Schlüsselwerke der Organisationsforschung

Chapter

Zusammenfassung

In Abgrenzung zum Mainstream der Organisationsforschung, der Organisationen unhinterfragt als grundsätzlich geschlechtsneutral und asexuell konzipiert, sowie zu frühen feministischen Arbeiten im angloamerikanischen Raum, welche die Geschlechtsneutralität von Organisationen nicht konsequent in Frage stellen und Geschlecht als den organisationalen Strukturen und Prozessen äußeres Phänomen betrachten (siehe unter anderem ➣ Kanter 1977), setzt sich die US-amerikanische Soziologin Joan Acker aus konstruktivistischer Perspektive mit dem Zusammenhang von Geschlecht und Organisation auseinander. Unter Einbezug eigener empirischer Befunde diskutiert sie, wie Organisationen als inhärent vergeschlechtlicht, das heißt als durch Geschlecht strukturierte soziale Gebilde, verstanden werden können.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Acker, J. (2000). Revisiting Class: Thinking from Gender, Race, and Organizations. Social Politics 7, 192–214.Google Scholar
  2. Britton, D. (2000). The Epistemology of the Gendered Organization. Gender & Society 14, 418–434.Google Scholar
  3. Rastetter, D. (1994). Sexualität und Herrschaft in Organisationen. Eine geschlechtervergleichende Analyse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  4. West, C. & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender & Society 1, 125–151.Google Scholar
  5. Williams, C., Muller, C. & Kilanski, K. (2012). Gendered Organizations in the New Economy. Gender & Society 26, 549–573.Google Scholar
  6. Wilz, S. (2007). De-Institutionalisierung, Individualisierung und Personalisierung ? Arbeit, Organisation und Geschlecht im Wandel. In B. Aulenbacher, M. Funder, S. Völker & H. Jacobsen (Hrsg.), Arbeit und Geschlecht im Umbruch der modernen Gesellschaft (S. 114–130). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  7. Lengfeld, H. (2005). Arbeitsstruktur und soziale Ungleichheit in der Organisationsgesellschaft. Eine Einladung zum Perspektivenwechsel. In M. Faust, M. Funder & M. Moldaschl (Hrsg.), Die » Organisation « der Arbeit (S. 321–345). München; Mering: Rainer Hampp.Google Scholar
  8. Wolf, H. (1999). Arbeit und Autonomie. Ein Versuch über Widersprüche und Metamorphosen kapitalistischer Produktion. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  9. Ahrne, G. & Brunsson, N. (2008). Meta-organizations, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Ahrne, G. & Brunsson, N. (2011). Organization outside organizations: the significance of partial organization. Organization 18, 83–104.Google Scholar
  11. King, B. G., Felin, T. & Whetten, D. A. (2010). Finding the organization in organizational theo ry: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science 21, 290–305.Google Scholar
  12. March, J. & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Seidl, D. (2011). Wozu brauchen wir noch die Organisationsforschung ? Zwei Reaktionsstrategien der Organisationsforschung auf den drohenden Verlust ihres Erkenntnisobjekts. Ein Kommentar zu Peter Walgenbachs Plädoyer für eine Radikalisierung des Organisationskonzeptes. Die Betriebswirtschaft 71 (5), 493–496.Google Scholar
  14. Aldrich, H. E: (1999). Organizations Evolving. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Aldrich, H. E. & Mindlin, Sergio (1978). Uncertainty and Dependence. Two Perspectives on Environment. In L. Karpik (Hrsg.), Organization and Environment (S. 149–170). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Carroll, G. R. & Hannan, M. T. (2000). The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Emery, F. E. & Trist, E. L. (1965). The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments. Human Relations 18, 21–32.Google Scholar
  18. McKelvey, B. & Aldrich, H. E. (1983). Populations, Natural Selections and Applied Organizational Science. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 101–128.Google Scholar
  19. Oertel, S., Walgenbach, P. (2009): How the Organizational Ecology Approach Can Enrich Business Research on Small And Medium-sized Enterprises – Three Areas for Future Research. Schmalenbach Business Review 61, 250–269.Google Scholar
  20. Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T. & Willmott, H. (2009). Introduction. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman & H. Willmott (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies (S. 1–26). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Alvesson, M. & Deetz, S. (2005). Critical theory and postmodernism: Approaches to organizational studies. In C. Grey & H. Willmott (Hrsg.), Critical Management Studies. A Reader (S. 60–106). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H. (Hrsg.). (1992). Critical Management Studies. London; Newbury Park; New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual. Journal of Management Studies 39 (5), 619–644.Google Scholar
  24. Habermas, J. (1973). Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  25. Hartz, R. (2011). Die › Critical Management Studies ‹ – eine Zwischenbilanz in kritischer Absicht. In M. Bruch, W. Schaffar & P. Scheiffele (Hrsg.), Organisation und Kritik (S. 211–246). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  26. Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T. W. (1988). Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Parker, M. (2002). Against management: Organization in the age of managerialism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Argyris, C. (1973). Personality and Organization Theory Revisited. Administrative Science Quarterly 18 (2), 141–167.Google Scholar
  29. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning I. A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  30. Argyris, C. (1992). On Organizational Learning. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  31. Blau P. M. (1956). Bureaucracy in Modern Society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  32. Caplow, T. (1958). Book Review on » Argyris, Chris. Personality and Organization: The Conflict Between System and the Individual «. American Sociological Review 23 (6), 748–749.Google Scholar
  33. Göhlich, M. & Weber, S. M. (2010). Organisationale Demokratie und die Bildung des Organisationsbürgers. Interdisziplinäre Verhältnisbestimmungen. In L. Ludwig, H. Luckas, F. Hamburger & S. Aufenanger (Hrsg.), Bildung in der Demokratie II. Tendenzen – Diskurse – Praktiken (S. 153–166). Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  34. Mc Gregor, D. M. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Schneider, E. V. (1958). Book Review on » Argyris, Chris. Personality and Organization: The Conflict Between System and the Individual. « Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 317 (1), 207–208.Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, E. K. (1959). Book Review on » Argyris, Chris. Personality and Organization: The Conflict Between System and the Individual «. Book Review Section. Personnel Psychology 12 (1), 159–161.Google Scholar
  37. Urwick, L. F. (1944). The elements of administration. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  38. Whisler, T. (1958). Book Review on » Argyris, Chris. Personality and Organization: The Conflict Between System and the Individual. « Journal of Business. Chicago Journals 31 (4), 353.Google Scholar
  39. Argyris, C. (1992). On Organizational Learning. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Argyris, C. (2004). Reasons and Rationalizations. The Limits of Organizational Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Argyris, C., Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning I. A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  42. Argyris, C., Schön, D. A. (1997). Wissen in Aktion. Eine Fallstudie zur lernenden Organisation. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  43. Brentel, H. (2003). Forschungsdesign für lernende Unternehmen. In H. Brentel, H. Klemisch & H. Rohn (Hrgs.), Lernendes Unternehmen. Konzepte und Instrumente für eine zukunftsfähige Unternehmens- und Organisationsentwicklung (S. 43–67). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  44. Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston.Google Scholar
  45. Hartmann, D. (2003). Die Bedeutung der Schlüsselkonzepte des Ansatzes von Argyris und Schön. Sozialwissenschaften und Berufspraxis 1 (2) 6, 15–28.Google Scholar
  46. Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  47. Bechky, B. A. (2011). Making Organizational Theory Work: Institutions, Occupations, and Negotiated Orders. Organization Science 22 (5), 1157–1167.Google Scholar
  48. Culyba, R. J., Heimer, C. A. & Leigh Coleman Petty, J. (2004). The Ethnographic Turn: Fact, Fashion, or Fiction ? Qualitative Sociology 27 (4), 365–389.Google Scholar
  49. Czarniawska, B. (2004). On Time, Space, and Action Nets. Organization 11 (6), 773–791.Google Scholar
  50. Hirschauer, S. (2001). Ethnografisches Schreiben und die Schweigsamkeit des Sozialen. Zu einer Methodologie der Beschreibung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 30 (6), 429–451.Google Scholar
  51. Iedema, R. (2007). On the Multimodality, Materially and Contingency of Organization Discourse. Organization Studies 28 (6), 931–946.Google Scholar
  52. Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition. American Sociological Review 74 (1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  53. Schneijderberg, C., Merkator, N., Teichler, U. & Kehm, B. M. (Hrsg.). (2013). Verwaltung war gestern ? Neue Hochschulprofessionen und die Gestaltung von Studium und Lehre. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  54. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observation of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (1), 78–108.Google Scholar
  55. Barley, S. R. (1990). The Alignment of Technology and Structure through Roles and Networks. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, 61–103.Google Scholar
  56. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, L. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  57. Burns, J. & Scapens, R. W. (2000). Conceptualizing Management Accounting Change: An Institutional Framework. Management Accounting Research 11 (1), 3–25.Google Scholar
  58. Cooney, K. (2007). Fields, Organization and Agency. Toward a Multilevel Theory of Institutionalization in Action. Administration & Society 39 (6), 687–718.Google Scholar
  59. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  60. Lawrence, R., Suddaby R & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization. Journal of Management Inquiry 20 (1), 52–58.Google Scholar
  61. Ortmann, G., Sydow J. & . Windeler, A. (1997). Organisation als reflexive Strukturation. In G. Ortmann, J. Sydow & K. Türk (Hrsg.), Theorien der Organisation: Die Rückkehr der Gesellschaft (S. 315–354). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  62. Pozzebon, M. & Pinsonneault, A. (2005). Challenges in Conducting Empirical Work Using Structuring Theory: Learning from IT Research. Organization Studies 26 (9), 1353–1376.Google Scholar
  63. Barnard, C. (1969). Organisation und Management – Ausgewählte Aufsätze. Stuttgart: C. E. Poeschel Verlag.Google Scholar
  64. Drucker, P. (2006). Die wichtigsten Ideen von Peter F. Drucker. Harvard Business Manager, 92–105.Google Scholar
  65. Gabor, A. (2000). The capitalist philosophers: The genius of modern Business – Their lives, times and ideas. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  66. Gabor, A., Mahoney, J. T. (2010). Chester Barnard and the systems approach to nurturing organizations. www.business.illinois.edu/Working Papers/10-0102.pdf. Zugegriffen: 04. Juli 2014.Google Scholar
  67. Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Economic foundations of strategy. Thousand Oaks; London; New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  69. Meyer, M. (1995). Ökonomische Organisation der Industrie: Netzwerkarrangements zwischen Markt und Unternehmung, Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  70. Pareto, V. (1932). Sociologie Generale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  71. Bendix, R. (1964). Max Weber. Das Werk. Darstellung, Analyse, Ergebnisse. München: Piper.Google Scholar
  72. Bendix, R. (1980). Könige oder Volk. Machtausübung und Herrschaftsmandat. 2 Bände. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  73. Kössler, R. (1990). Arbeitskultur im Industrialisierungsprozess, Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  74. Konràd, G. & Szelényi, I. (1978): Die Intelligenz auf dem Weg zur Klassenmacht. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  75. Berliner, J. S. (1957). Factory and Manager in the USSR. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Fröhlich, D. (1983). Machtprobleme in teilautonomen Arbeitsgruppen. In F. Neidhardt (Hrsg.), Gruppensoziologie. Perspektiven und Materialien. Sonderheft 25 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (S. 532–551). Opladen: WDV.Google Scholar
  77. Jackall, R. (1988). Moral Mazes. The World of Corporate Managers. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Kühl, S. (2007). Formalität, Informalität und Illegalität in der Organisationsberatung. Systemtheoretische Analyse eines Beratungsprozesses. Soziale Welt 58, 269–291.Google Scholar
  79. Merton, R. K. (1957). Social Structure and Anomie. In R. K. Merton (Hrsg.), Social Theory and Social Structure (131–160). Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  80. Benson, K. J. (1973). The analysis of bureaucratic-professional conflict: functional versus dialectical approaches. The Sociological Quarterly 14, 376–394.Google Scholar
  81. Benson, K. J. (1975). The interorganizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly 20, 229–249.Google Scholar
  82. Benson, K. J. (1977). Innovation and Crisis in Organizational Analysis. The Sociological Quarterly 18, 3–16.Google Scholar
  83. Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1969). Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  84. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  85. Ranson, S., Hinings, B. & Greenwood, R. (1980). The Structuring of Organizational Structures. Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 1–17.Google Scholar
  86. Seo, M. & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective. Academy of Management Review 27, 222–247.Google Scholar
  87. Austin, R. D. (1996). Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations. New York: Dorset House Publishing.Google Scholar
  88. Cohen, H. (1965). The Demonics of Bureaucracy: Problems of Change in a Government Agency, Iowa City: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Cohen, H. (1970). Bureaucratic Flexibility. Some Comments on Robert Merton’s » Bureaucratic Structure and Personality «. The British Journal of Sociology 21 (4), 390–399.Google Scholar
  90. Hopf, C. (1987). Normen in formalen Organisationen. Theoretische und methodische Probleme bei der empirischen Analyse. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 16 (4), 239–253.Google Scholar
  91. Latimore, J. (1979). Productivity and Accountability: Weeding out the Target Population of Social Welfare. Public Productivity Review 3 (4), 69–83.Google Scholar
  92. Ridgway, V. F. (1956). Dysfunctional Consequences of Performance Measurements. Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (2), 240–247.Google Scholar
  93. Taylor, T. (2013). Paperwork First, not Work First: How Caseworkers Use Paperwork to Feel Effective. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare XL (1), 9–27.Google Scholar
  94. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A-M., Shore, L. M., Taylor, M. S., & Tetrick, L. E. (Hrsg.). (2005). The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological und Contextual Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology 71, 500–507.Google Scholar
  96. Gouldner, A. (1960). The Norm of Reciprocity. American Sociological Review 25, 161–178.Google Scholar
  97. Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). The Relationship-based Approach to Leadership: Development of LMX Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-level, Multi-domain Perspective. Leadership Quarterly 6, 219–247.Google Scholar
  98. Homans, C. G. (1961). Social Behavior. Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  99. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  100. Thibaut, J. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  101. Blau, P. M. & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal Organizations. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
  102. Braithwaite, R. B. (1968). Scientific Explanation. A Study of the Function of Theory, Probability, and Law in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Kincaid, H. (1996). Philosophical foundations of the social sciences: Analyzing controversies in social research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  104. McPherson, J. M. & Ranger-Moore, J. R. (1991). Evolution on a dancing landscape: organizations and networks in dynamic Blau space. Social Forces 70 (1), 19–42.Google Scholar
  105. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  106. Turner, S. P. (1977). Blau’s Theory of Differentiation: is it explanatory ? The Sociological Quarterly 18 (1), 17–32.Google Scholar
  107. Donaldson, L. (1985). In Defence of Organization Theory: A Reply to the Critiques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  109. Kalleberg, A. L., Knoke, D., Marsden, P. V. & Spaeth, J. L. (1996). Organizations in America: Analyzing Their Structures and Human Resource Practices. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  110. Meyer, M. W. (1979). Change in Public Bureaucracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Perrow, C. (1967). A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations. American Sociological Review 32, 194–208.Google Scholar
  112. Ahrens, T. & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Accounting for Flexibility and Efficiency: A Field Study of Management Control Systems in a Restaurant Chain. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (2), 271–301.Google Scholar
  113. Ansari, S. & Euske, K. L. (1987). Rational, Rationalizing and Reifying Uses of Accounting Data in Organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 (6), 549–570.Google Scholar
  114. Czarniawska, B. & Jacobsson, B. (1989). Budget in a cold climate. Accounting, Organizations and Society 14 (1-2), 29–39.Google Scholar
  115. Dent, J. F. (1991). Accounting and Organizational Cultures: A Field Study of the Emergence of a New Organizational Reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16 (8), 705–732.Google Scholar
  116. Ezzamel, M. & Willmott, H. (1998). Accounting for Teamwork: A Critical Study of Group-based Systems of Organizational Control. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (2), 358–396.Google Scholar
  117. Macintosh, N. B. & Scapens, R. (1990). Structuration Theory in Management Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15 (5), 455–477.Google Scholar
  118. Scheytt, T. (2003). Die Bedeutung ethnografischer Methoden für die Controllingforschung. In: J. Weber & B. Hirsch (Hrsg.), Zur Zukunft der Controllingforschung (S. 117–142). Wiesbaden: Gabler/DUV.Google Scholar
  119. Beckfield, J. (2003). Inequality in the World Polity: The Structure of International Organization. American Sociological Review 68, 401–424.Google Scholar
  120. Boli, J. (1999). Conclusion: World Authority Structures and Legitimations. In J. Boli & G. M. Thomas (Hrsg.), Constructing World Culture. International Nongovernmental Organization since 1875 (S. 267–300). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  121. Boli, J., Thomas, G. M. (1997). World Culture in the World Polity. A Century of International Non-Governmental Organization. American Sociological Review 62, 171–190.Google Scholar
  122. Lechner, F. J. & Boli, J. (2005). World Culture. Origins and Consequences. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  123. Mayer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M. & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology 103, 144–181.Google Scholar
  124. Reimann, K. D. (2006). A View from the Top: International Politics, Norms and the Worldwide Growth of NGOs. International Studies Quarterly 50, 45–67.Google Scholar
  125. Thomas, G. M. (2009). World Polity, World Culture, World Society. International Political Sociology 3, 115–119.Google Scholar
  126. Thomas, G. M. (2010). Differentiation, Rationalization, and Actorhood in New Systems and World Culture Theories. In M. Albert, L. E. Cederman & A. Wendt (Hrsg.), New Systems Theories of World Politics (S. 220–248). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  127. Thomas, G. M. (2013). Rationalized Cultural Contexts of Functional Differentiation. In M. Albert, B. Buzan & M. Zürn (Hrsg.), Bringing Sociology to IR. World Politics as Differentiation Theory (S. 27–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  128. Bogusz, T. (2010). Zur Aktualität von Luc Boltanski. Einleitung in sein Werk. Wiesbaden: VS VerlagGoogle Scholar
  129. Boltanski, L. (1990). Die Führungskräfte. Die Entstehung einer sozialen Gruppe. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  130. Boltanski, L. & Thévenot, L. (2007). Über die Rechtfertigung. Eine Soziologie der kritischen Urteilskraft. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.Google Scholar
  131. Chiapello, È. (2013). Capitalism and its criticism. In P. du Gay & G. Morgan (Hrsg.), New spirits of capitalism ? Crisis, justifications, and dynamics (S. 60–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  132. Corcuff, P. (2011). Les novelles sociologies – Entre le collectif et l’individuel. 3. Auflage. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  133. Diaz-Bone, R. (Hrsg.). (2011). Soziologie der Konventionen. Grundlagen einer pragmatischen Anthropologie. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  134. Dosse, F. (1999). The empire of meaning. The humanization of social sciences. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
  135. Knoll, L. (Hrsg.). (2015). Organisationen und Konventionen. Die Soziologie der Konventionen in der Organisationsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  136. Thévenot, L. (1984). Rules and implements: investment in forms. Social Science Information 23, 1–45.Google Scholar
  137. Bourdieu, P. (1987). Die feinen Unterschiede. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  138. Bourdieu, P. et al. (2002). Der Einzige und sein Eigenheim (erweiterte Neuausgabe). Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  139. Emirbayer, M. & Johnson, V. (2008). Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and So ciety 37 (1), 1–44.Google Scholar
  140. Golsorkhi, D., Leca, B., Lounsbury, M. & Ramirez, C. (2009). Analysing, Accounting for and Unmasking Domination: On Our Role as Scholars of Practice, Practitioners of Social Science and Public Intellectuals. Organization 16 (6), 779–797.Google Scholar
  141. Möller, C. (2013). Wie offen ist die Universitätsprofessur für soziale Aufsteigerinnen und Aufsteiger ? Explorative Analysen zur sozialen Herkunft der Professorinnen und Professoren an den nordrhein-westfälischen Universitäten. Soziale Welt 64 (4), 341–360.Google Scholar
  142. Sieweke, J. (2014). Pierre Bourdieu in management and organization studies – A citation context analysis and discussion of contributions. Scandinavian Journal of Management. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2014.04.004Google Scholar
  143. Vaara, E. & Faÿ, E. (2012). Reproduction and Change on the Global Scale: A Bourdieusian Perspective on Management Education. Journal of Management Studies 49 (6), 1023–1051.Google Scholar
  144. Baran, P. A. & Sweezy, P. M. (1966). Monopoly Capital: An essay on the American economic and social order. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  145. Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  146. Blauner, R. (1964). Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
  147. Blumberg, P. (1969). Industrial Democracy: The Sociology of Participation. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  148. Boes, A., Kämpf, T., Lühr, T. & Marrs, K. (2014). Kopfarbeit in der modernen Arbeitswelt: Auf dem Weg zu einer » Industrialisierung neuen Typs «. In J. Sydow, D. Sadowski. & P. Conrad (Hrsg.), Arbeit – eine Neubestimmung. Managementforschung 24, 33–62.Google Scholar
  149. Friedman, A. (1977). Industry and Labor: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  150. Kerr, C., Dunlop, J., Harbison, F. & Myers, C. (1969). Industrialism and Industrial Man. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  151. Mallet, S. (1975). The New Working Class. Nottingham: Spokesman Books.Google Scholar
  152. Thomson, P. (1983). The Nature of Work. An Introduction to Debates on the Labour Process. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  153. Carter, C., Clegg, S. R. & Kornberger, M. (2008). Strategy as practice? Strategic Organization 6 (1), 83–99.Google Scholar
  154. Demers, C. (2007). Organizational Change Theories: A Synthesis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  155. Denrell, J. (2003). Vicarious Learning, Undersampling of Failure, and the Myths of Management. Organization Science 14 (3), 227–243.Google Scholar
  156. March, J. G. (1987). Ambiguity and accounting: The elusive link between information and decision making. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 (2), 153–168.Google Scholar
  157. March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1986). Garbage can models of decision making in organizations. In J. G. March & R. Weissinger-Baylon (Hrsg.), Ambiguity and Command: Organizational Perspectives on Military Decision Making (S. 11–35). Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  158. Brunsson, N. (2007). The Consequences of Decision-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  159. Carter, P. & Brunsson, N. (1992). The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Organization Studies 13, 291–295.Google Scholar
  160. Krassner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  161. Lipson, M (2007). Peacekeeping: Organized Hypocrisy? European Journal of International Re lations 13, 5–34.Google Scholar
  162. Luhmann, N. (2010). Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  163. March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1979). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  164. Scott, R. & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems Perspectives. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  165. Skelley, B. D. (2002). Radical Institutionalism and Public Administration: A Review of Nils Brunsson’s Contributions to Understanding Public Sector Organizations. Public Administration & Management 5, 112–122.Google Scholar
  166. Brunsson, N. (2009). Reform as Routine. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  167. Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (Hrsg.). (2001). New Public Management – the Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  168. Jann, W. (2006). Die skandinavische Schule der Verwaltungswissenschaft: Neo-Institutionalismus und die Renaissance der Bürokratie. In J. Bogumil, W. Jann & F. Nullmeier (Hrsg.), Politik und Verwaltung (= PVS-Sonderheft 37) (S. 121–148). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  169. Olsen, J. P. (2006). Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (1), 1–34.Google Scholar
  170. Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform. 3. Auflage. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  171. Røvik, K. A. (2011). From Fashion to Virus: An Alternative Theory of Organizations’ Handling of Management Ideas. Organization Studies 32 (5), 631–653.Google Scholar
  172. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  173. Blomgren, M. & Sahlin, K. (2007). Quests for Transparency: Signs of a New Institutional Era in the Health Care Field. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Hrsg.), Transcending New Public Management. The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms (S. 155–178). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  174. de Boer, H. F., Enders, J. & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public Sector Reforms in Dutch Higher Education: The Organizational Transformation of the University. Public Administration 85, 1, 27–46.Google Scholar
  175. Gammelsæter, H. & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2008). Models of Organization in Norwegian Professional Soccers. European Sport Management Quarterly 8, 1, 1–25.Google Scholar
  176. Levay, C. & Waks, C. (2009): Professions and the Pursuit of Transparency in Healthcare. Two Cases of Soft Autonomy. Organization Studies 30 (5), 509–527.Google Scholar
  177. Wilkesmann, U. & Schmid, C. J. (Hrsg.). (2012). Hochschule als Organisation. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  178. Bruch, M. (2000). Betriebliche Organisationsform und gesellschaftliche Regulation. In G. Ortmann, J. Sydow & K. Türk (Hrsg.), Theorien der Organisation (S. 181–210). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  179. Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory 16 (1), 4–33.Google Scholar
  180. Clawson, D. & Fantasia, R. (1983). Beyond Burawoy: The dialectics of conflict and consent on the shop floor. Theory and Society 12 (5), 671–680.Google Scholar
  181. Gartman, D. (1982). Ideology in the labor process: A review of Burawoy’s manufacturing consent. Critical Sociology 11, 91–95.Google Scholar
  182. Haraszti, M. (1975). Stücklohn. Berlin: Rotbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
  183. Kühl, S. (2008). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: neomarxistische Theorieansätze. In A. Maurer (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Wirtschaftssoziologie (S. 124–151). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  184. Mahnkopf, B. (1987). Hegemonie und Konsens. Regulationsmuster betrieblicher Sozialbeziehungen und ihre Legitimationseffekte. In H. Abromeit & B. Blanke (Hrsg.), Arbeitsmarkt, Arbeitsbeziehungen und Politik in den 80er Jahren. Leviathan-Sonderheft 8, 253–269.Google Scholar
  185. Menz, W. (2009). Die Legitimität des Marktregimes. Leistungs- und Gerechtigkeitsorientierungen in neuen Formen betrieblicher Leistungspolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  186. Neuberger, O. (1995). Mikropolitik. Der alltägliche Aufbau und Einsatz von Macht in Organisationen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
  187. Prasad, A. & Prasad, P. (1998). Everyday struggles at the workplace: The nature and implications of routine resistance in contemporary organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 16, 225–257.Google Scholar
  188. Thompson, P. (1983). The Nature of Work. An introduction to debates on the labour process. London; Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  189. Becker, J. (2013). Regulationstheorie: Ursprünge und Entwicklungstendenzen. In R. Atzmüller, J. Becker et al. (Hrsg.), Fit für die Krise? – Perspektiven der Regulationstheorie (24 – 56). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  190. Gartman, D. (1988). The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes under Capitalism and Socialism by Michael Burawoy – Review. Social Forces 66, 848–850.Google Scholar
  191. Greenberg, E. S. (1986). The Politics of Production, by Michael Burawoy. – Review. American Political Science Review 80, 309–310.Google Scholar
  192. McKay, S. C. (2006). Satanic Mills or Silicon Islands? The Politics of High-Tech Production in the Philippines. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  193. Münch, R. & Guenther, T. (2005). Der Markt in der Organisation. Von der Hegemonie der Fachspezialisten zur Hegemonie des Finanzmanagements. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderheft 45, 394–417.Google Scholar
  194. Nichols, T., Cam, S., Grace Chou, W., Chun, S., Zhao, W. & Feng, T. (2004). Factory Regimes and the Dismantling of Established Labour in Asia: A Review of Cases from Large Manufacturing Plants in China, South Korea and Taiwan. Work, Employment & Society & Society 18, 663–685.Google Scholar
  195. Pfeiffer, S. (2007). Montage und Erfahrung. Warum ganzheitliche Produktionssysteme menschliches Arbeitsvermögen brauchen. München; Mering: Hampp.Google Scholar
  196. Preibisch, K. (2011). Migrant Workers and Changing Workplace Regimes in Contemporary Agricultural Production in Canada. International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture & Food 19, 62–82.Google Scholar
  197. Vallas, S. P. (1993). Power in the Workplace. The Politics of Production at AT&T. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  198. Zhang, L. (2008). Lean Production and Labor Controls in the Chinese Automobile Industry in an Age of Globalization. International Labor and Working-Class History 73, 24–44.Google Scholar
  199. Berle, A. A. & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  200. Gerth, H. H. & Mills, C. W. (1941). A Marx for the Managers. Ethics 52 (2), 200–215.Google Scholar
  201. Orwell, G. (1944/1970). As I Please. 21 July 1944. In S. Orwell & I. Angus (Hrsg.), The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, As I Please. 1943–1945. Bd. 3 (S. 219–223). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  202. Orwell, G. (1946/1970). James Burnham and the Managerial Revolution. In S. Orwell & I. Angus (Hrsg.), The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, In Front Of Your Nose. Bd. 4 (S. 192–215). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  203. Schelsky, H. (1965). Berechtigung und Anmaßung in der Managerherrschaft. In H. Schelsky (Hrsg.), Auf der Suche nach Wirklichkeit. Gesammelte Aufsätze (S. 17–32). Düsseldorf; Köln: Eugen Diederichs Verlag.Google Scholar
  204. Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
  205. Burns, Tom (2001). Organization and Social Order. – [unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, ca. 1980–2001]. – http://www.sociology.ed.ac.uk/tomburns/manuscript.html. Zugegriffen: 26. Juli 2014.
  206. Dawson, S. (2013). Deeply Engaged, Intuitively Analytical, and Determinedly Applied: Tom Burns and Joan Woodward in Context but Not in Concert. In M. Witzel & M. Warner (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Management Theorists (S. 174–195) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  207. Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The Politics of Organizational Decision-Making. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  208. Poggi, G. (2003). Tom Burns 1913–2001. Proceedings of the British Academy 120, 43–62.Google Scholar
  209. Vigoda-Gadot, E. & Drory, A. (2011). Handbook of Organizational Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  210. Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization theory and design. 10 Auflage. South-Western: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  211. Lam, A. (2006). Organizational innovation. In R. R. Nelson, D. C. Mowery & J. Fagerberg (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (S. 115–147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  212. Sine, W. D., Mitsuhashi, H. & Kirsch, D. A. (2006). Revisiting Burns and Stalker. Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Academy of Management Journal 49, 121–132.Google Scholar
  213. Spender, J. C. & Kessler, E. H. (1995). Managing the uncertainties of innovation. Extending Thompson (1967). Human Relations 48, 35–56.Google Scholar
  214. Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of Friends. Networks, Manipulators and Coalitions. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  215. Cross, R. L. & Parker, A. (2004). The Hidden Power of Social Networks. Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  216. Krackhardt, D. (1999).The Ties that Torture: Simmelian Tie Analysis in Organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 16, 183–210.Google Scholar
  217. Reiners, F. (2008). Networking in Organisationen. München; Mering: Hampp.Google Scholar
  218. Rogers, E M. & Agarwala-Rogers, R. (1976). Communication in Organizations. New York u.a.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  219. Salancik, G. R. (1995). Wanted: A Good Network Theory of Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 345–349.Google Scholar
  220. Tichy, N. M., Tushman, M. L. & Fombrun, C. J. (1976). Social Network Analysis for Organizations. Academy of Management Review 4, 507–519.Google Scholar
  221. Amburgey, T. L. & Dacin, T. (1994). As the Left Foot Follows the Right? The Dynamics of Strategic and Structural Change. Academy of Management Journal 37 (6), 1427–1452.Google Scholar
  222. Fligstein, N. (1985). The Spread of the Multidivisional Form Among Large Firms, 1919–1979. American Sociological Review 50 (3), 377–391.Google Scholar
  223. Freeland, R. F. (1996). The Myth of the M-Form? Governance, Consent, and Organizational Change. American Journal of Sociology 102 (2), 483–526.Google Scholar
  224. Hall, D. J. & Saias, M. A. (1980). Strategy Follows Structure! Strategic Management Journal 1 (2), 149–163.Google Scholar
  225. Whittington, R. (2008). Alfred Chandler, Founder of Strategy: Lost Tradition and Renewed Inspiration. The Business History Review 82 (2 – A Special Issue on Alfred D. Chandler Jr.), 267–277.Google Scholar
  226. Chandler Jr., A. D. (1974). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  227. Chandler Jr., A. D. (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  228. Fligstein, N. (2008). Chandler and the Sociology of Organizations. Business History Review 82, 241–250.Google Scholar
  229. John, R. R. (1997). Elaborations, Revisions, Dissents: Alfred D. Chandler, Jr.’s. » The Visible Hand « after Twenty Years. Business History Review 71, 151–200.Google Scholar
  230. Perrow, C. (2002). Organizing America: Wealth, Power, and the Origins of Corporate Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  231. Piore, M. J. & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide. Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books. Richard, J. R. (1997). Elaborations, Revisions, Dissents: Alfred D. Chandler, Jr.’s, » The Visible Hand « after Twenty Years. Business History Review 71, 151–200.Google Scholar
  232. Roy, W. G. (1997). Socializing Capital: The Rise of the large Industrial Corporation in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  233. Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent Capitalisms. The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  234. Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  235. Chia, R. & Holt, R. (2006). Strategy as Practical Coping: A Heideggerian Perspective. Organization Studies 27, 635–655.Google Scholar
  236. Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (2010). Introducing » Perspectives on Process Organization Studies «. In T. Hernes & S. Maitlis (Hrsg.), Process, Sensemaking & Organizing (S. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  237. Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and Institutions. Academy of Management Review 29, 635–652.Google Scholar
  238. Roberts, J. (2005). The Power of the › Imaginary ‹ in Disciplinary Processes. Organization, 12 (5), 619–642.Google Scholar
  239. Tsoukas, H. & Chia, R. (2002). On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change. Organization Science 13, 567–582.Google Scholar
  240. Vogel, R. (2012). The Visible Colleges of Management and Organization Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Journals. Organization Studies 33, 1015–1043.Google Scholar
  241. Willmott, H. (2005). Theorizing Contemporary Control: Some Post-structuralist Responses to Some Critical Realist Questions. Organization 12, 747–780.Google Scholar
  242. Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The Very Idea. Sussex: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
  243. Child, J. (1997). Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies 18, 43–76.Google Scholar
  244. Hrebiniak, L. G. & Joyce, W. F. (1985). Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly 30, 336–349.Google Scholar
  245. Montanari, J. R. (1979). Strategic choice: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Management Studies 16, 202–221.Google Scholar
  246. Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review 28, 275–296.Google Scholar
  247. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18, 509–533.Google Scholar
  248. Amable, B. (2003). The Variety of Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  249. Bauman, Z. (1988). Viewpoint: Sociology and Postmodernity. Sociological Review 36 (4), 790–813.Google Scholar
  250. Cooper, R. & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, Postmodernism and Organisational Analysis: An Introduction. Organization Studies 9 (1), 91–112.Google Scholar
  251. Koch, J. (2003). Organisation und Differenz: Kritik des organisationstheoretischen Diskurses der Postmoderne. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  252. Linstead, S. (Hrsg.). (2004). Organization Theory and Postmodern Thought. London; Newbury Park; New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  253. Coase, R. H. (1988). The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  254. Coase, R. H. (2000). The Acquisition of Fisher Body by General Motors. Journal of Law and Economics 43, 15–31.Google Scholar
  255. Freeland, R. F. (2000). Creating Holdup Through Vertical Integration: Fisher Body Revisited. Journal of Law and Economics 43, 33–66.Google Scholar
  256. Klein, B., Crawford, R. G. & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process. Journal of Law and Economics 21, 297–326.Google Scholar
  257. Lafontaine, F. & Slate, M. (2007). Vertical Integration and Firm Bounderies: The Evidence. Journal of Economic Literature 45, 629–685.Google Scholar
  258. Voss, T. (2003). The Rational Choice Approach to an Analysis of Intra- and Interorganizational Governance. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 20, 21–46.Google Scholar
  259. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press (deutsche Teil-Übersetzung: Williamson, O. E. (1990). Die ökonomischen Institutionen des Kapitalismus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
  260. Williamson, O. E. & Winter, S. G. (Hrsg.). (1993). The Nature of the Firm. Origins, Evolution, and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  261. Bendor, J. B., Moe, T. M. & Shotts, K. (2001). Recycling the garbage can: An assessment of the research program. American Political Science Review 95 (1), 169–190.Google Scholar
  262. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (2012). » A Garbage Can Model at Forty « – A Solution That Still Attracts Problems. In A. Lomi & R. J. Harrison (Hrsg.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Bd. 36): Garbage can model of organizational choice. Looking forward at forty (S. 19–30). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  263. Gibson, D. R. (2012). Turn-Taking and Geopolitics in the Making of Decisions. In A. Lomi & R. J. Harrison (Hrsg.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Bd. 36): Garbage can model of organizational choice. Looking forward at forty (S. 33–64). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  264. Heimer, C. A. & Stinchcombe, A. L. (1999). Remodeling the garbage can: Implications on the origins of items in decision streams. In M. Egeberg & P. Loegreid (Hrsg.), Organizing Political Institutions (S. 27–57). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  265. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  266. March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (Hrsg.). (1994). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  267. Olsen, J. P. (2001). Garbage cans, new institutionalism, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 95 (1), 191–198.Google Scholar
  268. Orton, D. J. & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 15 (2), 203–223.Google Scholar
  269. Warglien, M. & Masuch, M. (Hrsg.). (1996). De Gruyter studies in organization. The logic of organizational disorder. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  270. Huber, M. (2012). Die Organisation Universität. In M. Apelt & V. Tacke (Hrsg.), Handbuch Organisationstypen (S. 239–252). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  271. March, J. G. (1971). The Technology of Foolishness. Civiløkonomen 18, 4–12.Google Scholar
  272. March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P (1976): Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  273. Marion, R. & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadership in complex organizations. The Leadership Quarterly 12, 389–418.Google Scholar
  274. Ortmann, G. (2009). Management in der Hypermoderne. Kontingenz und Entscheidung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  275. Aldrich, H. (2006). Organizations Evolving. 2. Auflage. London; Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  276. Braun, N. & Voss, T. (Hrsg.). (2014). Zur Aktualität von James Coleman. Einleitung in sein Werk. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  277. Coleman, J. S. (1982). The Asymmetric Society. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  278. Mayntz, R. & Scharpf, F. W. (1995). Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Frankfurt; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  279. Scharpf, F. W. (1989). Politische Steuerung und politische Institutionen. In H.-H. Hartwich (Hrsg.), Macht und Ohnmacht politischer Institutionen (S. 17–29). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  280. Schimank, U. (2002). Organisationen. Akteurskonstellationen – korporative Akteure – Sozialsysteme. In J. Allmendinger & T. Hinz (Hrsg.), Organisationssoziologie (S. 29–54). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  281. Vaughan, D. (1999). The Dark Side of Organizations. Mistake, Misconduct and Disaster. Annual Review of Sociology 25, 271–305.Google Scholar
  282. Coser, L. A. (1967). Greedy Organizations. Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie 8, 198–215.Google Scholar
  283. Davies, C. (1989). Goffman’s concept of the total institution: Criticisms and revisions. Human Studies 12, 77–95.Google Scholar
  284. Egger de Campo, M. (2013). Contemporary Greedy Institutions. An Essay on Lewis Coser’s Concept in the Era of the › Hive Mind ‹. Czech Sociological Review 49, 969–987.Google Scholar
  285. Segal, M. W. (1986). The Military And The Family As Greedy Institutions. Armed Forces & Society 13, 9–38.Google Scholar
  286. Simmel, G. (1992). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. 7. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  287. Bell, D. (1985). Die nachindustrielle Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  288. Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral science 2 (3), 201–215.Google Scholar
  289. d’Iribarne, P. (1989). La logique de l’honneur: gestion des entreprises et traditions nationales. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  290. Ellul, Jacques (1954): The Technological Society. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  291. Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E. & Pennings, J. M. (1971). A strategic contingencies’ theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly 16 (2), 216–229.Google Scholar
  292. Kühl, S. (1998). Wenn die Affen den Zoo regieren: die Tücken der flachen Hierarchien. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  293. Küpper, W. & Ortmann, G. (Hrsg.). (1988). Mikropolitik: Rationalität, Macht und Spiele in Organisationen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  294. Ortmann, G., Sydow, J. & Türk, K. (Hrsg.). (2000). Theorien der Organisation: Die Rückkehr der Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  295. Schelsky, H. (1965). Der Mensch in der wissenschaftlichen Zivilisation. In H. Schelsky: Auf der Suche nach Wirklichkeit. Gesammelte Aufsätze (S. 439–480). Düsseldorf; Köln: Diederichs.Google Scholar
  296. Brousselle, A. (2004). What Counts is not Falling…but Landing. Strategic Analysis. An Adapted Model for Implementation Evaluation. Evaluation 10 (2), 155–178.Google Scholar
  297. Fitsch, H. (2007). Beratung und Veränderung in Organisationen. Eine mikropolitische Untersuchung von Umsetzungsschwierigkeiten in Beratungsprozessen am Beispiel der Einführung von Lean Production in einem Automobilkonzern. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.Google Scholar
  298. Friedberg, E. (2003). Mikropolitik und organisationales Lernen. In H. Brentel, H. Klemisch & H. Rohn (Hrgs.), Lernendes Unternehmen. Konzepte und Instrumente für eine zukunftsfähige Unternehmens- und Organisationsentwicklung (S. 97–108). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  299. Ortmann, G. (1995). Formen der Produktion. Organisation und Rekursivität. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  300. Pavé, F. (1994). L’analyse stratégique autour de Michel Crozier. Sa genèse, ses applications et ses problèmes actuels. Paris: Édition du Seuil.Google Scholar
  301. Rehberg, M. (2007). Handeln in Organisationen. Versuch einer Ergänzung des Spiel-Konzepts von Michel Crozier und Erhard Friedberg. Frankfurt am Main: Online-Ressource der Universitätsbibliothek. URL: http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/indexdocId/650. Zugegriffen: 01. September 2014.
  302. Schirmer, F. (2000). Reorganisationsmanagement. Interessenkonflikte, Koalitionen des Wandels und Reorganisationserfolg. Wiesbaden: DUV.Google Scholar
  303. Augier, M. (2004). March’ing towards a Behavioral Theory of the Firm. James G. March and the Early Evolution of Behavioral Organization Theory. Behavioral Organization Theory 42 (10), 1257–1268.Google Scholar
  304. Augier, M., March, J. G. & Sullivan, B. (2005). Notes on the Evolution of a Research Community: Organization Studies in Anglophone North America, 1945–2000. Organization Science, 16 (1), 85–95.Google Scholar
  305. Day, R. H. & Suder, S. (1996). Ideas and Work of Ricard M. Cyert. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 31, 139–148.Google Scholar
  306. Kette, S. (2012). Das Unternehmen als Organisation. Typische Strukturen und Probleme. In M. Apelt & V. Tacke (Hrsg.): Handbuch Organisationstypen (S. 21–42). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  307. Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  308. Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2000). Taking the Linguistic Turn in Organizational Research Challenges, Responses, Consequences. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 36 (2), 136–158. doi:10.1177/0021886300362002Google Scholar
  309. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  310. Czarniawska, B. (1997). A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  311. Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in Social Science Research. Introducing Qualitative Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  312. Czarniawska, B. (2009). A Theory of Organizing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  313. Czarniawska, B. & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of Ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Hrsg.), Translating Organizational Change (S. 13–48). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  314. Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (Hrsg.). (2005). Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in a Global Economy. Kopenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  315. Elliott, J. (1951). The Changing Culture of a Factory. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  316. Sahlin, K. & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing. In P. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin (Hrsg.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (S. 218–242). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  317. Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research. London u. a.: Sage.Google Scholar
  318. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. & Sevón, G. (1996). Translating Organizational Change. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  319. Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions, and Fantasies. Oxford u. a.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  320. Hernes, T. & Maitlis, S. (Hrsg.). (2010). Process, Sensemaking and Organizing. Perspectives on Process Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  321. Latour, B. (1994). On Technical Mediation. Common Knowledge 3 (2), 29–64.Google Scholar
  322. Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La Condition Postmoderne: Rapport sur le Savoir. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  323. Ospina, S. M. & Dodge, J. (2005). It’s About Time: Catching Method Up to Meaning – The Usefulness of Narrative Inquiry in Public Administration Research. Public Administration Review 65 (2), 143–157.Google Scholar
  324. Van de Ven, A. H. & Poole, M. S. (2005). Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change. Organization Studies 26 (9), 1377–1404.Google Scholar
  325. Watson, T. J. (2009). Narrative, Life Story and Manager Identity: A Case Study in Autobiographical Identity Work. Human Relations 62 (3), 425–452.Google Scholar
  326. Berle, A. A. & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  327. Boltanski, L. (1990). Die Führungskräfte: Die Entstehung einer sozialen Gruppe. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  328. Dahrendorf, R. (1955). Industrie- und Betriebssoziologie. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  329. Dahrendorf, R. (1985). Soziale Klassen und Klassenkonflikt: Zur Entwicklung und Wirkung eines Theoriestücks. Ein persönlicher Bericht. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 14 (3), 236–240.Google Scholar
  330. Tjaden-Steinhauer, M. & Tjaden, K. H. (1973). Klassenverhältnisse im Spätkapitalismus: Beitrag zur Analyse der Sozialstruktur unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der BRD. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
  331. Bourdieu, P. (1982). Die feinen Unterschiede. Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  332. Dalton, M. (1950). Conflicts between Line and Staff Managerial Officers. American Journal of Sociology 15 (3), 342–351.Google Scholar
  333. Dalton, M. (1951). Informal Factors in Career Achievement. American Journal of Sociology 56 (5), 407–415.Google Scholar
  334. Dalton, M. (1964). Preconceptions and Methods in » Men Who Manage «. In P. Hammond (Hrsg.), Sociologists at Work (S. 44–86). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  335. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  336. Jackall, R. (1988). Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  337. Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1978). The Structure of Educational Organizations. In M. W. Meyer (Hrsg.), Environments and Organizations (S. 78–109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  338. Watson T. (1994). In Search of Management: Culture, Chaos and Control in Managerial Work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  339. Greenwood, R. & Meyer, R. E. (2008). Influencing ideas a celebration of DiMaggio and Powell (1983). Journal of Management Inquiry 17, 258–264.Google Scholar
  340. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin-Andersson, K. & Suddaby, R. (Hrsg.) (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  341. Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363.Google Scholar
  342. Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  343. Walgenbach, P. & Meyer, R. E. (2008). Neoinstitutionalistische Organisationstheorie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  344. Wooten, M. & Hoffman, A. J. (2008). Organizational fields: past, present and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson & R. Suddaby (Hrsg.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  345. Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review 42, 726–743.Google Scholar
  346. Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology 13, 443–464.Google Scholar
  347. Boltanski, L. (1990). Die Führungskräfte Die Entstehung einer sozialen Gruppe. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  348. Geiger, T. J. (1932). Die soziale Schichtung des deutschen Volkes. Soziographischer Versuch auf statistischer Grundlage. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
  349. Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  350. Kocka, J. (1977). Angestellte zwischen Faschismus und Demokratie. Zur politischen Sozialgeschichte der Angestellten: USA 1890 – 1940 im internationalen Vergleich. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  351. Mills, C. W. (1951). White Collar. The American Middle Classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  352. Rastetter, D. (1994). Sexualität und Herrschaft in Organisationen: eine geschlechtervergleichende Analyse. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  353. Vester, M. (2001). Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel: zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  354. Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  355. Drucker, P. (1959). The Landmarks of Tomorrow. A Report on the New » Post-Modern « World. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  356. Machlup, F. (1962). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
  357. Marx, K. (1867). Das Kapital. Buch I: Der Produktionsprozess des Kapitals. Hamburg: Meissner.Google Scholar
  358. Moldaschl, M. & Voß, G. G. (2003). Subjektivierung von Arbeit. München und Mering: Hampp.Google Scholar
  359. Dobbin, F. (Hrsg.) (2004). The New Economic Sociology: A Reader. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  360. Eccles, R. G. & Crane, D. B. (1988). Doing Deals. Investment Banks at Work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  361. Leifer, E. & White, H. C. (1987). A Structural Approach to Markets. In M. S. Mizruchi & M. Schwartz (Hrsg.), Intercorporate Relations. The Structural Analysis of Business (S. 85–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  362. Luhmann, N. (1988). Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  363. Nee, V. & Swedberg, R. (2005). The Economic Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  364. Smelser, N. J. & Swedberg, R. (Hrsg.). (2005). The Handbook of Economic Sociology. 2. Auflage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  365. White, H. C. (1981). Where Do Markets Come From ? American Journal of Sociology 87, 517–547.Google Scholar
  366. Clegg, S. & Dunkerley, D. (1980). Organization, Class and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
  367. Friedman, A. (1977). Industry and Labour: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  368. Gordon, D. M., Edwards, R. C. & Reich, M. (1982). Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  369. Knights, D. & Willmott, H. (1990). Labour Process Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  370. Merz, F. (2012). Die Arbeitsbedingungen der chinesischen Wanderarbeiter: Eine Analyse am Beispiel des Apple-Zulieferers Foxconn. Reihe China: Band 35. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag.Google Scholar
  371. Thompson, P. (1997). The Nature of Work: An Introduction to the Debates of the Labour Process. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  372. Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. & Katz, E. (1960). Some Sociological Observations on the Response of Israeli Organizations to New Immigrants, Administrative Science Quarterly 5 (1) (Special Issue on Comparative Public Administration), 113–133.Google Scholar
  373. Mayntz, R. (1978). Soziologie der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Karlsruhe: C. F. Müller Juristischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  374. Burbank, J. & Cooper, F. (2012). Imperien der Weltgeschichte. Das Repertoire der Macht vom alten Rom und China bis heute. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  375. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1985). Comment on John Kautsky’s The Politics of Aristocratic Empires. A Review Article. Comparative Studies in Society and History 27, 135–137.Google Scholar
  376. Kautsky, J. H. (1982). The Politics of Aristocratic Empires. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  377. Luhmann, N. (1991). Funktionale Methode und Systemtheorie. In N. Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (S. 31–53). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  378. Scheidel, W. (Hrsg.). (2009). Rome and China. Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  379. Wolf, E. (1965). Review of the Political Systems of Empires by S. N. Eisenstadt. American Anthropologist 67, 172–176.Google Scholar
  380. Apelt, M. & Tacke, V. (Hrsg.). (2012). Handbuch Organisationstypen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  381. Brager, G. (1969). Commitment and Conflict in a Normative Organization. American Sociological Review 34 (4), 482–491.Google Scholar
  382. Bonazzi, G. (2008). Geschichte des organisatorischen Denkens. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  383. Blau, P. M. & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach. Scranton: Chandler.Google Scholar
  384. Julian, J. (1966). Compliance patterns and communication blocks in complex organizations. American Sociological Review 31 (3), 382–389.Google Scholar
  385. Kühl, S. (2012). Zwangsorganisationen. In M. Apelt & V. Tacke (Hrsg.), Handbuch Organisationstypen (S. 345–358). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  386. Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  387. Grusky, O. (1965). Modern Organizations – Etzioni, A. American Journal of Sociology, Jg. 71, Heft 1, 107.Google Scholar
  388. Kosiol, E. (1966). Die Unternehmung als wirtschaftliches Aktionszentrum. Einführung in die Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  389. Ikeda, K. (1965). Modern Organizations. By Amitai Etzioni. Social Forces, Jg. 44, Heft 1, 121–123.Google Scholar
  390. Luhmann, N. (1968). Modern Organizations. By Amitai Etzioni. Soziale Welt, Jg. 19, 373–374.Google Scholar
  391. Mayntz, R. (1963). Soziologie der Organisation. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  392. Reese-Schäfer, W. (2001): Amitai Etzioni zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.Google Scholar
  393. Weber, S. M. (2015). Ökonomie des Glücks. Von der » reflektierten Utopie « zum Paradigma und Praxis im Organisieren. In M. W. Fröse, S. Kaudela-Baum, F. E. P. Dievernich (Hrsg.), Intuitionen und Emotionen in Führung und Management (S. 317–338). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  394. Braybrooke, D. (1964). The Mystery of Executive Success Re-Examined. Administrative Science Quarterly 8, 533–560.Google Scholar
  395. Gulick, L. H. & Urwick, L. F. (Hrsg.). (1937). Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  396. Mooney, J. D. (1931). Onward Industry. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  397. Sloan, A. P. (1964). My Years With General Motors. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  398. Barnett, M. N. & Finnemore, M. (1999). The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, 53 (4), 699–732.Google Scholar
  399. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  400. Foucault, M. (1973). Die Geburt der Klinik. Eine Archäologie des ärztlichen Blicks. München: Hanser.Google Scholar
  401. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Hrsg.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (S. 87–104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  402. Hanke, S. (1996). Weiß die Weltbank, was sie tut ? Über den Umgang mit Unsicherheit in einer Organisation der Entwicklungsfinanzierung. Soziale Systeme, 2 (2), 331–359.Google Scholar
  403. Menzel, U. (1992). Das Ende der Dritten Welt und das Scheitern der großen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  404. Fligstein, N. (2011). Die Architektur der Märkte. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  405. Greenwood, R. et al. (Hrsg.). (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  406. Maurer, A. (2008). Das moderne Unternehmen – Die Unternehmen der Gesellschaft. In A. Maurer & U. Schimank (Hrsg.), Die Gesellschaft der Unternehmen – Die Unternehmen der Gesellschaft. Gesellschaftstheoretische Zugänge zum Wirtschaftsgeschehen (S. 17–39). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  407. Skok, R. (2014). Fligstein, Neil: Die Architektur der Märkte. In G. W. Oesterdiekhof (Hrsg.), Lexikon der soziologischen Werke (S. 209–210). 2. Auflage Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  408. Swedberg, R. (2003). Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton Press.Google Scholar
  409. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning I: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading et al.: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  410. Bassett, D. (2004). Mary Parker Follett: A Public Scholar » Far Ahead of Her Time «. http://www.com.washington.edu/graduate/assets/publicservice/ps_bassett.html.Zugegriffen: 14. Mai 2014.
  411. Follett, M. P. (1918). The New State. Group Organization, the Solution of Popular Government. London; New York: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
  412. Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative Experience. London; New York: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
  413. Graham, P. (Hrsg.). (1995). Mary Parker Follett – Prophet of Management. A Celebration of Writings from the 1920s. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  414. Smith, M. K. (2002). Mary Parker Follett: Community, Creative Experience and Education. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education, http://infed.org/mobi/mary-parker-follett-community-creative-experience-and-education. Zugegriffen: 14. Mai 2014.
  415. Tonn, J. C. (2003). Mary P. Follett: Creating Democracy, Transforming Management. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  416. Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H (Hrsg.). (2003). Studying Management Critically. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  417. Burell, G. (1988). Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis 2: The Contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies 9 (2), 221–235.Google Scholar
  418. Deleuze, G. (1993). Postskriptum über die Kontrollgesellschaften. In G. Deleuze (Hrsg.), Unterhandlungen. 1972–1990 (S. 254–262). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  419. Foucault, M. (1977). Der Wille zum Wissen (Band 1: Sexualität und Wahrheit). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  420. McKinlay, A. (2006). Managing Foucault: Genealogies of Management. Management and Organizational History 1 (1), 87–100.Google Scholar
  421. McKinlay, A. & Starkey, K. (Hrsg.). (1998). Foucault, Management and Organization Theory. From Panopticon to Technologies of Self. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  422. Sewell, G. & Wilkinson, B (1992). » Someone to Watch Over Me «: Surveillance, Discipline and the Just-in-Time Labour Process. Sociology 26 (2), 271–291.Google Scholar
  423. Weiskopf, R. (Hrsg.). (2003). Menschenregierungskünste. Anwendungen poststrukturalistischer Analyse auf Management und Organisation. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  424. Clemens, E. & Minkoff, D. C. (2004). Beyond the iron law: rethinking the place of organizations in social movement research. In J. Scott, J. Treas & M. Richards (Hrsg.), The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families (S. 155–170). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  425. Gamson, W. A. & Sifry, M. L. (2013). The #Occupy movement: an introduction. The Sociological Quarterly, 54 (2), 159–163. doi:10.1111/tsq.12026Google Scholar
  426. Polletta, F. (2002). Freedom Is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  427. Rucht, D. (1999). Linking organization and mobilization. Michels’ Iron Law of Oligarchy reconsidered. Mobilization, 4 (2), 151–169.Google Scholar
  428. Staggenborg, S. (1988). The consequences of professionalization and formalization in the prochoice movement. American Sociological Review, 53 (4), 585–605. doi:10.2307/2095851Google Scholar
  429. Sutherland, N., Land, C. & Böhm, S. (2013). Anti-leaders(hip) in social movement organizations: the case of autonomous grassroots groups. Organization (online first). doi:10.1177/1350508413480254Google Scholar
  430. Friedberg, E. (1986). Folgen der Informatisierung der Produktion für die Machtquellen unterer und mittlerer Führungskräfte. In R. Seltz, U. Mill & E. Hildebrandt (Hrsg.), Organisation als soziales System (S. 143–149). Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  431. Friedberg, E. (2003). Mikropolitik und organisationelles Lernen. In H. Brentel, H. Klemisch & H. Rohn (Hrsg.), Lernendes Unternehmen. Konzepte und Instrumente für eine zukunftsfähige Unternehmens-und Organisationsentwicklung (S. 97–108). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  432. Friedberg, E. (2008). Organisationales Beziehungsgefüge und Beratung – ein komplexes Verhältnis. In B. Blättel-Mink, K. Briken, A. Drinkuth & P. Wassermann (Hrsg.), Beratung als Reflexion. Perspektiven einer kritischen Berufpraxis für Soziolog/inn/en (S. 182–186). Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  433. Küpper, W. & Ortmann, G. (1988). Mikropolitik. Rationalität, Macht und Spiele in Organisationen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  434. Küpper, W. & Felsch, A. (2000). Organisation, Macht und Ökonomie. Mikropolitik und die Konstitution organisationaler Handlungssysteme. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  435. Neuberger, O. (Hrsg.). (1995). Mikropolitik. Der alltägliche Aufbau und Einsatz von Macht in Organisationen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
  436. Schnelle, W. (2006). Diskursive Organisations- und Strategieberatung. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.Google Scholar
  437. Schreyögg, G. & Koch, J. (2010): Grundlagen des Managements: Basiswissen für Studium und Praxis. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  438. Zenkert, G. (2004). Die Konstitution der Macht: Kompetenz, Ordnung und Integration in der politischen Verfassung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  439. Boxenbaum, E. & Lounsbury, M. (Hrsg.). (2013). Institutional logics in action. ABC Network conference. Research in the sociology of organizations 39 (A&B). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  440. DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Lynne G. Zucker (Hrsg.), Institutional Patterns in Organizations (S. 3–21). Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  441. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, Evelyn R. & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. The Academy of Management Annals 5 (1), 317–371.Google Scholar
  442. Powell, W. & DiMaggio, P. (Hrsg.). (1991). The new Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  443. Blauner, R. (1964). Alienation and freedom. The factory worker and his industry. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
  444. Düll, K. (1975). Industriesoziologie in Frankreich. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  445. Friedmann, G. (1936). La crise du progrès. Esquisse d’une histoire des idées (1895 – 1935). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  446. Friedmann, G. (1950). Où va le travail humain ? Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  447. Friedmann, G. (1956). Le travail en miettes. Spécialisation et loisirs. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  448. Kern, H. & Schumann, M. (1970). Industriearbeit und Arbeiterbewußtsein. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  449. Moldaschl, M. (2010). Organisierung und Organisation von Arbeit. In F. Böhle, G. G. Voß & G. Wachtler (Hrsg.), Handbuch Arbeitssoziologie (S. 263–299). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  450. Popitz, H., Bahrdt, H. P., Jüres, E. A. & Kesting, H. (1957). Technik und Industriearbeit. Soziologische Untersuchungen in der Hüttenindustrie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  451. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge; London: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  452. Chandler, A. D. (1977). The Visible Hand. The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  453. Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and Scope. The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  454. Galambos, L. (1983). Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization: Central Themes of the Organizational Synthesis, Business History Review 57, 471–493.Google Scholar
  455. Kleinschmidt, C. & Welskopp, T. (1993). Zu viel » Scale « – zu wenig » Scope « Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Alfred D. Chandlers Analyse der deutschen Eisen- und Stahlindustrie in der Zwischenkriegszeit, Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 1993 (2), 251–297.Google Scholar
  456. Wiebe, R. H. (1967). The Search for Order, 1877 – 1920. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  457. Yates, J. (1993). Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  458. Chu, Y. K. (1999). The Triads as Business. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  459. Dixit, A. K. (2004). Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  460. Dorn, C. & Hoebel, T. (2013). Mafias als organisierte Dritte. Behemoth. A Journal on Civilisation 6, 74–97.Google Scholar
  461. Hess, H. (1973). Mafia and Mafiosi. The Structure of Power. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  462. Hill, P. (2006). The Japanese Mafia. Yakuza, Law, and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  463. Paoli, L. (2003). Mafia Brotherhoods. Organized Crime, Italian Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  464. Schelling, T. C. (1971). What is the Business of Organized Crime ? Journal of Public Law 20, 71–84.Google Scholar
  465. Varese, F. (2001). The Russian Mafia. Private Protection in a New Market Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  466. Avni, N. (1991). Battered Wives. The Home as a Total Institution. Violence and Victims 6 (2), 137–149.Google Scholar
  467. Gerstenberger, H. (1996). Men Apart. The Concept of » Total Institution « and the Analysis of Seafaring. International Journal of Maritime History 8 (1), 173–182.Google Scholar
  468. Goffman, E. (2007). Die Verrücktheit des Platzes. In G. Erving, Das Individuum im öffentlichen Austausch. Mikrostudien zur öffentlichen Ordnung (S. 434–503). 1. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  469. Knottnerus, J. D. et al. (1999). The Slave Plantation System from a Total Institution Perspective. In T. J. Durant & J. D. Knottnerus (Hrsg.), Plantation Society and Race Relations. The Origins of Inequality (S. 17–27). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  470. Manning, P. (2005). Erving Goffman and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  471. Mauss, M. (2007). Die Gabe. Form und Funktion des Austauschs in archaischen Gesellschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  472. Pollard, N. (1996). The Roman Army as » Total Insitution « in the Near East ? Dura-Europos as a Case Study. In D. L. Kennedy & D. C. Braund (Hrsg.), The Roman Army in the East. Journal of Roman Archaeology: Supplementary Series (18), 211–228.Google Scholar
  473. Shenkar, O. (1996). The Firm as a Total Institution. Reflections on the Chinese State Enterprise. Organizational Studies 17 (6), S. 885–907.Google Scholar
  474. Hopwood, A. & Miller, P. (Hrsg.) (1993). Accounting as social and institutional practice. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  475. Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. 1. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  476. Martin, J. L. (2009). Social Structures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  477. Padgett, J. F. & Powell, W. W. (2012). The Emergence of Organizations and Markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  478. Parsons, T. (1960). Pattern Variables Revisited: A Response to Robert Dubin. American Sociological Review 25, 192–219.Google Scholar
  479. Parsons, T. (1964). Evolutionary Universals in Society. American Sociological Review 29, 339–357.Google Scholar
  480. Power, M. (1996). Making Things Auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21, 289–315.Google Scholar
  481. Smith, R. S. (1985). Rule-by-Records and Rule-by-Reports: Complementary Aspects of the British Imperial Rule of Law. Contributions to Indian Sociology 19, 153–176.Google Scholar
  482. Burawoy, M. (1996). The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory 16, 4–33.Google Scholar
  483. Hallett, T. & Ventresca, M. J. (2006a). How Institutions Form. Loose Coupling as Mechanism in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. American Behavioral Scientist 49, 908–924.Google Scholar
  484. Hallett, T. & Ventresca, M. J. (2006b). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society 35, 213–236.Google Scholar
  485. Burawoy, M. (1982). The Written and the Repressed in Gouldner’s Industrial Sociology. Theory and Society – Special Issue in Memory of Alvin W. Gouldner 11, 831–851.Google Scholar
  486. Chriss, J. J. (2001). Alvin W. Gouldner and industrial sociology at Columbia University. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 37, 241–259.Google Scholar
  487. Eldridge, J. E. T. (1968). Industrial Disputes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  488. Gouldner, A. W. (1954). The problem of loyalty in groups under tension. Social Problems 2, 82–88.Google Scholar
  489. Gouldner, A. W. (1959). Organizational Analysis. In R. Merton, L. Broom & L. Cottrell (Hrsg.): Sociology Today (S. 400–428). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  490. Hallett, T. & Ventresca, M. J. (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society 35, 213–236.Google Scholar
  491. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. London: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  492. Abolafia, M. (1998). Markets as Culture: An Ethnographic Approach. In M. Callon (Hrsg.), The Laws of the Markets (S. 69–85). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  493. Beckert, J. (2002). Vertrauen und die performative Konstruktion von Märkten. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 31, 27–43.Google Scholar
  494. Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar
  495. Granovetter, M. (2005). Business Groups and Social Organization. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Hrsg.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology (S. 429–450). New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  496. Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation. New York u. a.: Rinehart.Google Scholar
  497. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1), 35–67.Google Scholar
  498. Wrong, D. (1961). The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology. American Sociological Review 26 (2), 183–193.Google Scholar
  499. Zelizer, V. (1988). Beyond the Polemics of the Market: Establishing a Theoretical and Empirica. Agenda. Sociological Forum 3, 614–634.Google Scholar
  500. Zukin, S. & Di Maggio, P. (1990). Introduction. In S. Zukin & P. Di Maggio (Hrsg.), Structures of Capital. The Social Organization of the Economy (S. 1–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  501. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  502. Apelt, M. & Tacke, V. (Hrsg.). (2012). Handbuch Organisationstypen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  503. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18, 105–115.Google Scholar
  504. Mayntz, R. (1964). The Study of Organizations. Current Sociology 13, 94–156.Google Scholar
  505. Parsons, T. (1968). Professions. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 12, 536–547.Google Scholar
  506. Porter, L. W. & Lawler, E. E. (1968): Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood: Irwin- Dorsey.Google Scholar
  507. Schimank, U. (2000). Handeln und Strukturen. Einführung in die akteurtheoretische Soziologie. München: Juventa.Google Scholar
  508. Scott, R. (1965). Reactions to Supervision in a Heteronomous Professional Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 10, 65–81.Google Scholar
  509. Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning. Organization Science 2, 125–34.Google Scholar
  510. Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The Professionalization of Everyone ? American Journal of Sociology 70, 137–158.Google Scholar
  511. Allison, G. T. (1969). Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. American Political Science Review 63, 689–718.Google Scholar
  512. Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of Decision. Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  513. Allison, G. T. & Halperin, M. H. (1972). Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications. World Politics 24 (Supplement), 40–79.Google Scholar
  514. Drezner, D. W. (2000). Ideas, Bureaucratic Politics, and the Crafting of Foreign Policy. American Journal of Political Science 44, 733–749.Google Scholar
  515. Halperin, M. H. (1971). Why Bureaucrats Play Games. Foreign Policy Nr. 2, 70–90.Google Scholar
  516. Holland, L. (1999). The U. S. Decision to Launch Operation Desert Storm: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis. Armed Forces and Society 25, 219–242.Google Scholar
  517. Kozak, D. C. (1988). The Bureaucratic Politics Approach: The Evolution of the Paradigm. In D. C. Kozak & J. M. Keagle (Hrsg.), Bureaucratic Politics and National Security: Theory and Practice (S. 3–15). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  518. Miles, R. E. (1978). The Origin and Meaning of Miles’ Law. Public Administration Review 38, 399–403.Google Scholar
  519. Astley, G. W. (1985). The Two Ecologies: Population and Community Perspectives on Organizational Evolution. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 245–273.Google Scholar
  520. Hannan, M. T. & Carroll, G. (1992). Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  521. Hannan, M. & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82, 929–964.Google Scholar
  522. Hannan, M. T., Polos, L. & Carroll, G. R. (2007). Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Code, and Ecologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  523. Perrow, C. (1986). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. 3. Auflage. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  524. Ruef, M. (2000). The emergence of organizational forms: A community ecology approach. American Journal of Sociology 106, 658–714.Google Scholar
  525. Dobrev, S. D. & Kim, T. Y (2006). Positioning among organizations in a population: Moves between market segments and the evolution of industry structure. Administrative Science Quarterly 51 (2), 230–261.Google Scholar
  526. Thompson, P. & McHugh, D. (1990). Work Organizations. A Critical Introduction. London: Mac MillanGoogle Scholar
  527. Young, R. C. (1988). Is Population Ecology a Useful Paradigm For the Study of Organizations. American Sociological Review 94, 1–24.Google Scholar
  528. Barnett, M. & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  529. Davis, K. & Moore, W. E. (1945). Some Principles of Stratification. American Sociological Review 10, 242–247.Google Scholar
  530. Edeling, T. & Hartmann, H. (2000). Funktionale Autorität. Systematische Abhandlung zu einem soziologischen Begriff. In K. Türk (Hrsg.), Hauptwerke der Organisationstheorie. (S. 137–140).Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  531. Huntington, S. P. (1957). The Soldier and the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  532. Jannowitz, M. (1960). The professional soldier. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  533. Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and Process on Modern Societies. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  534. Zündorf, L. (1986). Macht, Einfluss, Vertrauen und Verständigung. Zum Problem der Handlungskoordination in Arbeitsorganisationen. In R. Seltz, U. Mill & E. Hildebrandt (Hrsg.), Organisation als soziales System. Kontrolle und Kommunikationstechnologie in Arbeitsorganisationen. (S. 33–56). Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  535. Adelman, J. (2013). Worldly Philosopher. The Odyssey of Albert O. Hirschman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  536. Hirschman, A. O. (1996). Selbstbefragung und Erkenntnis. München: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
  537. Lepenies, P. H. (2008). Possibilism. An Approach to Problem-Solving Derived from the Life and Work of Albert O. Hirschman, Development and Change 39, 437–459.Google Scholar
  538. Parsons, T. & E. A. Shils (Hrsg.). (1951). Toward a general theory of action. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  539. Picciotto, R. (1994). Visibility and disappointment. The new role of development evaluation. In L. Rodwin und D. A. Schon (Hrsg.), Rethinking the development experience. Essays provoked by the work of Albert O. Hirschman (S. 210–274). Washington D. C.: Brookings and the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  540. Barry, B. (1974). Review Article: › Exit, Voice, and Loyalty ‹. British Journal of Political Science 4, 79–107.Google Scholar
  541. Dowding, K., John, P., Mergoupis, T. & Van Vugt, M. (2000). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Analytic and Empirical Developments. European Journal of Political Research 37, 469–495.Google Scholar
  542. Down, A. (1956). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  543. Farell, D. (1983). Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect as Response to Job Dissatisfaction: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. The Academy of Management Journal 26, 596–607.Google Scholar
  544. Hirschman, A. O. (1981). Essays in Trespassing. Economics to Politics and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  545. Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal 39, 41–57.Google Scholar
  546. Maurer, A. (2006). Abwanderung und Widerspruch: Grenzüberschreitungen zwischen Soziologie und Ökonomie ? In I. Pies & M. Leschke (Hrsg.), Albert Hirschmans grenzüberschreitende Ökonomik (S. 67–85). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  547. Si, S. & Li, Y. (2012). Human Resource Management Practices on Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect: Organizational Commitment as a Mediator. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 23, 1705–1716.Google Scholar
  548. Withey, M. J. & Cooper, W. H. (1989). Predicting Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect. Administrative Science Quarterly 34, 521–539.Google Scholar
  549. Deschepper, R., Grigoryan, L., Stålsby Lundborg, C., Hofstede, G., Cohen J., Van Der Kelen, G., Deliens, L. & Haaijer-Ruskamp, F. (2008). Are cultural dimensions relevant for explaining cross-national differences in antibiotic use in Europe ? BMC Health Services Research 8, 123–132, http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6963-8-123.pdf. Zugegriffen: 13. März 2014.
  550. Early, C. (2006). Cultural Research in Future. A Matter of Paradigms and Taste. Journal of International Business Studies 37 (6), 922–931.Google Scholar
  551. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  552. Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, G.-J. (2012). Lokales Denken, globales Handeln: Interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales Management, 5. durchgesehene Auflage. München: Beck/DTV.Google Scholar
  553. Kirkman, B. L., Lowe K. B. & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A quarter century of Culture’s consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies 37, 285–320.Google Scholar
  554. Marcus, A. & Gould, E. W. (2000). Crosscurrents: Cultural Dimensions and Global Web User- Interface Design, New Visions of Human-Computer Interaction 7(4), 32–46.Google Scholar
  555. Sondergaard, M. (1994). Hofstede’s Consequences: A Study of Reviews, Citations and Replications. Organization Studies 15 (3), 447–456.Google Scholar
  556. Taras, V., Rowney, J. & Steel, P. (2009). Half a Century of Measuring Culture: A review of Approaches, Challenges, and limitations for Quantifying Culture. Journal of international Google Scholar
  557. Management, 12 (3), 357–373.Google Scholar
  558. Armstrong, P. (1994). The Influence of Michel Foucault on Accounting Research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 5, 25–55.Google Scholar
  559. Hopwood, A. G. & Miller, P. (Hrsg.). (1994). Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  560. Hoskin, K. (1994). Boxing Clever: For, Against and Beyond Foucault in the Battle for Accouting Theory. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 5, 57–85.Google Scholar
  561. Hoskin, K. & Macve, R. (1986). Accounting and the Examination: A Genealogy of Disciplinary Power. Accounting, Organizations and Society 11, 105–136.Google Scholar
  562. Miller, P. & O’Leary, T. (1996). The Factory as Laboratory. In M. Power (Hrsg.), Accounting and Science: Natural Inquiry and Commercial Reason (S. 120–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  563. Otley, D. T. (1980). The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5, 413–428.Google Scholar
  564. Power, M. (1996). Making Things Auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21, 289–315.Google Scholar
  565. Geser, H. (1980). Kleine Sozialsysteme: Strukturmerkmale und Leistungskapazitäten. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 32, 205–239.Google Scholar
  566. Horch, H.-D. (1985). Personalisierung und Ambivalenz. Strukturbesonderheiten freiwilliger Vereinigungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 37, 257–276.Google Scholar
  567. Horch, H.-D. (1992). Geld, Macht und Engagement in freiwilligen Vereinigungen. Grundlagen einer Wirtschaftssoziologie von Non-Profit-Organisationen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  568. Müller-Jentsch, W. (2008). Der Verein – ein blinder Fleck der Organisationssoziologie. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 18, 476–502.Google Scholar
  569. Bosk, C. (1979). Forgive and Remember. Managing medical failure. Chicago: Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  570. Burns, L. (1980). The Chicago School and the Study of Organization-Environment Relations. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 16, 342–358.Google Scholar
  571. Helmes-Hayes, R. (1998). Everett Hughes: Theorist of the Second Chicago School. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 11, 621–673.Google Scholar
  572. Hughes, E. (1971). The Sociological Eye: Selected Papers. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  573. Rohde, J. (1974). Soziologie des Krankenhauses. Zur Einführung in die Soziologie der Medizin. 2. Auflage. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.Google Scholar
  574. Strauss, A. et. al. (1963). The Hospital and its Negotiated Order. In E. Friedson (Hrsg.), The Hospital in Modern Society (S. 147–169). Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  575. Ventresca, M. & Kaghan, W. (2008). Routines, » Going Concerns « and Innovation: Towards an Evolutionary Economic Sociology. In C. Markus (Hrsg.), Handbook of Organizational Routines (S. 52–86). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  576. Alvesson, M. (2013). Understanding Organizatinal Culture. 2. Auflage. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  577. Alvesson, M. & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  578. Calhoun, C. (1989). Why Do Bad Careers Happen to Good Managers ? Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers by Robert Jackall. Contemporary Sociology 18 (4), 542–545.Google Scholar
  579. Doherty, E. M. (1990). Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers by Robert Jackall. The Academy of Management Review 15 (2), 331–333.Google Scholar
  580. Heelas, P. (1990). Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers by Robert Jackall. Man, New Series 25 (2), 363.Google Scholar
  581. Morrill, C. (1989). Getting by in a Bureaucracy. Moral Mazes by Robert Jackall. Science, New Series 244 (4906), 836–837.Google Scholar
  582. Weber, M. (2007). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Erftstadt: area verlag.Google Scholar
  583. Allmendinger, J. & Hackmann, R. (1994). Akzeptanz oder Abwehr ? Die Integration von Frauen in professionellen Organisationen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie 46 (2), 238–258.Google Scholar
  584. Heintz, B. & Nadai, E. (1998): Geschlecht im Kontext. DE-Institutionalisierungsprozesse und geschlechtliche Differenzierung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 27 (2), 75–93.Google Scholar
  585. Halford, S., Savage, M. & Witz, A. (1997). Gender, careers and organisations: current developments in banking, nursing and local government. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  586. Pringel, R. (1989). Secretaries talk: sexuality, power and work. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  587. Riegraf, B. (2013). Theoretische Erörterungen. In U. Müller, B. Riegraf & S. M. Wilt (Hrsg.), Geschlecht und Gesellschaft. Bd 45: Geschlecht und Organisation (S. 17–22). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  588. Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender & Society 5, 178–192.Google Scholar
  589. Huczynski, A. & Buchanan, D. (1985). Organizational Behaviour. An Introductory Text. New York et al.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  590. Kirchler, E., Meier-Pesti, K. & Hoffmann, E. (2011). Menschenbilder. In E. Kirchler (Hrsg.), Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (S. 15–195). 3. Auflage. Wien: Facultas.Google Scholar
  591. Shafritz, J. & Ott, S. (2001). Classics of Organization Theory. 5. Auflage. Fort Worth et al.: Hartcourt.Google Scholar
  592. Sofer, C. (1972). Organizations in Theory and Practice. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  593. Tannenbaum, A., Kavcic, B., Vianello, M. & Wieser, G. (1974). Hierarchy in Organizations. An International Comparison. San Francisco u. a.: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  594. Zick, A. (2000). Katz, Daniel/Kahn, Robert L. The Social Psychology of Organizations. In K. Türk (Hrsg.), Hauptwerke der Organisationstheorie (S. 150–152). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  595. Altmann, N. & Düll, K. (1990). Rationalization and Participation: Implementation of New Technologies and Problems of the Works Council in the FRG. Economic and Industrial Democracy 11, 111–127.Google Scholar
  596. Boyer, R. & Freyssenet, M. (1999). Les modèles productif. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  597. Kern, H. & Schumann, M. (1970). Industriearbeit und Arbeiterbewusstsein. Teil I + II. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  598. Kühl, S. (2002). Sisyphos im Management. Die vergebliche Suche nach der optimalen Organisationsstruktur Weinheim: Wiley.Google Scholar
  599. Manske, F. (1991). Kontrolle, Rationalisierung und Arbeit. Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  600. Piore, M. J. & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  601. Schumann, M., Baethge-Kinsky, V., Neumann, U. & Springer, R. (1990). Breite Diffusion der neuen Produktionskonzepte – Zögerlicher Wandel der Arbeitsstrukturen. Trendreport Rationalisierung in der Automobilindustrie, im Werkzeugmaschinenbau und der chemischen Industrie. Soziale Welt 1, 47–69.Google Scholar
  602. Springer, R. (1999). Rückkehr zum Taylorismus ? Arbeitspolitik in der Automobilindustrie am Scheideweg. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  603. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T. & Roos, D. (1990). The Machine that Changed the World. The Story of Lean Production. New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar
  604. Friedland, R. & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Hrsg.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (S. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  605. Guler, I., Guillén, M. F. & Macpherson, J. M. (2002). Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (2), 207–232.Google Scholar
  606. Kieser, A. (1994). Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses – And How This Should Be Performed. Organization Science, 5 (4), 608–620.Google Scholar
  607. Kieser, A. (1998). From Freemasons to Industrious Patriots. Organizing and Disciplining in 18th Century Germany. Organization Studies, 19 (1), 47–71.Google Scholar
  608. Lewin, A. Y. & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Prolegomena on Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 10 (5), 519–534.Google Scholar
  609. Newton, T. (2004). From Freemasons to the Employee: Organization, History and Subjectivity. Organization Studies, 25 (8), 1363–1387.Google Scholar
  610. Rowlinson, M., Hassard, J. & Decker, S. (2014). Research Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue Between Historical Theory and Organization Theory. Academy of Management Review 39, 250–274.Google Scholar
  611. Elbe, M. (2002). Wissen und Methode: Grundlagen der verstehenden Organisationswissenschaft. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  612. Mayntz, R. (1963). Soziologie der Organisation. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  613. Pfordten, O. von der (1917). Organisation. Ihr Wesen und ihre politische Bedeutung. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
  614. Plenge, J. (1965). Organisations- und Propagandalehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  615. Simmel, G. (1995). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Gesamtausgabe: Band II. 2. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  616. Tönnies, F. (1979). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Neudruck der 8. Auflage. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  617. Türk, K. (1995). » Die Organisation der Welt «: Herrschaft durch Organisation in der modernen Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  618. Türk, K. (2000). (Hrsg.). Hauptwerke der Organisationstheorie. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  619. Bahrdt, H. P. (1958). Industriebürokratie. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
  620. Boltanski, L. (1990). Die Führungskräfte. Zur Entstehung einer sozialen Gruppe. Frankfurt am Main u. a.: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  621. Kocka, J. (1974). Zur Problematik der deutschen Angestellten 1914–1933. In H. Mommsen (Hrsg.), Industrielles System und politische Entwicklung in der Weimarer Republik. Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag.Google Scholar
  622. Lederer, E. (1912). Die Privatangestellten in der modernen Wirtschaftsentwicklung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  623. Mills, C. W. (1951). White Collar. The American Middle Classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  624. Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 634–665.Google Scholar
  625. Cross, R. & Parker, A. (2004). The Hidden Power of Social Networks. Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  626. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The Search-transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 82–111.Google Scholar
  627. Holzer, B. (2005). Netzwerkanalyse. In S. Kühl, P. Strodtholz & A. Taffertshofer (Hrsg.), Quantitative Methoden der Organisationsforschung. Ein Handbuch (S. 386–419). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  628. Jansen, D. (2002). Netzwerkansätze in der Organisationsforschung. In J. Allmendinger & H. Thomas (Hrsg.), Organisationssoziologie (S. 88–118). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  629. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  630. Nelson, R. E. (1989). The Strength of Strong Ties: Social Networks and Intergroup Conflict in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 32, 377–401.Google Scholar
  631. Tushman, M. L. (1977). Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. Administrative Science Quarterly 22, 587–605.Google Scholar
  632. Heinrich, P. & Schulz zur Wiesch, J. (1998). Wörterbuch der Mikropolitik. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  633. Küpper, W. & Felsch, A. (2000). Organisation, Macht und Ökonomie: Mikropolitik und die Konstitution organisationaler Handlungssysteme. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  634. Küpper, W. & Ortmann, G. (1988). Mikropolitik: Rationalität, Macht und Spiele in Organisationen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  635. Mensching, A. (2008). Gelebte Hierarchien: mikropolitische Arrangements und organisationskulturelle Praktiken am Beispiel der Polizei. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  636. Neuberger, O. (1995). Mikropolitik: der alltägliche Aufbau und Einsatz von Macht in Organisationen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
  637. Noll, P. & Bachmann, H. R. (1987). Der kleine Machiavelli: Handbuch der Macht für den alltäglichen Gebrauch. Zürich: Pendo.Google Scholar
  638. Ortmann, G., Sydow, J. & Türk, K. (1997). Theorien der Organisation: Die Rückkehr der Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  639. Flynn, B. B., Huob, B. & Zhao, X. (2010). The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Performance: A Contingency and Configuration Approach. Journal of Operations Management 28 (1), 58–71.Google Scholar
  640. Frese, E., Graumann, M. & Theuvsen, L. (2012). Grundlagen der Organisation. Entscheidungsorientiertes Konzept der Organisationsgestaltung. 10. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  641. Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organization Design. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  642. Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P. & Tseng, S.-Y. (2009). Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance: A Contingency Perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 28 (4), 301–327.Google Scholar
  643. Khandwalla, P. N. (1977). The Design of Organizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  644. Lorsch, J. W. (1965). Product Innovation and Organization. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  645. Schreyögg, G. (1995). Umwelt, Technologie und Organisationsstruktur: Eine Analyse des kontingenztheoretischen Ansatzes. Bern u. a.: Paul Haupt.Google Scholar
  646. Theuvsen, L., Heyder, M. & Niederhut-Bollmann, C. (2010). Does Strategic Group Membership Affect Firm Performance ? An Analysis of the German Brewing Industry. German Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (1), 61–76.Google Scholar
  647. Battilana, J. & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional Work and the Paradox of Embedded Agency. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Hrsg.), Institutional work. Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (S. 31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  648. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In L. G. Zucker (Hrsg.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations. Culture and Environment (S. 3–21). Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  649. Hirsch, P. M. & Lounsbury, M. (1997). Ending the Family Quarrel: Toward a Reconciliation of » Old « and » New « Institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist 40, 406–418.Google Scholar
  650. Holm, P. (1995). The Dynamics of Institutionalization: Transformation Process in Norwegian Fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 398–422.Google Scholar
  651. Jepperson, R. L. (1991): Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Hrsg.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (S. 143–163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  652. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, Roy & Leca, Bernard (Hrsg.). (2009a). Institutional Work. Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  653. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. & Leca, B. (2009b): Introduction: Theorizing and Studying Institutional Work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Hrsg.), Institutional Work. Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (S. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  654. Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B. & Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional Work: Current Research, New Directions and Overlooked Issues. Organization Studies 34, 1023–1033.Google Scholar
  655. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science 11, 404–28.Google Scholar
  656. Senge, K. (2011). Das Neue am Neo-Institutionalismus. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  657. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W. & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective. Foundations, research, and theoretical elaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  658. Zietsma, C. & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work. Administrative Science Quarterly 55, 189–221.Google Scholar
  659. Bailey, J. J. & O’Connor, R. J. (1975). Operationalizing Incrementalism: Measuring the Muddles. Public Administration Review 35, 60–66.Google Scholar
  660. Dror, Y. (1964). Muddling Through – » Science « or Inertia ? Public Administration Review 24, 153–157.Google Scholar
  661. Forester, J. (1984). Bounded Rationality and the Politics of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review 44, 23–31.Google Scholar
  662. Lindblom, C. E. (1979). Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review 39, 517–526.Google Scholar
  663. Weiss, A. & Woodhouse, E. (1992). Reframing incrementalism: A constructive response to the critics. Policy Sciences 25, 255–273.Google Scholar
  664. Wildavsky, A. (1964). The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little, Brown and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  665. Bovens, M. & Zouridis, S. (2002). From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control. Public Administration Review, 62 (2), 174–184.Google Scholar
  666. Ellis, K., Davis, A. & Rummery, K. (1999). Needs Assessment, Street-level Bureaucracy and the New Community Care. Social policy und administration, 33 (3), 262–280.Google Scholar
  667. Evans, T. (2011). Professionals, Managers and Discretion: Critiquing Street-Level Bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41 (2), 368–386.Google Scholar
  668. Evans, T. & Harris, J. (2004). Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34 (6), 871–895.Google Scholar
  669. Meyers, M. K. & Vorsanger, S. (2007). Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Implementation of Public Policy. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Hrsg.), Handbook of Public Administration (S. 153–163). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  670. Moore, S. T. (1987). The Theory of Street-Level Bureaucracy: A Positive Critique. Administration und Society, 19 (1), 74–94.Google Scholar
  671. Baecker, D. (2004). Wozu Soziologie ? Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.Google Scholar
  672. Kühl, S. (2009). Coaching und Supervision – Zur personenorientierten Beratung in Organisationen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  673. Schreyögg, A. (2008). Coaching für die neu ernannte Führungskraft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  674. Kieserling, A. (1999). Kommunikation unter Anwesenden. Studien über Interaktionssysteme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  675. Kühl, S. (2011). Organisationen. Eine sehr kurze Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  676. Luhmann, N. (1970). Funktion und Kausalität. In N. Luhmann (Hrsg.), Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (S. 9–30). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  677. Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (Hrsg.). (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  678. Dammann, K. (2000). Luhmannianische und Luhmannesque Gedanken in der Verwaltungsreflexion. In H. de Berg & J. Schmidt (Hrsg.), Rezeption und Reflexion. Zur Resonanz der Systemtheorie Niklas Luhmanns außerhalb der Soziologie (S. 469–510). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  679. Jann, W. (2001). Verwaltungswissenschaft und Managementlehre. In B. Blanke et al. (Hrsg.), Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform (S. 61–70). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  680. Langrod, G. (1957). Science administrative ou Sciences administratives. Annales Universitatis Saraviensis (Droit, Economie) 5, 92–125.Google Scholar
  681. Luhmann, N. (1968). Soziologie des politischen Systems. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 20, 705–733.Google Scholar
  682. Luhmann, N. (1983). Legitimation durch Verfahren. 2. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  683. Luhmann, N. (1987). Die Unterscheidung von Staat und Gesellschaft. In N. Luhmann (Hrsg.), Soziologische Aufklärung 4. Beiträge zur funktionalen Differenzierung der Gesellschaft (S. 69–76). 3. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  684. Luhmann, N. (2000a). Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  685. Luhmann, N. (2010). Politische Soziologie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  686. Männle, P. (2011). Verwaltung (in) der Gesellschaft. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  687. Luhmann, N. (1971). Zweck – Herrschaft – System: Grundbegriffe und Prämissen Max Webers. In N. Luhmann, Politische Planung (S. 90–112). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  688. Drepper, T. (2003). Organisationen der Gesellschaft. Gesellschaft und Organisation in der Systemtheorie Niklas Luhmanns. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  689. Lieckweg, T. & Wehrsig C. (2001). Zur komplementären Ausdifferenzierung von Organisationen und Funktionssystemen. Perspektiven einer Gesellschaftstheorie der Organisation. In V. Tacke (Hrsg.), Organisation und gesellschaftliche Differenzierung (S. 39–60). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  690. Luhmann, N. (1975). Interaktion, Organisation, Gesellschaft. In N. Luhmann (Hrsg.), Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (S. 9–20). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  691. Luhmann, N. (1981). Organisation und Entscheidung. In N. Luhmann (Hrsg.), Soziologische Aufklärung. 3. Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organisation (S. 335–389). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  692. Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziologische Aspekte des Entscheidungsverhaltens. Die Betriebswirtschaft (DBW) 44, 591–603.Google Scholar
  693. Luhmann, N. (1988). Organisation. In W. Küpper & G. Ortmann (Hrsg.), Mikropolitik. Rationalität, Macht und Spiele in Organisationen (S. 165–185). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  694. Luhmann, N. (1993). Die Paradoxie des Entscheidens. Verwaltungs-Archiv 84, 287–310.Google Scholar
  695. Tacke, V. (Hrsg.). (2001). Organisation und gesellschaftliche Differenzierung. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  696. Tacke, V. (2015). Formalität und Informalität. Zu einer klassischen Unterscheidung der Organisationssoziologie. In V. von Groddeck & S. Wilz (Hrsg.), Formalität und Informalität in Organisationen (S. 37–92). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  697. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Every-day Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  698. Jacobs, J. (1969). Symbolic Bureaucracy: a Case Study of a Social Welfare Agency. Social Forces 47, 413–422.Google Scholar
  699. Manning, P. (2008). Goffman on Organizations. Organization Studies 29 (5), 677–699.Google Scholar
  700. Reichertz, J. (1991): Aufklärungsarbeit. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
  701. Reiner, R. (2003). Policing and the media. In T. Newburn (Hrsg.), Handbook of Policing (S. 259–281). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  702. Samra-Fredericks, D., Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2008). Introduction to the Symposium on The Foundations of Organizing: The Contribution from Garfinkel, Goffman and Sacks. Organization Studies 29 (5), 653–675.Google Scholar
  703. Wilz, S. (2012). Polizei. In M. Apelt & V. Tacke (Hrsg.), Handbuch Organisationstypen (S. 113–132). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  704. Japp, K. P. (2000). Besprechung zu » Decisions and Organizations «. In K. Türk (Hrsg.), Hauptwerke der Organisationssoziologie (S. 183–186). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  705. Luhmann, N. (1981). Organisation und Entscheidung. In N. Luhmann (Hrsg.), Soziologische Aufklärung 3. Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organisation (S. 335–389). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  706. March, J. G. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making. How Decisions Happen. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  707. Tacke, V. (2001). James G. March und die Tyrannei der instrumentellen Rationalität. In T. M. Bardmann & T. Groth (Hrsg.), Zirkuläre Positionen 3: Organisation, Management und Beratung (S. 34–41). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  708. Weick, K. E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations. The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 628–652.Google Scholar
  709. Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D. & Skocpol, T. (Hrsg.). (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  710. Goldmann, K. (2005). Appropriateness and Consequences: The Logic of Neo-Institutionalism. Governance 18, 35–52.Google Scholar
  711. Hall, P. A. & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political studies XLIV, 936–957.Google Scholar
  712. Hartmann, J. (2003). Geschichte der Politikwissenschaft. Grundzüge der Fachentwicklung in den USA und in Europa. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  713. Kaiser, A. (2009). Die Politische Theorie des Neo-Institutionalismus: James March und Johan Olsen. In A. Brodocz & G. S. Schaal (Hrsg.), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart II. Eine Einführung (S. 313–342). 3. Auflage. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  714. March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52, 943–969.Google Scholar
  715. March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (2006). The Logic of Appropriateness. In M. Moran, M. Rein & R. E. Goodin (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (S. 689–708). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  716. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations. Ideas and Interests. 3. Auflage. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  717. Sjöblom, G. (1993). Some Critical Remarks on March and Olsen’s Rediscovering Institutions. Journal of Theoretical Politics 5, 397–407.Google Scholar
  718. Becker, A. (1996). Rationalität strategischer Entscheidungsprozesse: Ein strukturationstheoretisches Konzept. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
  719. Becker, A., Küpper, W. & Ortmann, G. (1988). Revisionen der Rationalität. In W. Küpper & G. Ortmann (Hrsg.), Mikropolitik: Rationalität, Macht und Spiele in Organisationen (S. 89–114). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  720. Elster, J (2007). Explaining Social Behaviour: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  721. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305–360.Google Scholar
  722. March, J. G. (1966). The Power of Power. In D. Batson (Hrsg.), Varieties of Political Theory (S. 39–70). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  723. Ortmann, G. (1976). Unternehmungsziele als Ideologie: Zur Kritik betriebswirtschaftlicher und organisationstheoretischer Entwürfe einer Theorie der Unternehmungsziele. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.Google Scholar
  724. Albrow, M. (1976). Bureaucracy in India: A Sociological Study by G. K. Prasad; Policy-Making in the German Federal Bureaucracy by Renate Mayntz and Fritz W. Scharpf. Review. The British Journal of Sociology 27 (4), 515–516.Google Scholar
  725. Diamant, A. (1981). Bureaucracy and Public Policy in Neocorporatist Settings: Some European Lessons. Comparative Politics 14 (1), 101–124.Google Scholar
  726. Heidenheimer, A. J. (1978). Policy-Making in the German Federal Bureaucracy by Renate Mayntz and Fritz W. Scharpf. Review. The American Political Science Review 72 (2), 748–749.Google Scholar
  727. Mayntz, R. (1978). Soziologie der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Karlsruhe: C. F. Müller Juristischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  728. Mayntz, R. (1980). Die Entwicklung eines analytischen Paradigmas der Implementationsforschung. In R. Mayntz (Hrsg.), Implementation politischer Programme. Empirische Forschungsberichte (S. 1–20). Königstein: Athenäum.Google Scholar
  729. Mayntz, R. (1997). Soziale Dynamik und politische Steuerung. Theoretische und methodische Überlegungen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  730. Offe, C. (1976). Policy Making in the German Federal Bureaucracy. By Renate Mayntz and Fritz W. Scharpf. Review. Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (4), 744–747.Google Scholar
  731. Peters, B. G. (1979). Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy. Comparative Politics 11 (3), 339–358.Google Scholar
  732. Scharpf, F., Reissert, B. & Schnabel, F. (1976). Politikverflechtung. Kronberg: Skriptor.Google Scholar
  733. Bendix, R., Fisher, L. H. (1949). The Perspectives of Elton Mayo. The Review of Economics and Statistics 31 (4), 312–319.Google Scholar
  734. Carey, A. (1967). The Hawthorne Studies: A Radical Criticism. American Sociological Review 32 (3), 403–416.Google Scholar
  735. Homans, G. C. (1949). The Perspectives of Elton Mayo: Some Corrections. The Review of Economics and Statistics 31 (4), 319–321.Google Scholar
  736. Kieser, A. (1999). Human Relations-Bewegung und Organisationspsychologie. In A. Kieser (Hrsg.), Organisationstheorien (S. 101–131). 3. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  737. Clegg, S. et al. (2006). Power and Organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  738. Dubin, R. (1957). Power and Union-Management Relations. Administrative Science Quarterly 2, 60–81.Google Scholar
  739. Emerson, R. (1962). Power-Dependance Relationships. American Sociological Review 27, 31–41.Google Scholar
  740. French, J. R. P. & Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. In D. Cartwright (Hrsg.), Studies in Social Power. Michigan: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  741. Hickson, D. J. et al. (1971). A Strategic Contingencies Theory of Intraorganizational Power. Administrative Science Quarterly 16, 216–229.Google Scholar
  742. Hinings, C. R. et al. (1974). Structural Conditions of Intraorganizational Power. Administrative Science Quarterly 19, 22–44.Google Scholar
  743. Luhmann, N. (1969). Unterwachung. Oder die Kunst, Vorgesetzte zu lenken. Bielefeld: Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.Google Scholar
  744. Pennings, J. M. et al. (1969). Uncertainty and Power in Organizations. Mens en maatschappij 25, 418–433.Google Scholar
  745. Thibaut, J. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Ulan Press.Google Scholar
  746. Thompson, J. D. (1956). Authority and Power in » Identical « Organizations. American Journal of Sociology 62, 290–301.Google Scholar
  747. Albert, G. (2011). Moderater Holismus – emergentistische Methodologie einer dritten Soziologie. In J. Greve & A. Schnabel (Hrsg.), Emergenz. Zur Analyse und Erklärung komplexer Strukturen (S. 252–285). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  748. Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  749. Emery, F. E. & Trist, E. L. (1960). Socio-technical Systems. In C. W. Churchman & M. Verhurst (Hrsg.), Management Science, Models and Techniques. Bd. 2 (S. 83–97). London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  750. Jacques, E. (1951). The Changing culture of a factory. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  751. Ortmann, G. (1995). Organisation und Psyche. In B. Volmerg, T. Leithäuser, O. Neuberger, G. Ortmann & B. Sievers (Hrsg.), Nach allen Regeln der Kunst. Macht und Geschlecht in Organisationen (S. 205–250). Freiburg: Kore.Google Scholar
  752. Blau, P. M. & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal Organizations. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
  753. Merton, R. K. (1936). The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review 1, 894–904.Google Scholar
  754. Merton, R. K. & Barber, E. (1963). Sociological Ambivalence. In E. A. Tiryakian (Hrsg.), Sociological Theory, Values, and Socio-cultural Change (S. 91–120). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  755. Vaughan, D. (1999). The Dark Side of Organizations: Mistake, Misconduct, and Disaster. Annual Review of Sociology 25, 271–305.Google Scholar
  756. Warnotte, D. (1937). Bureaucratie et Fonctionnalisme. Revue de l’Institut de Sociologie 17, 245–60.Google Scholar
  757. Baron, J. N. & Bielby, W. T. (1980). Bringing the Firms Back In: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of Work. American Sociological Review 45, 737–765.Google Scholar
  758. Grages, C. (2012). Potenziale und Grenzen der Synthese von Institutionalismustheorien. WAO Online-Journal für Wirtschafts,- Arbeits- und Organisationssoziologie, Jg.2, Heft 1, 50–68.Google Scholar
  759. Hasse, R. & Krücken, G. (2005). Organisationsgesellschaft und Weltgesellschaft im soziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus. In W. Jäger & U. Schimank (Hrsg.), Organisationsgesellschaft: Facetten und Perspektiven (S. 124–147). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  760. Homans, G. C. (1964). Bringing Men Back In. American Sociological Review 29 (5), 809–818.Google Scholar
  761. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  762. Meyer, J. W. (1987). The World Polity and the Authority of the Nation State. In G. M. Thomas, J. W. Meyer, F. O. Ramirez & J. Boli (Hrsg.), Institutional Structure. Constituting State, Society, and the Individual (S. 41–70). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  763. Meyer, J. W., Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., Schofer, E. & Brandon Tuma, N. (1997). The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870–1990. International Organization Jg. 51, Heft 4, 623–651.Google Scholar
  764. Thomas, G. M., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Boli, J. (Hrsg.). (1987). Institutional Structure. Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  765. Weber, M. (1968). Wissenschaft als Beruf. In M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (S. 566–597). Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
  766. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  767. Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  768. Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism. In P. J. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Hrsg.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (S. 143–163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  769. Lounsbury, M. (2003). The Problem of Order Revisited. Towards a more Critical Institutional Perspective. In R. Westwood & S. Clegg (Hrsg.), Debating Organization (S. 210–219). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  770. Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1968). The Structure of Educational Organisations. In M. W. Meyer (Hrsg.), Environments and Organizations (S. 78–109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pubishers.Google Scholar
  771. Senge, K. (2011). Das Neue am Neo-Institutionalismus. Der Neo-Institutionalismus im Kontext der Organisationswissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  772. Walgenbach, P. (2001). Institutionalistische Ansätze in der Organisationstheorie. In A. Kieser (Hrsg.), Organisationstheorien (S. 319–353). 4. Auflage. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  773. Zucker, L. G. (1983). Organizations as Institutions. In S. B. Bacharach (Hrsg.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bd. 2 (S. 1–47). Greenwich; Connecticut u. a.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  774. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D. & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management 37, 39–67. doi:10.1177/0149206310388419Google Scholar
  775. Gambetta, D. (2009). Signaling. In P. Hedström & P. Bearman (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology (S. 168–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  776. McKinley, W. (2010). Organizational Theory Development: Displacement of Ends ? Organization Studies 31, 47–68. doi:10.1177/0170840609347055Google Scholar
  777. Brunsson, N. (2006). Mechanisms of Hope. Maintaining the dream of the rational organization. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  778. Hargrove, E. C. (1994). Prisoners of Myth. The Leadership of the Tennessee Valley Authority, 1933 – 1990 1994. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  779. Seibel, W. (1992). Funktionaler Dilettantismus. Erfolgreich scheiternde Organisationen im » Dritten Sektor « zwischen Markt und Staat. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  780. Staw, B. M. (1997). The Escalation of Commitment: An Update and Appraisal. In Z. Sharpira (Hrsg.), Organizational Decision Making (S. 191–215). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  781. Thurow, L. C. (1980). Zero-Sum Society: Distribution and the Possibilities for Economic Change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  782. Duverger, M. (1959). Sociologie de la politique. Elements de Science politique.Paris 1973: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  783. De Marchi, F. (1968). Rückblick auf die Soziologie vor 50 Jahren im Gedenken an Roberto Michels. Annali di Sociologia. Soziologisches Jahrbuch 2, I, 15–63.Google Scholar
  784. Lohmar, U. (1968). Innerparteiliche Demokratie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  785. Lipset, S. M. (1962). Introduction. In R. Michels (Hrsg.), Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (S. 15–39). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  786. Mayntz, R. (1959). Parteigruppen in der Großstadt. Köln et al.: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  787. McKenzie, R. T. (1961). Politische Parteien in England. Köln et al.: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  788. Pfetsch, F. (2003). Theoretiker der Politik. Von Plato bis Habermas. Paderborn: Fink.Google Scholar
  789. Röhrich, W. (1972). Robert Michels. Berlin: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
  790. Zeitler, B. (2006).Verbände als Herrschaftsinstrument politischer Oligarchien: Robert Michels.Google Scholar
  791. In M. Sebald & A. Strassner (Hrsg.), Klassiker der Verbändeforschung (S. 223–240). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  792. Bourdieu, P. (2004). Der Staatsadel. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  793. Burris, V. (2005). Interlocking Directorates and Political Cohesion among Corporate Elites. American Journal of Sociology 111 (1), 249–283.Google Scholar
  794. Dahrendorf, R. (1962). Die angewandte Aufklärung. Gesellschaft und Soziologie in Amerika. München: Piper.Google Scholar
  795. Domhoff, W. G. (2006). Mills’ The Power Elite 50 Years Later. Contemporary Sociology 35, 547–550.Google Scholar
  796. Domhoff, W. G. (2009). Who Rules America ? 6. Auflage. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  797. Karabel, J. (2005). The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  798. Parsons, T. (1957). The Distribution of Power in American Society. The Power Elite by C. Wright Mills. World Politics 10 (1), 123–143.Google Scholar
  799. Scott, J. (1991). Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 17, 181–203.Google Scholar
  800. Useem, M. (1986). The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U. S. and U. K. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  801. Gulick, L. H. (1937). Notes on the Theory of Organization. In L. H. Gulick & L. F. Urwick (Hrsg.), Papers on the Science of Administration (S. 1–46), New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  802. Kubert, J. M. (1974). Review of » The Nature of Managerial Work « by Henry Mintzberg. The Journal of Business 3, 459–461.Google Scholar
  803. Kurke, L. B. & Aldrich, H. E. (1983). Note – Mintzberg was Right !: A Replication and Extension of The Nature of Managerial Work. Management Science 8, 975–984.Google Scholar
  804. Mintzberg, H. (1968). The Manager at Work – Determining his Activities, Roles, and Programms by Structured Observation. Cambridge: M.I.T. Sloan School of Management.Google Scholar
  805. Paolillo, J. G. P. (1987). Role Profiles for Managers in Different Functional Areas. Group Organization Management 12, 1, 109–118.Google Scholar
  806. Pearson, C. A. L. & Chatterjee, S. R. (2003). Managerial Work Roles in Asia: An Empirical Study of Mintzberg’s Role Formulation in Four Asian Countries. Journal of Management Development 22, 8, 694–707.Google Scholar
  807. Shapita, Z. & Dunbar, R. L. M. (1980). Testing Mintzberg’s Managerial Roles Classification Using an In-Basket Simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology 65, 1, 87–95.Google Scholar
  808. Staudt, E. (1979). Planung als Stückwerktechnologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  809. Weick, K. E. (1974). Review of » The Nature of Managerial Work « by Henry Mintzberg. Administrative Science Quarterly 1, 111–118.Google Scholar
  810. Andrews, R. & Beynon, M. J. (2011). Organizational Form and Strategic Alignment in a Local Authority: A Preliminary Exploration using Fuzzy Clustering. Public Organization review 11 (3), 201–218.Google Scholar
  811. Blaise, P. & Kegels, G. (2004). A realistic approach to the evaluation of the quality management movement in health care systems: a comparison between European and African contexts based on Mintzberg’s organizational models. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 19 (4), 337–364.Google Scholar
  812. Brock, D. M, Powell, M. J. & Hinings, C. R. (Hrsg.). (1999). Restructuring the Professional Organization. Accounting, health care and law. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  813. Doty, D. H., Glick, W. H. & Huber, G. P. (1993). Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: a test of two configurational theories. Academy of Management Journal 36 (6), 1198–1250.Google Scholar
  814. Hardy, C. (1991). Configuration and Strategy Making in Universities: Broadening the Scope. Journal of Higher Education 62 (4), 363–393.Google Scholar
  815. Lega, F. & DePietro, C. (2005). Converging Patterns in Hospital Organization: Beyond the Professional Bureaucracy. Health Policy 74 (3), 261–281.Google Scholar
  816. Simon, H. A. (1969). The Science of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  817. Unger, J. P., Macq, J., Bredo, F. & Boelart, M. (2000). Through Mintzberg’s glasses: a fresh look at the organizational of ministries of health. Bulletin of World Health Organization 78 (8), 1005–1014.Google Scholar
  818. Dahl, R. A. (1968). Power. In D. L. Sills (Hrsg.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Science, Bd. 12, (S. 405–415). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  819. Demers, C. (2007). Organizational Change Theories. A Synthesis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  820. Farrell, D. & Petersen, J. (1982). Patterns of Political Behavior in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 7, 403–412.Google Scholar
  821. Klein, J. (1988). The Myth of the Corporate Political Jungle: Politicization as a Political Strategy. Journal of Management Studies 25, 1–12.Google Scholar
  822. Neuberger, O. (1992). Spiele in Organisationen, Organisationen als Spiele. In W. Küpper & G. Ortmann (Hrsg.), Mikropolitik. Rationalität, Macht und Spiele in Organisationen (S. 53–86). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  823. Neuberger, O. (1995). Mikropolitik. Der alltägliche Aufbau und Einsatz von Macht in Organisationen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
  824. Neuberger, O. (2007). Mikropolitik und Moral in Organisationen. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in Organizations. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  825. Lowndes, V. (2010). The Institutional Approach. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Hrsg.), Theories and Methods in Political Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  826. North, D. C. (1988). Theorie des institutionellen Wandels. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  827. Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Hrsg.). (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  828. Priddat, B. P. (2004). Strukturierter Individualismus. Institutionen als ökonomische Theorie. Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
  829. Richter, R. & Furubotn, E. (2003). Neue Institutionenökonomik. 3. Auflage. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  830. Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism » Old « and » New «. Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 270–277.Google Scholar
  831. Weber, M. (1976). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. 5. Revidierte Ausgabe besorgt von J. Winckelmann. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  832. Bolte, K. M. (1979). Leistung und Leistungsprinzip. Zur Konzeption, Wirklichkeit und Möglichkeit eines gesellschaftlichen Gestaltungsprinzips. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  833. Dexter, C. R. (1979). Review Industry and Inequality. American Journal of Sociology 84 (5), 1286–1287.Google Scholar
  834. Dröge, K., Marrs, K. & Menz, W. (Hrsg.). (2008). Die Rückkehr der Leistungsfrage. Leistung in Arbeit, Unternehmen und Gesellschaft. Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  835. Hartfiel, G. (Hrsg.). (1977). Das Leistungsprinzip: Merkmale – Bedingungen – Probleme. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  836. Longstreth, F. (1978). Review Industry and Inequality. British Journal of Sociology 29 (2), 275–276.Google Scholar
  837. Menz, W. (2009). Die Legitimität des Marktregimes. Leistungs- und Gerechtigkeitsorientierungen in Formen betrieblicher Leistungspolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  838. Vallas, S. P. (1991). Workers, Firms, and the Dominant Ideology: Hegemony and Consciousness in the Monopoly Core. The Sociological Quarterly 32 (1), 61–83.Google Scholar
  839. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  840. Hechter, M. (1987). Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  841. Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  842. Offe, C. & Wiesenthal, H. (1980). Two Logics of Collective Action. Political Power and Social Theory 1, 67–115.Google Scholar
  843. Schubert, K. (Hrsg.). (1992). Leistungen und Grenzen politisch-ökonomischer Theorie. Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme zu Mancur Olson. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  844. Simpson, B., Willer, R. & Ridgeway, C. L. (2012). Status Hierarchies and the Organization of Collective Action. Sociological Theory 30, 149–166.Google Scholar
  845. Wilkesmann, U. & Blutner, D. (2007). Brot und Spiele. Zur Produktion und Allokation von Clubgütern im deutschen Profifußball. Soziale Welt 58, 55–74.Google Scholar
  846. Burke, E. (1882) [1770]. Thoughts on the Cause the Present Discontents. Dublin: Mc Gill & Son.Google Scholar
  847. Herzog, D. (1966). Max Weber als Klassiker der Parteiensoziologie. Soziale Welt 17 (3), 232–252.Google Scholar
  848. Hume, D. (1988) [1741/42]. Politische und ökonomische Essays. 2 Bände. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  849. Lipset, S. M. (1964a). Bibliographical Note. In M. S. Lipset (Hrsg.), Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. Band II: The United States (S. vii – viii). Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
  850. Lipset, S. M. (1964). Introduction. Ostrogorski and the Analytical Approach to the Comparative Study of Political Parties. In M. S. Lipset (Hrsg.), Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. Band II: The United States (S. ix-lxviii). Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
  851. Runciman, W. G. (1963). Social Science and Political Theory. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  852. Siri, J. (2012). Parteien. Zur Soziologie einer politischen Form. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  853. Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Costs. Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–44.Google Scholar
  854. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  855. Frey, B. S. (2010). Lin Ostrom’s Contribution to Economics: A Personal Evaluation. Public Choice Vol 143, 303–308.Google Scholar
  856. Hanisch, M. (2010). Die Organisation von Kooperation – was die Genossenschaftswissenschaft von Elinor Ostrom lernen könnte. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen 60 (4), 251–263.Google Scholar
  857. Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162, 1243–1248.Google Scholar
  858. Hayek, F. A. (1935). Collectivist Economic Planning: Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  859. Lange, O. (1938). On the Economic Theory of Socialism. In Oskar Lange, Fred M. Taylor & Benjamin E. Lippincott (Hrsg.), On the Economic Theory of Socialism (S. 53–143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  860. Popper, K. R. (1967). La rationalité et le statut du principe de rationalité. In Emil M. Classen (Hrsg.), Les fondements philosophiques des systèmes économiques: Textes de Jacques Rueff et essais rédigés en son honneur (S. 142–150). Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  861. Rösner, H. J. & Schulz-Nieswandt, F. (Hrsg.). (2009). Beiträge der genossenschaftlichen Selbsthilfe zur wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Entwicklung. 2 Bände. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  862. Adler P. S. (2001). Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism. Organization Science 12, 215–234.Google Scholar
  863. Bradach J. L. & Eccles R. G. (1989). Markets versus Hierarchies: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms. Annual Review of Sociology 15, 97–118.Google Scholar
  864. Meyerson D. & Martin J. (1987). Cultural Change: An Integration of Three Different Views. Journal of Management Studies 24, 623–647.Google Scholar
  865. Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American Business can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  866. Sydow J. & Windeler A. (1998). Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: A Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness. Organization Science 9, 265–284.Google Scholar
  867. Gought, L. (2012). C. Northcote Parkinson » Parkinsons Gesetz «: 52 brillante Ideen für Ihr Business. Offenbach: GABLE Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
  868. Jones, G. R. & Bouncken, R. B. (2008). Organisation. Theorie, Design und Wandel. 5. Aktualisierte Auflage. München: Pearson Studium.Google Scholar
  869. Kieser, A. & Kubicek, H. (1977). Organisation. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter (de Gruyter Lehrbuch).Google Scholar
  870. Parkinson, C. N. (1982). Parkinsons neues Gesetz. Düsseldorf: ECON.Google Scholar
  871. Beckert, J. (1997). Grenzen des Marktes. Die sozialen Grundlagen wirtschaftlicher Effizienz. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  872. Dunlop, J. T. (1958). Industrial Relations Systems. New York et al.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  873. Luhmann, N. (1988). Warum AGIL ? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 40, 127–139.Google Scholar
  874. Mayntz, R. (1963). Soziologie der Organisation. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  875. Mills, C. Wright (1959). The Sociological Imagination. London u. a.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  876. Parsons, T. & Smelser, N. J. (1956). Economy and Society: A Study of the Integration of Economic and Social Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  877. Touraine, A. (1965). Sociologie de l’action. Paris: Denoel.Google Scholar
  878. Alexander, K. L. & McDill, E. L. (1976). Selection and Allocation within Schools: Some Causes and Consequences of Curriculum Placement. American Sociological Review 41 (6), 963–980.Google Scholar
  879. Boli, J., Ramirez, F. O. & Meyer, J. W. (1985). Explaining the Origins and Expansion of Mass Education. Comparative Education Review 29 (2), 145–170.Google Scholar
  880. Dreeben, R. (1967). The Contribution of Schooling to the Learning of Norms. Harvard Educational Review 37 (2), 211–237.Google Scholar
  881. Dreeben, R. (1968). On What Is Learned in School. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  882. Ingersoll, R. M. (1996). Teachers’ Decision-Making Power and School Conflict. Sociology of Education 69 (2), 159–176.Google Scholar
  883. Kedar-Voivodas, G. (1983). The Impact of Elementary Children’s School Roles and Sex Roles on Teacher Attitudes: An Interactional Analysis. Review of Educational Research 53, 415–437.Google Scholar
  884. Scott, J. F. (1965). The American College Soroity: Its Role in Class and Ethnic Endogamy. American Sociological Review 30 (4), 514–527.Google Scholar
  885. Vanderstraeten, R. (2001). The School Class as an Interaction Order. British Journal of Sociology of Education 22 (2), 267–277.Google Scholar
  886. Welch, A. R. (1993). Class, Culture and the State in Comparative Education: problems, perspectives and prospects. Comparative Education 29 (1), 7–27.Google Scholar
  887. Baker, G., Gibbs, M. & Holmstrom, B. (1994). The Internal Economics of the Firm: Evidence from Personnel Data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 881–919.Google Scholar
  888. Gibbs, M. & Hendricks, W. (2004). Do Formal Salary Systems Really Matter. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 58, 71–93.Google Scholar
  889. Lazear, E. (1992). The Job as a Concept. In W. J. Bruns (Hrsg.): Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives (S. 183–215). Jr. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  890. Lazear, E. (2004). The Peter Principle: A Theory of Decline. Journal of Political Economy 112, 141–163.Google Scholar
  891. Medoff, J. L. & Abraham, K. G. (1980). Experience, Performance, and Earnings. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 95, 703–736.Google Scholar
  892. Peter, L. J. (1984). Why Things Go Wrong or the Peter Principle Revisited. New York: William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar
  893. Peter, L. J. (1986). The Peter Pyramid or will we ever get the point ? New York: William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar
  894. Pluchino, A., Rapisarda, A. & Garofalo, C. (2010). The Peter Principle Revisited: A Computational Study. Physica A 389, 467–472. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2009.09.045Google Scholar
  895. Goffman, E. (1956). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre.Google Scholar
  896. Kaube, J. (2013). Universität, Prestige, Organisation. Merkur. Deutsche Zeitschrift für europäisches Denken 67, 342–348.Google Scholar
  897. Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive action. American Sociological Review 1, 894–904.Google Scholar
  898. Perrow, C. (1960). Authority, Goals and Prestige in a General Hospital. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  899. Ahrne, G., Aspers, P. & Brunsson, N. (2014). The Organization of Markets. Organization Studies. http://oss.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/09/18/0170840614544557 Zugegriffen: 21. 10. 2014.
  900. Granovetter, M. (1984). Small is Bountiful: Labor Markets and Establishment Size. American Journal of Sociology 49 (3), 323–334.Google Scholar
  901. Perrow, C. (1991). A Society of Organizations. Theory and Society 20, 725–762.Google Scholar
  902. Scott, R. W. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 32 (4). 493–511Google Scholar
  903. Türk, K. (2000). Besprechung zu » Charles Perrow: Complex Organizations «. In K. Türk (Hrsg.), Hauptwerke der Organisationstheorie (S. 238–239). WV-Studium Sozialwissenschaft (186). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  904. Wiesenthal, H. (2000). Markt, Organisation und Gemeinschaft als » zweitbeste « Verfahren sozialer Koordination. In R. Werle, U. Schimank & R. Mayntz (Hrsg.), Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit (S. 44–73). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  905. Japp, K. P. (2001). Negationen in Funktionssystemen und Organisationen. Gedächtnisfunktion im Kontext politischer Kommunikationen. In V. Tacke (Hrsg.), Organisation und gesellschaftliche Differenzierung (S. 192–214). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  906. Japp, K. P. (2002). Struktureffekte öffentlicher Risikokommunikation auf Regulierungsregime. Zur Funktion von Nichtwissen im BSE-Konflikt. In C. Engel, J. Halfmann & M. Schulte (Hrsg.), Wissen, Nichtwissen, Unsicheres Wissen (S. 39–74). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  907. Luhmann, N. (1990). Risiko und Gefahr. St. Gallen: Hochschule St. Gallen.Google Scholar
  908. Palmer, D. & Maher, M. (2010). A Normal Accident Analysis of the Mortgage Meltdown. In M. Lounsbury & P. M. Hirsch (Hrsg.), Markets on Trial. The Economic Sociology of the U. S. Financial Crisis (S. 221–256). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  909. Perrow, C. (2010). The Meltdown Was Not An Accident. In M. Lounsbury & P. M. Hirsch (Hrsg.), Markets on Trial. The Economic Sociology of the U. S. Financial Crisis (S. 309–330). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  910. Sagan, S. D. (1993). The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  911. Turner, B. A. (1976). The Organizational and Interorganizational Development of Disasters. Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (3), 378–397.Google Scholar
  912. Jacoby, H. (1969). Die Bürokratisierung der Welt. Ein Beitrag zur Problemgeschichte. Neuwied; Berlin: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  913. Meyer, J. W. (1987). The World Polity and the Authority of the Nation-State. In G. M. Thomas et al. (Hrsg.), Institutional Structure. Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. (S. 41–70). Newbury Park u. a.: Sage.Google Scholar
  914. Meyer, J. W. (2005). Weltkultur. Wie die westlichen Prinzipien die Welt durchdringen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  915. Presthus, R. (1962). Individuum und Organisation. Typologie der Anpassung. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  916. Türk, K. (1995). » Die Organisation der Welt «. Herrschaft durch Organisation in der modernen Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  917. Williamson. O. E. (1980). The Organization of Work: A Comparative Institutional Assessment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1, 5–38.Google Scholar
  918. Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and Heterogeneity. A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  919. Buche, A., Jungbauer-Gans, M., Niebuhr, A. & Peters, C. (2013). Diversität und Erfolg von Organisationen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 42 (6), 483–501.Google Scholar
  920. Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The Black Box of Organizational Demography. Organization Science 8 (1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  921. Milliken, F. J. & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for Common Thread: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups. Academy of Management Review 21 (2), 402–433.Google Scholar
  922. Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and Organization Theory. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  923. Pfeffer, J. (1985). Organizational Demography: Implications for Management. California Management Review 28 (1), 67–81.Google Scholar
  924. Casciaro, T. & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 50, 167–199.Google Scholar
  925. Davis, G. F. & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 28, 21–42.Google Scholar
  926. Drees, J. M., Pursey P. M. & Heugens, A. R. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management 39, 1666–1698.Google Scholar
  927. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C. & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management 35, 1404–1427.Google Scholar
  928. Salancik, G. (1995). Wanted: A good network theory of organization. Adminstrative Science Quarterly 40, 345–349.Google Scholar
  929. Schreyögg, G. (1997). Theorien organisatorischer Ressourcen. In G. Ortmann, J. Sydow & K. Türk (Hrsg.), Theorien der Organisation (S. 481–486). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  930. Berghoff, H. & Sydow, J. (Hrsg.). (2007). Unternehmerische Netzwerke. Eine historische Organisationsform mit Zukunft ? Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  931. Brass, D. J., Labianca, G., Mehra, A., Halgin, D. S. & Borgatti, S. P. (Hrsg.). (2014). Research in the sociology of organizations 40. Google Scholar
  932. Cropper, S., Ebers, M., Huxham, C. & Smith Ring, P. (Hrsg.). (2008). The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  933. Ebers, M. (1999). The dynamics of inter-organizational relationships. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 16, 31–56.Google Scholar
  934. Gulati, R. & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from ? American Journal of Sociology 104, 1439–1493.Google Scholar
  935. Kilduff, M. & Brass, D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research. Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals 4, 317–357.Google Scholar
  936. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W. & Smith-Doerr, L., (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 116–145.Google Scholar
  937. Powell, W. W. & Grodal, S. (2006). Networks of innovators. In R. R. Nelson, D. C. Mowery & J. Fagerberg (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (S. 56–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  938. Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft: auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  939. Black, J. (2005). The Emergence of Risk-based Regulation and the New Public Risk Management in the United Kingdom. Public Law 3, 512–548.Google Scholar
  940. Huber, M. & Rothstein, H. (2013). The Risk Organisation. Or how organizations reconcile themselves to failure. Journal of Risk Research 16 (6), 651–675.Google Scholar
  941. Moran, M. (2002). The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  942. Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  943. Rothstein, H., Borraz O. & Huber, M. (2013). Risk and the Limits of Governance: Exploring varied patterns of risk-based governance across Europe. Regulation and Governance 7 (2), 215–235.Google Scholar
  944. Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureacracy. Little: Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  945. George, J. R. & Bishop, L. K. (1971). Relationship of Organizational Structure and Teacher Personality Characteristics to Organizational Climate. Administrative Science Quarterly 16 (4), 467–475.Google Scholar
  946. Hinings, C. R. & Greenwood, R. (2002). Disconnects and Consequences in Organization Theory ? Administrative Science Quarterly 47 (3), 411–421.Google Scholar
  947. Schimank, U. (2005). Organisationsgesellschaft. In W. Jäger & U. Schimank, Organisationsgesellschaft. Facetten und Perspektiven (S. 19–50). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  948. Schmitter, P. C. (1983). Democratic Theory and Neocorporatist Practice. Social Research 50 (4), 885–928.Google Scholar
  949. Scott, R. W. & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and Organizing. Rational, Natural, and Open System Perspectives. New Jersey: Pearson.Google Scholar
  950. Suddaby, R., Hardy, C. & Huy, Q. N. (2011). Where are the New Theories of Organization ? Academy of Management Review 36 (2), 236–246.Google Scholar
  951. Tichy, N. (1973). An Analysis of Clique Formation and Structure in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 18 (2), 194–208.Google Scholar
  952. Kieser, A. (2006). Max Webers Analyse der Bürokratie. In A. Kieser & M. Ebers (Hrsg.), Organisationstheorien (S. 63–92). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  953. Kieser, A. & Walgenbach, P. (2010). Organisation. 6. Auflage. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  954. Pugh, D. S. & Hinings, C. R. (Hrsg.). (1976). Organizational Structure: Extensions and Replications. The Aston Programme 2. Westmead; Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar
  955. Van de Ven, A. H., Ganco, M. & Hinings, C. R. (2013). Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. Academy of Management Annals 7, 393–440.Google Scholar
  956. Weber, M. (1976). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. 5. Revidierte Ausgabe besorgt von J. Winckelmann. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  957. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  958. Lutz, B. (1989). Der kurze Traum immerwährender Prosperität. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  959. Haque, H. S. (2010). Rethinking Development Administration and Remembering Fred W. Riggs, International Review of Administrative Sciences 76, 767–773.Google Scholar
  960. Pen, W. S. (2008). A Critique of W. F. Riggs’ Ecology of Public Administration. International Public Management Review 9, 213–225.Google Scholar
  961. Tönnies, F. (1991). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  962. Baritz, L. (1969). The Servants of Power. A History of the Use of Social Science in American Industry. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  963. Bell, D. (1947). Adjusting Men to Machines. Commentary 3, 79–88.Google Scholar
  964. Carey, A. (1967). The Hawthorne Studies. A Radical Criticism. American Sociological Review 32, 403–416.Google Scholar
  965. Likert, R. (1961). New Patterns of Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  966. McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  967. Mayo, E. (1945). The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  968. White, R. & Lippitt, R. (1953). Leader Behavior and Member Reaction in Three › Social Climates ‹ «. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Hrsg.), Group Dynamics (S. 586–611). Evanstone: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  969. Whyte, W. F. (1959). Man and Organization. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  970. Bordt, R. L. (1998). The Structure of Women’s Nonprofit Organizations. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  971. Cnaan, R. A. & Milofsky, C. (Hrsg.) (2008). Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  972. Courpasson, D. (2009). › We Have Always Been Oligarchs ‹: Business Elite in Polyarchy. In S. R. Clegg & C. L Cooper (Hrsg.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Behavior: Macro Approaches (S. 424–441). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  973. Courpasson, D. & Clegg, S. (2012). The Polyarchic Bureaucracy: Cooperative Resistance in the Workplace and the Construction of a New Political Structure of Organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 34, 55–79.Google Scholar
  974. Rothschild, J. (2009). Workers’ Cooperatives and Social Enterprise: A Forgotten Route to Social Equity and Democracy. American Behavioral Scientist 52 (7), 1023–1041.Google Scholar
  975. Rothschild, J. & Leach, D. (2008). Avoid, Talk or Fight: Alternative Cultural Strategies in the Battle against Oligarchy in Collectivist-Democratic Organizations. In R. A. Cnaan & C. Milofsky (Hrsg.), Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations (S. 346–361). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  976. Rothschild, J. & Whitt, A. J. (1986). The Cooperative Workplace. Potentials and Dilemmas of Organizational Democracy and Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  977. Bierschenk, T. (2003). Buchbesprechung Weit hergeholte Fakten by Richard Rottenburg. Paideuma 49, 281–285.Google Scholar
  978. Campregher, C. (2008). Perspektivenwechsel: Drei Paradigmen der Entwicklungsanthropologie und die Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. Austrian Studies in Social Anthropology 3, 1–29.Google Scholar
  979. Mosse, D. (2013). The Anthropology of International Development. Annual Review of Anthropology 42, 227–46.Google Scholar
  980. Rottenburg, Richard (2009). Far-fetched facts. A Parable of Development Aid. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  981. Rottenburg, R. (2014). Experimental Engagements and Metacodes. Common Knowledge. i. E. Rottenburg, R. & von Oppen, A. (Hrsg.). (1995). Organisationswandel in Afrika: Kollektive Praxis und kulturelle Aneignung. Berlin: Das Arabische Buch.Google Scholar
  982. Spies, E. (2009). Das Dogma der Partizipation. Interkulturelle Kontakte im Kontext der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit in Niger. Mainzer Beiträge zur Afrikaforschung 20. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
  983. Wainaina, B. (2005). How to Write About Africa. Granta: The View from Africa 92, 91–126.Google Scholar
  984. Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding Organizational Behavior. Homewood: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  985. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning I: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading et al.: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  986. Rice, A. K. (1963). The Enterprise and its Environment. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  987. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  988. Trist, E. L. et al (1962). Organizational Choice. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  989. Alvesson, M. (1992). Cultural Perspectives on Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  990. Alvesson, M. & Berg, P. O. (1992). Corporate Culture and Organizational Symbolism. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  991. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning I: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading et al.: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  992. Dülfer, E. (Hrsg.). (1988; 1991). Organisationskultur. Phänomen – Philosophie – Technik. 1./2. Auflage. Stuttgart: C. E. Poeschel.Google Scholar
  993. Hatch, M. J. (1993). The Dynamics of Organizational Culture. Academy of Management Review 18, 657 – 663.Google Scholar
  994. Lang, R., Winkler, I. & Weik, E. (2005). Organisationskultur, Organisationaler Symbolismus und organisationaler Diskurs. In E. Weik & R. Lang (Hrsg.), Moderne Organisationstheorien: Handlungsorientierte Ansätze (S. 207 – 258). Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  995. Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  996. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. 2. Auflage. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.Google Scholar
  997. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. 4. Auflage. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.Google Scholar
  998. Schultz, M. (1992). Postmodern Pictures of Culture. International Studies of Management and Organizations 22, 15 – 32.Google Scholar
  999. Kühl, S. (2014). Ganz normale Organisationen. Zur Soziologie des Holocaust. Berlin: Suhrkamp. Luhmann, N. (1987). Rechtssoziologie. 3. Auflage. Opladen: WDV.Google Scholar
  1000. Schimank, U. (2002). Organisationen: Akteurkonstellationen – Korporative Akteure – Sozialsysteme. In J. Allmendinger & T. Hinz (Hrsg.), Organisationssoziologie (S. 29 – 54). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1001. Schimank, U. (2014). Identitätsbedrohungen und Identitätsbehauptung: Professoren in reformbewegten Universitäten. In V. von Groddeck & S. Wilz (Hrsg.), Formalität und Informalität in Organisationen (S. 277 – 296.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1002. Breuer, S. (1990). Rationale Herrschaft. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 31, 4 – 32.Google Scholar
  1003. Luhmann, N. (1975). Rezension: Wolfgang Schluchter, Aspekte bürokratischer Herrschaft. Studien zur Interpretation der fortschreitenden Industriegesellschaft. München 1972: List Verlag. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 1, 150 – 154.Google Scholar
  1004. Mayntz, R. (Hrsg.). (1968). Bürokratische Organisation. Köln; Berlin: Kiepenhauer und Witsch.Google Scholar
  1005. Tyrell, H. (1981). Ist der Webersche Bürokratietypus ein objektiver Richtigkeitstypus ? Anmerkungen zu einer These von Renate Mayntz. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 10, 38 – 49.Google Scholar
  1006. Tyrell, H. & Petzke, M. (2008). Anmerkungen zur Organisationsgesellschaft. In H.-J. Große Kracht & C. Spieß (Hrsg.), Christentum und Solidarität. Bestandsaufnahmen zu Sozialethik und Religionssoziologie (S. 435 – 464). Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
  1007. Blau, P. M. & Scott, W. R. (2003). Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  1008. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organization. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  1009. Ortmann, G., Sydow, J. & Türk, K. (2000). Organisation, Strukturation, Gesellschaft. Die Rückkehr der Gesellschaft in die Organisationstheorie. In G. Ortmann, J. Sydow & K. Türk (Hrsg.), Theorien der Organisation. Die Rückkehr der Gesellschaft (S. 15 – 34). 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1010. Scott, W. R. (1993). Recent Developments in Organizational Sociology, Acta Sociologica 36, 63 – 68.Google Scholar
  1011. Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations. Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 5. Auflage. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall (International Edition).Google Scholar
  1012. Scott, W. R. & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing. Rational, Natural, and Open Systems Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs: Pearson (International Edition).Google Scholar
  1013. DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. (Hrsg.). (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  1014. Friedland, R. & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Hrsg.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (S. 232 – 266). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  1015. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R. & Sahlin, K. (Hrsg.). (2008). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  1016. Meyer, J. W. & Scott, R. (1983). Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  1017. Schneiberg, M. (2007). What’s on the Path ? Path Dependence, Organizational Diversity and the Problem of Institutional Change in the U.S. Economy, 1900 – 1950. Socio-Economic Review 5, 47 – 80.Google Scholar
  1018. Senge, K. & Hellmann, K. U. (Hrsg.). (2006). Einführung in den Neo-Institutionalismus. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1019. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W. & Lounsbury. M. (Hrsg.). (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  1020. Walgenbach, P. & Meyer, R. (2008). Neoinstitutionalistische Organisationstheorie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  1021. Zucker, L. (Hrsg.). (1988). Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge: BallingerGoogle Scholar
  1022. Blau, P. M. & Scott, R. W. (1962). Formal Organizations: A comparative Approach. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
  1023. Dunn. M. B. & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967 – 2005. Administrative Science Quarterly 55, 114 – 149.Google Scholar
  1024. Goodrick, E. (2002). Review. Administrative Science Quarterly 47 (2), 384 – 387.Google Scholar
  1025. Mendel, P., Meredith, L. S., Schoenbaum, M., Sherbourne, C. D. & Wells, K. B. (2008). Interventions in Organizational and Community Context: A Framework for Building Evidence on Dissemination and Implementation in Health Services Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 35, 1 – 37.Google Scholar
  1026. Meyer, A. D., Brooks, G. R. & Goes, J. B. (1990). Environmental Jolts and Industry Revolutions: Organizational Responses to Discontinuous Change. Strategic Management Journal 11, 93 – 110.Google Scholar
  1027. Reay, T. & Hinings, C. R. (2005). The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta. Organization Studies 26, 351 – 384.Google Scholar
  1028. Samuel, S., Dirsmith, M. W. & McElroy, B. (2005). Monetized Medicine: from the Physical to the Fiscal. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30, 249 – 278.Google Scholar
  1029. Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching Adulthood: the Maturing of Institutional Theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427 – 442.Google Scholar
  1030. Starkweather, D. B. (1990). Competition, Integration, and Diversification: Seven Hospitals of Growthville, U.S.A. Journal of Health Administration Education 8(4), 519 – 70.Google Scholar
  1031. Van de Ven, A. H. & Grazman, D. N. (1994). From Generation to Generation: A Genealogy of Twin Cities Health Care Organizations, 1853–1993. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Academy of Management, Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
  1032. Albrow, M. (1970). Bureaucracy. London: Pall Mall Press.Google Scholar
  1033. Bonazzi, G. (2008). Geschichte des organisatorischen Denkens. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1034. Gouldner A. W. (1959). Organizational Analysis. In R. K. Merton, L. Broom & L. S. Cottrell Jr. (Hrsg.), Sociology Today (S. 400 – 428). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  1035. Meier, F. & Schimank, U. (2014). Bürokratie als Schicksal ? – Max Webers Bürokratiemodell im Lichte der Organizational Studies. In H.-P. Müller & S. Sigmund (Hrsg.), Max Weber-Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung (S. 354 – 361). Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  1036. Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. 5. Auflage. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  1037. Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the Theory of Organizations. American Sociological Review 13, 25 – 35.Google Scholar
  1038. Selznick, P & Broom, L. (1963). Sociology. A Text with Adapted Readings. 3. Auflage. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  1039. Colignon, R. A. (1989). Reification: The » Holistic « and » Individualistic « Views of Organizations. Theory and Society 18, 83 – 123.Google Scholar
  1040. Hargrove, E. C. (1994). Prisoners of Myth: The Leadership of the Tennessee Valley Authority, 1933–1990. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  1041. Hargrove, E. C. & Conkin, P. K. (Hrsg.). (1983). TVA: Fifty Years of Grass-Roots Bureaucracy. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  1042. Stivers, C. (2009). Postcards from the Past: Messages from TVA and the Grassroots. Public Administration Review 69, 1196 – 1199.Google Scholar
  1043. Thatcher, D. (2006). The Normative Case Study. American Journal of Sociology 111, 1631 – 1676.Google Scholar
  1044. Knudsen, C. (1995). The Competence View of the Firm: What Can Modern Economists Learn from Philip Selznick’s Sociological Theory of Leadership ? In W. R. Scott & S. Christensen (Hrsg.), The Institutional Construction of Organizations. International and Longitudinal Studies (S. 135 – 163). Thousand Oaks; London; New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  1045. Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the Theory of Organization. American Sociological Review 13 (1), 25 – 35.Google Scholar
  1046. Selznick, P. (1952). The Organizational Weapon: A Study of Bolshevik Strategy and Tactics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  1047. Selznick, P. (1969). Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  1048. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing Social Theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  1049. Terry, L. D. (1995). Leadership of Public Bureaucracies: The Administrator as Conservator. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  1050. Apelt, M. (2012). Das Militär als Organisation. In M. Apelt, Handbuch Organisationstypen (S. 133 – 148). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  1051. Biehl, H. (2006). Kampfmoral und Einsatzmotivation. In S. B. Gareis (Hrsg.), Handbuch Militär und Sozialwissenschaft (S. 294 – 302). 2. aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1052. Biehl, H. (2010). Kampfmoral und Kohäsion als Forschungsgegenstand, militärische Praxis und Organisationsideologie. In M. Apelt (Hrsg.), Forschungsthema: Militär (S. 139 – 162). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1053. Cooley, C. H. (1909). Social Organization. A Study of the Larger Mind. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  1054. MacCoun, R. J., Kier, E. & Belkin, A. (2006). Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat ? An old question with an old answer. Armed Forces & Society 32 (4), 646 – 654.Google Scholar
  1055. Madej, W. V. (1978). Effectiveness and Cohesion of the German ground forces in World War II. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 6 (2), 233 – 248.Google Scholar
  1056. Moskos Jr. & Charles C. (1968). Eigeninteresse, Primärgruppen und Ideologie. In R. König (Hrsg.), Beiträge zur Militärsoziologie. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie: Sonderheft 12 (S. 199 – 220). Köln; Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1057. Savage, P. L. & Gabriel, R. A. (1976). Cohesion and Disintegration in the American Army. An Alternative Perspective. Armed Forces & Society 2 (3), 340 – 376.Google Scholar
  1058. Stouffer, S. A. (1949). The American Soldier. Studies in Social Psychology in World War 2. Band 1 & 2. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
  1059. Vollmer, H. (2010). Kohäsion und Desintegration militärischer Einheiten. In M. Apelt (Hrsg.), Forschungsthema: Militär (S. 163 – 192). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1060. Bentem, N. van (2006). Vereine, eingetragene Vereine, Dritter-Sektor-Organisationen. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  1061. Clark, B. R. (1960). The Open Door College: A Case Study. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  1062. DiMaggio, P. J. & Anheier, H. K. (1990). The Sociology of Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors. Annual Review of Sociology 16, 137 – 159.Google Scholar
  1063. Etzioni, A. (1969). The Semi-Professions and Their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  1064. Rose, D. (2010). A History of the March of Dimes. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes Archives. http://www.marchofdimes.org/mission/a-history-of-the-march-of-dimes.aspx. Zugegriffen: 17.11.2014.
  1065. Zald, M. N. & Denton, P. (1963). From Evangelism to General Service: The Transformation of the YMCA. Administrative Science Quarterly 8 (2), 214 – 34.Google Scholar
  1066. Child, J. (1973). Man and Organization. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  1067. Czarniawska, B. (2008). A Theory Of Organizing, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  1068. Donaldson, L. (1985). In Defence of Organization Theory. A Reply to the Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  1069. Hassard, J. & Parker, M. (Hrsg.). (1994). Towards a New Theory of Organizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  1070. Morgan, G. (1997). Images of Organization. 2. Auflage. Thousand Oakes: Sage.Google Scholar
  1071. Silverman, D. (2011). Qualitative Research. 3. Auflage. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  1072. Silverman, D. (2012). Interpreting Qualitative Data. 4. Auflage. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  1073. Silverman, D. & Jones, J. (1976). Organizational Work: the Language of Grading, the Grading of Language. London: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
  1074. Zucker, L. (Hrsg.). (1988). Culture and Environment. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  1075. Banfield, E. C. (1957). The Decision Making Schema. Public Administrative Review 17 (4), 278 – 282.Google Scholar
  1076. Cruise, P. L. (1997). Are Proverbs Really so Bad ? Herbert Simon and the Logical Positivist Perspective in American Public Administration. Journal of Management History 3 (4), 342 – 359.Google Scholar
  1077. Gulick, L. & Urwick; L. (Hrsg.). (1939). Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration; Columbia University.Google Scholar
  1078. Kühl, S. (2000). Das Regenmacher-Phänomen. Widersprüche und Aberglaube im Konzept der lernenden Organisation. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  1079. Stivers, C. (2000). Resisting the Ascendancy of Public Management. Normative Theory and Public Administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis 22 (1), 10 – 23.Google Scholar
  1080. Augier, M. & March, J. G. (2001). Remembering Herbert A. Simon. Public Administration Review 61 (4), 396 – 402.Google Scholar
  1081. Cohen, M. D. (2007). » Administrative Behavior «: Laying the Foundations for Cyert and March. Organization Science 18 (3), 503 – 506.Google Scholar
  1082. Cohen, M. D. & Bacdayan Source, P. (1994). Organizational Routines Are Stored As Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study. Organization Science 5 (4), 554 – 568.Google Scholar
  1083. Conlisk, J. (1996). Why Bounded Rationality ? Journal of Economic Literature 34 (2), 669 – 700.Google Scholar
  1084. Luhmann, N. (1975). Allgemeine Theorie organisierter Sozialsysteme. In N. Luhmann (Hrsg.), Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (S. 39 – 50). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1085. March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Oslo u. a.: Scandinavian U.P.Google Scholar
  1086. Mitchell, T. R. & Scott, W. G. (1988). The Barnard-Simon Contribution: Vanished Legacy. Public Administration Quarterly 12 (3), 348 – 368.Google Scholar
  1087. Scharpf, F. W. (1989). Decision Rules, Decision Styles and Policy Choices. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1 (2), 149 – 176.Google Scholar
  1088. Augier M. & March J. (Hrsg.). (2004). Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  1089. Harstad, R. M. & Selten, R. (2013). Bounded-Rationality Models: Tasks to Become Intellectually Competitive. Journal of Economic Literature 51, 496 – 511Google Scholar
  1090. Klaes, M. & Sent, E.-M. (2005). A Conceptual History of the Emergence of Bounded Rationality. History of Political Economy 37, 27 – 59.Google Scholar
  1091. Mitzenmacher, M. (2003). A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions. Internet Mathematics 1, 226 – 251.Google Scholar
  1092. Simon, H. A. (1991). Models of My Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  1093. Simon, H. A. (1982/1997). Models of Bounded Rationality. 3 Bände. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  1094. Williamson, O. (1986). Economic Organization: Firms, Markets, and Policy Control. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  1095. Luhmann, N. (1971). Politische Planung. Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1096. Simon, H. A. (1993). The State of American Political Science: Professor Lowi’s View of Our Discipline. PS. Political Science and Politics 26, 49 – 51.Google Scholar
  1097. Simon, H. A., Smithburg, D. W. & Thompson, V. A. (1952). A Manual For Teachers Using Public Administration. http://digitalcollections.library.cmu.edu/portal/main.jsp?flag=browse&smd=1&awdid=6. Zugegriffen: 22. März 2014.
  1098. Storing, H. J. (1962). The Science of Public Administration: Herbert A. Simon. In H. J. Storing (Hrsg.), Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics (S. 63 – 150). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  1099. The Reissue of Simon, Smithburg, and Thompson’s Public Administration (1991). [Editorial]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1 (1), 75 – 78.Google Scholar
  1100. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning I: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading et al.: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  1101. Deshpandé, R. & Webster, F. E. (1989). Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda. Journal of Marketing 53 (1), 3 – 15.Google Scholar
  1102. Ebers, M. (1985). Organisationskultur. Ein neues Forschungsprogramm ? Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  1103. Mense-Petermann, U. (2006). Transnationalisierung, Organisation und Kultur. Organisationswissenschaftliche Kulturbegriffe auf dem Prüfstand. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, Heft 3, 393 – 411.Google Scholar
  1104. Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z. Reading. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  1105. Sackmann, S. A. (1990). Möglichkeiten der Gestaltung von Unternehmenskultur. In C. Lattmann (Hrsg.), Die Unternehmenskultur. Ihre Grundlagen und ihre Bedeutung für die Führung der Unternehmung (S. 153 – 188). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
  1106. Smircich, L. & Calás, M. B. (1987). Organizational Culture: A Critical Assessment. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts & L. W. Porter (Hrsg.): Handbook of Organizational Communication (S. 228 – 263). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  1107. Dekker, S. (2005). Ten Questions About Human Error. A New View of Human Factors and System Safety. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  1108. Roberts, K. (1989). New Challenges to Organizational Research: High Reliability Organizations. Industrial Crisis Quarterly 3, 111 – 125.Google Scholar
  1109. Sagan, S. D. (2004). Learning from Normal Accidents. Organization & Environment 17 (1), 15 – 19.Google Scholar
  1110. Vaughan, D. (2005). Organizational Rituals of Risk and Error. In B. Hutter und M. Power (Hrsg.), Organizational Encounters with Risk (S. 33 – 66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  1111. Weick, K. E. (2004). Normal Accident Theory As Frame, Link, and Provocation. Organization & Environment 17 (1), 27 – 31.Google Scholar
  1112. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for » Lemons «: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 488 – 500.Google Scholar
  1113. Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing Initial Public Offering Investors with Prestige: Signaling with Board Structures. The Academy of Management Review 28, 432 – 446.Google Scholar
  1114. Densley, J. A. (2012). Street Gang Recruitment: Signaling, Screening, and Selection. Social Problems 59, 301 – 321.Google Scholar
  1115. Picot, A., Dietl, H., Franck, E., Fiedler, M. & Royer, S. (2012). Organisation: Theorie und Praxis aus ökonomischer Sicht. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  1116. Spence, A. M. (1974). Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  1117. Spence, A. M. (2002). Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets. The American Economic Review 92, 434 – 459.Google Scholar
  1118. Brunsson, N. (1982). The irrationality of action and action rationality: Decisions, ideologies, and organisational actions. Journal of Management Studies 19, 29 – 44.Google Scholar
  1119. Hewitt, J. P. & Hall, P. M. (1973). Social problems, problematic situations, and quasi-theories. American Sociological Review 38, 367 – 374.Google Scholar
  1120. Kepner, C. H. & Tregoe, B. B. (1965). The rational manager: A systematic approach to problem solving and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  1121. Levitt, B. & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14, 319 – 340.Google Scholar
  1122. Luhmann, N. (1971). Zweck – Herrschaft – System: Grundbegriffe und Prämissen Max Webers. In N. Luhmann, Politische Planung (S. 90 – 112). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1123. Ortmann, G. (2000). William H. Starbuck. In K. Türk (Hrsg.), Hauptwerke der Organisationstheorie (S. 304 – 306). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1124. Starbuck, W. H. (1982). Congealing oil. Inventing ideologies to justify acting ideologies out. Journal of Management Studies 19, 3 – 27.Google Scholar
  1125. Starbuck, W. H. & Hedberg, B. L. T. (1977). Saving an organization from a stagnating environment. In H. B. Thorelli (Hrsg.), Strategy + structure = performance. The strategic planning imperative (S. 249 – 258). Bloomington; London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  1126. Burawoy, M. (1998). Critical Sociology: A Dialogue between Two Sciences. Contemporary Sociology 27(1), 12 – 20.Google Scholar
  1127. Faulkner, R. R. & Anderson, A. B. (1987). Short-Term Projects and Emergent Careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology 92(4), 879 – 909.Google Scholar
  1128. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism. The third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  1129. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (Hrsg). (2008). Organizational Institutionalism. Los Angeles u. a.: Sage.Google Scholar
  1130. Hasse, R. (2010). Ökonomisierungstendenzen bei Non-Profits, Großunternehmen und Startups – eine theoriegeleitete Diskussion empirischer Trends. In M. Endreß & T. Matys (Hrsg.), Die Ökonomie der Organisation – die Organisation der Ökonomie (S. 93 – 119). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1131. Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of Carlifornia Press.Google Scholar
  1132. Mayntz, R. (1965). Max Webers Idealtypus der Bürokratie und die Organisationssoziologie. In J. Fijalkowski (Hrsg.), Politologie und Soziologie (S. 91 – 100). Köln; Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1133. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1997). On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology 23, 1 – 18.Google Scholar
  1134. Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R. & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates, American Sociological Review 48, 692 – 710.Google Scholar
  1135. Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change, American Sociological Review 49, 149 – 164.Google Scholar
  1136. Johnson V. (2007). What is organizational imprinting ? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology 113, 97 – 127.Google Scholar
  1137. Kriauciunas A. & Kale P. (2006). The impact of socialist imprinting and search on resource change: A study of firms in Lithuania. Strategic Management Journal 27, 659 – 679.Google Scholar
  1138. Marquis C. (2003). The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 655 – 689.Google Scholar
  1139. Marquis C. & Huang Z. (2010). Acquisitions as exaptation: The legacy of founding institutions in the U. S. commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal 53, 1441 – 1473.Google Scholar
  1140. Marquis C. & Tilcsik A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. The Academy of Management Annals 7, 193 – 243.Google Scholar
  1141. Shinkle G. A. & Kriauciunas A. P. (2012). The impact of current and founding institutions on strength of competitive aspirations in transition economies. Strategic Management Journal 33, 448 – 458.Google Scholar
  1142. Clarke, L. B. (1999). Mission improbable. Chicago u. a.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  1143. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19 (4), 293 – 317.Google Scholar
  1144. March, James G. & Olsen, Johan P. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  1145. Sabel, C. F. (1982). Work and Politics: The Division of Labor in Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  1146. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  1147. Döbert, R. (1989). Max Webers Handlungstheorie und die Ebenen des Rationalitätskomplexes. In J. Weiß (Hrsg.), Max Weber heute: Erträge und Probleme der Forschung (S. 210 – 249). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  1148. Scott, W. R. (2002). Formalization: Reflection or Construction ? Contemporary Sociology 31, 635 – 637. doi:10.2307/3089907Google Scholar
  1149. Slammon, R. (2002). Book Review: When Formality Works: Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations. Theoretical Criminology 6, 506 – 509. doi:10.1177/136248060200600411Google Scholar
  1150. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1997). On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology 23, 1 – 18. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.1Google Scholar
  1151. Stinchcombe, A. L. (2001). When Formality Works. Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  1152. Wittek, R. (2002). Review: When Formality Works (Book). British Journal of Sociology 53, 698 – 700.Google Scholar
  1153. Caulkins, D. D. & Jordan, A. T. (Hrsg.). (2013). A Companion to Organizational Anthropology. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  1154. Diederichsen, D. & Franke, A. (Hrsg.). (2013). The Whole Earth. California and the Disappearance of the Outside. Berlin: Sternberg Press. [Deutsche Parallelausgabe: Diederichsen, D. & Franke, A. (Hrsg.). (2013). The Whole Earth. Kalifornien und das Verschwinden des Außen. Berlin: Sternberg Press].Google Scholar
  1155. Jacko, J. A. (Hrsg.). (2012). The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications. 3. Auflage. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  1156. La Mettrie, J. O. de (2009). Die Maschine Mensch. Hamburg: Meiner. [Im französischen Original: La Mettrie, J. O. de (1748). L’ homme machine].Google Scholar
  1157. Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J. & Heath, C. (Hrsg.). (2000).Workplace Studies. Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  1158. Scharmer, C. O. & Suchman, L. (1999). » I have, more than ever, a sense of the immovability of these institutions «. Conversation with Lucy Suchman, August 13, 1999. – Dialogue on Leadership. – http://www.presencing.com/presencing/dol/Suchman-1999.shtml. Zugegriffen: 16. April 2014.
  1159. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine. The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  1160. Brandl, J. (2005). Die Legitimität von Personalabteilungen. Eine Rekonstruktion aus Sicht der Unternehmensleitung. München; Mering: Rainer Hampp.Google Scholar
  1161. Giacovelli, S. (2011). Legitimacy Building for the European Energy Exchange. In K. Nathaus & D. Gilgen (Hrsg.), Historical Social Research, Special Issue: Change of Markets and Market Societies: Concepts and Case Studies 36 (S. 202 – 219). Köln: HSR.Google Scholar
  1162. Meyer, J. W. & Scott, W. R. (Hrsg.). (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  1163. Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  1164. Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Hrsg.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  1165. Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Hrsg.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (S. 164 – 182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  1166. Tuschke, A. (2005). Legitimität und Effizienz administrativer Innovationen. Wiesbaden: DUV.Google Scholar
  1167. Allport, F. H (1933). Institutional behavior. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  1168. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  1169. McMahon, T. J. & Perrit, G. W. (1971). The control structure of organizations: An empirical analysis. Academy of Management Journal 3, 327 – 340.Google Scholar
  1170. Michels, R. (1962). Political parties. New York: Transaction.Google Scholar
  1171. Tannenbaum, A. S. (1972). Control in organizations: comment. Academy of Management Journal 4, 543 – 544.Google Scholar
  1172. Teubner, G. (1978). Organisationsdemokratie und Verbandsverfassung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  1173. Bonazzi, G. (2008). Geschichte des organisatorischen Denkens. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1174. Kieser, A. (2006). Managementlehre und Taylorismus. In A. Kieser & M. Ebers (Hrsg.), Organisationstheorien (S. 93 – 132). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  1175. Mehrtens, H. (1999). Schmidts Schaufel (9,5 kg). Frederick W. Taylors Techniken des » Scientific Management «. In W. Sohn & H. Mehrtens (Hrsg.), Normalität und Abweichung. Studien zur Theorie und Geschichte der Normalisierungsgesellschaft (S. 85 – 106). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1176. Nelson, D. (1980). Frederick W. Taylor and the Rise of Scientific Management. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  1177. Taylor, F. W. (1903). Shop Management. New York; London: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  1178. Wrege, C. D. & Greenwood, R. G. (1991). Frederick W. Taylor. The Father of Scientific Management. Myth and Reality. New York: IRWIN.Google Scholar
  1179. Wrege, C. D. & Perroni, A. G. (1974). Taylor’s Pig-Tale: A Historical Analysis of Frederick W. Taylor’s Pig-Iron Experiments. The Academy of Management Journal 1, 6 – 27.Google Scholar
  1180. Borchers, U. & Wehrsig, C. (2000). James D. Thompson: Organizations in Action. 1967. In K. Türk (Hrsg.), Hauptwerke der Organisationstheorie (S. 314 – 316). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1181. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. London; Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  1182. Kerst, C. (1997). Unter Druck – Organisatorischer Wandel und Organisationsdomänen. Der Fall der Druckindustrie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1183. Tacke, V. (1997). Rationalitätsverlust im Organisationswandel. Von den Waschküchen der Farbenfabriken zur informatisierten Chemieindustrie. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  1184. Wehrsig, C. (1986). Komplexe Organisation, Information und Entscheidung. In R. Seltz, U. Mill & E. Hildebrandt (Hrsg.), Organisation als soziales System. Kontrolle und KommunikationstechnologieGoogle Scholar
  1185. in Arbeitsorganisationen (S. 93 – 102). Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  1186. Abraham, F. (2013). The Tavistock Group. In M. Witzel & M. Warner (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Management Theorists. New York: Oxford University-Press.Google Scholar
  1187. Cunningham, J. B. (1993). Action Research and Organizational Development. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  1188. Emery, F. E. (1959). Characteristics of Socio-Technical Systems. London: Tavistock Institute.Google Scholar
  1189. Jaques, E. (1951). The Changing Culture of a Factory: A Study of Authority and Participation in an Industrial Setting. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  1190. Miller, E. J. (1999). The Tavistock Institute Contribution to Job and Organizational Design. Aldershot; Brookfield: Dartmouth and Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  1191. Sydow, J. (1985). Der soziotechnische Ansatz der Arbeits- und Organisationsgestaltung: Darstellung, Kritik, Weiterentwicklung. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  1192. Trist, E. L. & Murray, H. (1993). The Social Engagement of Social Science. A Tavistock Anthology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  1193. Balcke, J. (2001). Verantwortungsentlastung durch Organisation. Die » Inspektion der Konzentrationslager « und der KZ-Terror. Tübingen: edition disord.Google Scholar
  1194. Bruch, M. (2000). Herrschaft in der modernen Gesellschaft. Zur Bedeutung des Organisationsverhältnisses in kritischen Theorien der Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1195. Foucault, M. (1978). Dispositive der Macht. Berlin: Merve Verlag.Google Scholar
  1196. Lemke, T. (1997). Eine Kritik der politischen Vernunft. Foucaults Analyse der modernen Gouvernementalität. Berlin; Hamburg: Argument Verlag.Google Scholar
  1197. Matys, T. (2011). » Legal Persons « – Kämpfe um die organisationale Form. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1198. Tauchnitz, T. (1999). Krankenkassen – Zwang oder Segen ? Organisationsgeschichte des deutschen Krankenkassenwesens im » langen « 19. Jahrhundert. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1199. Türk, K.(1975). Organisationstheorie. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar
  1200. Türk, K. (1995). » Die Organisation der Welt «. Herrschaft durch Organisation in der modernen Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1201. Clarke, L. (1989). Acceptable risk ? Making decisions in a toxic environment. Berkeley u. a.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  1202. Culjak, A. (2014). Organisation und Devianz. Eine empirische Fallrekonstruktion der Havarie der Costa Concordia. Organisationsstudien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  1203. Merton, R. K. (1968). Manifest und latent functions. In R. K. Merton (Hrsg.), Social theory and social structure (S. 73 – 138). Erweiterte Ausgabe. 1. Auflage. New York u. a.: Free Press.Google Scholar
  1204. Turner, B. & Pidgeon, N. F. (1997). Man-made disasters. 2. Auflage, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. Vaughan, D. (1999). The darkside of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology 25, 271 – 305.Google Scholar
  1205. Vaughan, D. (2005). Organizational rituals of risk and error. In B. Hutter & M. Power (Hrsg.), Organizational encounters with risk (S. 33 – 66). Cambridge u. a.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  1206. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism. The Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  1207. Klatetzki, T. & Tacke, V. (Hrsg.). (2005). Organisation und Profession. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwssenschaften.Google Scholar
  1208. Lazega, E. (2001). The Collegial Phenomenon. The Social Mechanism of Cooperation among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  1209. Parsons, T. (1947). Introduction. In T. Parsons (Hrsg.), Max Weber. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  1210. Parsons, T. (1968). Professions. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 12, 536 – 547.Google Scholar
  1211. Sciulli, D. (1992). Theory of Societal Constitutionalism. Foundation of a Non-Marxist Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  1212. Svensson, L. G. & Evetts, J. (Hrsg.). (2010). Sociology of Professions. Continental and Anglo Saxon Traditions. Göteborg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
  1213. Waters, M. (1993). Alternative Organizational Formations: A Neo-Weberian Typology of Polycratic Forms, Sociological Review 25, 55 – 81.Google Scholar
  1214. Bendix, R. (1965). Diskussion zum Thema: Industrialisierung und Kapitalismus. In O. Stammer (Hrsg.), Max Weber und die Soziologie heute (S. 184 – 191). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  1215. Gabriel, K. (1979). Analysen der Organisationsgesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  1216. Hennis, W. (1988). Eine » Wissenschaft vom Menschen «. Max Weber und die deutsche Nationalökonomie der Historischen Schule. In W. J. Mommsen & W. Schwentker (Hrsg.), Weber und seine Zeitgenossen (S. 41 – 83). Göttingen: Vandenhoek.Google Scholar
  1217. Luhmann, N. (1975). Legitimation durch Verfahren. 2. Auflage. Darmstadt; Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  1218. March, J. G. & Simon, H. A. (1976). Organisation und Individuum. Menschliches Verhalten in Organisationen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  1219. Marcuse, H. (1965). Industrialisierung und Kapitalismus. In O. Stammer (Hrsg.), Max Weber und die Soziologie heute (S. 161 – 180). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  1220. Schluchter, W. (1980). Rationalismus der Weltbeherrschung. Studien zu Max Weber. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  1221. Weber, M. (1971 [1920]). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. 3 Bände. 6. Auflage. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
  1222. Weber, M. (1958 [1921]). Gesammelte politische Schriften. 2. Auflage. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
  1223. Weber, M. (1924). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Soziologie und Sozialpolitik. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
  1224. Alvesson, M. (2013). Understanding Organizational Culture. 2. Auflage. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  1225. Cohen, M. D. & Sproull, L. S. (Hrsg.). (1996). Organizational Learning. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  1226. Donaldson, L. (1992). The Weick Stuff: Managing Beyond Games. Organization Science 3, 461 – 466.Google Scholar
  1227. Gioia, D. A. (2006). On Weick: An Appreciation. Organization Studies 27, 1709 – 1721.Google Scholar
  1228. Gioia, D. A., Price K. N. & Thomas, J. B. (2010). Forging an Identity: An Insider-outsider Study of Processes Involved in the Formation of Organizational Identity. Administrative Science Quarterly 55, 1 – 46.Google Scholar
  1229. Harris, S. G. (1994). Organizational Culture and Individual Sensemaking: A Schema-Based Perspective. Organization Science 5, 309 – 321.Google Scholar
  1230. Hiller, P. (2005). Organisationswissen. Eine wissenssoziologische Neubeschreibung der Organisation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1231. Walter-Busch, E. (1996). Organisationstheorien von Weber bis Weick. Amsterdam: Verlag Fakultas.Google Scholar
  1232. Weick, K. E. (1988). Enacted Sensemaking in Crisis Situations. Journal of Management Studies 25, 305 – 317.Google Scholar
  1233. Weick, K. E. (1990). The Vulnerable System: An Analysis of the Tenerife Air Disaster. Journal of Management 3, 571 – 593.Google Scholar
  1234. Weick, K. E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 628 – 652.Google Scholar
  1235. Orton, J. D. & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review 15, 203 – 223.Google Scholar
  1236. Weick, K. E. (1982). Administering Education in Loosely Coupled Schools. Phi Delta Kappan 63, 673 – 676.Google Scholar
  1237. Weick, K. E. (1984). Management of Organizational Change Among Loosely Coupled Elements. In P. S. Goodman et al. (Hrsg.), Change in Organizations. New Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice (S. 375 – 408). 2. Auflage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  1238. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  1239. Czarniawska, B. (1998). A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  1240. Hiller, P. (2005). Organisationswissen. Eine wissenssoziologische Neubeschreibung der Organisation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  1241. Meindl, J. R., Stubbart C. & Porac, J. F. (Hrsg.). (1996). Cognition Within and Between Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  1242. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W. & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective. A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  1243. Weick, K. E. (1985). Der Prozeß des Organisierens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  1244. Wiley, N. (1988). The Micro-macro Problem in Social Theory. Sociological Theory 6, 254 – 261.Google Scholar
  1245. Catino, M. & Patriotta, G. (2013). Learning from Errors: Cognition, Emotions and Safety Culture in the Italian Air Force. Organization Studies 34 (4), 437 – 467.Google Scholar
  1246. Gebauer, A. (2013). Mindful Organizing as a Paradigm to Develop Managers. Journal of Management Education 37 (2), 203 – 228.Google Scholar
  1247. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  1248. Roberts K. H. & Bea R. (2001). Must Accidents Happen ? Lessons from High-reliability Organizations. Academy of Management Executive 15 (3), 70 – 79.Google Scholar
  1249. Rochlin, G. I., La Porte, T. R. & Roberts, K. H. (1987). The Self-designing High-reliability Organization: Aircraft Carrier Flight Operations at Sea. Naval War College Review 40 (4), 76 – 90.Google Scholar
  1250. Weick, K. E. (1987). Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability. California Management Review 29, 112 – 127.Google Scholar
  1251. Weick, K. E. & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006). Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention. Organization Science 17 (4), 514 – 524.Google Scholar
  1252. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior 21. 81 – 123.Google Scholar
  1253. Broms, H. & Gahmberg H. (1983). Communication to Self in Organizations and Cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (3), 482 – 495.Google Scholar
  1254. Jönsson, S. & Lundin, R. (1977). Myths and Wishful Thinking as Management Tools. In P. C. Nystroem & W. H. Starbuck (Hrsg.), Prescriptive Models for Organizations. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  1255. Rhenman, E., Strömberg, L. & Westerlund, G. (1970). Conflict and Co-operation in Business Organizations. London: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  1256. Sjöstrand, S.-E. (1992). On the Rationale behind » Irrational « Institutions. Journal of Economic Issues 26 (4), 1007 – 1040.Google Scholar
  1257. Janis, I. (1972). Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  1258. Johnson, S. (2011). Where Good Ideas Come From. The Seven Patters of Innovation. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  1259. Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia. How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  1260. Whyte, W. H. (1952). Groupthink, Fortune Magazine. http://fortune.com/2012/07/22/groupthink-fortune-1952/. Zugegriffen: 02. Oktober 2014.
  1261. Baker, G., Gibbons, R. & Murphy, K. J. (2002). Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 39 – 83.Google Scholar
  1262. Buskens, V., Raub, W. & Snijders, C. (Hrsg.). (2003). The Governance of Relations in Markets and Organizations, Amsterdam: JAI (Elsevier).Google Scholar
  1263. Gibbons, R. (2001). Trust in Social Structures: Hobbes Meets Repeated Games. In Cook, K. S. (Hrsg.), Trust in Society (S. 332 – 353). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  1264. Lafontaine, F. & Slate, M (2007). Vertical Integration and Firm Bounderies: The Evidence. Journal of Economic Literature 45, 629 – 685.Google Scholar
  1265. Masten, S. (Hrsg.). (1996). Case Studies in Contracting and Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  1266. Simon, H. A. (1951). A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship. Econometrica 19, 293 – 305Google Scholar
  1267. Voss, T. (2003). The Rational Choice Approach to an Analysis of Intra- and Interorganizational Governance. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 20, 21 – 46.Google Scholar
  1268. Williamson, O. E. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  1269. Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1 – 44.Google Scholar
  1270. Crook, T. R., Combs, J. G., Ketchen, D. J. & Aguinis, H. (2013). Organizing around Transaction Costs: What Have We Learned and Where Do We Go from Here ? The Academy of Management Perspectives 27, 63 – 79.Google Scholar
  1271. David, R. J. & Han, S.-K. (2004). A Systematic Assessment of the Empirical Support for Transaction Cost Economics. Strategic Management Journal 25, 39 – 58.Google Scholar
  1272. Ebers, M. & Gotsch, W. (2014). Institutionenökonomische Theorien der Organisation. In A. Kieser & M. Ebers (Hrsg.), Organisationstheorien (S. 195 – 255). 7. Auflage. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  1273. Klein, B., Crawford, R. G. & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents and the Competitive Contracting Process. Journal of Law & Economics 21, 297 – 326.Google Scholar
  1274. Macher, J. T. & Richman, B. D. (2008). Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences. Business and Politics 10, 1 – 63.Google Scholar
  1275. McNeil, I. R. (1978). Contracts: Adjustments of Long-Term Economic Relations under Classical, Neoclassical and Relational Contract Law. Northwestern University Law Review 72, 854 – 906.Google Scholar
  1276. Dawson, S. & Wedderburn, D. (1980). Introduction: Joan Woodward and the development of organization theory. In Joan Woodward (Hrsg.), Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (S. xiii – xxvi). 2. Auflage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  1277. Donaldson, L. (2005). Following the scientific method: How I became a committed functionalist and positivist. Organization Studies 26, 1071 – 1088.Google Scholar
  1278. Reeves, K. T. & Woodward, J. (1970). The study of managerial control. In Joan Woodward (Hrsg.), Industrial Organization: Behaviour and Control (S. 37 – 56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  1279. Sewell, G. & Phillips, N. (2010). Introduction: Joan Woodward and the study of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 29, 3 – 20.Google Scholar
  1280. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99 – 120.Google Scholar
  1281. Cameron, K. S. (1980). Critical Questions in Assessing Organizational Effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics 9, 66 – 80.Google Scholar
  1282. Cunningham, J. B. (1977). Approaches to the Evaluation of Organizational Effectiveness. Academy of Management Review 2 (3), 463 – 474.Google Scholar
  1283. Gouldner, A. W. (1959). Organizational Analysis. In R. K. Merton, L. Broom & L. S. Cottrell (Hrsg.), Sociology Today. Problems and Prospects (S. 400 – 428). London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  1284. Seashore, S. E. & Yuchtman, E. (1967). Factorial Analysis of Organizational Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 12, 377 – 395.Google Scholar
  1285. Schreyögg, G. (1997). Theorien organisatorischer Ressourcen. In G. Ortmann, J. Sydow & K. Türk (Hrsg.), Theorien der Organisation. Die Rückkehr der Gesellschaft (S. 481 – 486). Opladen: WDVGoogle Scholar
  1286. Freeman, J. (1979). Resource Mobilization and Strategy: A Model for Analyzing Social Movement Organization Actions. In M. N. Zald & J. D. McCarthy (Hrsg.), The Dynamics of Social Movements. Resource Mobilization, Social Control, and Tactics (S. 167 – 189). Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers.Google Scholar
  1287. McAdam, D. (1982). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency. 1930–1970. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  1288. Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the Theory of Organizations. American Sociological Review 13, 23 – 35.Google Scholar
  1289. Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement. Social Movements and contentious Politics. Second Edition. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  1290. Zald, M. N. & McCarthy, J. D. (Hrsg.). (1987). Social Movements in an Organizational Society. Collected Essays. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  1291. Zald, M. N. & McCarthy, J. D. (1987). Social Movement Industries: Competition and Conflict Among SMOs. In M. N. Zald & J. D. McCarthy (Hrsg.), Social Movements in an Organizational Society. Collected Essays (S. 161 – 180). New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  1292. Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, Entrepreneurs and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations. Organization Studies 20, 777 – 799.Google Scholar
  1293. Lounsbury, M. (2003). The Problem of Order Revisited. Towards a more Critical Institutional Perspective. In R. Westwood & S. Clegg (Hrsg.), Debating Organization (S. 210 – 219). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  1294. Türk, K. (2000). Organisation als Institution der kapitalistischen Gesellschaftsformation. In G. Ortmann, J. Sydow & K. Türk (Hrsg.), Theorien der Organisation. Die Rückkehr der Gesellschaft (S. 124 – 176). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  1295. Weick, K. E. & Bougon, M. G. (1986). Organizations as Cognitive Maps: Charting Ways of Success and Failure. In H. P. Sims jr. & D. A. Goia et al. (Hrsg.), The Thinking Organization (S. 102 – 135). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  1296. Zucker, L. G. (1977). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence. American Sociological Review 42, 726 – 743.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fakultät für SoziologieUniversität BielefeldBielefeldDeutschland

Personalised recommendations