Skip to main content

Entrepreneurial Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 12k Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Wirtschaft ((SRW))

Zusammenfassung

Der Artikel definiert Entrepreneurial Innovation und zeigt Wege auf, um Innovation und Neuerungen unternehmerisch voranzutreiben. Dabei werden die zentralen Gestaltungsansätze von Entrepreneurial Innovation erläutert und in strukturelle Ausprägungen und Verhaltensausprägungen unterschieden. Die Relevanz dieser Gestaltungsansätze wird anhand zahlreicher aktueller Praxisbeispiele beleuchtet. Im Zentrum steht die Frage, wie Großunternehmen im Umgang mit Innovation von unternehmerischen Jungunternehmen lernen und revitalisiert werden können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bass, B. M., und B. Avolio. 1994. Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneel, J., E. Van de Velde, und B. Clarysse. 2013. Impact of the type of corporate spin-off on growth. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 37(4): 943–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, Robert A. 2002. Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-In. Administrative Science Quarterly 47(2): 325–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, R. K., und G. J. Tellis. 1998. Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research 35(4): 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. 1998. Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch, 2. Aufl. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A., J. G. Covin, G. C. O’Connor, und C. L. Tucci. 2013. Corporate Entrepreneurship: State-of-the-Art Research and a Future Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30(5): 812–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. 2004. „Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and a Research Agenda.“ Journal of Product Innovation management 21(3): 246–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., und L. E. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faltin, G. 2008. Kopf schlägt Kapital. Die ganz andere Art, ein Unternehmen zu gründen. Von der Lust, ein Entrepreneur zu sein, 9 Aufl. München: Hanser.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., und F. Schweitzer. 2013. Management of the fuzzy front end of innovation. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., und P. Sutter. 2013. Innovationsprozesse. In Praxiswissen Innovationsmanagement, Hrsg. O. Gassmann und P. Sutter, 48–67. München: Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, Oliver, Karolin Frankenberger, und Michaela Csik. 2013. The Business Model Navigator : 55 Models that will revolutionise your Business. Harlow : Pearson, 2014. „https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/Publikationen/Zitation/Oliver_Gassmann/240196.%20ISBN%20978-1292065816“.

  • Gassmann, O., K. Frankenberger, und M. Csik. 2013. Geschäftsmodelle entwickeln: 55 innovative Konzepte mit dem St. Galler Business Model Navigator. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerpott, T. J. 2005. Strategisches Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement, 2. Aufl. Stuttgart: Schäffer- Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grichnik, D., und O. Gassmann. 2013. Das unternehmerische Unternehmen – Revitalisieren und Gestalten der Zukunft mit Effectuation – Navigieren und Kurshalten in stürmischen Zeiten. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., und I. Cockburn. (1996). Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. Rand Journal of Economics 27(1): 32–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohensee, M., M. Seiwert, und A. Hennersdorf. 2014. Das größte Risiko ist, nichts zu riskieren. WirtschaftsWoche 6(1/2): 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, F., A. Prencipe, und J. Van Den Ende. 2012. Organizing interindustry architectural innovations: Evidence from mobile communication applications. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29(3): 419–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, R., C. M. McDermott, G. C. O’Connor, L. S. Peters, M. Rice, und R. W. Veryzer. 2000. Radical innovation: How mature companies can outsmart upstarts. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R., W. Cohen, und D. Mowery. 1985. R&D appropriability, opportunity, and market structure: New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses. American Economic Review 75:20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuno, K., J. T. Mentzer, und A. Özsomer. 2002. The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. Journal of Marketing 66(3): 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuno, K., Z. Zhu, und M. P. Rice. 2014. Innovation process and outcomes for large Japanese firms: Roles of entrepreneurial proclivity and customer equity. Journal of Product Innovation Management. doi:10.1111/jpim.12147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuivey, J. 2013. Digital disruption: Unleashing the next wave of innovation. Las Vegas: Amazon Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Morgan P., Jeffrey G. Covin. 2002. Exploring the practice of corporate venturing: Some common forms and their organizational implications. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 26(3): 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science 29(7): 770–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., und P. H. Friesen. 1982. Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal 3(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., D. F. Kuratko, und J. G. Covin. 2011. Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation, 3 Aufl. Mason: South-Western, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, G. C., und R. DeMartino. 2006. Organizing for radical innovation: An exploratory study of the structural aspects for RI management systems in large established firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23(6): 475–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot, G. 1985. Intrapreneuring. In Why you don’t have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, Eric. 2011. The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, Saras D. 2001. „Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency“ academy of management. The Academy of Management Review 26(2): 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D., und N. Dew. 2005. New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 15(5): 533–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1912. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1942. Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie. Tübingen Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G. J. 2006. Disruptive technology or visionary leadership? Journal of Product Innovation Management 23(1): 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M. 1997. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal 18(1): 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wipperfürth, H. 2014. Viel versprechende Brutkästen. Profil 45(16): 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Gassmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gassmann, O., Schweitzer, F. (2018). Entrepreneurial Innovation. In: Faltin, G. (eds) Handbuch Entrepreneurship. Springer Reference Wirtschaft . Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04994-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04994-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-04993-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04994-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics