Transboundary and Cultural Crisis Communication



The dominant paradigm in traditional crisis communication research is linked to functionalism, rationalism and modernity. This paradigm leads researchers and practitioners to focus on preparation, monitoring, control measures, plans and dissemination of mass information. In traditional research there has also been a tendency to emphasize crisis communication in a homogenous, and often national, setting. In this chapter the rationalistic and monophonic view on crisis communication is questioned, using a transboundary and cultural communication perspective. In the first part of the chapter the concept of culture, linked to crisis, is discussed. Two possible cultural approaches, out of several, are then analyzed, and partly criticized: national culture and organizational culture. Then the concept of transboundary crisis communication, inspired by Boin (2010), is presented as a valid concept, integrating the cultural dimension. Meeting the contemporary communicative challenge is not easy but it definitively means developing a new mindset for communicators, accepting that communication cannot be controlled, that multiple strategies should be used and using decentralized communication systems where the closeness to different publics, cultures (in a broad sense) and arenas may lead to better communication. The chapter ends with a part about practical consequences that highlights three relevant approaches: need for increased diversity in organizations, a focus on relational communication as well as an opinion leadership strategy.


  1. Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansell, C., Boin, A., & Keller, A. (2010). Managing transboundary crises: Identifying the building blocks of an effective response system. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 18(4), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashcroft, L. S. (1997). Crisis management – Public relations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12(5), 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (2002). The terrorist threat: World risk society revisited. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(4), 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boin, A., Mcconnell, A., & Hart, P ’t. (2008a). Governing after crisis. The politics of investigation, accountability and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boin, A., & Rhinard, M. (2008b). The management of transboundary crises: What role for the EU? International Studies Review, 10(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  7. Boin, A., Hart, P.‘t., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Attribution theory as a guide for post-crisis communication research. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deresky, H. (1997). International managementManaging across borders and cultures, 2. Aufl. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Deverell, E., & Olsson, E.-K. (2010). Organizational culture effects on strategy and adaptability in crisis management. Risk Management, 12(2), 116–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falkheimer, J. (2013, fortcoming). Crisis communication and terrorism: The Norway attacks on 22 July 2011. Corporate Communication: an International Journal (best paper award Corporate Communication Conference, New York, 2012).Google Scholar
  13. Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (2008). Kriskommunikation i ett globalt samhälle. Stockholm: Krisberedskapsmyndigheten.Google Scholar
  14. Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (2010). On dropping the tools: From planning to improvisation. In W. T. Coombs (Ed.), Handbook of crisis communication. Wiley-Blackwell: Malden, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2011). The study of internal crisis communication: Towards an integrative framework. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(4), 347–361.Google Scholar
  16. Gilpin, D. & Murphy, P. (2008). Crisis Management in a Complex World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Excellent public relations and effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.Google Scholar
  18. Gudykunst, W. B., & Mody, B. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of international and intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Hall, E. T. (1981). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor P.Google Scholar
  20. Harro-Loit, H., Vihalemm, T., & Ugur, K. (2012). Cultural experience as a (critical) factor in crisis communication planning. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 20(1), 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1957). Personal influence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kauffman, J. (2005). Lost in space: A critique of NASA’s crisis communications in the Columbia disaster. Public Relations Review, 31(2), 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marra, F. J. (1998). Crisis communications plans: Poor predictors of excellent crisis public relations. Public Relations Review, 24(4), 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–117.Google Scholar
  25. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrated model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, F. (1916). The principles of scientific management. Shafritz, J. M., Ott, S. J. & Jang, S. Y. (2005). Classics of Organization Theory (6th ed.). Wadsworth: Belmont.Google Scholar
  28. Wertz, E. K., & Kim, S. (2010). Cultural issues in crisis communication: A comparative study of messages chosen by South Korean and US print media. Journal of Communication Management, 14(1), 81–94.Google Scholar
  29. Wise, K. (2003). The oxford incident: Organizational culture’s role in an anthrax crisis. Public Relations Review, 29(4), 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yu, T.-H., & Wen, W.-C. (2003). Crisis communication in Chinese culture: A case study in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Communication, 13(2), 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Strategic CommunicationLund UniversityHelsingborgSweden

Personalised recommendations