Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Networks, Persistence and Change—A Path Dependence Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Permanent Change

Abstract

The network form of organizing is usually considered to provide organizations with the strategic flexibility needed to survive in increasingly turbulent environments. At the same time, empirical research demonstrates that the network form—not least strategic alliances, regional networks and clusters, and global production and supply networks—runs the risk of becoming inert over time, reducing not only the networks’ strategic flexibility but also making organizational change increasingly difficult. Upon closer inspection, some of the structural inertia or institutional persistencies of this form may turn out to result from organizational path dependencies which are particularly difficult to detect and to overcome. It is argued that the emerging theory of organizational path dependence that builds on previous economic and institutional approaches in this field may be particularly helpful in this respect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital—prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Feild, H. S. (2000). Making change permanent. A model for institutionalizing change interventions. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 12, 97–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arthur, W. B. (Ed.) (1994). Increasing returns and path dependency in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bakker, R. M. (2010). Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 466–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beyer, J. (2010). The same or not the same—on the variety of mechanisms of path dependence. International Journal of Social Science, 5(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bourgeois, III, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34(7), 816–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burger, M., & Sydow, J. (2014). How inter-organizational networks can become path-dependent: Bargaining practices in the photonics industry. Schmalenbach Business Review, 66(1), 73–99.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Colpan, A. M., Hikino, T., & Lincoln, J. R. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of corporate groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dobusch, L., & Schüßler, E. (2013). Theorizing path dependence: A review of positive feedback mechanisms in prominent cases. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(3), 617–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, & D. P. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organization design: Strategies and implementation (vol. 1, pp. 167–188). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans, P. A. L., & Doz, Y. (1989). The dualistic organization. In P. A. L Evans, Y. Doz, & A. Laurent (Eds.), Human resource management in international firms (pp. 219–242). London: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gilbert, C. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grabher, G., & Powell, W. W. (Eds.). (2004). Networks. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gulati, R., & Puranam, P. (2009). Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science, 20(2), 422–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hedlund, G. (1986). The hypermodern MNC—a heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25(1), 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of knowledgement and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(summer special issue), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khanna, T. (1998). The scope of alliance. Organization Science, 9(3), 340–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, T., Oh, H., & Swaminathan, A. (2006). Framing interorganizational network change: A network inertia perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31, 704–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Koch, J. (2011). Inscribed strategies: Exploring the organizational nature of strategic lock-in. Organization Studies, 32, 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, S. X., & Rowley, T. J. (2002). Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among US investment banks. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1104–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Manning, S., & Sydow, J. (2011). Projects, paths, practices: Sustaining and leveraging project-based relationships. Industrial & Corporate Change, 20(5), 1369–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. March, J. G. (1991). Exploitation and exploration in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Annuals of the Academy of Management, 7(1), 195–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 262–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Meyer, U., & Schubert, C. (2007). Integrating path dependency and path creation in a general understanding of path constitution. Science, Technology & Innovation, 3, 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Müller-Seitz, G. (2012). Leadership in interorganizational networks: A literature review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 428–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Oliver, D., & Ross, J. (2005). Decision-making in high-velocity environments: The importance of guiding principles. Organization Studies, 26(6), 889–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33, 479–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Raab, J., & Kenis, P. (2009). Heading toward a society of networks: Empirical developments and theoretical challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(3), 198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2010). Organizing for fluidity? On the dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 21(6), 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Schüßler, E. (2009). Strategische Prozesse und Persistenzen: Pfadabhängige Organisation und Wertschöpfung in der deutschen Bekleidungsindustrie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Staber, U., & Sydow, J. (2002). Organizational adaptive capacity: A structuration perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(4), 408–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Starkey, K., Barnatt, C., & Tempest, S. (2000). Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the UK television industry. Organization Science, 11(3), 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sydow, J., & Duschek, S. (2011). Management interorganisationaler Beziehungen. Netzwerke-Cluster-Allianzen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sydow, J., & Schreyögg, G. (2013). Self-reinforcing processes in organizations, networks and fields—an introduction. In J. Sydow, & G. Schreyögg (Eds.), Self-reinforcing processes in and among Organizations (pp. 3–13). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34, 689–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sydow, J., Schüßler, E., & Müller-Seitz, G. (in press). Managing interorganizational relations. Debates and cases. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sydow, J., Windeler, A., Schubert, C., & Möllering, G. (2012). Organizing R & D consortia for path creation and extension: The case of semiconductor manufacturing technologies. Organization Studies, 33(7), 907–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Vergne, J. P., & Durand, R. (2011). The path of most persistence: An evolutionary perspective on path dependency and dynamic capabilities. Organization Studies, 32(3), 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8, 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Freie Universität Berlin, Management Department, Boltzmannstr 20, 14195, Berlin, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Jörg Sydow

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Jörg Sydow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Sydow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Leipzig, Germany

    Horst Albach

  2. Münster, Germany

    Heribert Meffert

  3. HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany

    Andreas Pinkwart

  4. & Cooperation, Handelshochschule Leipzig Center for Leading Innovation, Leipzig, Germany

    Ralf Reichwald

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sydow, J. (2015). Networks, Persistence and Change—A Path Dependence Perspective. In: Albach, H., Meffert, H., Pinkwart, A., Reichwald, R. (eds) Management of Permanent Change. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05014-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation