Advertisement

Business as usual – Der ausbleibende Protektionismus in der Wirtschaftskrise

  • Maria Behrens
  • Holger Janusch
Chapter
Part of the Sonderheft der Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik book series (ZFAS, volume 5)

Zusammenfassung

Trotz des dramatischen Einbruches des Welthandels während der internationalen Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise blieb ein zunehmender Protektionismus entgegen vieler einschlägiger Theorien seitens der großen Wirtschaftsnationen aus, weshalb sich der Welthandel schnell von einem Einbruch erholen konnte. In diesem Artikel wird der ausbleibende Protektionismus als auch die stockenden multilateralen Verhandlungen, sowie der zunehmende Bilateralismus über das Konzept der Transnationalisierung des Staates erklärt.

Schlüsselwörter

Internationale Politische Ökonomie Außenhandelspolitik Wirtschaftskrise Protektionismus Transnationalisierung 

Business as Usual: The Missing Protectionism in the Economic Crisis

Abstract

Despite the dramatic collapse in world trade during the international financial and economic crisis, a rising protectionism of the major economic countries failed to appear. Thus, the world trade could recover fast after a considerable decrease. However, the missing protectionist policy is contrary to many theories. In this article, the missing protectionist policy as well as the stalemate in multilateral trade negotiations and rising bilateralism will be explained by the concept of the transnationalization of the state.

Keywords

International political economy Foreign trade policy Economic crisis Protectionism Transnationalization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Amiti, M., & Weinstein, D. (2009). Exports and Finacial Shocks. NBER Working Paper Series, Nr. 15556.Google Scholar
  2. Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. (2003). Protection and the Business Cycle. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), 1–43.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R. (2006). Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade. The World Economy, 29(11), 1451–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, R., & Evenett, S. (2012). Beggar-thy-neighbour policies during the crisis era: Causes, constraints, and lessons for maintaining open borders. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(2), 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baunsgaard, T., & Keen, M. (2005). Tax revenue and (or?) Trade liberalization. IMF Working Paper, Nr. 05/112.Google Scholar
  6. Behrens, M., & Janusch, H. (2012a). Der transnationale Wettbewerbsstaat. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik, Schwerpunktheft: Tiefe Integration in den Nord-Süd-Beziehungen, 28(2), 28–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behrens, M., & Janusch, H. (2012b). Great ‚normative power‘: The European and American trade approaches with Chile and Mexico. European Foreign Affairs Review, 17(3), 367–386.Google Scholar
  8. Bems, R., Johnson, R., & Yi, K. (2009). The collapse of global trade. Update on the vertical linkages. http://www.voxeu.org/article/collapse-global-trade-update-role-vertical-linkages. Zugegriffen: 07. Feb. 2013.
  9. Benz, S., Karl, J., & Yalcinifo, E. (2011). UNCTAD World Investment Report 2011: Die Entwicklung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen. ifo Schnelldienst, 64(15), 21–31.Google Scholar
  10. Bhagwati, J. (2008). Termites in the trading system. How preferential trade agreements undermine free trade. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bieling, H.-J. (2006). Internationale Politische Ökonomie. In S. Schieder & M. Spindler (Hrsg.), Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen (2. Aufl., S. 381–404). Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  12. Bieling, H.-J. (2007). Internationale Politische Ökonomie. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Bown, C. (2011). Taking stock of antidumping, safeguards and countervailing duties, 1990–2009. The World Economy, 34(12), 1955–1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bown, C., & Crowley, M. (2012). Import protection, business cycles, and exchange rates: Evidence from the great recession. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, Nr. 6038.Google Scholar
  15. Brand, U., Görg, Ch., & Wissen, M. (2007). Verdichtung zweiter Ordnung. Die Internationalisierung des Staates aus einer neo-poulantzianischen Perspektive. PROKLA, 37(2), 217–234.Google Scholar
  16. Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bruszt, L., & McDermott, G. A. (2012a). Integrating rule takers: Transnational integration regimes shaping institutional change in emerging markets. Review of International Political Economy, 19(5), 742–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bruszt, L., & McDermott, G. A. (2012b). Introduction. In L. Bruszt & G. A. McDermott (Hrsg.), Assembling level playing fields: Transnational regulatory integration and institutional change in emerging markets (S. 1–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Conybeare, J. (1983). Tariff protection in developed and developing countries. A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. International Organization, 37(3), 441–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Conybeare, J. (1984). Public goods, prisoners’ dilemmas and the international political economy. International Studies Quaterly, 28(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Costinot, A. (2009). Jobs, jobs, jobs: A „New“ Perspective on Protectionism. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(5), 1011–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crouch, C. (2008). Postdemokratie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  23. Eaton, J., Kortun, S., Neiman, B., & Romalis, J. (2011). Trade and the global recession. NBER Working Paper Series, Nr. 16666.Google Scholar
  24. Eichengreen, B., & Iriwin, D. (2009). The slide to protectionism in the great depression: Who succumbed and why? NBER Working Paper Series, Nr. 15142.Google Scholar
  25. Evenett, S., & Vines, D. (2012). Crisis-era protectionism and the multilateral governance of trade. An assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(2), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. G20. (2008). G20 Declaration of the Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy,15. November 2008. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/11/20081115-1.html. Zugegriffen: 28. Jan. 2013.
  27. Global Trade Alert. (2012). Statistics. http://www.globaltradealert.org/site-statistics. Zugegriffen: 29. Jan. 2013.
  28. Gowa, J. (1989). Rational hegemons, excludable goods, and small groups. An epitaph for hegemonic stability theory. World Politics, 41(3), 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen, J. (1990). Taxation and the political economy of the tariff. International Organization, 44(4), 527–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heigl, M. C. (2011). Social conflict and competing state projects in the semi-periphery: A strategic-relational analysis of the transformation of the Mexican state into an internationalized competition state. Antipode, 43(1), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heritage Foundation. (2013). Index of Economic Freedom. http://www.heritage.org/index. Zugegriffen: 24. Jan. 2013.
  32. Hirsch, J. (1995). Der nationale Wettbewerbsstaat. Staat, Demokratie und Politik im globalen Kapitalismus. Berlin: Edition ID-Archiv.Google Scholar
  33. Hirsch, J. (1998). Vom Sicherheits- zum nationalen Wettbewerbsstaat. Berlin: Edition ID-Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Hirsch, J., & Kannankulam, J. (2011). The spaces of capital: The political form of capitalism and the internationalization of the state. Antipode, 43(1), 12–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. International Monetary Fund. (IMF). (2012). World Economic Outlook Database 2012. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/weodata/index.aspx. Zugegriffen: 29. Jan. 2013
  36. Janusch, H. (2010). Regionale versus weltwirtschaftliche Integration. Die „building vs. stumbling blocs“-Debatte. ORDO, Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Bd. 61, S. 353–376). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
  37. Jessop, B. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment & Planning D, 26(3), 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaushal, A. (2009). Revisiting history: How the past matters for the present backlash against the foreign investment regime. Harvard International Law Journal, 50(2), 491–534.Google Scholar
  39. Kee, H., Neagu, C., & Nicita, A. (2013). Is protectionism on the rise? Assessing national trade policies during the crisis of 2008. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 342–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Keohane, R. O. (1997). Problematic Lucidity. Stephen Krasner’s „State power and the structure of international trade“. World Politics, 50(1), 150–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kindleberger, C. (1963). Foreign trade and the national economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Klein, M., & Kamenev, D. (2009). Die WTO in der Krise. Wirtschaftsdienst, 8, 534–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Krasner, S. (1976). State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics, 23(3), 317–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lake, D. (1990). Power, protection, and free trade. International sources of U.S. commercial, 1887–1939. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mansfield, E. (1992). The concentration of capabilities and international trade. International Organization, 46(3), 731–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mansfield, E. (1994). Power, trade and war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Maus, I. (2011). Über Volkssouveränität. Elemente einer Demokratietheorie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  49. McKeown, T. (1983). Hegemonic stability theory and the 19th century tariff levels in Europe. International Organization, 37(1), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McKeown, T. (1984). Firms and tariff regime change: Explaining the demand for protection. World Politics, 36(2), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. OECD. (2009). Policy responses to the economic crisis: Investing in innovation long-term growth. http://www.oecd.org/science/innovationinsciencetechnologyandindustry/42983414.pdf. Zugegriffen: 24. Jan. 2013.
  52. OECD. (2010). Trade and economic effects of repsonses to the economic crisis. OECD trade policy studies. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/trade/trade-and-economic-effects-of-responses-to-the-crisis_9789264088436-en. Zugegriffen: 22. Jan. 2013.
  53. Payne, A. (2010). How many Gs are there in ‚global governance‘ after the crisis? The perspectives of the ‚marginal majority‘ of the world’s states. International Affairs, 86(3), 729–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Risse, T. (2000). Let’s argue! Communicative action in world politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rose, A. (2012). Protectiopnism isn’t counctercyclic (anymore). NBER Working Paper Series, Nr. 18062.Google Scholar
  56. Ruddy, B. (2010). The critical success of the WTO. Trade policies of the current economic crisis. Journal of International Economic Law, 13(2), 475–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  58. Strange, S. (1992). States, firms and diplomacy. International Affairs, 68(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strange, S., & Stopford, J. (1991). Rival states, rival firms. Competition for world market shares. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Trade Analysis and Information System. (2013). World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). http://wits.worldbank.org/wits/. Zugegriffen: 28. Jan. 2013.
  61. UN Comtrade. (2013). World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). http://wits.worldbank.org/wits/. Zugegriffen: 25. Jan. 2013.
  62. UNCTAD. (2009). Global economic crisis: Implications for trade and development. http://unctad.org/en/Docs/cicrp1_en.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22. Jan. 2013.
  63. UNCTAD. (2010). International trade after the economic crisis: Challenges and new opportunities. http://unctad.org/en/Docs/ditctab20102_en.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22. Jan. 2013.
  64. WTO. (2010). World Trade Report 2010. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wtr10_e.htm. Zugegriffen: 22. Jan. 2013.
  65. WTO. (2011). World Trade Report 2011. The WTO and preferential trade agreements: From co-existence to coherence. Genf: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
  66. WTO. (2013a). Short-term merchandise trade statistics. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/quarterly_world_exp_e.htm. Zugegriffen: 15. Jan. 2012.
  67. WTO. (2013b). Anti-dumping. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm. Zugegriffen: 18. Jan. 2013.
  68. WTO. (2013c). Subsidies and countervailing measures. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/scm_e/scm_e.htm. Zugegriffen: 18. Jan. 2013.
  69. WTO. (2013d). Safeguard measures. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/safeg_e/safeg_e.htm. Zugegriffen: 18. Jan. 2013.
  70. WTO. (2013e). Chronological list of disputes cases. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_status_e.htm. Zugegriffen: 20. März 2013.
  71. WTO Newsletter. (2009). WTO-Newsletter for Parliamentarians, Nr. 4. http://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/parliamentarians_e/newsletter_sept09_e.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. März 2013.
  72. Yi, K. (2009). The collopase of global trade: The role of vertical specialisation. In R. Baldwin & S. Evenett (Hrsg.), The collopase of global trade, murky protectionism and the crisis: Recommandations for the G20 (S. 45–48). London: Center for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Behrens
    • 1
  • Holger Janusch
    • 1
  1. 1.FB G, PolitikwissenschaftBergische Universität WuppertalWuppertalDeutschland

Personalised recommendations