Advertisement

Die Rolle des Teamdesigns für die Teamleistung

  • Martin RatzmannEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Der demografische Wandel in Deutschland stellt Unternehmen kurz- bis mittelfristig vor die Herausforderung, mit deutlich veränderten Altersstrukturen umzugehen. Für die Arbeit in Innovationsprojekten impliziert diese Entwicklung, dass sich Teammitglieder über ihren kross-funktionalen Hintergrund hinaus, häufig auch stärker hinsichtlich ihres Alters und ihrer Berufserfahrung unterscheiden. Es wird aufgezeigt, dass Veränderungen der Altersstruktur und des Teamdesigns einen geringen – aber nicht zu vernachlässigenden – Einfluss auf die Ergebnisse der Teamarbeit aufweisen. Die Ergebnisse basieren auf einer aktuellen Befragung von Innovationsprojekten aus 290 Unternehmen des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes in Deutschland.

Schlüsselwörter

Teamdesign Teamgröße Altersstruktur Rollendifferenzierung Innovationsteams 

Literatur

  1. Abernathy, W. & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40–47.Google Scholar
  2. Aritzeta, A., Swailes, S., & Senior, B. (2007). Belbin’s team role model: Development, validity and applications for team building*. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 96–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00666.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backes-Gellner, U., & Veen, S. (2013). Positive effects of ageing and age diversity in innovative companies – large-scale empirical evidence on company productivity. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(3), 279–295. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12011.Google Scholar
  4. Belbin, R. M. M. (2012). Team roles at work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49. doi:10.1177/1059601102027001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance eelationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709–743. doi:10.1177/0149206310365001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K., Zanutto, E., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and composition. A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bouncken, R. B. (2011). Innovation by operating practices in project alliances – when size matters. British Journal of Management, 22(4), 586–608. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8551.2010.00688.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouncken, R. B., & Koch, M. J. (2007). The role of innovation orientation: Strategic antecedents and innovation consequences of innovation orientation. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 3(3), 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruch, H., Kunze, F., & Böhm, S. (2010). Generationen erfolgreich führen: Konzepte und Praxiserfahrungen zum Management des demografischen Wandels. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  12. Chattopadhyay, P., George, E., & Lawrence, S. A. (2004). Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 892–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Curral, L. A., Forrester, R. H., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2001). It’s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray, W. D., & Hills, T. (2014). Does cognition deteriorate with age or Is It enhanced by experience? Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(1), 2–4. doi:10.1111/tops.12080.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group Performance and intergroup relations in organisations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Hrsg.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2. Aufl., Bd. 3, S. 269–314). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hackman, J. R. (1968). Effects of task characteristics on group Products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 162–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational behavior (S. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (S. 45–99). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1983). Group tasks, group interaction, and group performance effectiveness. In H. H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Hrsg.), Small groups and social interaction (Bd. 1, S. 331–345). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A Theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, varity, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Levine, M. (2011). When other people are heaven, when other people are hell: How social identity determines the nature and impact of social support. In J. Jetten, C. Haslam, & S. A. Haslam (Hrsg.), The social cure: Identity, health, and well-being (S. 157–174). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  26. Henry, S. M., & Todd Stevens, K. (1999). Using Belbin’s leadership role to improve team effectiveness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Systems and Software, 44(3), 241–250. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S 0164-1212(98)10060-2.
  27. Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257–274.Google Scholar
  28. Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140.Google Scholar
  30. Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987–1015. doi:10.1177/0149206307308587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jehn, K. A., Bezrukova, K., & Thatcher, S. (2008). Conflict, diversity, and faultlines in workgroups. In C. K. W. De Dreu & M. Gelfand (Hrsg.), The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations (S. 179–210). The SIOP Frontiers Series, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.89.6.1008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325–340.Google Scholar
  34. Lauring, J., & Selmer, J. (2012). Knowledge sharing in diverse organisations. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(1), 89–105. doi:10.1111/j.1748–8583.2010.00158.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu, T. T., & Chen, J. C. (2010). Incremental or radical? A study of organizational innovation: An artificial world approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8193–8200. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.067.Google Scholar
  36. Meyer, B., & Glenz, A. (2013). Calculating diversity faultlines with the asw.cluster package in R.Google Scholar
  37. Moreland, R. L. (2013). Composition and diversity. In J. M. Levine (Hrsg.), Group processes (S. 11–32). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  38. Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In E. H. W. J. H. Davis (Hrsg.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 20). Small group processes and interpersonal relations (S. 11–35). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Palmer, V. (2006). Simulation of the categorization-elaboration model of diversity and work-group performance. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  40. Pennington, D. C. (2002). The social psychology of behaviour in small groups. New York: Psychology press.Google Scholar
  41. Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Shaoul, C., Milin, P., & Baayen, H. (2014). The myth of cognitive decline: Non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 5–42. doi:10.1111/tops.12078.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Settersten, R. A., Jr., & Mayer, K. U. (1997). The Measurement of age, age structuring, and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 233–261. doi:10.2307/2952551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Slater, P. E. (1955). Role Differentiation in Small Groups. American Sociological Review, 20(3), 300–310. doi:10.2307/2087389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Beschäftigung und Umsatz der Betriebe des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes. Fachserie 4, Reihe 4.1.1. Wiesbaden: destatis.Google Scholar
  45. Thatcher, S. M. B. (2013). Moving beyond a categorical approach to diversity: The role of demographic faultlines. In Q. M. Roberson (Hrsg.), The oxford handbook of diversity and work (S. 52–72). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(3), 217–241. doi:10.1023/a:1023325406946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2008). The Social Identity Perspektive in Intergroup Relations: Theories, Themes, and Controversies. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Hrsg.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (S. 133–152). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  48. Wegge, J., Roth, C., Neubach, B., Schmidt, K. H., & Kanfer, R. (2008). Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1301–1313. doi:10.1037/a0012680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wegge, J., Jungmann, F., Liebermann, S., Schmidt, K. H., & Ries, B. C. (2011). Altersgemischte Teamarbeit kann erfolgreich sein. Sozialrecht + Praxis, 7, 433–442.Google Scholar
  50. Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., Maloney, M. M., Bhappu, A. D., & Salvador, R. (2008). When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 107(1), 41–59. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Strategisches Management und OrganisationUniversität BayreuthBayreuthDeutschland

Personalised recommendations