Zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Unternehmen aus mikroökonomischer Perspektive

Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Der Begriff der gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Unternehmen (Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR) hat sich mittlerweile fest etabliert, sowohl in der unternehmerischen Wirklichkeit (vgl. z. B. die Initiative CSR Germany, die gemeinsam von vier Spitzenverbänden der deutschen Wirtschaft getragen wird) als auch in der wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fachliteratur. Dabei ist die Bestimmung dieses Begriffs weder einfach noch einheitlich.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aguinis, H., Glavas, A. 2012. What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management 38 (4): S. 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J. 1989. Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy 97 (6): S. 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreoni, J. 1990. Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving? Economic Journal 100 (401): S. 464–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrow, K., Debreu, G. 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22 (3): S. 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagnoli, M., Watts, S.G. 2003. Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and the Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 12 (3): S. 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron, D.P. 2001. Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10 (1): S. 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron, D.P. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16 (3): S. 683–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, D.P. 2009. A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18 (1): S. 7–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron, D.P., Diermeier, D. 2007. Strategic Activism and Nonmarket Strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16 (3): S. 599–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker-Olsen, K.L., Cudmore, B.A., Hill, R.P. 2006. The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Research 59 (1): S. 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., Varian, H. 1986. On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics 29 (1): S. 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Besley, T., Ghatak, M. 2007. Retailing Public Goods: The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Public Economics 91 (9): S. 1645–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bettzüge, M.O., van Bracht, G., Heider, M., Schmidt, C.M., Paqué, K.-H. 2013. Sondervotum. In Schlussbericht der Enquête-Kommission „Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität“, Drucksache 17/13300 des Deutschen Bundestags: S. 519–521.Google Scholar
  14. Beurden, P. van, Gössling, T. 2008. The Worth of Values – A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 82: S. 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brekke, K.A., Nyborg, K. 2004. Moral Hazard and Moral Motivation: Corporate Social Responsibility as Labor Market Screening. University of Oslo Department of Economics Memorandum 25/2004.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, T.J., Dacin. P.A. 1997. The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing 61 (1): S. 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll, A.B. 1979. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review 4 (4): S. 497–505.Google Scholar
  18. Cespa, G., Cestone, G. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Entrenchment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16 (3): S. 741–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davidson, W.N., Worrell, D.L., El-Jelly, A. 1995. Influencing Managers to Change Unpopular Corporate Behavior through Boycotts and Divestitures: A Stock Market Test. Business and Society 34 (2): S. 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value. An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. DeMarzo, P.M. 1993. Majority Voting and Corporate Control: The Role of the Dominant Shareholder. Review of Economic Studies 60 (3): S. 713–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review 20 (1): S. 65–91.Google Scholar
  23. Eesley, C., Lenox, M.J. 2006. Firm Responses to Secondary Stakeholder Action. Strategic Management Journal 27 (8): S. 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ellen, P.S., Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J. 2000. Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix? Journal of Retailing 76 (3): S. 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Europäische Kommission. 2001. Grünbuch – Europäische Rahmenbedingungen für die soziale Verantwortung der Unternehmen. KOM/2001/0366.Google Scholar
  26. Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pittman-Ballinger.Google Scholar
  27. Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Friedman, M. 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13. September 1970: S. 122–126.Google Scholar
  29. Godfrey, P.C. 2005. The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy And Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective. The Academy of Management Review 30 (4): S. 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B., Hansen, J.M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30: S. 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graff Zivin, J., Small, A. 2005. A Modigliani– Miller Theory of Altruistic Corporate Social Responsibility. B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy 5 (1).Google Scholar
  32. Graves, S.B., Waddock, S.A. 1994. Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Journal 37 (4): S. 1034–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greening, D.W., Turban, D.B. 2000. Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business and Society 39 (3): S. 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Günther, E. 2012. CSR und Rechnungslegung. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, S. 357–370. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Habisch, A., Schwarz, C. 2012. CSR als Investition in Human- und Sozialkapital. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, 98–117. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Henriques, I., Sadorsky, P. 1996. The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (3): S. 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Innes, R., Sam, A.G. 2008. Voluntary Pollution Reductions and the Enforcement of Environmental Law: An Empirical Study of the 33/50 Program. Journal of Law and Economics 51 (2): S. 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jonas, H. 1979. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  39. Jones, T.M., Wicks, A.C. 1999. Convergent Stakeholder Theory. The Academy of Management Review 24 (2): S. 206–221.Google Scholar
  40. Kagan, R.A., Gunningham, N., Thornton, D. 2003. Explaining Corporate Environmental Performance: How Does Regulation Matter? Law and Society Review 37 (1): S. 51–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kitzmueller, M., Shimshack, J. 2012. Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature 50 (1): S. 51–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kotchen, M.J. 2006. Green Markets and Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Political Economy 114 (4): S. 816–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review 26 (1): S. 117–127.Google Scholar
  44. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review 22 (4): S. 853–886.Google Scholar
  45. Navarro, P. 1988. Why Do Corporations Give to Charity? Journal of Business 61 (1): S. 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nikolaeva, R., Bicho, M. 2011. The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (1): S. 136–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. 2006. Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review 12/2006: S. 78–92.Google Scholar
  48. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. 2011. Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review 1/2011: S. 62–77.Google Scholar
  49. Porter, M.E., van der Linde, C. 1995. Toward a New Conception of the Environment– Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): S. 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Preston, A.E. 1989. The Nonprofit Worker in a For-Profit World. Journal of Labor Economics 7 (4): S. 438–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schneider, A. 2012. Reifegradmodell CSR – eine Begriffsklärung und -abgrenzung. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, S. 17–38. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  52. Schreck, P. 2012. Der Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, 67–86. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  53. Schwalbach, J., Klink, D. 2012. Der Ehrbare Kaufmann als individuelle Verantwortungskategorie der CSR-Forschung. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, S. 219–240. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sedmak, C. 2012. CSR – eine humanistische Sichtweise. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, S. 191–202. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. 2001. Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2): S. 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Suchanek, A. 2012. Vertrauen als Grundlage nachhaltiger unternehmerischer Wertschöpfung.In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, 55–66. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  57. Warr, P. 1983. The Private Provision of a Public Good is Independent of the Distribution of Income. Economics Letters 13: S. 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DirektorStaatswissenschaftliches Seminar der Universität zu KölnKölnDeutschland

Personalised recommendations