Abstract
A more comprehensive, that is, an inclusive definition with a broad or wide mental grasp (Merriam-Webster 2013) in understanding non-violent and non-coercive interventions such as mediation requires a more systematic analysis of possible outcomes. As Mark Anstey (2006) claims, achieving a peace agreement is difficult, but it is no easier than implementing them. Adebajo (2006) suggests agreements should be detailed and inclusive. Agreements should address the root causes of conflicts, ensure parties are representative and are trustworthy. They should have a win-win element to optimize prospects of success. They should build on continuous dispute resolution systems to overcome problems of implementation, and be scheduled with deadlines and accountabilities for delivery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References:
Adebajo, A. ed., 2006. United Nations Mediation Experience in Africa, Cape Town: Centre for Conflict Resolution.
Anstey, M., 2006. Managing Change: Negotiating Conflict, Lanadowne: Juta Legal and Academic Publishing.
Abu Bakar, A.-H., 2010. Brunei to join Mindanao Peace Monitors. Brunei FM. Available at: http://news.brunei.fm/2010/03/02/brunei-to-join-mindanao-peace-monitors/ [Accessed September 20, 2013].
Balana, C., 2010. EU to Monitor Mindanao Peace Process. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Available at: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20100520–271049/EU-to-monitor-Mindanao-peace-process [Accessed September 20, 2013].
Bercovitch, J., 1997. Mediation in International Conflict: An Overview of Theory, A Review of Practice. In I. W. Zartman & J. L. Rasmussen, eds. Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques. Washington D.C.: United States Institute for Peace, pp. 125–154.
Bercovitch, J. & Gartner, S.S., 2006. Empirical Studies in International Mediation: Introduction. International Interactions, 32(4), pp. 319–357.
Coser, L., 1967. Continuities in the Study of Social Conflict, New York: The Free Press.
Easton, D., 1965. A Framework for Polical Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Fabe, B., 2010. EU joins IMT in peace process in Mindanao. The Mindanao Daily Mirror. Available at: http://www.dailymirror.ph/May–2010/May2010/front4.html.
Gartner, S.S. & Melin, M., 2009. Assessing Outcomes: Conflict Management and the Durability of Peace. In J. Bercovitch, V. Kremenyuk, & I. W.
Zartman, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution. Los Angeles & London: SAGE Publications, pp. 564–579.
Herbolzheimer, K. & Leslie, E., 2013. Innovation in Mediation Support: The International Contact Group in Mindanao, London: Conciliation Resources. Available at: http://www.c-r.org/sites/c-r.org/files/PracticePaper_MindanaoICG_ConciliationResources_0.pdf [Accessed September 9, 2013].
Iklé, F.C., 1964. How Nations Negotiate: Written under the Auspices of the Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, New York: Harper & Row.
Merriam-Webster, 2013. Comprehensive. Available at: http://www.merriamwebster.com/netdict/comprehensive [Accessed September 21, 2013].
Meyer, A., 1960. Functions of the Mediator in Collective Bargaining. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 13, pp. 159–165.
Moore, C., 1996. The Mediation Process. Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict Second Edition., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
People’ s Daily Online, 2009. UK agrees to joining International Contact Group in S Philippines. People’s Daily Online. Available at: http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90777/90851/6829282.html [Accessed September 21, 2013].
Rumsfeld, D., 2002. DoD News Briefing – Secretary Rumsfeld and Gen. Myers. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=2636 [Accessed September 23, 2013].
Sharkansky, I., 1970. Environment, Policy, Output, and Impact: Problems of Theory and Method in the Analysis of Public Policy. In I. Sharkansky, ed. Policy Analysis in Political Science. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co., pp. 61–79.
Simkin, W., 1971. Mediation and the Dynamics of Collective Bargaining, Washington D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.
Underdahl, A., 2002. The Outcomes of Negotiation. In V. Kremenyuk, ed. International Negotiation. Analysis, Approaches, Issues. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Uy, V., 2010. EU to send experts for Mindanao Peace Process. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Available at: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/regions/view/20100519–270905/EU-to-send-experts-for-Mindanao-peaceprocess.
Winham, G.R., 1977. Complexity in International Negotiations. In D. Druckman, ed. Complexity in International Negotiations. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 347–366.
Young, O., 1967. The Intermediaries: Third Parties in International Crisis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zartman, I.W., 2000. Ripeness: The Hurting Stalemate and Beyond. In P. Stern & D. Druckman, eds. International Conflict Resolution after the Cold War. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 225–250.
Zartman, I.W., 2001. The Timing of Peace Initiatives: Hurting Stalemate and Ripe Moments. Th Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 1(1), pp. 8–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hernandez, A. (2014). Relating Agreements to the Peace Process – The Science and Art of Decision-Making. In: Nation-building and Identity Conflicts. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05215-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05215-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-05214-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-05215-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)