Capability Maturity Model® Integration (CMMI), Version 1.1. Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, P.: Quality is Free. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey, N. C.: Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. The Rand Corporation, Chicago, IL, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. & Aaker, D. A.: Marketing Research. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, T.: Methods for Analysing Data from Delphi Panels. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Jg., 1987, Heft 31, S. 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbecq, A. L., Ven, A. H. V. d. & Gustafson, D. H.: Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group Delphi Process. Scott-Foresman, Glenview, IL, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLoe, R. C.: Explorig Complex Policy Questions Using The Policy Delphi: A Multi-Round, Interactive Survey Method. In: Applied Geography, 1. Jg., 1995, Heft 15, S. 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E.: Out of the Crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. P.: Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality. Wiley Computer Publishing, New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, A. V.: Total Quality Control. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A. & Frey, J. H.: Interviewing: The Art of Science. Sage, London, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, J.: Handbook of Futures Research. Greenwood Press, London, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannoccaro, A., Shanks, G. & Darke, P.: Stakeholder Perceptions of Data Quality in a Data Warehouse Environment. In: Australian Computer Journal, 4. Jg., 1999, Heft 31, S. 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • <http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/how-much-info-2003> (Zugriff am 25th of August 2006), 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, K.: Guide to Quality Control. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, J. M.: Quality Control Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, J. M.: Juran on Planing for Quality. Free Press, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaynak, E. & Macaulay, J. A.: The Delphi Technique in the Measurement of Tourism Marketing Potential. In: Tourism Management, Jg., 1984, Heft, S. 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, S., Hasson, F. & McKenna, H. P.: A Critical Review of the Delphi Technique as a Research Methodology for Nursing. In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Jg., 2001, Heft 38, S. 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyung-seok, R.: A study on data quality management maturity model. In: Advanced Communication Technology, 2005, ICACT 2005. The 7th International Conference on Advanced Communications Technology, 2005, S. 598–603 Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, D. & Newman, D.: From IM to EIM: An Adoption Model. Gartner Research, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, J. P.: Technological Forecasting for Decision Making. American Elsevier, New York, NY, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEliece, R. J.: The Theory of Information and Coding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. M.: Enhancing Regional Analysis with the Delphi Method. In: Review of Regional Studies, 2. Jg., 1993, Heft 23, S. 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, V. M. & McGoldrick, P. J.: The Role of Geodemographics in Segmenting and Targeting Consumer Markets: A Delphi Study. In: European Journal of Marketing, Jg., 1994, Heft 28, S. 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motwani, J.: Measuring Critical Factors of TQM. In: Measuring Business Excellence, 2. Jg., 2001, Heft 5, S. 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paliwoda, S. J.: Predicting the Future using Delphi. In: Management Decision, 1. Jg., 1983, Heft 21, S. 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parente, F. J., Anderson, J. K., Myers, P. & O’Brin, T.: An Examination of Factors Contributing to Delphi Accuracy. In: Journal of Forecasting, 2. Jg., 1984, Heft 3, S. 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parke, H. W. & Wormell, D. E. W.: The Delphi Oracle. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B. & Weber, C. V.: Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Software Engineering Institute/Carnegie Mellon University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, G. & Marr, N.: Towards a Branchless Banking Society? In: International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2. Jg., 1994, Heft 22, S. 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radice, R. A., Harding, J. T., Munnis, P. E. & R.W. Phillips: A Programming Process Study. In: IBM Systems Journal, 2. Jg., 1985, Heft 24, S. 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G. & Wright, G.: The Delphi Technique as a Forecasting Tool: Issues and Analysis. In: International Journal of Forecasting, Jg., 1999, Heft 15, S. 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G., Wright, G. & Bolger, F.: Delphi: A Re-evaluation of Research and Theory. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Jg., 1991, Heft 39, S. 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E.: A Mathematical Theory of Communication. In: The Bell Systems Technical Journal, Jg., 1948, Heft 27, S. 379–423, 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart, W. A.: The Application of Statistics as an Aid in Maintaining Quality of a Manufactured Product. In: Journal of the American Statistical Association, Jg., 1925, Heft 20, S. 546–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart, W. A.: Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. van Nostrand, New York, NY, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, B. Y.: Management by Information. In: Information Strategy: The Executive’s Journal, 4. Jg., 1985, Heft 1, S. 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W. & Wang, R. Y.: Decision Support for Exception Handling and Quality Control in Office Operations. In: Decision Support Systems, 3. Jg., 1992, Heft 8, S. 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W. & Wang, R. Y.: Data Quality In Context. In: Communications of the ACM, 5. Jg., 1997, Heft 40, S. 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R. Y. A.: A Product Perspective on Total Data Quality Management. In: Communications of the ACM, 2. Jg., 1998, Heft 41, S. 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R. Y. & Strong, D.: Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. In: Journal of Management Information Systems, 4. Jg., 1996, Heft 12, S. 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woundenberg, F.: An Evaluation of Delphi. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Jg., 1991, Heft 40, S. 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. & Berry, L. L.: Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perception and Expectations. Free Press, New York, NY, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Adelaide, South Australia

    Saša Baškarada, Andy Koronios & Jing Gao

  2. Department: IT-GMO, Hannover Re AG, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 50, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland

    Marcus Gebauer

Authors
  1. Saša Baškarada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcus Gebauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andy Koronios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jing Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saša Baškarada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Landshut, Germany

    Knut Hildebrand

  2. Haan, Germany

    Marcus Gebauer

  3. Lübeck, Germany

    Holger Hinrichs

  4. Helferskirchen, Germany

    Michael Mielke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baškarada, S., Gebauer, M., Koronios, A., Gao, J. (2015). IQM-Reifegradmodell für die Bewertung und Verbesserung des Information Lifecycle Management Prozesses. In: Hildebrand, K., Gebauer, M., Hinrichs, H., Mielke, M. (eds) Daten- und Informationsqualität. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09214-6_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation