Skip to main content
Book cover

Motoren der Innovation pp 39–55Cite as

Die Patentabteilung als Motor des Technologiemanagements: Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick

  • 7315 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Bedeutung von Patenten hat in den letzten Jahren erheblich zugenommen. Dies spiegelt sich in den weltweit stark ansteigenden Patentanmeldezahlen wider. Seit 2004 sind die weltweiten Patentanmeldungen im Durchschnitt jährlich um 6,7 % angestiegen (Im Jahr 2009 gab es eine Ausnahme mit einem Minus von 3,6%.) und das jährliche Patentanmeldevolumen weltweit betrug im Jahr 2012 ca. 2,4 Millionen Patentanmeldungen, im Vergleich zu ca. 1 Million Patentanmeldungen im Jahr 1995 (WIPO, 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-06135-7_3
  • Chapter length: 17 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-658-06135-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Ahuja, G. & Katila, R. (2001): Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study. In: Strategic Management Journal, 22 (3): 197–220.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Aali, A. Y. & Teece, D. J. (2013): Towards the (Strategic) Management of Intellectual Property: Retrospective And Prospective. In: California Management Review, 55 (4): 15–30.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., Fosfuri, A. & Gambardella, A. (2001): Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BCG (2013): The Most Innovative Companies 2013 – Lessons from Leaders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K. (1999): Forschung und Entwicklung. Planung und Kontrolle (5. Aufl.). München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K. (2001): Innovationsmanagement als Technologiemanagement. In: Albers, S., Brockhoff, K. & Hauschildt, J. (Hrsg.): Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement. Leistungsbilanz des Kieler Graduiertenkollegs: 17-78. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universtitäts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni, F. & Piccaluga, A. (2013): Operational Challenges and ST’s Proposed Solutions to Improve Collaboration between IP and R & D in Innovation Processes. In: California Management Review, 55 (4): 143–156.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003): Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990): Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128–152.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, J. G., Bican, P. M. & Ernst H. (2013): Value Articulation – A Framework for the Strategic Management of Intellectual Property. In: California Management Review, 55 (4): 102–120.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cukier, K. (2005): A Market of Ideas. A Survey of Patents and Technology. In: The Economist, 22.10.2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Minin, A. & Faems, D. (2013): Building Appropriation Advantage: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Intellectual Property Management. In: California Management Review, 55 (4): 7–14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (1996): Patentinformationen für die strategische Planung von Forschung und Entwicklung. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2001): Patent Applications and Subsequent Changes of Performance: Evidence from Time- Series Cross-Section Analyses on the Firm Level. In: Research Policy, 30 (1): 143–157.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2002): Success Factors of New Product Development: A Review of the Empirical Literature. In: International Journal of Management Reviews, 4 (1): 1–40.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2003): Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management. In: World Patent Information, 25 (3): 233–242.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2007): Technologiemanagement. In: Köhler, R., Küpper, H.-U., Pfingsten, A. (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch der Betriebswirtschaft (6. Aufl.): 1731-1740. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H., Conley, J. & Omland, N. (2012): How to Create Commercial Value from Patents. The Role of Patent Management. Working Paper. Vallendar/Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. & Fischer, M. (2014): Integrating the R & D and Patent Functions: Implications for New Product Performance. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H., Leptien, C. & Vitt, J. (2000): Inventors are not alike: The Distribution of Patenting Output among Industrial R & D Personnel. In: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47 (2): 184–199.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. & Omland, N. (2011): The Patent Asset Index – A New Approach to Benchmark Patent Portfolios. In: World Patent Information, 33 (1): 34–41.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. & Soll, J. H. (2003): An Integrated Portfolio Approach to Support Market-Oriented R & D Planning. In: International Journal of Technology Management, 26 (5/6): 540–560.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. & Vitt, J. (2000): The Influence of Corporate Acquisitions on the Behaviour of Key Inventors. In: R & D Management, 30 (2): 105–119.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fabry, B., Ernst, H., Langholz, J. & Kösters, M. (2006): Patent Portfolio Analysis as a Useful Tool for Identifying R & D and Business Opportunities – An Empirical Application in the Nutrition and Health Industry. In: World Patent Information, 28 (3): 215–225.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fickling, D. & Kelly, R. (2011): Apple, Samsung Await Ruling in Australia Case. In: The Wall Street Journal, 05.10.2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella A., Harhoff, D. & Verspagen B. (2008): The Value of European Patents. European Management Review, 5 (2): 69–84.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O. & Bader, M. A. (2011): Patentmanagement – Innovationen erfolgreich nutzen und schützen. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O. (2000): The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1990): Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. In: Journal of Economic Literature, 28 (4): 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindley, P. & Teece, D. J. (1997): Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics. In: California Management Review, 39 (2): 8–41.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D. & Hoisl, K. (2010): Patente in mittelständischen Unternehmen. Eine empirische Studie des Instituts für Innovationsforschung, Technologiemanagement und Entrepreneurship. Institut für Innovationsforschung, Technologiemanagement und Entrepreneurship, LMU München, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., Scherer F. M. & Vopel, K. (2003): Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights. In: Research Policy, 32 (8): 1343–1363.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, J. & Salomo, S. (2010): Innovationsmanagement (5. Aufl.). München: Vahlen Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, J. & Reitzig, M. (2008): Patent Sharks. Harvard Business Review, 86 (6): 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jell, F. (2012):. Patent Filing Strategies and Patent Management – An Empirical Study. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. & Allen, T. J. (1982): Investigating the Not-Invented-Here (NIH) Syndrome: A Look at Performance, Tenure and Communication Patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. In: R & D Management, 12 (1): 7–19.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, D. (2003): Sharing the Corporate Crown Jewels. In: MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (3): 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane P. J., Koka B. & Pathak S. (2006): The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct. In: Academy of Management Review, 31 (4): 833–863.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. (1987): Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: 783-831. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2006): Leveraging Knowledge Assets: Success Factors of External Technology Commercialization. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991): The Knowledge Creating Company. In: Harvard Business Review, 69 (6): 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. & Teece, D. J. (2007): How to Capture Value from Innovation: Shaping Intellectual Property and Industry Architecture. In: California Management Review, 50 (1): 278–296.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkethly, R. H. (2001): Intellectual Property Strategy in Japanese and UK Companies: Patent Licensing Decisions and Learning Opportunities. In: Research Policy, 30 (3): 425–442.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • PwC (2013): 2013 Patent Litigation Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammer, C., Aschhoff, B., Crass, D., Doherr, T., Hud, M., Köhler, C., Peters, B., Schubert, T. & Schwiebacher, F. (2013): Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft. Indikatorenbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2012. Mannheim: ZEW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, E. (2012): Flecki gegen Paula. Streit zwischen Oetker und Aldi spitzt sich zu. In: Manager Magazin, 26.06.2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, E. (2014): Goldbären und Schoko-Teddys streiten sich weiter. In: DIE WELT, 06.03.2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitzig, M. & Puranam, P. (2009): Value Appropriation as an Organizational Capability: The Case of IP Protection through Patents. In: Strategic Management Journal, 30 (7): 765–789.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rivette, K. & Kline, D. (2000): Rembrandts in the Attic. Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusli, E. M. & Miller, C. (2011): Google to Buy Motorola Mobility for $12.5 Billion. In: New York Times, 15.08.2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somaya, D. (2012): Patent Strategy and Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. In: Journal of Management, 38 (4): 1084–1114.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Somaya, D., Williamson, I. O. und Zhan, X. (2007): Combining Patent Law Expertise with R & D for Patenting Performance. In: Organization Science, 18 (6): 922–937.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1986): Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. In: Research Policy, 15 (6): 285–305.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. (2011): Patents Main Lure behind Google’s Purchase. Financial Times, 15.08.2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • WIPO (2013): WIPO Economics & Statistics Series: 2013 World Intellectual Property Indicators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worstall, T. (2011): Apple Samsung Patent Fight: Round Elebenty. Forbes, 05.12.2011

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vallendar, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Holger Ernst

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Holger Ernst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Ernst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Innovationsforschung, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    Carsten Schultz

  2. Lehrstuhl für Innovationsmanagement, Potsdam, Germany

    Katharina Hölzle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ernst, H. (2014). Die Patentabteilung als Motor des Technologiemanagements: Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick. In: Schultz, C., Hölzle, K. (eds) Motoren der Innovation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06135-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06135-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06134-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06135-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)