Advertisement

Verstrickung und Korrektiv. Zivilgesellschaftliche Akteure und marktbasierte Klimaschutzinstrumente – das Beispiel der Forest Carbon Offsets

Chapter
Part of the Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie book series (BÜD, volume 39)

Zusammenfassung

Als sich mit Verabschiedung des Kyoto-Protokolls 1997 bzw. mit dessen Inkrafttreten 2005 marktbasierte Instrumente zum Schutz des Klimas durchsetzten, haben viele internationale klimapolitische Nichtregierungsorganisationen (NGOs) wie das Climate Action Network (CAN) dies anfänglich kritisiert.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. ABC Rural (2008): Carbon scheme will help save Aceh forest. Abrufbar unter: http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/200804/s2214030.htm (Zugriff am 25. Juni 2012).
  2. Boyd , Emily; Hultman, Nate; Roberts, Timmons; Corbera, Esteve; Cole, John; Bozmoski, Alex; Ebeling, Johannes; Tippman, Robert; Mann, Philip; Brown, Katrina; Liverman, Diana (2009): Reforming the CDM for sustainable development: lessons learned and policy futures. In: Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 7, S. 820–831.Google Scholar
  3. Bumpus, Adam (2011): The Matter of Carbon: Understanding the Materiality of tCO2e in Carbon Offsets. In: Antipode, 43, 3, S. 612–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bumpus, Adam (2011): Carbon Colonialism ? Offsets, greenhouse gas reductions, and sustainable development. In: Richard, Peet; Paul Robbins; Michael Watts (Hg.): Global political ecology. London und New York: Routledge, S. 203–224.Google Scholar
  5. Bumpus , Adam; Liverman, Diana (2008): Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets. In: Economic Geography, 84, 2, S. 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castree, Noel (2003): Commodifying what nature ? In: Progress in Human Geography, 27, 3, S. 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CCBA, Climate Community, and Biodiversity Alliance (2005): Climate, Community and Biodiversity Project Design Standards. First Edition. Washington DC: CCBA.Google Scholar
  8. CCBA, Climate Community, and Biodiversity Alliance (2008a): Climate, Community and Biodiversity Project Design Standards. Second Edition. Arlington, USA: CCBA.Google Scholar
  9. CCBA, Climate Community, and Biodiversity Alliance (2008b): Terms of reference, procedures and workplan for revision of the Climate, Community & Biodiversity Standards 2012. Abrufbar unter: http://www.climate-standards.org/pdf/CCBS_Revision_TORS_15_Feb_updated_13_June_2008.pdf (Zugriff am 25. Juni 2012).
  10. CCBA, Climate Community, and Biodiversity Alliance (2010a): Rules for the use of the Climate, Community & Biodiversity Standards. Abrufbar unter: http://www.climate-standards.org/pdf/CCB_Standards_Rules_Version_June_21_2010.pdf (Zugriff am 25. Juni 2012).
  11. CCBA, Climate Community, and Biodiversity Alliance (2010b): Who We Are. Abrufbar unter: http://www.climate-standards.org/who/index.html (Zugriff am 25. Juni 2012).
  12. COICA (2012): AIDESEP Press Conference, 4. Dezember 2012. Abrufbar unter: http://issuu.com/edsonrosalesfigueroa/docs/aidesep_press_conference_04.12.12_cop18?mode=window&backgroundColor=%23222222 (Zugriff am 7. Februar 2013).
  13. Corbera , Esteve; Brown, Katrina (2010): Offsetting benefits ? Analyzing access to forest carbon. In: Environment and planning, 42, 7, S. 1739–1761.Google Scholar
  14. Dudley, Richard (2010): A little REDD model to quickly compare possible baseline and policy scenarios for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. In: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 15, 1, S. 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eden, Sally (2011): The politics of certification: consumer knowledge, power, and global governance in ecolabeling. In: Richard, Peet; Paul Robbins; Michael Watts (Hg.): Global political ecology. London und New York: Routledge, S. 169–184.Google Scholar
  16. Erler , Daniela; Frank, Sina; Hein, Jonas; Hotz, Hannes; Santacruz-Melgarejo, Anna-Maria; Zelli, Fariborz (2011): Inclusion social en el proceso REDD en el Peru – Una perspectiva de gobernanza en multiples niveles Nota Tecnica 2. Lima: Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.Google Scholar
  17. Europäische Komission (2012): International carbon market – Questions & Answers on use of international credits in the third trading phase of the EU ETS, January 2012. Abrufbar unter: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/linking/faq_en.htm (Zugriff am 7. Februar 2013).
  18. Fletcher, Robert (2010): Neoliberal environmentality: Towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. In: Conservation and Society, 8, 3, S. 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friends of the Earth International (2010): REDD: the realities in black and white. Abrufbar unter: http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/pdfs/2010/redd-the-realities-in-black-andwhite (Zugriff am 7. Februar 2013).
  20. Gaveau , David; Wich, Serge; Epting, Justin; Juhn, Daniel; Kanninen, Markku; Leader-Williams, Niggel (2009): The future of forests and orangutans (Pongo abelii) in Sumatra: predicting impacts of oil palm plantations, road construction, and mechanisms for reducing carbon emissions from deforestation. In: Environmental Research Letters, 4, 034013, S. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbertson , Tamra; Reyes, Oscar (2009): Reforming the CDM for sustainable development: lessons learned and policy futures Carbon Trading – How It Works and Why It Fails. Critical Currents Occassional Paper Series 7, November 2009. Uppsala: Dag Hammerskjöld Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Gonzalez , Jorge; Schomerus, Thomas (2010): Der Gold Standard als Garant für die Nachhaltigkeit von CDM-Projekten in Entwicklungsländern. Arbeitspapierreihe Wirtschaft & Recht, 5. Lüneburg: Leuphana Universität Lüneburg.Google Scholar
  23. Grainger , Alan; Boucheret, Douglas H.;, Peter; Laurance, William; Lovejoy, Thomas; McNeely, Jeffrey; Niekisch, Manfred; Raven, Peter; Sodhi, Navjot; Venter, Oscar; Pimm, Stuart (2009): Biodiversity and REDD at Copenhagen. In: Current Biology, 19, 21, S. R974 – R976.Google Scholar
  24. Greenomics (2012): Indonesia’s First REDD+ Project – Not a a Done Deal, Despite Promoter’s Claims. Abrufbar unter: http://www.greenomics.org/docs/Report_201212_Greenomics_RRC_REDD_Not_a_Done_Deal.pdf (Zugriff am 7. Februar 2013).
  25. Hein , Wolfgang; Moon, Suerie (2013): Informal Norms in Global Governance – Human Rights, Intellectual Property Rules and Access to Medicines. Surrey, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  26. Holz, Christian (2010): Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Partizipation – CDM-Kritik in den UN-Klimaverhandlungen. In: Voss, Martin (Hg.): Der Klimawandel. Sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Indonesian REDD Taskforce (2012): REDD+ National Strategy. Jakarta, Indonesia.Google Scholar
  28. Klinke, Andreas (2006): Demokratisches Regiern jenseits des Staates. Deliberative Politik im nordamerikanischen Große-Seen-Regime. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  29. Kollmuss, Anja; Zink, Helge, and Polycarp, Clifford (2008): Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: A comparison of carbon offset standards. WWF Germany.Google Scholar
  30. Lipschutz , Ronnie; McKendry, Corinna (2011): Social Movements and Global Civil Society. In: Dryzek, John; Norgaard, Richard, Schlosberg, David (Hg.): Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 369–383.Google Scholar
  31. Long, Andrew (2010): Global Climate Governance to Enhance Biodiversity & Well-Being: Integrating Non-State Networks and Public International Law in Tropical Forests. Abrufbar unter: http://works.bepress.com/andrew_long/1/ (Zugriff am 25. Juni 2012).
  32. Mcculloch, Lesley (2010): Ulu Masen REDD Demonstration Project – The challenges of Tackling Market Policy and Governance Failures that Underlie Deforestation and Forest Degradation. In: Forest Conservation Team Occasional Papers, Kamiyamaguchi, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.Google Scholar
  33. McGregor, Andrew (2010): Green and REDD ? Towards a Political Ecology of Deforestation in Aceh, Indonesia. In: Human Geography, 3, 2, S. 21–34.Google Scholar
  34. Merger , Eduard; Dutschke, Michael; Verchot, Louis (2011): Options for REDD+ voluntary certification to ensure net GHG benefits, poverty alleviation, sustainable management of forests and biodiversity conservation. In: Forests, 2, 2, S. 550–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merger , Eduard; Pistorius, Till (2011): Effectiveness and legitimacy of forest carbon standards in the OTC voluntary carbon market. In: Carbon Balance and Management, 6, 1, S. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Methmann, Chris (2011): NGOs in der staatlichen Klimapolitik. Zwischen diskursiver Intervention und hegemonialer Verstrickung. In: Brunnengräber, Achim (Hg.): Zivilisierung des Klimaregimes. NGOs und soziale Bewegungen in der nationalen, europäischen und internationalen Klimapolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morgan, Brihannala (2011): Community engagement – Don’t ignore REDD’s impact on communities, in: Inside Indonesia 105: JUL-SEP 2011.Google Scholar
  38. Neeff , Till; Ashford, Lisa; Calvert, Jeff; Davey, Claire; Durbin, Joanna; Ebeling, Johannes; Herrera, Tilde; Janson-Smith, Toby; Lazo, Bernardo; Mountain, Rachel; O’Keeffe, Siobhan; Panfil, Steve; Thorburn, Niall; Tuite, Chris; Wheeland, Matthew; Young, Simon (2009): The forest carbon offsetting survey 2009. Eco Securitas, Conservation International, The Climate, Community & Biodiversity Alliance, ClimateBiz.Google Scholar
  39. Newell , Peter; Paterson, Matthew (2010): The Politics of the Carbon Economy. In: Boykoff, Maxwell (Hg.): The Politics of Climate Change. A survey. London, New York: Routledge, S. 77–95.Google Scholar
  40. Olsen, Karen (2007): The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable development: a review of the literature. In: Climatic Change, 84, 1, S. 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peters-Stanley , Molly; Hamilton, Katherine; Marcello, Thomas; Sjardin, Milo (2011): Back to the Futur – State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2011 – A Report. New York und Washington: Ecosystem Marketplace.Google Scholar
  42. Putz , Francis; Redford, Kent (2009): Dangers of carbon-based conservation. In: Global environmental change, 19, 4, S. 400–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rest, Jonas (2011): Von der NGOisierung zur bewegten Mobilisierung. In: Brunnengräber, Achim (Hg.): Zivilisierung des Klimaregimes. NGOs und soziale Bewegungen in der nationalen, europäischen und internationalen Klimapolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reuters (2010): Indonesia project boosts global forest CO2 market. Abrufbar unter: http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/08/24/forests-carbon-redd-idAFSGE67N0D920100824?sp=true (Zugriff am 15. Dezember 2012).
  45. Sikor , Thomas; Stahl, Johannes; Enters, Thomas; Ribot; Jesse; Singh, Neera; Sunderlin, William; Wollenberg, Lini (2010): REDD-plus, forest people’s rights and nested climate governance, in: Global environmental change, 20, 3, S. 423–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smartwood (2008): Validation Audit Report For: Provincial Government of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam – Fauna & Flora International – Carbon Conservation in Ulu Masen Ecosystem, (Aceh Province, Indonesia). Abrufbar unter: http://www.climate-standards.org/projects/files/Carbon_Conservation_FFI_Provincial_Govt_of_Nanggroe_Aceh_Darussalam_CCB_Validation_Audit_Final_Feb_08.pdf (Zugriff am 25. Juni 2012).
  47. The Environmental Justice and Governance Research Lab (2011): Selling the Wind. In: Inside Indonesia, 105, Jul – Sep 2011.Google Scholar
  48. The Gold Standard (2011): A best practice methodology and a high quality carbon credit label for both Kyoto and voluntary markets. Abrufbar unter: http://www.cdmgoldstandard.org/about-us/who-we-are (Zugriff am 25. Juni 2012).
  49. The Provincial Government of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (Aceh) (2007): Reducing Carbon Emissions from Deforestation in the Ulu Masen Ecosystem, Aceh, Indonesia, A Triple Bebefit Project Design Note for CCBA Audit. Abrufbar unter: https://s3.amazonaws.com/CCBA/Projects/Reducing_Carbon_Emissions_from_Deforestation_in_the_Ulu_Masen_Ecosystem/Final_Ulu_Masen_CCBA_project_design_note_Dec29.pdf (Zugriff am 11. Februar 2013).
  50. UNFCCC, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1998): The Kyoto Protocol. Bonn.Google Scholar
  51. UNFCCC, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2007): Uniting on Climate – A guide to the Climate Change Convention and the Kyoto Protocol. Bonn: UNFCCC.Google Scholar
  52. UNFCCC, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2011a): Benefits of the Clean Development Mechanism. Bonn: UNFCCC.Google Scholar
  53. UNFCCC, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2011b): The Cancun Agreements, Decision 1/CP.16.Google Scholar
  54. UNFCCC, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2012a): About Web, 2012. Abrufbar unter: http://cdm.unfccc.int/about/index.html (Zugriff am 25. Juni 2012).
  55. UNFCCC, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2012b): CDM Project Cycle 2012. Abrufbar unter: http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/diagram.html (Zugriff am 25. Juni 2012).
  56. Unmüßig, Barbara (2011): NGOs in der Klimakrise. Fragmentierungsprozesse, Konfliktlinien und strategische Ansätze. In: Brunnengräber, Achim (Hg.): Zivilisierung des Klimaregimes. NGOs und soziale Bewegungen in der nationalen, europäischen und internationalen Klimapolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, S. 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walter , Martin; Kahlert, Guénola (2010): Forest Carbon Standards. A WWF Assessment Guide. Frankfurt a. M.: WWF Germany.Google Scholar
  58. Wunder, Sven (2008): How do we deal with leakage. In: Angelsen, Arild (Hg.): Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications. Bogor, Indonesien: CIFOR, S. 65–75.Google Scholar
  59. Zelli , Fariborz; Erler, Daniela; Frank, Sina; Hein, Jonas; Hotz, Hannes; Santacruz-Melgarejo, Anna-Maria (2013, im Erscheinen): Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in Peru – A challenge to social inclusion and multi-level governance. Bonn: German Development Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BonnDeutschland
  2. 2.Forschungszentrum NachhaltigkeitUniversität BremenBremenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations