Skip to main content

Kooperationen Junger Technologieunternehmen mit Wettbewerbern

Der Einfluss von Vertragsvereinbarungen und Beziehungskapital auf den Kooperationserfolg

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fallstudien zur Gründung und Entwicklung innovationsorientierter Unternehmen

Überblick

Für junge Technologieunternehmen sind Kooperationen mit Konkurrenten, so genannte Koopetitionen, eine viel versprechende Möglichkeit, um im Innovationswettbewerb durch synergetische Effekte einzigartige Produkte und Dienstleistungen zu entwickeln und anzubieten. Vorangegangene Studien legen jedoch nahe, dass der Wettbewerb zwischen den Partnern den Erfolg solch koopetitiver Zusammenarbeiten erodieren lässt. Unternehmen, die diesen Zusammenhang antizipieren, versuchen mögliche negative Effekte durch vertragliche Schutzvereinbarungen und den Aufbau von Beziehungskapital weitestgehend zu verhindern. In dem vorliegenden Beitrag dokumentieren wir, wie zwei junge Hightech-Unternehmen mit diesen Maßnahmen ihre Kooperationen mit internationalen Wettbewerbern erfolgreich absichern. In einem Fall können die Unternehmen auf bereits vor der Zusammenarbeit etabliertes, belastbares Beziehungskapital zurückgreifen und auf vertragliche Schutzvereinbarungen verzichten. In einem zweiten Fall nutzen die Unternehmen formale Verträge und die dem Vertragsschluss vorausgehenden Verhandlungen, um Unsicherheit zu reduzieren und Beziehungskapital zu bilden. Wir belegen empirisch den Einfluss von Beziehungskapital und formaler Schutzvereinbarungen und leiten Empfehlungen für das Management von Koopetitionen ab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Ariño A (2003) Measures of Strategic Alliance Performance: an Analysis of Construct Validity. J Int Bus Stud 34:66 –79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ariño A, de la Torre J, Ring PS (2001) Relational Quality: managing Trust in Corporate Alliances. Calif Manage Rev 44(1):109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ariño A, Reuer JJ (2004) Designing and Renegotiating Strategic Alliance Contracts. Acad Manage Exec 18(3):37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barney JB (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. J Manage 17(1):99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barney JB, Hansen MH (1994) Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Strateg Manag J 15:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS (2000) Don’t go it alone: alliance Network Composition and Startups’ Performance in Canadian Biotechnology. Strateg Manag J 21:267–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bejou D, Wray B, Ingram TN (1996) Determinants of Relationship Quality: an Artificial Neural Network Analysis. J Bus Res 36(2):137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bengtsson M, Kock S (2000) „Coopetition“ in Business Networks - to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously. Ind Mark Manage 29:411–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergen M, Peteraf MA (2002) Competitor Identification and Competitor Analysis: a Broad-Based Managerial Approach. Managerial Dec Econ 23:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blomqvist K, Hurmelinna P, Seppänen R (2005) Playing the Collaboration Game right - balancing Trust and Contracting. Technovation 25:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (1995) The Right Game: use Game Theory to Shape Strategy. Harv Bus Rev 73(4):57–71

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dagnino GB, Padula G (2002) Coopetition Strategy: a new Kind of interfirm Dynamics for Value Creation. Paper presented at EURAM – The European Academy of Management, Second Annual Conference – „Innovative Research in Management“, Stockholm, Schweden

    Google Scholar 

  13. Das TK, Rahman N (2002) Opportunism Dynamics in Strategic Alliances. In: Contractor FJ, Lorange P (Hrsg) Cooperative Strategies and Alliances. Pergamnon, Amsterdam, S 89–118

    Google Scholar 

  14. Das TK, Teng BS (2000) Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: an Internal Tensions Perspective. Organ Sci 11(1):77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Das TK, Teng BS (2002a) A Social Exchange Theory of Strategic Alliances. In: Contractor FJ, Lorange P (Hrsg) Cooperative Strategies and Alliances. Pergamnon, Amsterdam, S 439–460

    Google Scholar 

  16. Das TK, Teng BS (2002b) The Dynamics of Alliance Conditions in the Alliance Development Process. J Manag Stud 39(5):725–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dussauge P, Garrette B, Mitchell W (2000) Learning from competing Partners: outcomes and Duration of Scale and Link Alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strateg Manag J 21(2):99–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The Relational View: cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Acad Manage Rev 23(4):660–679

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ebers M, Gotsch M (1995) Institutionenökonomische Theorien der Organisation. In: Kieser A (Hrsg) Organisationstheorien, 2. überarb. Aufl, Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart u. a., S 185–235

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gnywali DR, He J, Madhavan R (2008) Co-opetition: promises and Challenges. In: Wankel C (Hrsg) 21st Century Management: a Reference Handbook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CA, S 386–398

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gulati R (1995) Does Familiarity breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances. Acad Manage J 38(1):85–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A (2000) Strategic Networks. Strateg Manag J 21:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gundlach GT, Achrol RS, Mentzer JT (1995) The Structure of Commitment in Exchange. J Marketing 59:78–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamel G (1991) Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning within international Strategic Alliances. Strateg Manag J 12(4):83–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamel G, Doz YL, Prahalad CK (1989) Collaborate with your Competitors and win. Harv Bus Rev 67(1):133–138

    Google Scholar 

  26. Heide JB, John G (1992) Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships. J Marketing 56(2):32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heimeriks KH, Schreiner M (2002) The Influence of Relational Quality and Alliance Capacity on Alliance Performance: a Conceptual Framework. In: Konferenzbeitrag präsentiert an der 22. International Annual Conference der Strategic Management Society, Paris, Frankreich

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jap SD, Anderson E (2003) Safeguarding Interorganizational Performance and Continuity Under Ex Post Opportunism. Manage Sci 49(12):1684–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jap SD, Ganesan S (2000) Control Mechanisms and the Relationship Life Cycle: implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing Commitment. J Marketing Res 37:227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Järvelin AM (2001) Evaluation of Relationship Quality in Business Relationships. University of Tampere

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: building Relational Capital. Strateg Manag J 21:217–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Khanna T, Gulati R, Nohria N (1998) The Dynamics of Learning Alliances: competition, Cooperation, and Relative Scope. Strateg Manag J 19:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Luo Y (2007) A Coopetition Perspective of global Competition. J World Bus 42(2):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Macneil IR (1980) The New Social Contract: an Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. New Haven [u.a.]

    Google Scholar 

  35. Madhok A, Tallman SB (1998) Resources, Transactions and Rents: managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships. Organ Sci 9(3):326–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ness H, Haugland SA (2005) The Evolution of Governance Mechanisms and Negotiation Strategies in Fixed-Duration Interfirm Relationships. J Bus Res 58(9):1226–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Norman PM (2001) Are Your Secrets Safe? Knowledge Protection in Strategic Alliances. Bus Horiz 44:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Norman PM (2002) Protecting Knowledge in Strategic Alliances: resource and Relational Characteristics. The J High Technol Manage Res 13(2):177–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Norman PM (2004) Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Loss, and Satisfaction in High Technology Alliances. J Bus Res 57(6):610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Oliver C (1997) Sustainable Competitive Advantage: combining Institutional and Resource-Based Views. Strateg Manag J 18(9):697–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Padula G, Dagnino GB (2007) Untangling the Rise of Coopetition. Int Stud Manage Organ 37(2):32–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Park SH, Ungson GR (2001) Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: a Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure. Organ Sci 12(1):37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Park SH, Russo MV (1996) When Competition eclipses Cooperation: an Event History Analysis of Joint Venture Failure. Manage Sci 42(6):875–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Picot A, Dietl HM (1990) Transaktionskostentheorie. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium 19(4):178–184

    Google Scholar 

  45. Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance function as Substitutes or Complements? Strateg Manag J 23:707–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Poppo L, Zhou KZ, Ryu S (2008) Alternative Origins to Interorganizational Trust: an Interdependence Perspective on the Shadow of the Past and the Shadow of the Future. Organ Sci 19(1):39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Quintana-García C, Benavides-Velasco CA (2004) Cooperation, Competition, and innovative Capability: a panel Data of European dedicated Biotechnology Firms. Technovation 24:927–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sarkar MB, Echambadi R, Cavusgil ST, Aulakh PS (2001) The Influence of Complementarity, Compatibility, and Realtionship Capital on Alliance Performance. J Acad Mark Sci 29(4):358–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Schmidtchen D (2005) Wettbewerb und Kooperation (Co-opetion): Neues Paradigma für Wettbewerbstheorie und Wettbewerbspolitik? In: Zentes J, Swoboda B, Morschett D (Hrsg) Kooperationen, Allianzen und Netzwerke: Grundlagen - Ansätze - Perspektiven. Gabler, Wiesbaden, S 65–93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Ulaga W, Eggert A (2004) Relationship Value and Relationship Quality: broadening the nomological Network of Business-to-Business Relationships. Eur J Mark 40(3/4):311–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ulaga W, Eggert A (2006) Value-Based Differentiation in Business Relationships: gaining and Sustaining Key Supplier Status. J Marketing 70(1):119–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Van Well B (1996) Ressourcenmanagement in strategischen Netzwerken. In: Hinterhuber HH, Al-Ani A, Handlbauer G (Hrsg) Das Neue Strategische Management: Elemente und Perspektiven einer zukunftsorientierten Unternehmensführung. Gabler, Wiesbaden, S 159–185

    Google Scholar 

  53. Walter A, Muller TA, Helfert G, Ritter T (2003) Functions of Industrial Supplier Relationships and their Impact on Relationship Quality. Ind Mark Manage 32(2):159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Walter A, Ritter T, Gemünden HG (2001) Value Creation in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results from a Supplier’s Perspective. Ind Mark Manage 30(4):365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wathne KH, Heide JB (2000) Opportunism in Interfirm Relationships: forms, Outcomes, and Solutions. J Marketing 64(4):36–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York, London

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yu CMJ, Liao TJ, Lin ZD (2006) Formal Governance Mechanisms, Relational Governance Mechanisms, and Transaction-Specific Investments in Supplier-Manufacturer Relationships. Ind Mark Manage 35(2):128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V (1998) Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance. Organ Sci 9(2):141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berit Egge (verh. Wilckens) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Egge (verh. Wilckens), B., Müller, D. (2014). Kooperationen Junger Technologieunternehmen mit Wettbewerbern. In: Walter, A., Rasmus, A., Riesenhuber, F., Schmidthals, J., Dickel, P. (eds) Fallstudien zur Gründung und Entwicklung innovationsorientierter Unternehmen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03598-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03598-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-03597-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-03598-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics