Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do only dead fish swim with the stream?

The role of intuition, emotion and deliberation in love and work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emotion und Intuition in Führung und Organisation

Part of the book series: uniscope. Publikationen der SGO Stiftung ((UNISCOPE))

Abstract

The conflict between intuitive insight and deliberate thinking has been acknowledged in both philosophy and popular culture. Thus, Blaise Pascal argued that “The heart has its reasons which reason does not understand.” The title of one of Connie Francis’ songs is “My heart has a mind of its own.” More recently, Daniel Kahneman has suggested differentiating between two systems of thinking: a fast intuitive system and a slow intellectual system.

“Only dead fish swim with the stream.”

(Malcolm Muggeridge)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gigerenzer (2007); Kahneman (2011).

  2. 2.

    Ben-Ze’ev (2000).

  3. 3.

    Bergson (1907, p. 155).

  4. 4.

    See, e.g., Spinoza (1677). IIp40s1, 2; IIp47; V5p33. On the importance, in 17th century philosophy, of emotions for knowledge, see James 1997, Chaps. 9–10.

  5. 5.

    Smith und Lazarus (1990, p. 629).

  6. 6.

    Ben-Ze’ev (2009); Goleman (1998, p. 7, part 4).

  7. 7.

    Dijksterhuis et al. (2006).

  8. 8.

    Calvillo und Penaloza (2009), Lassiter et al. (2009), Segal (2004), Sio und Ormerod (2009).

  9. 9.

    See Ben-Ze’ev (1993).

  10. 10.

    Segal (2004).

  11. 11.

    For a more detailed discussion see Ben-Ze’ev (1993, Chap. 4).

  12. 12.

    Dijksterhuis et al. (2006), Calvillo und Penaloza (2009), Lassiter et al. (2009), Segal (2004).

  13. 13.

    Gigerenzer (2007, p. 18).

  14. 14.

    Aristotle, On dreams: 460b; see also Nicomachean Ethics: 1149a26–29.

  15. 15.

    Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 1103b12–20; Ewin (1992, p. 142).

  16. 16.

    Kant (1797). Metaphysics of Morals, § 17.

  17. 17.

    Elster (1999, p. 91), see also Ben-Ze’ev (2000, p. 165).

  18. 18.

    Coontz (2005, p. 15, 18).

  19. 19.

    Bruckner (2013).

  20. 20.

    Gigerenzer (2007).

  21. 21.

    Simsion (2013).

  22. 22.

    Ben-Ze’ev und Goussinsky (2008).

  23. 23.

    Russell (1968, p. 195–96), cited in Irvine (2006, p. 14–15).

  24. 24.

    Our focus is on drifting as a “local” decision-making mechanism in love or work. We do not address the wider issue of drifting as an attitude to all your life or personality trait, for this see, e.g., Sennett (1999), Rosa (2013).

  25. 25.

    Wittgenstein (1967, p. 504).

  26. 26.

    Krebs (2002, 2014, in press).

  27. 27.

    For the first kind of studies, see, e.g., Jose et al.(2010), Rhoades et al. (2012), Stanley et al. (2006) for the second kind, see, e.g., Kulu und Boyle (2010), Lillard et al. (1995); Manning und Cohen (2012).

  28. 28.

    Jones und Adams (1999).

  29. 29.

    Stanley et al. (2006).

  30. 30.

    Stanley et al. (2006).

  31. 31.

    Kulu und Boyle (2010), Lillard et al. (1995).

  32. 32.

    Manning und Cohen (2012), see also Kelmer et al. (2013).

  33. 33.

    Eisenberg und Fabes (1992).

  34. 34.

    Hochschild (1983).

  35. 35.

    Hochschild (1983).

  36. 36.

    For review, see Van Putten et al. 2013.

References

  • Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (J. Barnes, Hrsg). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev, A. (1993). The perceptual system: A philosophical and psychological perspective. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2000). The subtlety of emotions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2009). Die Logik der Gefühle: Kritik der emotionalen Intelligenz. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev, A., & Goussinsky, R. (2008). In the name of love: Romantic Ideology and its victims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1907). Creative evolution. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, P. (2013). Has marriage for love failed? Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvillo, D. P., & Penaloza, A. (2009). Are complex decisions better left to the unconscious? Further failed replications of the deliberation-without-attention effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 509–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy or How love conquered marriage. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1992). Emotion, regulation, and the development of social competence. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 119–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the mind: Rationality and the emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewin, R. E. (1992). Loyalty and virtues. The Philosophical Quarterly, 42, 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, W. B. (2006). On desire: Why we want what we want. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, S. (1997). Passion and action: The emotions in seventeenth-century philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W., & Adams, J. (1999). Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose, A., O’Leary, K. D., & Moyer, A. (2010). Does premarital cohabitation predict subsequent marital stability and marital quality? A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1797/1991). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelmer, G., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2013). Relationship quality, commitment, and stability in long-distance relationships. Family Process, 52, 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, A. (2002). Arbeit und Liebe. Die philosophischen Grundlagen sozialer Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, A. (2014). Between I and Thou – On the dialogical nature of love. In C. Maurer, T. Milligan, & K. Pacovská (Hrsg.), Love and its objects (pp. 7–24). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, A. (in press). Zwischen Ich und Du. Eine dialogische Philosophie der Liebe. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H., & Boyle, P. J. (2010). Premarital cohabitation and divorce: Support for the “Trial Marriage” Theory? Demographic Research, 23, 879–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, G. D., Lindberg, M. J., González-Vallejo, C., Bellezza, F. S., & Phillips, N. D. (2009). The deliberation-without-attention effect: Evidence for an artifactual interpretation. Psychological Science, 20, 671–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, L. A., Brien, M. J., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital dissolution: A matter of self-selection? Demography, 32, 437–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., & Cohen, J. A. (2012). Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution: An examination of recent marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Putten, M., Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, E., & Tykocinski, O. E. (2013). Inaction inertia. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 123–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of commitment dynamics in cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 33, 369–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1968). Autobiography of Bertrand Russell: 1872-World War I. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, E. (2004). Incubation in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1999). The corrosion of character. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsion, G. (2013). The Rosie project. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 94–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Emotion and adaptation. In L. A. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 609–637). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, B. (1677/1985). Ethics. In E. Curley (Hrsg.), The collected works of Spinoza. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding vs. deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Basel, CH-4051, Basel, Switzerland

    Prof. Dr. Angelika Krebs

  2. University of Haifa, 31905, Haifa, Israel

    Prof. Dr. Aaron Ben-Ze’ev

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Aaron Ben-Ze’ev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Angelika Krebs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelika Krebs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule Luzern - Soziale Arbeit, Luzern, Switzerland

    Marlies W. Fröse

  2. Hochschule Luzern - Wirtschaft, Luzern, Switzerland

    Stephanie Kaudela-Baum

  3. Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Frank E.P. Dievernich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ben-Ze’ev, A., Krebs, A. (2015). Do only dead fish swim with the stream?. In: Fröse, M., Kaudela-Baum, S., Dievernich, F. (eds) Emotion und Intuition in Führung und Organisation. uniscope. Publikationen der SGO Stiftung. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07796-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07796-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-07795-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-07796-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation