Skip to main content

Politics and power in the babycare business – Structural aspects of childcare provision

Politik und Macht im Baby-Betreuungs-Geschäft – Strukturelle Aspekte der Kinderbetreuungsinfrastruktur

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Who cares for babies is an emotive topic that has challenged philanthropists, parents, policymakers, practitioners and researchers for decades. But as very young children’s care outside the family home becomes increasingly commodified and marketised in many countries of the world, moral arguments are often supplanted by others grounded in micro and macro-economic reasoning, using scientific evidence as justification. Attention then turns to a neoliberal preoccupation with affordability, accessibility and the structural dimensions of quality in provision for parents. Babies and their carers are positioned as service users and providers and the latter feel themselves to be subject to the impact of market forces and those for whom these provide the authority to dictate its conditions: politicians, regulators, employers and consumers (parents). This chapter considers how perceptions of power can influence the nature of relationships between babies and their carers. It is based on research carried out in private and state-maintained day nurseries in southeast England since 2008.

Zusammenfassung

Die Betreuung von Babys und Kleinkindern ist ein emotionsgeladenes Thema dessen sich seit Jahrzehnten Philanthropen, Eltern, Entscheidungsträger, Betreuer und Forscher annehmen. Da die Betreuung von Kleinkindern außerhalb der Familie in vielen Ländern immer mehr kommerzialisiert wird, rückt die moralische Auseinandersetzung oft in den Hintergrund und wird von einer mikro- und makroökonomischen Argumentation verdrängt, die sich über wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse rechtfertigen will. Dadurch steht die neoliberale Sorge um die Finanzierbarkeit, Verfügbarkeit und die strukturellen Dimensionen der Angebotsqualität für Eltern im Vordergrund. Kleinkinder und ihre Betreuer werden zu Kunden und Dienstleistern, wobei die letzteren den Auswirkungen des dynamischen Marktes ausgesetzt sind und derer, welche die Macht haben, die Marktbedingungen zu diktieren: Politiker, Aufsichtsbehörden, Arbeitgeber und Kunden (Eltern). Dieses Kapitel geht der Frage nach, wie Macht und Machtausübung die Beziehung zwischen Kleinkindern und ihren Betreuern beeinflussen kann. Es gründet auf Forschungsarbeiten in privaten und staatlichen Kindertagesstätten im Südosten Englands im Jahr 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aubrey, Carol. 2014. Effective Early Childhood Leadership. In An Introduction to Early Childhood Studies 3rd edition, eds. Trisha Maynard and Sacha Powell, 268–280. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Jacqueline, Leach, Penelope, Sylva, Kathy, Stein, Alan, Malmberg, Lars-Erik and the FCCC Team. 2006. Infant Care in England: Mothers’ Aspirations, Experiences, Satisfaction and Caregiver Relationships. Birkbeck: University of London. http://www.familieschildrenchildcare.org/fccc*frames*home.html (accessed 3 Feb. 2015).

  • Brehony, Kevin. 2003. Nursery Schools In Encyclopedia of Children and Childhood in History and Society, ed. Paula S. Fass, Macmillan Library Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Mary. 2009. Developing Your Leadership in the Early Years. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brind, Richard, McGinigal, Stephen, Lewis, James, Ghezelayagh, Shadi, Ransom, Heather, Robson, Jennifer, Street, Cathy, and Renton, Zoe. 2014. Childcare and Early Years Providers Survey 2013. London: DFE Publications Cooke, Graeme and Lawton, Kayte. 2008. For Love or Money: Pay, progression and professionalisation in the ‘early years’ workforce. London: Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR).

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Tricia, Goouch, Kathy, Powell, Sacha, and Abbott, Lesley. 2003. Birth to Three Matters. A Review of the Literature. RR444. Nottingham: DfES Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfE. 2012. Call for Evidence for the Independent Review of Early Education and Childcare Qualifications. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfE. 2014. Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfE/DwP. 2013. Commission on Childcare Terms of Reference. London: HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES 2005 Children’s Workforce Strategy. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, Judy. 2012. Independent Evaluation of the Baby Room Project. Final Report. Canterbury: CCCU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, Naomi. 2012. Providing a Sure Start. How government discovered early childhood. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfer, Peter. 2004. ‘Observation Matters’. In Birth to Three Matters; Supporting the Framework of Effective Practice, eds. Lesley Abbott and Anne Langston, 116–129, Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goouch, Kathy, and Powell, Sacha. 2013. ‘Orchestrating professional development for baby room practitioners: raising the stakes in new dialogic encounters’, Journal of Early Childhood Research 11(1): 78–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield, Mark, Jopling, Michael, Needham, Martin, Waller, Tim, Coleyshaw, Liz, Emira, Mahmoud, and Royle, Karl. 2012. Longitudinal Study of Early Years Professional Status. An exploration of progress, leadership and impact. Final report. DFE-RR239c. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, Thelma, Cryer, Debby, and Clifford, Richard. 2006. Infant-Toddler Environment Rating Scale. Revised Edition. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huskinson, Tom, Pye, Julia, Medien, Kathryn, Dobie, Sarah, Ferguson, Chris, and Gardner, Colin, with Gilby, Nicholas, Littlewood, Mandy and D’Souza, John. 2013. Childcare and early years survey of parents 2011. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Pauline. 2014. ‘Training and Workforce Issues in the Early Years’ In Contemporary Issues in the Early Years eds. Gillian Pugh and Bernadette Duffy, 255–272. London: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaga, Yoshie, Bennett, John, and Moss, Peter. 2010. Caring and learning together. A crossnational study on the integration of early childhood care and education within education. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key Note. 2011. Childcare Market Assessment 2011. http://www.keynote.co.uk/market-intelligence/view/product/10458/childcare (accessed 3 Feb. 2015).

  • Lumsden, Eunice. 2010. ‘The New Early Years Professional in England’ In International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education 1(3): 173–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathers, Sandra, Singler, Rosanna, and Karemaker, Arjette. 2012. Improving Quality in the Early Years: A Comparison of Perspectives and Measures. Oxford: University of Oxford and The Daycare Trust. http://www.education.ox.ac.uk/research/fell/research/improving-quality-in-the-early-years-a-comparison-of-perspectives-and-measures/ (accessed 3 Feb. 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathers, Sandra, Ranns, Helen, Karemaker, Arjette, Moody, Alison, Sylva, Kathy, Graham, Jenny, and Siraj-Blatchford, Iram. 2011. Evaluation of Graduate Leader Fund: Technical Report. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Linda, and Hevey, Denise. 2012. Policy Issues in the Early Years. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherji, Penny, and Albon, Deborah. 2010. Research Methods in Early Childhood. An Introductory Guide. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • NUT. 2008. Early Years Professional Status. Advice and Guidance for NUT Members. London: National Union of Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbrown, Cathy. 2012. Foundations for Quality. The independent review of early education and childcare qualifications. Final report. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbrown, Cathy. 2013. Shaking the Foundations of Quality. Why ‘childcare’ policy must not lead to poor-quality early education and care. Sheffield: University of Sheffield. http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/education/staff/academic/nutbrownc (accessed 3 Feb. 2015).

  • ONS. 2010. Standard Occupational Classification System (SOC) 2010. Newport: Office for National Statistics. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/classifications/currentstandard-classifications/soc2010/index.html (accessed 3 Feb. 2015).

  • Osgood, Jayne. 2012. Narratives from the nursery. Negotiating professional identities in early childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paull, Gillian. 2014. Can Government Intervention in Childcare be Justified? Economic Affairs 34(1): 14–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Sacha, and Goouch, Kathy. 2012. ‘Whose hand rocks the cradle? Parallel discourses in the baby room’, Early Years 32(2): 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Liz. 2012. Nutbrown Slams ‘More Great Childcare’ Plans. Nursery World 19,March 2013. http://www.nurseryworld.co.uk/nursery-world/news/1106669/nutbrownslams-childcare-plans (accessed 30 Apr. 2014).

  • Rogoff, Barbara. 1990. Apprenticeship in Thinking. Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, Sharne, and Emmett, Sue. 2010. ‘Direct Observation’ Doing Early Childhood Research, International Perspectives on Theory and Practice, 2nd edition, eds. Mac-Naughton, Glenda, Rolfe, Sharne and Siraj-Blatchford, Iram, 309–326, Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Judyth, and Logan, Lloyd. 1997. Meeting the Challenges of Primary Schooling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Save the Children and the Daycare Trust. 2012. Making Work Pay – The Childcare Trap. London: Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronach, Ian, Corbin, Brian, McNamara, Olwen, Stark, Sheila, and Warne, Tony. 2002. ‘Towards an uncertain politics of professionalism: teacher and nurse identities in flux’, Journal of Education Policy 17(1): 109–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, Kathy, Melhuish, Edward, Sammons, Pam, Siraj-Blatchford, Iram, and Taggart, Brenda. 2004. The Effective Provision of Pre-School Education (EPPE Project: Effective Pre-School Education (Technical Paper 12). London: DfE/ Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, Kathy, Stein, Alan, and Leach, Penelope. 2000. A prospective study of the effects of different kinds of care on children’s development in the first five years. The Glass House and Tedworth Trusts. http://www.familieschildrenchildcare.org/fccc*frames*home.html (accessed 3 Feb. 2015).

  • Tickell, Claire. 2011. The Early Years Foundation Stage Review Report on the Evidence. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sacha Powell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Powell, S., Goouch, K. (2016). Politics and power in the babycare business – Structural aspects of childcare provision. In: Maier-Höfer, C. (eds) Angewandte Kindheitswissenschaften – Applied Childhood Studies. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08120-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08120-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-08119-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08120-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics