Zusammenfassung
Ihre Bezeichnung zeigt es bereits an: Die Sozialen Medien – Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Google+ und eine Vielzahl weniger bekannter Angebote, Community-Portale oder Blogs – sind unbestritten ein Interaktionsraum mit immenser sozialer Bedeutung. Eine (beinahe) ubiquitäre Zugänglichkeit, die große Reichweite und ein hoher Durchdringungsgrad würden sie allein in quantitativer Hinsicht zu einem beachtenswerten Phänomen machen. Sie tragen aber auch zu einem „neuen Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit“ bei – wie die drei deutschsprachigen Fachgesellschaften für Soziologie aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz Ende 2011 ihren Dreiländerkongress in Anknüpfung an die knapp fünfzig Jahre zuvor erschienene bahnbrechende Studie von Jürgen Habermas betitelten.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Bennett, W. Lance (2012): The Personalization of Politics. Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation. In: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644(1), 20–39.
Bollen, Johan;Mao, Huina;Zen, Xiaojun (2011): Twitter mood predicts the stock market. In: Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1–8.
Chozick, Amy;Perlroth, Nicole (2013): Twitter Speaks, Markets Listen and Fears Rise. In: New York Times, 28. April 2013.
Conte, Rosaria et mult. al. (2012): Manifesto of computational social science. In: The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 325–346.
Correa, Teresa;Hinsley, Amber Willard;Zúñiga, Gil de (2009): Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. In: Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247–253.
Crossley, Nick (2008): Small-world networks, complex systems and sociology. In: Sociology 42(2), 261–277.
Dodds, Peter Sheridan;Muhamad, Roby;Watts, Duncan J. (2003): An experimental study of search in global social networks. In: Science, 301(5634), 827–829.
Edwards, Adam;Housley, William;Williams, Matthew;Sloan, Luke;Williams, Malcolm (2013): Digital social research, social media and the sociological imagination: surrogacy, augmentation and re-orientation. In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), 245–260.
ElBaradei, Mohamed (2011): Wael Ghonim. Spokesman for a Revolution. In: Time Magazine, 21. April 2011.
Ghonim, Wael (2012): Revolution 2.0. The Power of the People is Greater than the People in Power. A Memoir. New York.
Giglietto, Fabio;Rossi, Luca (2012): Ethics and interdisciplinarity in computational social science. In: Methodological Innovations Online, 7(1), 25–36.
Golder, Scott;Macy, Michael (2012): Social Science with Social Media. In: footnotes, 40(1), 7.
Hermida, Alfred (2010): From TV to Twitter: How Ambient News Became Ambient Journalism. In: Media/Culture Journal, 13(2).
Hermida, Alfred (2012): Tweets and Truth. Journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. In: Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 659–668.
Karpf, David A. (2012): Social Science Research Methods in Internet Time. In: Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 639–661.
King, Gary (2011): Ensuring the Data-Rich Future of the Social Sciences. In: Science 331(6018), 719–721.
Kleinfeld, Judith (2002): The small-world problem. In: Society, 39(2), 61–66.
Lasorsa, Dominic L.;Lewis, Seth C.;Holton, Avery E. (2012): Normalizing Twitter. Journalism Practice in an Emerging Communication Space. In: Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36.
Lazer, David et al. (2009): Life in the network: the coming age of computational social science. In: Science, 323(5915) 721–723.
Lerman, Kristina;Ghosh, Rumi (2010): Information Contagion: an Empirical Study of the Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 90–97.
Leskovec, Jure;Horvitz, Eric (2008): Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM.
McKie, Linda;Ryan, Louise (2012): Exploring Trends and Challenges in Sociological Research. In: Sociology [e-Issue], 46(6), 1–7.
Milgram, Stanley (1967): The small-world problem. In: Psychology Today, 1(1), 61–67.
Mitter, Silvia;Wagner, Claudia;Strohmaier, Markus (2013): Understanding the impact of socialbot attacks in online social networks. In: ACM Web Science 2013, May 2-4th, Paris, France, 2013.
Murthy, Dhiraj (2012): Towards a Sociological Understanding of Social Media: Theorizing Twitter. In: Sociology, 46(6), 1059–1073.
Newman, Nic (2011): Mainstream media and the distribution of news in the age of social discovery. University of Oxford, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Newman, Nic (2009): The rise of social media and its impact on mainstream journalism: A study of how newspapers and broadcasters in the UK and US are responding to a wave of participatory social media, and a historic shift in control towards individual consumers. University of Oxford, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Newman, Nic;Dutton, William H.;Blank, Grant (2012): Social Media in the Changing Ecology of News: The Fourth and Fifth Estate in Britain. In: International Journal of Internet Science, 7(1), 6–22.
Noguera Vivo, José Manuel (2013): How open are journalists on Twitter? Trends towards the end-user journalism. In: Communication & Society, 26(1), 93–114.
Poell, Thomas;Borra, Eric (2012): Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto protests. In: Journalism, 13(6), 695–713.
Rasmussen, Mikkel B.;Madsberg, Christian (2013): Big Data Gets the Algorithms Right but the People Wrong. In: Bloomberg Businessweek, 16. Juli 2013.
Röhle, Theo (2010): Der Google-Komplex. Über Macht im Zeitalter des Internets. Bielefeld 2010.
Ryan, Tracii;Xenos, Sophia (2011): Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. In: Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658–1664.
Savage, Mike;Burrows, Roger (2007): The coming crisis of empirical sociology. In: Sociology, 41(5), 885–899.
Smith, Tom W. (2013): Survey-Research Paradigms Old and New. In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(2), 218–229.
Sobkowicz, Pawel;Kaschesky, Michael;Bouchard, Guillaume (2012): Opinion mining in social media: Modeling, simulating, and forecasting political opinions in the web. In: Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 470–479.
Starbird, Kate; Leysia Palen (2012): (How) will the revolution be retweeted? Information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM.
Strohmaier, Markus;Kröll, Martin;Körner Christian, (2009): Intentional Query Suggestion: Making user goals more explicit during search. In: Workshop on Web Search Click Data WSCD’09, in conjunction with WSDM 2009, Barcelona, Spain, 2009.
Travers, J.;Milgram, S. (1969): An experimental study of the small world problem. In: Sociometry, 32, 425–443.
Van Dijck, José (2009): Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. In: Media, culture, and society, 31(1), 41.
Wagner, Claudia;Mitter, Silvia;Strohmaier, Markus;Körner, Christian (2012): When social bots attack: Modeling susceptibility of users in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Making Sense of Microposts (MSM’2012), held in conjunction with the 21st World Wide Web Conference (WWW’2012), Lyon, France, 2012.
Wang, Fei;Tong, Hanghang;Yu, Phillip;Aggarwal, Charu (2012): Guest editorial: special issue on data mining technologies for computational social science. In: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 25, 415–419.
Wolfsfeld, Gadi;Segev, Elad;Sheafer, Tamir (2013): Social Media and the Arab Spring: Politics Comes First. In: The Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115–137.
Wu, Shaomei;Hofman, Jake M.;Mason, Winter A.;Watts, Duncan J. (2011): Who says What to Whom on Twitter. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. March 28-April 1, Hyderabad, India, 705–714.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Strohmaier, M., Zens, M. (2014). Analyse Sozialer Medien an der Schnittstelle zwischen Informatik und Sozialwissenschaften. In: König, C., Stahl, M., Wiegand, E. (eds) Soziale Medien. Schriftenreihe der ASI - Arbeitsgemeinschaft Sozialwissenschaftlicher Institute. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05327-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05327-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-05326-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-05327-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)