Can Tourism Qualify for Interdisciplinary Research? A European View



This paper adopts a political perspective on the disciplinary status of research on tourism and postulates that in "declaring" itself to be on the way towards becoming "a discipline", tourism research could significantly gain and uphold the recognition by policy and industry. This will not call into question the fact that methodological and content criteria ought to be considered and respected, however. Declarations should endeavour to be accepted not only within by the members of the tourism community but also externally. It should clarify that "becoming an academic discipline" is a scenario that could provide a number of opportunities for tourism research. Academic disciplines as distinct segments of knowledge have always contained a political aspect with political implications and it is this dimension that we intend to emphasize.


Interdisciplinary Research Interdisciplinary Approach Tourism Industry Tourism Research Round Table Discussion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Airey, D. (2008). In search of a mature subject, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 7(2): 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Airey, D. (2013). Forty years of tourism education and research, Poznan University of Economics Review, 13(4): 11–19.Google Scholar
  3. Bettis, R.A./Prahalad, C.K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension, Strategic Management Journal, 16(1): 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bieger, T. (2004). Tourismuslehre – Ein Grundriss, Bern: Paul Haupt.Google Scholar
  5. Buckler, J.A. (2004). Towards a new model of general education at Harvard College, Discussion paper. Online available at: 5 May 2013).
  6. Conrady, R./Kreilkamp, E./Pechlaner, H./Rulle, M. (2013): Touristische Forschung und Lehre in Gefahr, Handlungsempfehlungen als Ergebnis einer Sitzung auf Einladung des Ausschusses für Tourismus des Deutschen Bundestages, Paul-Löbe-Haus, 24. April 2013, 11.00–14.30, Berlin.Google Scholar
  7. Darbellay, F./Stock, M. (2012). Tourism as complex interdisciplinary research object, Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1): 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutscher Bundestag (2012). Ausschuss für Tourismus, Öffentliche Anhörung zum Thema "Tourismus und Wissenschaft – Ausbildung, Forschung, Wissenstransfer", Minutes of the 53rd meeting, 7 March 2012, Berlin.Google Scholar
  9. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Tourismuswissenschaft DGT e.V. (2011). Resolution zu Tourismusausbildung an Hochschulen‘. DGT.Google Scholar
  10. Donald, J. (1986). Knowledge and the university curriculum, Higher Education, 15: 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Echtner, C./Jamal, T. (1997). The disciplinary dilemma of tourism studies, Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4): 869–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goeldner, C. R. (1988). The evaluation of tourism as an industry and a discipline, Paper presented at the First International Conference for Tourism Educators mimeo, Surrey.Google Scholar
  13. Goodwin, M. (2004). Recovering the future: A post-disciplinary perspective on geography and political economy, in: Cloke, P./Goodwin, M./Crang, P. (Eds.), Envisioning human geography, London: Arnold: 65–80.Google Scholar
  14. Jafari, J. (2001). The scientification of tourism, in: Smith, V.L./Brent, M. (Eds.), Hosts and guests revisited, New York: Cognizant Communications, 28–41.Google Scholar
  15. Jafari, J./Ritchie, J.R.B. (1981). Towards a framework for tourism education, Annals of Tourism Research, 8: 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jennings, G. (2010). Tourism research, Milton: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Keller, P. (2011). The future of research and education in tourism, Speech given at 61st AIEST conference, 29th August 2011, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  18. Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Leiper, N. (2000). An emerging discipline, Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3): 805–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (edited by Cartwright, D.), New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. Lohmann, M./Müller, HR./Pechlaner, H./Smeral, E./Wöber, K. (2013). Österreich- Tourismus gewinnt an Boden; Bericht des Expertenbeirats "Tourismusstrategie", Wien.Google Scholar
  22. Pavitt, K. (1991). What makes basic research economically useful?, Research Policy, 20(2): 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pechlaner, H./Reuter, C. (2012). Multidisziplinarität, Interdisziplinarität, Transdisziplinarität – Perspektiven für den Tourismus?, in: Zehrer, A./Grabmüller, A. (Eds.), Tourismus 2020 + interdisziplinär: Herausforderungen für Wirtschaft, Umwelt und Gesellschaft, Berlin: ESV-Verlag: 13–22.Google Scholar
  24. Pechlaner, H./Volgger, M. (forthcoming): Strategies in tourism research, Unpublished study of Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt and European Academy of Bolzano-Bozen.Google Scholar
  25. Prahalad, C. K./Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance, Strategic Management Journal, 7(6): 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 59(3): 425–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. STCRC – Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Center (2005): 2004–2005 Annual Report Summary, established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program, Canberra.Google Scholar
  28. STCRC – Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre (n.y.), An inofficial description of STCRC.Google Scholar
  29. Tribe, J. (1997). The indiscipline of tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 24(3): 638–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tribe, J. (2006). The truth about tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 33(2): 360–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. TUI Think Tank (2012a). 5-Punkte-Erklärung "Tourismus & Wissenschaft", Hannover.Google Scholar
  32. TUI Think Tank (2012b). Statements der Teilnehmer, Online available at: (accessed 3 April 2014)
  33. Volgger, M./Pechlaner, H. (2014). Interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity and postdisciplinarity in tourism and hospitality education, in: Airey, D./Dredge, D./Gross, M.J. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Tourism, Hospitality and Events Education, Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Xiao, H./Smith, S. (2006). The maturation of tourism research: Evidence from a content analysis, Tourism Analysis, 10(4): 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair in Tourism/Center for EntrepreneurshipCatholic University Eichstaett-IngolstadtEichstaett-IngolstadtGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Regional Development and Location ManagementEuropean Academy of Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC)Bozen/BolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations