Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Managementperspektiven für die Zivilgesellschaft des 21. Jahrhunderts pp 133–152Cite as

Zukunftsstrategie Nachhaltiges Unternehmertum

Vom konventionellen Management zum SustainableEntrepreneurship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Nachhaltige Entwicklung ist das wahrscheinlich bedeutsamste Thema der Zivilgesellschaft des 21. Jahrhunderts. Das Ozonloch, der Klimawandel, die Zerstörung der Biodiversität, die Überfischung der Meere, Urbanisation oder das Armutsgefälle zwischen der Nord- und der Südhalbkugel sind nur einige der Konsequenzen menschlichen Handelns, denen es durch eine nachhaltige Entwicklung zu begegnen gilt. Handeln gemäß dem Prinzip der Nachhaltigkeit zielt darauf, Ressourcen so zu nutzen, dass sich die Umwelt möglichst auf natürliche Weise regenerieren kann und die Weltgesellschaft in lebenswerter Weise gestaltet wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 7(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Belz F, Peattie K (2012) Sustainability marketing: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Boons F, Lüdeke-Freund F (2013) Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J Cleaner Prod 45:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt Husmann T (2001) Efficiency in inter-organizational learning: a taxonomy of knowledge transfer costs, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy, Copenhagen Business School, Working Paper 2001-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen B, Winn M (2007) Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur 22(1):29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MD, Levinthal WM (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Slevin DP (1991) A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theor Prac 15(4):35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Nelson R, Winter SG (2002) Introduction: the nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. In: Dosi G, Nelson R, Winter SG (Hrsg) The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker EP (1985) The discipline of innovation. Harv Bus Rev 63(May–June):67–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manage J 22(4):660–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner HK, Gino F, Staats BR (2012) Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: transforming resources into performance. Acad Manage J 55(4):998–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünberg-Bochard J (2011) Die Entwicklung eines Profils erfolgreicher Governance für interorganisatorische Wissensproduktionsnetzwerke mit Akteursdiversität, Europäische Hochschulschriften, Reihe V. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünberg-Bochard J, Kreis-Hoyer P (2009) Knowledge networking capability in German SMEs: a model for empirical investigation. Int J Technol Manag 45(4/5):364–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haanaes K, Audretsch M, Reeves M, Kiron D, Kruschwitz N, von Streng Velken I (2012) Sustainability nears a tipping point, MIT Sloan Management Review. Winter 53(2):69–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen E, Klewitz J (2012) The role of an SME’s green strategy in public-private eco-innovation initiatives: the case of ecoprofit. J Small Bus Entrepreneurship 25(4):451–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen E, Schaltegger S (2013) 100% organic? A sustainable entrepreneurship perspective on the diffusion of organic clothing. Corp Gov: Int J Bus Soc 13(5):583–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen EG, Große-Dunker F, Reichwald R (2009) Sustainability innovation cube – a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. Int J Innov Manag 13(4):683–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks KH, Duysters G (2007) Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: an empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process. J Manag Stud 44(1):25–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson R (1994) Managing innovation in the information age. Harv Bus Rev (January–February):100–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson R, Clark K (1990) Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failuer of established firms. Adm Sci Q 5(1):9–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzig C, Schaltegger S (2007) Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung von Unternehmen. In: Michelsen G, Godemann J (Hrsg) Handbuch Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation. 2. aktualisierte und überarbeitete Neuauflage. Oekom, München, S 579–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesselbarth C, Schaltegger S (2013) Educating change agents for sustainability. Learnings from the first sustainability management master of business administration. J Clean Prod 62:24–36 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.042

  • Hockerts K, Wüstenhagen R (2010) Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids. Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur 25:481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones K, Rubin PH (1999) Effects of Harmful environmental events on reputations of companies. Department of Economics/Emory University, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P (2012) Transisdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(1):25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson B, Samson D (2001) Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. Int J Innov Manage 5(3):377–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair J, Marti I (2006) Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. J World Bus 41(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrewijk M van (2003) Concepts and Definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability, between agency and communion. J Bus Ethics 44(2/3):95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstraß J (2001) Wissen und Grenzen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet J, Goshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manage Rev 23(2):242–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastakia A (1998) Grassroots ecopreneurs: change agents for a sustainable society. J Organ Change Manage 1(2):157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose E (1980) The theory of the growth of the firm, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips N, Tracey P (2007) Opportunity recognition, and entrepreneurial capabilities and bricolage: connecting institutional theory and entrepreneurship in strategic organization. Strategic Organ 5(3):313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) Creating Shared Value. Harv Bus Rev (January/Febuary):63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Linde C van der (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv Bus Rev 73(5):120–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ Sci 20(4):685–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch A, Frese M (1998) Was wissen wir über die Psychologie erfolgreichen Unternehmertums? - Literaturüberblick. In: Frese M (Hrsg) Erfolgreiche Unternehmensgründer. Verlag für angewandte Psychologie, Göttingen, S 5–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney M, Prandelli E (2000) Communities of creation: managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. Calif Manage Rev 42(4):24–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Müller M (2008a) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16(15):1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Müller M (2008b) Core issues in sustainable supply chain management: a delphi study. Bus Strategy Environ 17(8):455–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S (2004) Nachhaltigkeitsaspekte der Markenführung. In: Bruhn M (Hrsg) Handbuch Markenführung. Gabler, München, S 2677–2703

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Kleiber O, Müller J, Herzig C (Hrsg) (2002) Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement in Unternehmen. Konzepte und Instrumente zur nachhaltigen Unternehmensentwicklung. Bundesministerium für Umwelt (BMU), Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Burritt R, Petersen H (2003) An introduction to environmental management. Striving for sustainability. Greenleaf, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Bennett M, Burritt R (Hrsg) (2006) Sustainability accounting and reporting. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Lüdeke-Freund F, Hansen EG (2012) Business cases for sustainability: the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 6(2):95–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Beckmann M, Hansen E (2013) Transdisciplinarity in corporate sustainability. Mapping the field. Bus Strategy Environ 22:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny S (1992) Kurswechsel. Artemis, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneidewind U (1998) Die Unternehmung als strukturpolitischer Akteur. Metropolis, Marburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J (1934) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus, 9. Aufl. Duncker & Humblodt, Berlin (1997, unv. Nachdruck der 4. Aufl. v 1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard DA, Patzelt H (2011) The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: studying entrepreneurial action linking “What is to be sustained” with “What is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 35(January 2011):137–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (2008) Sustainable organizational technology. Int J Sustain Strateg Manage 1(1):98–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philoso Soc 106:467–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs W, Cocklin C (2008) Conceptualizing a ‘sustainability business model’. Organ Environ 21(2):103–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustain Ability (2012) Collaborating for a sustainable future a GlobeScan/SustainAbility Survey

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece D, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2011) Towards a green economy. Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. http://hqweb.unep.org_greeneconomy/Portals/88/documents/ger/GER_synthesis_en.pd

  • Vilsmaier U, Lang D (2013) Transdisziplinäre Forschung. In: Heinrichs H, Michelsen G (Hrsg) Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften. Springer Spektrum, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Ness B, Schweizer-Ries P, Brand FS (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldesenbet K, Ram M, Jones T (2012) Supplying large firms: the role of entrepreneurial and dynamic capabilities in small businesses. Int Small Bus J 30(5):493–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2012) Living planet report 2012. World Wide Fund for Nature, Conches

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Scharnhorststraße 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Deutschland

    Dr. Jutta Grünberg-Bochard & Prof. Dr. Stefan Schaltegger

Authors
  1. Dr. Jutta Grünberg-Bochard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Stefan Schaltegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jutta Grünberg-Bochard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany

    Camillo von Müller

  2. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany

    Claas-Philip Zinth

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grünberg-Bochard, J., Schaltegger, S. (2014). Zukunftsstrategie Nachhaltiges Unternehmertum. In: von Müller, C., Zinth, CP. (eds) Managementperspektiven für die Zivilgesellschaft des 21. Jahrhunderts. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02523-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02523-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02522-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02523-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation