Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diskursanalyse in der Organisationsforschung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Empirische Organisationsforschung

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Wirtschaft ((SRW))

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag bietet einen grundlegenden Überblick über diskursanalytische Orientierungen und Perspektiven in der Organisationsforschung. Entlang der Achsen Sprachgebrauch – Ordnung des Diskurses und Deskription – Kritik werden zunächst grundlegende gegenstandsbezogene und normative Orientierungen der Diskursforschung benannt. Anschließend erfolgt eine Darstellung von Rhetorik, Gesprächsanalyse, Narrationsanalyse und kritischer Diskursanalyse als vier weitverbreiteten Perspektiven diskursanalytischer Forschung. Ein Überblick über methodische Schritte und methodische Besonderheiten diskursanalytischer Forschung beschließt den Beitrag.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aisnworth-Vaughn, N. 1992. Topic transitions in physician-patient interviews: Power, gender, and discourse change. Language in Society 21:409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., und Dan Kärreman. 2000. Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations 53(9): 1125–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., und Dan Kärreman. 2011. Decolonializing discourse: Critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis. Human Relations 64(9): 1121–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angermüller, Johannes, Nonhoff Martin, Herschinger Eva, Macgilchrist Felicitas, Reisigl Martin, Wedl Juliette, Wrana Daniel, und Ziem Alexander, Hrsg. 2014. Diskursforschung. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristoteles. 1999. Rhetorik. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit-Barné, Ch., und François Cooren. 2009. The accomplishment of authority through presentification. How authority is distributed among and negotiated by organizational members. Management Communication Quarterly 23(1): 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, D. 1994. The business of talk. Organizations in action. London/Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M. 1991. The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(1): 106–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M. 1995. Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as „Tamara-Land“. Academy of Management Journal 38(4): 997–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. H. 1985. That reminds me of a story: Speech action in organizational socialization. Western Journal of Speech Communication 49:27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., und George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Andrew D., Susan Ainsworth, und David Grant. 2012. The rhetoric of institutional change. Organization Studies 33(3): 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, L. D. 1992. Lists and stories in organizational communication. Communication Theory 2:281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. 1991. The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry 18(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, D., und Wolfgang Teubert. 1994. Ist Diskurs ein sprachwissenschaftliches Objekt? Zur Methodenfrage der historischen Semantik. In Begriffsgeschichte und Diskursgeschichte. Methodenfragen und Forschungsergebnisse der historische Semantik, Hrsg. Dietrich Busse, Fritz Hermanns und Wolfgang Teubert, 10–28. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1988. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40(4): 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. 2003. Organization theory as a postmodern science. In The Oxford handbook of organization theory, Hrsg. Haridimos Tsoukas und Christian Knudsen, 113–140. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, F. 1999. Applying socio-semiotics to organizational communication: A new approach. Management Communication Quarterly 13:294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, F. 2015. Organizational discourse. Communication and constitution. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B. 1998. Narrative approach in organization studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deppermann, A. 2008. Gespräche analysieren: Eine Einführung, 4. Aufl. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, Teun A. 2001. Critical discourse analysis. In The handbook of discourse analysis, Hrsg. Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen und Heidi Ehernberger Hamilton, 352–371. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK/Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. 2003. Analyzing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. 2010. Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N., Mulderigg Jane, und Wodak Ruth. 2011. Critical discourse analysis. In Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction, Hrsg. Teun A. van Dijk, 357–378. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst, Gail T., und Francois Cooren. 2004. Organizational language in use: Interaction analysis, conersation analysis and speech act schematics. In Sage handbook of organizational discourse, Hrsg. David Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick und Linda L. Putnam, 131–152. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. P. 1990. Stories as cultural creativity: on the relationship between symbolism and politics in organizational change. Journal of Applied Communication Research 13:45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. R. 1984. Narration as a human communication. The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs 51(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. D., und Laurie W. Ford. 1995. The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 541–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1973. Archäologie des Wissens. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frances, D. W. 1986. Some structures of negotiation talk. Language in Society 15:53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. 2004. Narratives, stories and texts. In Sage handbook of organizational discourse, Hrsg. David Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick und Linda L. Putnam, 61–79. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gasteiger, L., und Werner Schneider. 2014. Diskursanalyse und die Verwendung von CAQDA-Software. In Diskursforschung Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, Hrsg. Martin Nonhoff, Eva Herschinger, Johannes Angermüller, Felicitas Macgilchrist, Martin Reisigl, Juliette Wedl, Daniel Wrana und Alexander Ziem, Bd. 2, 164–184. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P., und Michael Handford, Hrsg. 2012. The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D., und Rick Iedema. 2005. Discourse analysis and the study of organizations. Text und diskurs 25(1): 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D., Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick, und Linda L. Putnam. 2004a. Introduction: Organizational discourse: Exploring the field. In Sage handbook of organizational discourse, Hrsg. David Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick und Linda L. Putnam, 1–36. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D., Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick, und Linda L. Putnam, Hrsg. 2004b. Sage handbook of organizational discourse. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Jr., S. E. 2004. A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review 26:653–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., Ian Palmer, und Nelson Phillips. 2000. Discourse as a strategic resource. Human Relations 53(9): 1227–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, R. 2012. Reclaiming the truth of the market in times of crisis: Course, transformation and strategies of a liberal discourse in Germany. Culture & Organization 18(2): 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, R., und Gabriele Fassauer. 2013. Performance principle and organizational compensation practice in the context of the global financial crisis: A discourse-analytical study. Management Revue 24(1): 30–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, R., und Thomas Steger. 2010. Heroes, villains and ‚honourable merchants‘: Narrative change in the German media discourse on corporate governance. Organization 17(6): 767–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helin, J., Tor Hernes, Daniel Hjorth, und Robin Holt, Hrsg. 2014. The Oxford handbook of process philosophy and organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henne, H., und H. Helmut Rehbock. 2001. Einführung in die Gesprächsanalyse, 4. Aufl. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, C., und Robyn Walker. 2012. Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports. Accounting Forum 36(3): 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. 2006. Gendered talk at work. Constructing social identity through workplace interaction. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoßfeld, H. 2011. Sprachliche Legitimation von Personalabbaumaßnahmen. Eine Argumentations- und Metaphernanalyse der Massenkommunikation zweier Großbanken. Mering: Hampp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M., und Andrew D. Brown. 2002. Narratives of organizational identity and identification: A case study of hegemony and resistance. Organization Studies 23:421–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablin, F. M., und Linda L. Putnam, Hrsg. 2001. The new handbook of organizational communication. Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, S. 2012. Kritische Diskursanalyse. Eine Einführung. Münster: Unrast.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D., und Sandra Clarke. 1993. Women, men and interruptions: A critical review. In Gender and conversational interaction, Hrsg. Deborah Tannen, 231–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermier, J. M., David Knights, und W. Walter Nord, Hrsg. 1994. Resistance and power in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallmeyer, W. 1985. Handlungskonstitution im Gespräch. In Grammatik, Konversation, Interaktion, Hrsg. Elisabeth Gülich und Thomas Kotschi, 81–123. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, M. 1995. Organisational myths as storytelling as communication management: A conceptual framework for learning as organisation’s culture. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 1:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R., Andreas Hirseland, Werner Schneider, und Willy Viehöver, Hrsg. 2010. Handbuch sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band 2: Forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R., Andreas Hirseland, Werner Schneider, und Willi Viehöver, Hrsg. 2011. Handbuch sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band 1: Theorien und Methoden. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. 1996. Moden & Mythen des Organisierens. Die Betriebswirtschaft 56(1): 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. 1998. Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Organisation beim Reden. Organisieren als Kommunizieren. Industrielle Beziehungen 5(1): 45–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneer, G. 2008. Institution/Organisation: Über die Paradoxie des Organisierens. In Poststrukturalistische Sozialwissenschaften, Hrsg. Moebius Stephan und Reckwitz Andreas, 124–140. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopperschmidt, J., Hrsg. 1991. Rhetorik. Zweiter Band: Wirkungsgeschichte der Rhetorik. Darmstadt: WBG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr, A. 2008. Historische Diskursanalyse. Frankfurt/Main: Campus-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K. 1995. Human resource management. Rhetorics and realities. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, R. J. 1998. A discourse on discourse. Redeeming the meaning of talk. In Discourse and organization, Hrsg. David Grant, Tom Keenoy und Cliff Oswick, 15–30. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. 1986. The rhetoric of economics. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D. K. 1987. The political function of narrative in organizations. Communication Monographs 54:113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D. K. 2004. Discourse, power and ideology: Unpacking the critical approach. In Sage handbook of organizational discourse, Hrsg. David Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick und Linda L. Putnam, 237–258. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D. K., und Jennifer Mease. 2011. Organizational Discourse. In Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction, Hrsg. A. Teun und van Dijk, 283–302. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munir, Kamal A., und Nelson Phillips. 2005. The birth of the ‚Kodak Moment‘: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organization Studies 26(11): 1665–1687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Ch., und Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 2004. Die neue Rhetorik. Eine Abhandlung über das Argumentieren. Stuttgart: Frommann, Holzboog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., und Cynthia Hardy. 2002. Discourse analysis. Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., und Maria Laura Di Domenico. 2009. Discourse analysis in organizational research: Methods and debates. In The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods, Hrsg. David A. Buchanan und Alan Bryman, 549–565. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., Graham Sewell, und Steve Jaynes. 2008. Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods 11(4): 770–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A., und B. J. Fehr. 2011. Conversation analysis: An approach to the analysis of social interaction. In Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction, Hrsg. Teun A. van Dijk, 165–190. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A., B. J. Fehr, und Jack Ende. 1997. When supervising physicians see patients. Human Communication Research 23:589–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., und Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and social psychology. Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London/Newbury Park, Calif: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L., und Anne Mayden Nicotera, Hrsg. 2009. Building theories of organization. The constitutive role of communication. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L., Anne Maydan Nicotera, und Robert D. McPhee. 2009. Introduction. Communication constitutes organization. In Building theories of organization. The constitutive role of communication, Hrsg. Linda Putnam und Anne Maydan Nicotera, 1–19. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragan, S. L. 1983. A conversational analysis of alignment talk in job interviews. In Communication yearbook 7, Hrsg. R. Bostrum, 502–516. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, C. 2000. ‚Doing‘ knowledge at work, dialogue, monologue and power in organizational learning. In Research and knowledge at work, Hrsg. John Garrick und Carl Rhodes, 217–231. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, C. 2002. Text, plurality and organisational knowledge. Ephemera 2(2): 98–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, C., und Andrew D. Brown. 2005. Narrative, organizations and research. International Journal of Management Reviews 7(3): 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Emanuel A. Schegloff, und Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, D., Deborah Tannen, und Heidi Ehernberger Hamilton, Hrsg. 2001. The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selting, M., Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Arnulf Deppermann, Peter Gilles, Susanne Günthner, Martin Hartung, Friederike Kern, Christine Mertzlufft, Christian Meyer, Miriam Morek, Frank Oberzaucher, Jörg Peters, Uta Quasthoff, Wilfried Schütte, Anja Stukenbrock, und Susanne Uhmann. 2009. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 10(2009): 353–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P. 2002. Changing conversations in organizations. A complexity approach to change. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sieben, B. 2007. Management und Emotionen. Analyse einer ambivalenten Verknüpfung. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieben, B. 2015. Der linguistic turn in der Managementforschung. In Diskurs und Ökonomie, Hrsg. Rainer Diaz-Bone und Gertraude Krell, 2. Aufl., 49–78. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siltaoja, M. E. 2013. Moral panic, moral regulation and essentialization of identities: Discursive struggle over unethical business practices in the Finnish national media. Culture & Organization 19(1): 62–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzmüller, J., und Ingo Warnke, Hrsg. 2011. Diskurslinguistik: eine Einführung in Theorien und Methoden der transtextuellen Sprachanalyse. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. 2003. The recontextualization of management: A discourse-based approach to analyzing the development of management thinking. Journal of Management Studies 40(4): 775–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, St. 1996. Der Gebrauch von Argumenten. Beltz Athenäum: Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, K. 1995. Action-implicative discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14:195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traue, B., Lisa Pfahl, und Lena Schürmann. 2014. Diskursanalyse. In Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, Hrsg. Nina Baur und Jörg Blasius, 493–508. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., und Janne Tienari. 2002. Justification, legitimization and naturalization of mergers and acquisitions: A critical discourse analysis of media texts. Organization 9(2): 275–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., Janne Tienari, und Juha Laurila. 2006. Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies 27(6): 789–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, Teun A. 2011. Introduction: The Study of Discourse. In Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction, Hrsg. Teun A. van Dijk, 1–7. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. 1994. In search of management. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 2002. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, J., und Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Sequential and institutional calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly 50:172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L., und Rolf O. Kroger. 2000. Doing discourse analysis. Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodilla, J. 1998. Workplace conversations: The text of organizing. In Discourse and organization, Hrsg. David Grant, Tom Keenoy und Cliff Oswick, 31–50. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wrana, D., Alexander Ziem, Martin Reisigl, Martin Nonhoff, und Johannes Angermuller, Hrsg. 2014. DiskursNetz. Wörterbuch der interdisziplinären Diskursforschung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanoni, P., und Maddy Janssens. 2004. Deconstructing difference: The rhetoric of human resource managers’ diversity discourses. Organization Studies 25(1): 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zbaracki, M. J. 1998. The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(3): 602–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Deutschland

    Ronald Hartz

  2. Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland

    Gabriele Fassauer

Authors
  1. Ronald Hartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriele Fassauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Hartz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin), Berlin, Germany

    Stefan Liebig

  2. Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Hamburg, Germany

    Wenzel Matiaske

  3. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Sophie Rosenbohm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartz, R., Fassauer, G. (2017). Diskursanalyse in der Organisationsforschung. In: Liebig, S., Matiaske, W., Rosenbohm, S. (eds) Handbuch Empirische Organisationsforschung. Springer Reference Wirtschaft . Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08493-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08493-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-08492-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08493-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation