Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbuch Krisenmanagement pp 197–211Cite as

Internal Crisis Communication and Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The aim of the chapter is to discuss internal crisis communication and why it is important to pay more attention to co-workers and internal aspects of crisis management. Both crisis management research and practice have a lot to win by taking the internal perspective seriously. The chapter starts with a discussion about the need of more meta-theoretical reflections in order to develop the field of crisis management. Two contrasting traditions are presented and discussed – the modern and the postmodern tradition. Within the modern tradition rationality and control is emphasized. Crisis situations are here managed as fire emergency responses and thus managed in a reactive way. The postmodern tradition is based in social constructionism, meaning that people’s perception and sensemaking of a situation is put in the center. According to this tradition there exists no objective reality, only enacted realities. Postmodern scholars are skeptical to standard solutions in crisis management, and organizational crisis are seen as normal phases in a natural on-going evolution. From a postmodern perspective co-workers are the most important resource in crisis management. They have many sensitive tentacles and therefore excellent qualifications to early detect weak signals of changes that might lead to a crisis. Further, during a crisis it is important to also focus the co-workers and not solely communicate with external groups. Co-workers need early to receive information about the crisis, but first and foremost occasions to discuss and get help to make sense of the situation. After a crisis internal communication is fundamental for the reflection and development of new understandings, routines, knowledge and actions. Internal crisis communication will become even more important in the future with a fast, complex and ever-changing reality where co-workership and internal focus is key to success. Internal audiences are as, if not more, important than external audiences during a crisis, and yet those who aren’t actually on the crisis response team often receive the least consideration when the stuff hits the fan (Bernstein 1999, p. 20).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alsop, R. J. (2004). The 18 immutable laws of corporate reputation: Creating, repairing and protecting your most valuable asset. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003). Managers doing leadership: The extra-ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations, 56(12), 1435–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2011). Management is the solution: Now what was the problem? On the fragile basis for managerialism. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(4), 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, T., & Tengblad, S. (2009). Medledarskap: Ledarskap som kollektiv förmåga. In S. Jönsson & L. Strannegård (Eds.), Ledarskapsboken (pp. 245–268). Malmö: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argenti, P. (2002). Crisis communication: Lessons from 9/11. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. (1999). It’s an inside job: Internal crisis communications. Arizona attorney, 35(11), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, J. R., Benoit, W. L., & Brazeal, L. M. (2002). Blowout!: Firestone’s image restoration campaign. Public Relations Review, 28(4), 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagle, J. (2006). Internal communication during a crisis pays dividends. Communication World, March–April, 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. (1997). Thirty years on: From organizational structures to the organization of thought. Organization Studies, 18(4), 685–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. (2008). Ontology. In S. R. Clegg & J. R. Bailey (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organization studies (Vol. 3, pp. 994–997). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Cheney, G. (2008). Corporate communications: Convention, complexity, and critique. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1981). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 984–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Development in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst, G. T. (2008). Discursive leadership: A communication alternative to leadership psychology. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 510–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (2006). Multicultural crisis communication: Towards a social constructionist perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 14(4), 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (2010). Crisis communicators in change: From plans to improvisations. In W. T. Coombs & S. Holladay (Eds.), Handbook of crisis communication (pp. 511–526). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foldy, E. G., Goldman, L., & Ospina, S. (2008). Sensegiving and the role of cognitive shifts in the work of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 514–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2011). The study of internal crisis communication: Towards an integrative framework. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(4), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, D. R., & Murphy, P. (2010). Complexity and crises: A new paradigm. In W. T. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 683–690). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, D. R., & Murphy, P. J. (2008). Crisis management in a complex world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearit, K. M. (1999). Newsgroups, activist publics, and corporate apologia: The case of Intel and its Pentium chip. Public Relations Review, 3(25), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, M., & Simonsson, C. (2011). Putting coworkers in the limelight: New challenges for communication professionals. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 5(4), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzhausen, D. R. (2000). Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12, 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzhausen, D. R. (2012). Public relations as activism: Postmodern approaches to theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D.-M., & Morley, I. E. (1991). A social psychology of organizing: People, processes and contexts. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M., & Brown, A. D. (2002). Narratives of organizational identity and identification: A case study of hegemony and resistance. Organization Studies, 23(3), 421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, W., Aggerholm, H. K., & Frandsen, F. (2012). Entering new territory: A study of internal crisis management and crisis communication in organizations. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 270–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M. L. (2010). What is a public relations “crisis”? Refocusing crisis research. In T. W. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 705–712). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, A. (2005). Crisis as usual: Organizational dysfunction and public relations. Public Relations Review, 31(4), 544–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S., & Lawrence, T. B. (2007). Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 57–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzei, A. (2010). Promoting active communication behaviours through internal communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(3), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzei, A., Kim, J.-N., & Dell’Oro, C. (2012). Strategic value of employee relationships and communicative actions: Overcoming corporate crisis with quality internal communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 6(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1999). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (Eds.). (2009). Building theories of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). Communication, organization, and crisis. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook 21 (pp. 230–275). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellnow, T. L. (1993). Scientific argument in organizational crisis communication: The case of exxon. Argumentation & Advocacy, 30(1), 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellnow, T. L., Veil, S. R., & Streifel, R. A. (2010). Credibility seeking through an interorganizational alliance: Instigating the Fen-Phen confrontation crisis. In W. T. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 657–674). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J., & Gergen, K. J. (1994). Social construction: Knowledge, self, others, and continuing the conversation. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 17 (pp. 3–33). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, E. (1997). Crisis and learning: A conceptual balance sheet. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 5(2), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveningsson, S., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Ledarskap i kunskapsintensiva verksamheter: Hjälteideal och vardagsmagi. In S. Jönsson & L. Strannegård (Eds.), Ledarskapsboken (pp. 29–57). Malmö: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C., & Johnson, C. (2007). Seasonal cycles in public management: Disaggregation and re-aggregation. Public Money & Management, 27(1), 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2010). Towards a holistic organizational approach to understanding crisis. In W. T. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 698–704). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tengblad, S. (2003). Den myndige medarbetaren. Malmö: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourish, D. (2005). Critical upward communication: Ten commandments for improving strategy and decision making. Long Range Planning, 38(5), 485–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourish, D., & Hargie, O. (2004). Motivating critical upward communication: A key challenge for management decision making. In D. Tourish & O. Hargie (Eds.), Key issues in organizational communication (pp. 188–204). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourish, D., & Robson, P. (2006). Sensemaking and the distortion of critical upward communication in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 711–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, L. (2005). Towards a postmodern understanding of crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 31(4), 566–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, R. R., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2010). Considering the future of crisis communication research: Understanding the opportunities inherent to crisis event through the discourse of renewal. In W. T. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 691–697). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, 9(5), 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford: Blackwell Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (2nd ed). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, R. (1990). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production. New York, NY: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfaß, A., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., Angeles, M., & Tench, R. (2012). European communication monitor 2012: Challenges and competencies for strategic communiation: Results of an empirical survey in 42 countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Strategic Communication, Campus Helsingborg, Lund University, P.O. Box 882, 251 08, Helsingborg, Sweden

    Mats Heide

Authors
  1. Mats Heide
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mats Heide .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Zürich, Switzerland

    Ansgar Thießen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heide, M. (2014). Internal Crisis Communication and Management. In: Thießen, A. (eds) Handbuch Krisenmanagement. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04293-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04293-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-04292-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04293-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation