Abstract
An important function of organisations is to provide general routines, structures, and logics that unburden the staff of the necessity to constantly take new decisions, change the focus, and deal with uncertainties while fulfilling their daily tasks. Consequently, the logics behind organisations and innovation must naturally stand in a relationship of tension: maintaining routines and organised everyday action is opposed to innovation action, as has been shown by Lipsky’s studies on street-level bureaucracy (Lipsky 2010). He observed that public services and their administration were resistant to change and found ways to oppose the pressure on the part of the managers or service users. This autonomy and the inventiveness contained therein must be understood to change organisations and implement new processes or technologies (cf. Eurich and Langer 2016). Although all forms of change are unique, different studies indicate that innovation rather takes place in incremental than in sudden and radical processes (Laino and Sütó 2013) and that incremental change often has a longer lasting influence than radical intervention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All quotations translated from German by Langer/Eurich/Güntner.
References
Augusto, Juan Carlos; Huch, Michael; et al. (Eds.) (2012): Handbook of Ambient Assisted Living, Technology for Healthcare, Rehabilitation and Well-being. Amsterdam, Berlin, Tokio, Waschington DC: IOS Press.
Eurich, Johannes; Langer, Andreas (2016): Social Innovations as Opportunities: How Can Innovations in Social Services Be Stimulated and Managed? In: Diaconia 7/2016 (2), 174–190.
Grabher, Gernot (2002): Cool Projects, Boring Institutions – temporary collaboration in social context. In: Regional Studies 63/3 (36.3), 205–214.
Grunwald, Klaus; Steinbacher, Elke (2007): Organisationsgestaltung und Personalführung in den Erziehungshilfen. Grundlagen und Praxismethoden. Tübingen: Juventa.
Hermans, Koen; Vranken, Renilt (2010): Switch the light on green for innovation in care. Practice Book. Brussles: Flemish federation of welfare.
Jacobsen, Heike; Jostmeier, Milena (2010): Dienstleistungsinnovation als soziale Innovation: neue Optionen für produktive Aktivität der NutzerInnen. In: Jürgen Howaldt und Heike Jacobsen (Eds.): Soziale Innovation. Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma. (pp. 219–235). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Laino, Elsa; Sütó, Timea (2013): Pushing research further: International expert meetings on innovation in the social services. Report. INNOSERV.
Langer, Andreas (2009): Zur Professionalisierung der SozialmanagerInnen. Neue Kunden (Klienten) – Handlungskompetenzen – politische Anreize. In: Karl-Siegbert Rehberg (Ed.): Die Natur der Gesellschaft. Verhandlungsband des 33. Soziologiekongresses 2006. Ad-hoc Gruppe Professionssoziologie: Campus.
Langer, Andreas (2013b): Professionell managen. Kompetenz, Wissen und Governance im Sozialen Management. Wiesbaden: Springer VS (Soziale Investitionen).
Langer, Andreas; Eurich, Johannes (2014): Innovation in Social Work and its Impacts on Social Management. In: International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 1 (4), 1–14.
Langer, Andreas; Güntner, Simon; Crcic, Jasmina (2013): Theoretically informed case studies. Report. INNOSERV.
Laville, Jean-Louis (2014): Innovation sociale, économie sociale et solidaire, entrepreneuriat social. Une mise en perspective historique. In : Frank Moulaert (Ed.) : L’Innovation Sociale. Unter Mitarbeit von Juan-Luis Klein und Jean-Louis Laville. (pp. 45–80). Toulous: ERES.
Leichsenring, Kai (2004): Developing integrated health and social care services for older persons in Europe. In: International Journal of Integrated Care (4, 3).
Leichsenring, Kai (2012): Integrated care for older people in Europe – latest trends and perceptions. In: International Journal of Integrated Care (12).
Lipsky, Michael (2010): Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Updated ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lloyd, James; Wait, Suzanne (2005): Integrated Care. A Guide for Policymakers. London: Alliance for Health and the Future.
Mahoney, James (2000): Path dependence in historical sociology. In: Theory and Society 29 (4), 507–548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879.
Mur-Veeman, Ingrid; van Raak, Arno; Paulus, Aggie (2008): Comparing integrated care policy in Europe: does policy matter? In: Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 85 (2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.008.
Pohlmann, Markus C. (2002): Organisationsentwicklung und Organisationsberatung im Zeichen reflexiver Modernisierung. In: Gruppendynamik 33 (3), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-002-0027-1.
Prahalad, Coimbatore Krishnarao; Ramaswamy, Venkatram (2004): Co-Creating Experiences. the next practice in value creation. In: Journal of Interactive Marketing (18(3)), 5–14.
Reichwald, Ralf; Piller, Frank (2009): Interaktive Wertschöpfung. Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. 2nd Edition Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Richez-Battesti, Nadine; Vallade, Delphine (2009): Économie sociale et solidaire et innovation sociale. Premières observations sur un incubateur dedié en Languedoc Roussillon. In: Innovations (vol. 30, issue 2), 41–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Langer, A., Eurich, J., Güntner, S. (2019). Innovation and Organisation. In: Innovation in Social Services. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05176-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05176-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-05175-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-05176-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)