Advertisement

Internal Crisis Communication and Management

Chapter

Abstract

The aim of the chapter is to discuss internal crisis communication and why it is important to pay more attention to co-workers and internal aspects of crisis management. Both crisis management research and practice have a lot to win by taking the internal perspective seriously. The chapter starts with a discussion about the need of more meta-theoretical reflections in order to develop the field of crisis management. Two contrasting traditions are presented and discussed – the modern and the postmodern tradition. Within the modern tradition rationality and control is emphasized. Crisis situations are here managed as fire emergency responses and thus managed in a reactive way. The postmodern tradition is based in social constructionism, meaning that people’s perception and sensemaking of a situation is put in the center. According to this tradition there exists no objective reality, only enacted realities. Postmodern scholars are skeptical to standard solutions in crisis management, and organizational crisis are seen as normal phases in a natural on-going evolution. From a postmodern perspective co-workers are the most important resource in crisis management. They have many sensitive tentacles and therefore excellent qualifications to early detect weak signals of changes that might lead to a crisis. Further, during a crisis it is important to also focus the co-workers and not solely communicate with external groups. Co-workers need early to receive information about the crisis, but first and foremost occasions to discuss and get help to make sense of the situation. After a crisis internal communication is fundamental for the reflection and development of new understandings, routines, knowledge and actions. Internal crisis communication will become even more important in the future with a fast, complex and ever-changing reality where co-workership and internal focus is key to success. Internal audiences are as, if not more, important than external audiences during a crisis, and yet those who aren’t actually on the crisis response team often receive the least consideration when the stuff hits the fan (Bernstein 1999, p. 20).

References

  1. Alsop, R. J. (2004). The 18 immutable laws of corporate reputation: Creating, repairing and protecting your most valuable asset. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003). Managers doing leadership: The extra-ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations, 56(12), 1435–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2011). Management is the solution: Now what was the problem? On the fragile basis for managerialism. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(4), 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson, T., & Tengblad, S. (2009). Medledarskap: Ledarskap som kollektiv förmåga. In S. Jönsson & L. Strannegård (Eds.), Ledarskapsboken (pp. 245–268). Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
  5. Argenti, P. (2002). Crisis communication: Lessons from 9/11. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 103–109.Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, J. (1999). It’s an inside job: Internal crisis communications. Arizona attorney, 35(11), 20.Google Scholar
  7. Blaney, J. R., Benoit, W. L., & Brazeal, L. M. (2002). Blowout!: Firestone’s image restoration campaign. Public Relations Review, 28(4), 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  10. Cagle, J. (2006). Internal communication during a crisis pays dividends. Communication World, March–April, 22–23.Google Scholar
  11. Chia, R. (1997). Thirty years on: From organizational structures to the organization of thought. Organization Studies, 18(4), 685–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chia, R. (2008). Ontology. In S. R. Clegg & J. R. Bailey (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organization studies (Vol. 3, pp. 994–997). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Cheney, G. (2008). Corporate communications: Convention, complexity, and critique. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, R. (1981). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 984–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Development in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fairhurst, G. T. (2008). Discursive leadership: A communication alternative to leadership psychology. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 510–521.Google Scholar
  17. Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (2006). Multicultural crisis communication: Towards a social constructionist perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 14(4), 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (2010). Crisis communicators in change: From plans to improvisations. In W. T. Coombs & S. Holladay (Eds.), Handbook of crisis communication (pp. 511–526). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foldy, E. G., Goldman, L., & Ospina, S. (2008). Sensegiving and the role of cognitive shifts in the work of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 514–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2011). The study of internal crisis communication: Towards an integrative framework. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(4), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilpin, D. R., & Murphy, P. (2010). Complexity and crises: A new paradigm. In W. T. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 683–690). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilpin, D. R., & Murphy, P. J. (2008). Crisis management in a complex world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hearit, K. M. (1999). Newsgroups, activist publics, and corporate apologia: The case of Intel and its Pentium chip. Public Relations Review, 3(25), 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heide, M., & Simonsson, C. (2011). Putting coworkers in the limelight: New challenges for communication professionals. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 5(4), 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holtzhausen, D. R. (2000). Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holtzhausen, D. R. (2012). Public relations as activism: Postmodern approaches to theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Hosking, D.-M., & Morley, I. E. (1991). A social psychology of organizing: People, processes and contexts. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  30. Humphreys, M., & Brown, A. D. (2002). Narratives of organizational identity and identification: A case study of hegemony and resistance. Organization Studies, 23(3), 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johansen, W., Aggerholm, H. K., & Frandsen, F. (2012). Entering new territory: A study of internal crisis management and crisis communication in organizations. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 270–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Kent, M. L. (2010). What is a public relations “crisis”? Refocusing crisis research. In T. W. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 705–712). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kersten, A. (2005). Crisis as usual: Organizational dysfunction and public relations. Public Relations Review, 31(4), 544–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maitlis, S., & Lawrence, T. B. (2007). Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazzei, A. (2010). Promoting active communication behaviours through internal communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(3), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mazzei, A., Kim, J.-N., & Dell’Oro, C. (2012). Strategic value of employee relationships and communicative actions: Overcoming corporate crisis with quality internal communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 6(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mintzberg, H. (1999). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (Eds.). (2009). Building theories of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). Communication, organization, and crisis. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook 21 (pp. 230–275). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sellnow, T. L. (1993). Scientific argument in organizational crisis communication: The case of exxon. Argumentation & Advocacy, 30(1), 28–43.Google Scholar
  45. Sellnow, T. L., Veil, S. R., & Streifel, R. A. (2010). Credibility seeking through an interorganizational alliance: Instigating the Fen-Phen confrontation crisis. In W. T. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 657–674). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Shotter, J., & Gergen, K. J. (1994). Social construction: Knowledge, self, others, and continuing the conversation. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 17 (pp. 3–33). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Stern, E. (1997). Crisis and learning: A conceptual balance sheet. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 5(2), 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sveningsson, S., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Ledarskap i kunskapsintensiva verksamheter: Hjälteideal och vardagsmagi. In S. Jönsson & L. Strannegård (Eds.), Ledarskapsboken (pp. 29–57). Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
  50. Talbot, C., & Johnson, C. (2007). Seasonal cycles in public management: Disaggregation and re-aggregation. Public Money & Management, 27(1), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, M. (2010). Towards a holistic organizational approach to understanding crisis. In W. T. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 698–704). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tengblad, S. (2003). Den myndige medarbetaren. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
  54. Tourish, D. (2005). Critical upward communication: Ten commandments for improving strategy and decision making. Long Range Planning, 38(5), 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tourish, D., & Hargie, O. (2004). Motivating critical upward communication: A key challenge for management decision making. In D. Tourish & O. Hargie (Eds.), Key issues in organizational communication (pp. 188–204). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Tourish, D., & Robson, P. (2006). Sensemaking and the distortion of critical upward communication in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 711–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tyler, L. (2005). Towards a postmodern understanding of crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 31(4), 566–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ulmer, R. R., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2010). Considering the future of crisis communication research: Understanding the opportunities inherent to crisis event through the discourse of renewal. In W. T. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 691–697). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  61. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  62. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, 9(5), 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford: Blackwell Business.Google Scholar
  65. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (2nd ed). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, R. (1990). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production. New York, NY: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar
  68. Zerfaß, A., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., Angeles, M., & Tench, R. (2012). European communication monitor 2012: Challenges and competencies for strategic communiation: Results of an empirical survey in 42 countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Strategic Communication, Campus HelsingborgLund UniversityHelsingborgSweden

Personalised recommendations