Abstract
Life Cycle Assessment addresses the environmental impacts of a product’s life cycle, from raw material extraction through production, use and end-of-life. In this paper, we apply this standardized method to two bridges: one designed as a composite bridge and one as a prestressed concrete bridge. The environmental profile of the bridges, defined by eleven indicators, is strongly connected to the bill of quantities. As a result, the composite bridge generates significantly less environmental impacts than its equivalent made of prestressed concrete, much heavier. The study also demonstrates that recycling is not necessarily beneficial depending on the material. On the one hand, the recycling of structural steel avoids the emission of 32 tCO2eq, thus decreasing the overall impact of the composite bridge, and, on the other hand, reinforced concrete requires a pre-treatment before recycling that is not counterbalanced by the benefits of recycling, thus downgrading the overall environmental profile of the prestressed bridge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ISO 14040-44: “Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework” and “Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines”; 2006
PE INTERNATIONAL, “Critical review report of the method for the environmental evaluation of bearing structures made of steel and concrete”, 2010
J.-B. Guinée, “Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment”, P GUINEE, 2001
A.-L. Hettinger, F. Labory, Y. Conan, “Environmental assessment of building structures made of steel or concrete”, 2010
WORLDSTEEL, www.worldsteel.org, 2010
ECSC Final Report, “Life-cycle assessment (LCA) for steel construction”, 2002
SRI, “Steel Recycling Institute”, www.recycle-steel.org, 2008
M. Sansom, J. Meijer, “Life-cycle assessment for steel construction”, SANSOM, 2002
BIRAT, “The value of recycling to society”, 2006
ZEMENT, “Bauberatung Zement – Expositionsklassen von Beton und besondere Betoneigenschaften”, 2004
D. Kellenberger, H-J Althaus, T. Künninger, “Concrete Products and Processes – Ecoinvent”, ECOINVENT, 2007
Jeannette Sjunnesson, “Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete” – Master thesis, LUND University, Department
of Technology and Society, September 2005
INRETS, Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité
PE International – GaBi databases, 2010
IPCC, http://unfccc.int/, 2010
Ademe report, “Car Labelling”, http://www2.ademe.fr/, 2011
AMECO, “Software on Life Cycle Assessment of bearing structure”, www.arcelormittal/sections, 2010
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hettinger, A., Birat, J., Hechler, O., Braun, M. (2015). Sustainable bridges – LCA for a composite and a concrete bridge. In: Petzek, E., Băncilă, R. (eds) Economical Bridge Solutions based on innovative composite dowels and integrated abutments. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06417-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06417-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06416-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06417-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)